Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

RE: Conflict of interests dilemma

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Lesley

Ok, apologies, I know this message is from weeks ago, but only just got around to reading it (have been a bit busy, falling in love) - but just want to say that I take Edith seriously - I agree with what she says. In my opinion, your opinions are waaay too extreme Lesley and somebody definately needs to challenge them, and I reckon Edith does that very well, thank you very much.

Joeann

<Ediths number one fan>

Lesley Dove <Lesley wrote:

 

Like Angie says, we don't take Edith too seriously.

Get personalised at My .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Well I will NOT apologise for being extremely in favour of respecting everyone's right to life, but not everyone's right to kill. I think vegans who kill their own offspring need to be challenged and from now on I shall not let it go unchallenged among vegan families. Most people would say we are too extreme as vegans, so how do you work out that I am extreme for extending that respect to the unborn? I don't see it as any more extreme than veganism itself.

 

Lesley

 

joeann cantillon [goosy_gander]27 March 2002 15:46 Subject: RE: Conflict of interests dilemma

Lesley Ok, apologies, I know this message is from weeks ago, but only just got around to reading it (have been a bit busy, falling in love) - but just want to say that I take Edith seriously - I agree with what she says. In my opinion, your opinions are waaay too extreme Lesley and somebody definately needs to challenge them, and I reckon Edith does that very well, thank you very much. Joeann <Ediths number one fan> Lesley Dove <Lesley wrote:

 

Like Angie says, we don't take Edith too seriously.

 

 

Get personalised at My . ~~ info ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Please remember that the above is only the opinion of the author, there may be another side to the story you have not heard.---------------------------Was this message Off Topic? Did you know? Was it snipped?~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Guidelines: visit <site temporarily offline>Un: send a blank message to -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I don't think I'm being extreme in saying that in the case of being

on the internet, you can either take everyone seriously or no-one at

all seriously. Anything in between and you're being judgemental.

 

, joeann cantillon <goosy_gander> wrote:

>

> Lesley

> Ok, apologies, I know this message is from weeks ago, but only just

got around to reading it (have been a bit busy, falling in love) -

but just want to say that I take Edith seriously - I agree with what

she says. In my opinion, your opinions are waaay too extreme Lesley

and somebody definately needs to challenge them, and I reckon Edith

does that very well, thank you very much.

> Joeann

> <Ediths number one fan>

> Lesley Dove <Lesley@v...> wrote: Like Angie says, we don't take

Edith too seriously.

>

>

>

>

> Get personalised at My .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

---I still can't fathon the standpoint of abortionist,{to polite s

word}, anyway, I think it must be similiar to meat-eaters,war-

excepters and so on, It has to be a kind of psychopathic reasoning in

order to find it exceptable.

Lesley seems to be one of the few that can see sense in regards to

this subject on this list,

SP,

 

 

 

In , " Lesley Dove " <Lesley@v...> wrote:

> Well I will NOT apologise for being extremely in favour of

respecting

> everyone's right to life, but not everyone's right to kill. I think

vegans

> who kill their own offspring need to be challenged and from now on

I shall

> not let it go unchallenged among vegan families. Most people would

say we

> are too extreme as vegans, so how do you work out that I am extreme

for

> extending that respect to the unborn? I don't see it as any more

extreme

> than veganism itself.

>

> Lesley

>

> joeann cantillon [goosy_gander]

> 27 March 2002 15:46

>

> RE: Conflict of interests dilemma

>

>

> Lesley

>

> Ok, apologies, I know this message is from weeks ago, but only

just got

> around to reading it (have been a bit busy, falling in love) - but

just want

> to say that I take Edith seriously - I agree with what she says. In

my

> opinion, your opinions are waaay too extreme Lesley and somebody

definately

> needs to challenge them, and I reckon Edith does that very well,

thank you

> very much.

>

> Joeann

>

> <Ediths number one fan>

>

> Lesley Dove <Lesley@v...> wrote:

>

> Like Angie says, we don't take Edith too seriously.

>

>

>

>

> --

--------

> --

>

> Get personalised at My .

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

There's nothing right or wrong about extremism.

 

Speaking of which, does anyone know of any institutions that are

vegan? I mean institutions such as the college I attend, where I

seek " education " . Institutions where all the food is vegan, all the

members of staff are vegan, and where everything possible has been

done to avoid cruelty, oppression, inequality etc in the constitution

of it? Like, right down to the very buildings that it is housed in?

 

I'm only asking this because I was having a fag break with some

pigeons just now. They were eating some scraps from off the floor,

and I was standing among them smoking my roll-up. I felt like a

pigeon, and was content for the duration of my cigarette.

Then the guardsman of my college, who sometimes does his patrols, who

checks ids and whatnot, walked past. He's a nice guy, black, gets on

with most of the students here. He said, innocently enough, as a joke

perhaps, " It'll be pigeon pie in the refectory tomorrow, know wadda

mean? " in that dark, humorous way that I assume only black people can

pull off (I'm not racist). I said, " what? " cause i hadn't heard him

properly. He repeated what he'd said, he doesn't know I'm a vegan. I

said, " euuurgh " , but didn't say anymore, for he'd already walked off

on his rounds. No rights or wrongs, that was the scary bit.

