Guest guest Posted April 13, 2002 Report Share Posted April 13, 2002 >Most international conventions are keyed into the idea of a head of >state. True, but just because it is that doesn't mean it has to be that way. A convention can easily be signed by the prime minister without any change to policy, meaning, or effect. >What are the practical alternatives to an elected head of state? Not having one! As said above you can function without a special position of head of state. >If you weren't planning to call an elected head of state a monarchy, >what were you calling him or her? Well I wasn't going to have one. Heck, who'd have thought that arguing for the status quo with regards to parliamentary democracy would seem to radical. I guess it's just like Oliver says, people just aren't thinking creatively enough for there to be any change, because they can only think in terms of existing forms of government. Michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.