The Russell Hustle (was: Veggie Romance?)

[Guest guest]

, Paul Russell <prussell@s...> wrote:

> I don't know if you read my entire message Lesley, but

veggiedate.org

> is FREE for the first 3 months. Even after the initial 3 months it

is

> very cheap compared to the alternatives, including VMM. Instead of

> criticising perhaps you should check it out ?

 

- Well, look who's calling the kettle black.

- Everyone takes of things what they want.

- I guess you are a single dad and are looking to change that,

therefore since this is interesting to you, it is not spam.

- If you are not Vegan, then an announcement for joining another

Vegan list would be considered spam to you.

 

> It's not just the - they've been sending out personal

> spam too. You might like to receive spam, but I don't - I already

get

> hundreds a day and I don't need any more, thanks, especially from

> people who should know better. It's particularly annoying when you

> get the same spam from the same person over and over again.

 

- I would have figgered you to be computer-savvy. Ever hear of

a " kill file? "

- You must have been spammed as well by anti-spamming devices.

- Have you looked into any?

 

 

> I don't

> think that constitutes a " bee in the bonnet " - you and fidyl seem

to

> be the only people I've ever heard of who approve of spam. In case

> you didn't know, spam is now illegal in most countries, and for

> good reasons.

>

> Paul

 

- Your head count is wrong. I have been deluged with new members who

actually appreciated my message(s).

- You are the minority.

- And, yes, how can one legalize/ " illegalize " spam?

- It would be interesting to see proof of your accusations, as well

as a definition. As well, documentation as to where it is " illegal. "

- [Actually, I'm truly not interested, but you keep repeating your

lies and I would like to see some substantiation.]

- And how can you dispute her claim of this being a " bee in your

bonnet? " Not only on this group, but two others you have disrupted

with your nonsense.

- And, don't accuse me of disrupting these groups - it was one post

that got lots of off-list reaction. You, Paul Russell, are the " bee "

here.

- It appears that your mantra is " spam, " and all else is tertiary.

 

- For those who are not on the other lists, Paul Russell has been

very deceitful in his ways. He has used alias names and addies to

forge union with his arguments. He even had one " member " leave a

group to show support for him. This " person " supposedly left one of

my lists, too. But as I researched the name, it never appeared on

any of my lists either now or before.

- I'd be very watchful of people like this.

[Guest guest]

>- I guess you are a single dad and are looking to change that,

>therefore since this is interesting to you, it is not spam.

 

Like I said, I wish them well, I just wish they wouldn't spam. Spam

is spam, whether you find it interesting or not.

 

>

>- I would have figgered you to be computer-savvy. Ever hear of

>a " kill file? "

 

I already use spam filters, but no spam filter is 100% effectove - I

have to deal with 100 or so spams a day manually, including yours.

 

>- You are the minority.

 

Ah - you have a problem with minorities - I thought so.

 

>- And, yes, how can one legalize/ " illegalize " spam?

 

Ask your president who you so admire - he signed a bill this week

outlawing spam nationally. In California spam has already been

illegal for more than a year. How can you be so totally unaware of

what's going on in the world around you ?

 

>- It would be interesting to see proof of your accusations, as well

>as a definition. As well, documentation as to where it is " illegal. "

 

Duh - try reading a newspaper or any news source on the WWW.

 

>- [Actually, I'm truly not interested, but you keep repeating your

>lies and I would like to see some substantiation.]

 

Sure - right - anything which doesn't fit with your cosy egotistical

world view is a " lie " .

 

>

>- For those who are not on the other lists, Paul Russell has been

>very deceitful in his ways. He has used alias names and addies to

>forge union with his arguments. He even had one " member " leave a

>group to show support for him. This " person " supposedly left one of

>my lists, too. But as I researched the name, it never appeared on

>any of my lists either now or before.

>- I'd be very watchful of people like this.

>

 

Oh puh-lease - full marks for imagination but no marks for honesty.

You really can't accept that not everyone agrees with you, can you ?

I guess it's a very black and white world on planet fidyl ?

 

I really thought that this idiotic little spat was over, but you

don't seem to be able to let it lie, do you ? If your object is just

to drive people who you don't agree with out of all then

you're doing a great job.

 

Paul

 

--