 

I am wondering whether I ought to leave this college. I'm at that

point where I'm not scared, but should be. Looking back, I realise

that I have been in this state for a long time, but now I think i

know why.

 

But where am I going to find education in a place that doesn't have

the essence of death and torture pervading the air? Anyone?

 

(Oh yeah, and I'm not studying poetry or storytelling, I study

sciences: Mavreela, moderate me if you think this is unsuitable and

shouldn't be allowed)

 

, " Lesley Dove " <Lesley@v...> wrote:

> Well I will NOT apologise for being extremely in favour of

respecting

> everyone's right to life, but not everyone's right to kill. I think

vegans

> who kill their own offspring need to be challenged and from now on

I shall

> not let it go unchallenged among vegan families. Most people would

say we

> are too extreme as vegans, so how do you work out that I am extreme

for

> extending that respect to the unborn? I don't see it as any more

extreme

> than veganism itself.

>

> Lesley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> Speaking of which, does anyone know of any institutions that are

> vegan? I mean institutions such as the college I attend, where I

> seek " education " . Institutions where all the food is vegan, all the

> members of staff are vegan, and where everything possible has been

> done to avoid cruelty, oppression, inequality etc in the constitution

> of it? Like, right down to the very buildings that it is housed in?

 

there are some Jainist temples in India that might have some courses... but

you have to wear just a bit of cloth and walk around slowly brushing insects

from your path....

 

being a vegan at a vegan college sounds to me like being a monk in a

monastery...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I hope the person you have fallen in love with is vegan, or at least veggie!

 

Lesley

 

 

joeann cantillon [goosy_gander]27 March 2002 15:46 Subject: RE: Conflict of interests dilemma

Lesley Ok, apologies, I know this message is from weeks ago, but only just got around to reading it (have been a bit busy, falling in love) - but just want to say that I take Edith seriously - I agree with what she says. In my opinion, your opinions are waaay too extreme Lesley and somebody definately needs to challenge them, and I reckon Edith does that very well, thank you very much. Joeann <Ediths number one fan> Lesley Dove <Lesley wrote:

 

Like Angie says, we don't take Edith too seriously.

 

 

Get personalised at My . ~~ info ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Please remember that the above is only the opinion of the author, there may be another side to the story you have not heard.---------------------------Was this message Off Topic? Did you know? Was it snipped?~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Guidelines: visit <site temporarily offline>Un: send a blank message to -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The way I see the argument its not about abortionists, its about freedom of choice - and Lesley et. al. wants to deny women the freedom of choice. This is the 21st century, for some of us at least, and freedom of speech, choice etc. has been with us quite some time and denying anybody that hard-earned freedom is wrong. It is up to the individual then to deal with and live with their own conscience. You or I have no right to impose our beliefs and/or prejudices on anybody else - I have as much right to my life as anybody else and I will not tell anybody else how to live theirs. I believe that is what yourself and Lesley etc. are proposing - telling others how to live, and I'm sorry but I've got to disagree with that. So, again I reiterate, its not about abortion, its about the underlying fredoom to choose.

Joeann

vegicate1 <simonpjones wrote: ---I still can't fathon the standpoint of abortionist,{to polite s word}, anyway, I think it must be similiar to meat-eaters,war-excepters and so on, It has to be a kind of psychopathic reasoning in order to find it exceptable.Lesley seems to be one of the few that can see sense in regards to this subject on this list,SP,In , "Lesley Dove" wrote:> Well I will NOT apologise for being extremely in favour of respecting> everyone's right to life, but not everyone's right to kill. I think vegans> who kill their own offspring need to be challenged and from now on I shall> not let it go unchallenged among vegan families. Most people would say we> are too extreme as vegans, so how do you work out that I am extreme for> extending that respect to the unborn? I don't see it as any more extreme> than veganism itself.> > Lesley> > joeann cantillon [goosy_gander]> 27 March 2002 15:46> > RE: Conflict of interests dilemma> > > Lesley> > Ok, apologies, I know this message is from weeks ago, but only just got> around to reading it (have been a bit busy, falling in love) - but just want> to say that I take Edith seriously - I agree with what she says. In my> opinion, your opinions are waaay too extreme Lesley and somebody definately> needs to challenge them, and I reckon Edith does that very well, thank you> very much.> > Joeann> > > > Lesley Dove wrote:> > Like Angie says, we don't take Edith too seriously.> > > > > ----------> --> > Get personalised at My .>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The issue is what/who deserves the right to live.

What level of life has the right not to be killed by us?

Do you believe that the unborn are lesser life forms than non-human animals, even though they are the same species as you?

Freedom of speech is worlds apart from freedom to kill. You cannot seriously compare the two.

You have no more or less right to your life than your own mother had, but she had the legal right to kill you if she had wanted to (depending on how old you are and whether abortion was legal at the time).

It is definitely psychopathic reasoning to be defending the right to kill, you are a bit like an animal-eater who defends their right to choose what to eat, when in fact you are both defending the right to kill.

Just remember exactly what you are defending the right to do here.

 

Lesley

 

 

joeann cantillon [goosy_gander]27 March 2002 22:23 Subject: Re: Re: Conflict of interests dilemma

The way I see the argument its not about abortionists, its about freedom of choice - and Lesley et. al. wants to deny women the freedom of choice. This is the 21st century, for some of us at least, and freedom of speech, choice etc. has been with us quite some time and denying anybody that hard-earned freedom is wrong. It is up to the individual then to deal with and live with their own conscience. You or I have no right to impose our beliefs and/or prejudices on anybody else - I have as much right to my life as anybody else and I will not tell anybody else how to live theirs. I believe that is what yourself and Lesley etc. are proposing - telling others how to live, and I'm sorry but I've got to disagree with that. So, again I reiterate, its not about abortion, its about the underlying fredoom to choose. Joeann vegicate1 <simonpjones wrote: ---I still can't fathon the standpoint of abortionist,{to polite s word}, anyway, I think it must be similiar to meat-eaters,war-excepters and so on, It has to be a kind of psychopathic reasoning in order to find it exceptable.Lesley seems to be one of the few that can see sense in regards to this subject on this list,SP,In , "Lesley Dove" wrote:> Well I will NOT apologise for being extremely in favour of respecting> everyone's right to life, but not everyone's right to kill. I think vegans> who kill their own offspring need to be challenged and from now on I shall> not let it go unchallenged among vegan families. Most people would say we> are too extreme as vegans, so how do you work out that I am extreme for> extending that respect to the unborn? I don't see it as any more extreme> than veganism itself.> > Lesley> > joeann cantillon [goosy_gander]> 27 March 2002 15:46> > RE: Conflict of interests dilemma> > > Lesley> > Ok, apologies, I know this message is from weeks ago, but only just got> around to reading it (have been a bit busy, falling in love) - but just want> to say that I take Edith seriously - I agree with what she says. In my> opinion, your opinions are waaay too extreme Lesley and somebody definately> needs to challenge them, and I reckon Edith does that very well, thank you> very much.> > Joeann> > > > Lesley Dove wrote:> > Like Angie says, we don't take Edith too seriously.> > > > > ----------> --> > Get personalised at My .>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Its funny. I've been away for a fortnight I've come back to the abortion debate that was running long before I left (or the computer died on me more to the point!). Do vegans talk about anything else other than abortion. I sure hope so!!!

 

Janey

x

 

 

-

Lesley Dove

Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:39 PM

RE: Re: Conflict of interests dilemma

 

 

The issue is what/who deserves the right to live.

What level of life has the right not to be killed by us?

Do you believe that the unborn are lesser life forms than non-human animals, even though they are the same species as you?

Freedom of speech is worlds apart from freedom to kill. You cannot seriously compare the two.

You have no more or less right to your life than your own mother had, but she had the legal right to kill you if she had wanted to (depending on how old you are and whether abortion was legal at the time).

It is definitely psychopathic reasoning to be defending the right to kill, you are a bit like an animal-eater who defends their right to choose what to eat, when in fact you are both defending the right to kill.

Just remember exactly what you are defending the right to do here.

 

Lesley

 

 

joeann cantillon [goosy_gander]27 March 2002 22:23 Subject: Re: Re: Conflict of interests dilemma

The way I see the argument its not about abortionists, its about freedom of choice - and Lesley et. al. wants to deny women the freedom of choice. This is the 21st century, for some of us at least, and freedom of speech, choice etc. has been with us quite some time and denying anybody that hard-earned freedom is wrong. It is up to the individual then to deal with and live with their own conscience. You or I have no right to impose our beliefs and/or prejudices on anybody else - I have as much right to my life as anybody else and I will not tell anybody else how to live theirs. I believe that is what yourself and Lesley etc. are proposing - telling others how to live, and I'm sorry but I've got to disagree with that. So, again I reiterate, its not about abortion, its about the underlying fredoom to choose. Joeann vegicate1 <simonpjones wrote: ---I still can't fathon the standpoint of abortionist,{to polite s word}, anyway, I think it must be similiar to meat-eaters,war-excepters and so on, It has to be a kind of psychopathic reasoning in order to find it exceptable.Lesley seems to be one of the few that can see sense in regards to this subject on this list,SP,In , "Lesley Dove" wrote:> Well I will NOT apologise for being extremely in favour of respecting> everyone's right to life, but not everyone's right to kill. I think vegans> who kill their own offspring need to be challenged and from now on I shall> not let it go unchallenged among vegan families. Most people would say we> are too extreme as vegans, so how do you work out that I am extreme for> extending that respect to the unborn? I don't see it as any more extreme> than veganism itself.> > Lesley> > joeann cantillon [goosy_gander]> 27 March 2002 15:46> > RE: Conflict of interests dilemma> > > Lesley> > Ok, apologies, I know this message is from weeks ago, but only just got> around to reading it (have been a bit busy, falling in love) - but just want> to say that I take Edith seriously - I agree with what she says. In my> opinion, your opinions are waaay too extreme Lesley and somebody definately> needs to challenge them, and I reckon Edith does that very well, thank you> very much.> > Joeann> > > > Lesley Dove wrote:> > Like Angie says, we don't take Edith too seriously.> > > > > ----------> --> > Get personalised at My .>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I really feel for you, as someone who started nurse training and experienced

a lot of anti-vegan discrimination, and ended up being bullied out.

 

When we get our act together my whole story is going on our website, I know,

manana, manana, sorry I don't know how to do the squiggly thing over the n!

If anyone wants me to email the whole tale to them, let me know. I won't put

it on this list as it's quite long.

 

One example of what I had to cope with was that we had one nursing tutor who

had a particular fondness for talking about animal experiments and what

useful things these studies on animals had shown, in his opinion. I just

kept quiet, because I felt certain that he was trying to goad me and I

didn't want to cause a row. Every time he mentioned animal experiments, I

could feel my face burning hot with the pent-up anger and humiliation that I

was feeling, because I felt I was letting down the animals by not arguing

with him, but I knew that he wanted to make me look bad and argumentative. I

was determined that he would not succeed in this. I would have definitely

stated my conscientious objection if the possibility of us dissecting had

ever come up. I feared this sort of confrontation might come up, but

fortunately it didn't. However, I was not especially secretive about my

views, and I even tried hard to find other like-minded people working in the

hospital. I felt very isolated most of the time as a vegan in a very vegan

unfriendly area of the country. I was in North Wales and lots of my

colleagues were married to, or daughters of, farmers and saw my veganism as

a threat to their families' livelihood, so I suffered a lot of hatred for

being into animal rights.

I sought support from the Nurses Anti-Vivisection Movement against the

discrimination and harassment, but they would do bugger all!

 

Is there no veggie/AR student group where you are? Where are you?

 

Lesley

 

 

 

geouze [djules_75]

27 March 2002 17:27

 

Re: Conflict of interests dilemma

 

 

There's nothing right or wrong about extremism.

 

Speaking of which, does anyone know of any institutions that are

vegan? I mean institutions such as the college I attend, where I

seek " education " . Institutions where all the food is vegan, all the

members of staff are vegan, and where everything possible has been

done to avoid cruelty, oppression, inequality etc in the constitution

of it? Like, right down to the very buildings that it is housed in?

 

I'm only asking this because I was having a fag break with some

pigeons just now. They were eating some scraps from off the floor,

and I was standing among them smoking my roll-up. I felt like a

pigeon, and was content for the duration of my cigarette.

Then the guardsman of my college, who sometimes does his patrols, who

checks ids and whatnot, walked past. He's a nice guy, black, gets on

with most of the students here. He said, innocently enough, as a joke

perhaps, " It'll be pigeon pie in the refectory tomorrow, know wadda

mean? " in that dark, humorous way that I assume only black people can

pull off (I'm not racist). I said, " what? " cause i hadn't heard him

properly. He repeated what he'd said, he doesn't know I'm a vegan. I

said, " euuurgh " , but didn't say anymore, for he'd already walked off

on his rounds. No rights or wrongs, that was the scary bit.

 

I am wondering whether I ought to leave this college. I'm at that

point where I'm not scared, but should be. Looking back, I realise

that I have been in this state for a long time, but now I think i

know why.

 

But where am I going to find education in a place that doesn't have

the essence of death and torture pervading the air? Anyone?

 

(Oh yeah, and I'm not studying poetry or storytelling, I study

sciences: Mavreela, moderate me if you think this is unsuitable and

shouldn't be allowed)

 

, " Lesley Dove " <Lesley@v...> wrote:

> Well I will NOT apologise for being extremely in favour of

respecting

> everyone's right to life, but not everyone's right to kill. I think

vegans

> who kill their own offspring need to be challenged and from now on

I shall

> not let it go unchallenged among vegan families. Most people would

say we

> are too extreme as vegans, so how do you work out that I am extreme

for

> extending that respect to the unborn? I don't see it as any more

extreme

> than veganism itself.

>

> Lesley

 

 

 

 

~~ info ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Please remember that the above is only the opinion of the author,

there may be another side to the story you have not heard.

---------------------------

Was this message Off Topic? Did you know? Was it snipped?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Guidelines: visit <site temporarily offline>

Un: send a blank message to -

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yes we do, but I cannot understand such a glaring inconsistency in vegan thinking as to support abortion as a choice!

 

Lesley

 

 

Janey [janey]27 March 2002 22:48 Subject: Re: Re: Conflict of interests dilemma

Its funny. I've been away for a fortnight I've come back to the abortion debate that was running long before I left (or the computer died on me more to the point!). Do vegans talk about anything else other than abortion. I sure hope so!!!

 

Janey

x

 

 

-

Lesley Dove

Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:39 PM

RE: Re: Conflict of interests dilemma

 

 

The issue is what/who deserves the right to live.

What level of life has the right not to be killed by us?

Do you believe that the unborn are lesser life forms than non-human animals, even though they are the same species as you?

Freedom of speech is worlds apart from freedom to kill. You cannot seriously compare the two.

You have no more or less right to your life than your own mother had, but she had the legal right to kill you if she had wanted to (depending on how old you are and whether abortion was legal at the time).

It is definitely psychopathic reasoning to be defending the right to kill, you are a bit like an animal-eater who defends their right to choose what to eat, when in fact you are both defending the right to kill.

Just remember exactly what you are defending the right to do here.

 

Lesley

 

 

joeann cantillon [goosy_gander]27 March 2002 22:23 Subject: Re: Re: Conflict of interests dilemma

The way I see the argument its not about abortionists, its about freedom of choice - and Lesley et. al. wants to deny women the freedom of choice. This is the 21st century, for some of us at least, and freedom of speech, choice etc. has been with us quite some time and denying anybody that hard-earned freedom is wrong. It is up to the individual then to deal with and live with their own conscience. You or I have no right to impose our beliefs and/or prejudices on anybody else - I have as much right to my life as anybody else and I will not tell anybody else how to live theirs. I believe that is what yourself and Lesley etc. are proposing - telling others how to live, and I'm sorry but I've got to disagree with that. So, again I reiterate, its not about abortion, its about the underlying fredoom to choose. Joeann vegicate1 <simonpjones wrote: ---I still can't fathon the standpoint of abortionist,{to polite s word}, anyway, I think it must be similiar to meat-eaters,war-excepters and so on, It has to be a kind of psychopathic reasoning in order to find it exceptable.Lesley seems to be one of the few that can see sense in regards to this subject on this list,SP,In , "Lesley Dove" wrote:> Well I will NOT apologise for being extremely in favour of respecting> everyone's right to life, but not everyone's right to kill. I think vegans> who kill their own offspring need to be challenged and from now on I shall> not let it go unchallenged among vegan families. Most people would say we> are too extreme as vegans, so how do you work out that I am extreme for> extending that respect to the unborn? I don't see it as any more extreme> than veganism itself.> > Lesley> > joeann cantillon [goosy_gander]> 27 March 2002 15:46> > RE: Conflict of interests dilemma> > > Lesley> > Ok, apologies, I know this message is from weeks ago, but only just got> around to reading it (have been a bit busy, falling in love) - but just want> to say that I take Edith seriously - I agree with what she says. In my> opinion, your opinions are waaay too extreme Lesley and somebody definately> needs to challenge them, and I reckon Edith does that very well, thank you> very much.> > Joeann> > > > Lesley Dove wrote:> > Like Angie says, we don't take Edith too seriously.> > > > > ----------> --> > Get personalised at My .>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> Its funny. I've been away for a fortnight I've come back to the

abortion debate that was running long before I left

 

Actually no, this is a brand new debate that only started when

you returned. An omen maybe?

 

>Do vegans talk about anything else other than abortion.

 

Well they hardly ever talking about practical vegan stuff, that's for

sure. Anyone have any recipes? I went to Neal's Yard for the

first time last Friday, the salad bar place. Guess I should

mention that on the travel list though.

 

> I sure hope so!!!

 

While you were gone the list went over all biblical for a bit. then

Yesterday we debated the emotions. And I comlained and

whined a lot. So something don't change.

 

Michael

 

(Hey does anyone know of any good websites that would give

advice on tounge related medical issues, basic diagnosis or

lists of problems, that kind of thing. A long shot but I haven't

been able to find much mesen.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

, joeann cantillon <goosy_gander> wrote:

>

> The way I see the argument its not about abortionists, its about

freedom of choice - and Lesley et. al. wants to deny women the

freedom of choice. This is the 21st century, for some of us at least,

and freedom of speech, choice etc. has been with us quite some time

and denying anybody that hard-earned freedom is wrong. It is up to

the individual then to deal with and live with their own conscience.

You or I have no right to impose our beliefs and/or prejudices on

anybody else - I have as much right to my life as anybody else and I

will not tell anybody else how to live theirs. I believe that is what

yourself and Lesley etc. are proposing - telling others how to live,

and I'm sorry but I've got to disagree with that. So, again I

reiterate, its not about abortion, its about the underlying fredoom

to choose.

> Joeann

> vegicate1 <simonpjones@o...> wrote: ---I still can't fathon the

standpoint of abortionist,{to polite a

> word}, anyway, I think it must be similiar to meat-eaters,war-

> excepters and so on, It has to be a kind of psychopathic reasoning

in

> order to find it exceptable.

> Lesley seems to be one of the few that can see sense in regards to

> this subject on this list,

> SP,

>

>

>

> In , " Lesley Dove " wrote:

> > Well I will NOT apologise for being extremely in favour of

> respecting

> > everyone's right to life, but not everyone's right to kill. I

think

> vegans

> > who kill their own offspring need to be challenged and from now

on

> I shall

> > not let it go unchallenged among vegan families. Most people

would

> say we

> > are too extreme as vegans, so how do you work out that I am

extreme

> for

> > extending that respect to the unborn? I don't see it as any more

> extreme

> > than veganism itself.

> >

> > Lesley

> >

> > joeann cantillon [goosy_gander]

> > 27 March 2002 15:46

> >

> > RE: Conflict of interests dilemma

> >

> >

> > Lesley

> >

> > Ok, apologies, I know this message is from weeks ago, but only

> just got

> > around to reading it (have been a bit busy, falling in love) -

but

> just want

> > to say that I take Edith seriously - I agree with what she says.

In

> my

> > opinion, your opinions are waaay too extreme Lesley and somebody

> definately

> > needs to challenge them, and I reckon Edith does that very well,

> thank you

> > very much.

> >

> > Joeann

> >

> >

> >

> > Lesley Dove wrote:

> >

> > Like Angie says, we don't take Edith too seriously.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

--

> --------

> > --

> >

> > Get personalised at My .

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

- that would give

> advice on tounge related medical issues, basic diagnosis or

> lists of problems,

 

Such as getting stuck in your cheek, perhaps?

 

Brave Sir Graham

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

, " Janey " <janey@p...> wrote:

Do vegans talk about anything else other than abortion. I sure

hope so!!!

>

> Janey

> x

Yeah, this severe interest in arguing about abortion is leading me

to believe that there are a larger proportion of vegans who are

suicidal, depressed, intensely religious, or so gone that they

wouldn't care if someone told them that god was going to turn back

the clock and abort them from their mother's womb at their time of

birth than in other groups of people, and that is why its so much

more controversial here. I'm only saying this because I sometimes

feel that way as well, I and I know its because of the meat-eating

dominated society that I live in.

 

I like what lesley is arguing for because it makes me feel I need to

stay alive for some reason.

 

Really I can't afford to be against abortion anymore, otherwise I

should really kill myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Incidentally, does anyone listen to CONFLICT? the band? they're

vegans, I think. They're certainly pro animal rights.

Perhaps I'll load some of their songs onto my computer to listen to

while I'm reading the abortion debate.

 

, " Lesley Dove " <Lesley@v...> wrote:

> Yes we do, but I cannot understand such a glaring inconsistency in

vegan

> thinking as to support abortion as a choice!

>

> Lesley

>

>

> Janey [janey@p...]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

, " Lesley Dove " <Lesley@v...> wrote:

Every time he mentioned animal experiments, I

> could feel my face burning hot with the pent-up anger and

humiliation that I

> was feeling, because I felt I was letting down the animals by not

arguing

> with him, but I knew that he wanted to make me look bad and

argumentative.

 

Yeah I have often felt that dilemma, I think the only thing to do in

those situations is ask questions, as calmly as possible, even

controversial ones, depending what the situation is, and not

answering back. If the speaker/teacher/nurse/whatever isn't

constitent, he/she will slip, and hopefully think about what he/she

is promoting.

I once had to watch a video that promoted animal experimentation, I

was boiling up with anger inside and wanted to say a lot of stuff,

but i kept silent untill the question time at the end, and asked why

the video hadn't interviewed scientists who were against vivisection

as well as for. I couldn't even listen to his reply, I thought I was

going to faint with exhaustion. (I'd spent the whole video trying to

block it out whilst at the same time trying to find anything that

was wrong with it so I could ask any questions, I was having trouble

breathing). To my surprise another student who I know is a meat

eater, blurted out, " yeah its so blatantly one-sided " . I didn't know

whether she was agreeing with me, or disagreeing with me, or what,

but she was right. It was one-sided, but there was nothing that said

it in clear, obvious words.

 

>I felt very isolated most of the time as a vegan in a very vegan

> unfriendly area of the country. I was in North Wales and lots of my

> colleagues were married to, or daughters of, farmers and saw my

>veganism as

> a threat to their families' livelihood, so I suffered a lot of

>hatred for

> being into animal rights.

 

That must have been terrible. Seeing as they rely on imprisoning,

using and killing animals for their own survival things are bound to

be black and white. Compared to the college I am at, where there is

a wide spectrum of people, it sounds like it must have been hell.

 

> Is there no veggie/AR student group where you are? Where are you?

 

I think there is, but am having trouble finding it. I'm not very

good at meeting people or integrating into groups, with people I

always been more of a " sheep " , whatever, although am very

independant when not with other people and am fine in my own

company. The people I am used to knowing are people I meet in

organised places, under the mighty shadow of the government,

(school, college, work) or family.

I know that I should really be trying to break away from all this

and meeting different people. But I find it compelling to try to be

like everyone else who tries to be like everyone else (precisely

because i know its wrong, and its not the way people, or me, should

be) because I have an interest in sociology and am an observer as

well; and it is (sadly) what I am best at. I think there are very

few vegans who are this way. Look, I " get on " on with the people who

are going to be businessmen, scientists (some of which I bet will

test on animals), policians, lawyers, etc. I can't help it. Its all

superficial within those kind of circles anyway, and if I'm masking

a hate for all of these people it makes no difference because many

of them are corrupt to the core. I went to a public school, I know !

(euuurgh)

 

But am also trying to escape, and am redoing education in a state

funded college, not just for my conscience and politics, but for the

plain old reason that at public school I did arts A-levels when

really I wanted to study science at A-levels, and also to compare

the two forms of education. You might find it difficult to

understand how much a system like an enclosed boarding school that

is finely and skillfully designed to 'better' its pupils can be

damaging if the pupil who has been through it wants to reject it. I

feel damaged by it: on a subconscious level I have been 'told' who

to be, who I should be friends with, how to get away with being two

faced, how to socialise with people whose prime motivation in life

is themselves and making 'contacts' with people. I'm not saying all

public school educated people are like what I've just said, there

are many who are very good people and would be good 'examples'

as 'citizens'. But I am one of those people who doesn't want to

ignore all the evil (to put it bluntly) that is going on, and

chooses to find out things I don't want to find out (as you're vegan

you will know what I mean). Thus, the 'good' people at my public

school would stick togethor, and I went and hung around with those

who will be (when my age group are middle aged) the cigar smoking

usurpers of the law but who never get sent to prison for it. I was

quite popular among them, perhaps because I try to be a

compassionate and trusting person, qualities many of them are alien

to. I don't think I realised exactly what I was doing, and how it

would affect me. Many of these rich, middle-classed white males who

I shared five years of cushy imprisonment with are out there now,

smoking pot, hiring prostitutes, excluding themselves from normal

society (yes, an old classmate (when I say old classmate, I don't

mean someone I am happy to know) at uni told me him and his friends

only go out on weekdays to 'avoid the plebs'(their words) who

generally go out on weekends, admittedly he also said it was because

they was scared of being beaten up, which they probably wouldn't be,

but probably deserve to be), all the time while doing their degrees,

with which, and thanks to their network of contacts they will be

making lots of money.

I wanted to leave public school after the first year. I didn't

because of a huge mixture of things, partly insecurity, partly

addiction to what I didn't like and refusal to ignore, partly

because of my mother, but mostly I think because of having played

too many roleplaying games as a child and thinking I could somehow

change the world for better (and I was a vegetarian at the time).

It has taken me two years to break away from them and to judge for

myself what is right and wrong for me, I am still reeling. Someone

from this public school wants to meet up with me for easter, I am

scared, because I am no longer willing to make any compromises and

now say what I think, and people with lots of contacts, money and

power to me are truly scary people.

 

So how I am going join a sab group, which I really, really want to

do (its the only form of activism I'd be completely happy with,

saving the life of an individual animal is a small but important

consolation of the atrocities), well, manana maybe I'll find the

courage.

 

But I am fucked because I see right through the system from the

perspective of those who use power, and money, and who glide through

it regardless of the consequences to others (simply because of the

situation they were born in) , and yet I also hate the system, I

know what the consequences of power and money are, I know what it

would take to change everything for good or for bad (and also know

that its not realistic), I know what goes on behind the scenes in

big businesses and in the minds of the wealthy because I have lived

with them, I am constantly facing a duality with myself on what to

do with myself: I don't want to meet people because i think I am

dangerous to them. I don't want to kill myself because... I think

I'll define the reasons as pro-life. I don't want to burn my public

school down because i think revenge is futile, and also, again, I

am, I suppose, pro-life.

 

God I'm so glad I've gotten this off my chest. Even though I've

tried to explain it to other people, another vegan is the only

person I can explain it to properly.

 

(If you reply please delete all but what is relevant of what I have

written, not only for Mavreela, but also because the contents of

what I wrote may be harmful to some people and possibly to myself).

 

 

 

 

 

, " Lesley Dove " <Lesley@v...> wrote:

>

> I really feel for you, as someone who started nurse training and

experienced

> a lot of anti-vegan discrimination, and ended up being bullied out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

, " Lesley Dove " <Lesley@v...> wrote:

my whole story is going on our website, I know,

> manana, manana, sorry I don't know how to do the squiggly thing

over the n!

> If anyone wants me to email the whole tale to them, let me know.

 

If you email it to me, I will read it.

 

I won't put

> it on this list as it's quite long.

 

Yeah, sorry about long emails.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

you sound like someone who is not content with their lot... and so that

makes you just as thoughtless as many other public school derivatives....

 

you had it lucky ... and more lucky than most people .. and you spent your

time feeling guilty? ... some don't get a chance to be so lucky... (i'm

thinking, here, of Ben Affleck's speech to Matt Damon in the film 'Good Will

Hunting' at the end... watch it again to catch it if you missed it... or

never saw it... cos i can't remember the words...)

 

what's worse than a public school person being all high and mighty and

networky... is a public school person trying to lower himself to become a

non-public school person with all their powerlessness and poverty that

entails ...except you'll never get there...

 

you'd probably get on with your school chum because he thinks the same way

as you and because none of you could ever share your mutual concerns...

 

you don't like sheep ... so you don't participate? ... what's different

about that and people who don't go out on Friday nights because others going

out are plebs?

 

still at least you seem aware to some degree... and you're moving in the

right direction... (away from public school... - but public school will

never go away... )

 

are Steiner schools vegetarian?

 

Z

 

 

> > Is there no veggie/AR student group where you are? Where are you?

>

> I think there is, but am having trouble finding it. I'm not very

> good at meeting people or integrating into groups, with people I

> always been more of a " sheep " , whatever, although am very

> independant when not with other people and am fine in my own

> company. The people I am used to knowing are people I meet in

> organised places, under the mighty shadow of the government,

> (school, college, work) or family.

 

> But am also trying to escape, and am redoing education in a state

> funded college, not just for my conscience and politics, but for the

> plain old reason that at public school I did arts A-levels when

> really I wanted to study science at A-levels, and also to compare

> the two forms of education. You might find it difficult to

 

> society (yes, an old classmate (when I say old classmate, I don't

> mean someone I am happy to know) at uni told me him and his friends

> only go out on weekdays to 'avoid the plebs'(their words) who

> generally go out on weekends, admittedly he also said it was because

> they was scared of being beaten up, which they probably wouldn't be,

> but probably deserve to be), all the time while doing their degrees,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

, Oliver Slay <oliver@l...> wrote:

You're the first person who has said something of the sort to me.

(I think I'm going to turn gay as a statement)

 

> you sound like someone who is not content with their lot... and

so that

> makes you just as thoughtless as many other public school

derivatives....

 

Thoughtless? I think all the time, but i know what you mean.

And I want you to know that that thoughtlessness is never going to

go away, however much i try, and I haTE it, I don't want it, and i

don't want to be myself. Maybe I should go and do a Barry Horne.

>

> you had it lucky ... and more lucky than most people .. and you

spent your

> time feeling guilty?

 

WHAT

my mother was born into a very, very poor working class family in

Birmingham. She had to give her first child (my half brother)to a

social worker because she wasn't educated about contraception, still

living at her parents home, and the family couldn't afford to keep

him, now the child has grown up and doesn't want to know her. Her

second child the same, only she managed to get her back, only for

this second child (my half sister) to walk out for six years, become

a vegan anarchist, come back into my life and form an intense

emotional relationship with me.

 

YOU GO TO A PUBLIC SCHOOL, AND BE GRATEFUL, BUT THEY'RE JUST AS

CLASS CONSCIOUS AS YOU ARE, AND YOU END UP LIKE THIS you're never

going to hear what some public school people talk about amomng

themselves if you haven't been to one, so you 're going to find it

difficult to understand ME. " plebs " , the " working class " , the jokes

about " plebs " and " working class " , the inability to speak out

against them (because of the hypocrisy of being there in the first

place), the fucking humiliation of being the only one in the whole

school to be vegetarian for ethical reasons, the pent-up anger only

PROVING to the others that they don't want to be vegetarians,

because it doesn't APPEAR to be very self advancing.

 

>... some don't get a chance to be so lucky...

 

(yeah well. lucky. ow. )

 

(i'm

> thinking, here, of Ben Affleck's speech to Matt Damon in the

film 'Good Will

> Hunting' at the end... watch it again to catch it if you missed

it... or

> never saw it... cos i can't remember the words...)

 

Yeah I saw it. Yeah I noticed everyone's talking about films. I'll

try to watch it again, but I'm short on money at the moment (I want

to die).Whats this speech got to do with anything? I've got nothing

to do with Will Hunting, he's fictious, and beats people up at the

beginning (perhaps he wouldn't have beaten people up if he were

vegan, har.) which I don't.

 

>

> what's worse than a public school person being all high and mighty

and

> networky... is a public school person trying to lower himself to

become a

> non-public school person with all their powerlessness and poverty

that

> entails ...except you'll never get there...

 

Lower himself? Do you wish you had gone to a public school?

 

OH YEAH BECAUSE I WANT TO GET THERE ??????(wherever the ! " £$%^ & *()_)

(* & ^%$£$%^ & *(* & ^%$££ " $%^ & *()(* & ^%$£$%^ & *()* & ^%$%^ & *()_)(* & ^%$£%^ & *()

(* & ^%$%^ & *()_)(* & ^%$%^ & *()_+_)(* & ^ & *()%$%^%$ " there " is).

 

I also said that the other reason I went to this state funded

college was that I studied Arts at my previous school and would

rather have studied sciences. So I'm doing just that. Otherwise I

would be in a university right now.

 

> you'd probably get on with your school chum because he thinks the

same way

> as you and because none of you could ever share your mutual

concerns...

 

WELL HE EATS A LOT OF MEAT DAILY. I WAS IN A BAND WITH HIM, I DON'T

WANT TO PLAY MUSIC ANYMORE. I HAD A DREAM THAT HE WAS GOING TO kill

ME (helllllllpppppp....).

>

> you don't like sheep ... so you don't participate? ... what's

different

> about that and people who don't go out on Friday nights because

others going

> out are plebs?

 

Who said i don't like sheep? Did I? Perhaps I said something along

the lines of: I am a sheep like person, I am easily " herded " . I

don't mind being a " clone " or sacrificing my individuality for

society sometimes (i don't mind wearing a suit FOR FIVE YEARS I WORE

A STRICT UNIFORM IN A STRICT SCHOOL THAT I'M " LUCKY " TO HAVE GONE

TO). And then later I said, on a different topic completely, that I

hated myself (for entirely different reasons), not the sheep status.

I don't hate sheep, the animals. I feel nothing towards them, except

that I shouldn't eat them, or drink their milk, or herd them.

This one's for George Orwell: Fuck off, your book Animal Farm was

shit, I only saw the cartoon anyway.

 

I believe like many people that we are a mixture of what we are

genetically and everything we have been exposed to throughout our

lives.

 

>

> still at least you seem aware to some degree...

 

so do you :)

 

>and you're moving in the

> right direction...

 

Whether its the right direction or the wrong direction, it is the

direction I am going in, unless I decide to change my direction.

 

(away from public school... - but public school >will

> never go away... )

 

I was on the verge of tears, shivering, angry, and my cat was

walking in front of my screen when I was writing some of this.

 

It will go away (public school)... I hope it will be before

everything else does (you know, end of the world and all that)

 

GET OFF YOUR ARSES AND THE INTERNET AND SOLVE SOME PROBLEMS, PEOPLE

(Oh no oh no oh no oh no oh no what am I doing please please please

someone help me)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...