Guest guest Posted June 1, 2001 Report Share Posted June 1, 2001 Hi again. Sorry for the time taken to reply and that. Maybe if you wer'rent taking up all my time or somthing... > Thanks for the session last night, babes, i really enjoyed it!! You > even managed to get out eventually!! Jim ¯¯¯ Eventually, Yes! I'm just worried what time I'll be there to if we get talking tonight though. Sorry I wasn't on when I said, but my body tends to get a little cranky unless I have at least 11hrs. > Ewhhhh!! I can't stand grapefruits-sorry!! Jim ¯¯¯ Well - that's ok, i guess. They're never entirely plesent anyway, I just find myself going back for more and more. Kinda like - oops, no, wait - I'm not allowed ot say that here! > > > And for juice I normally drink about a litre of sanguinello a day. > > yum! > > Wot's dat?? Jim ¯¯¯ Like red oranges. Somtimes called ruby orrange or blood orange. If you ever do try it drink straigt from the carton so you don't actually see it. It looks vile but tastes great! Kinda tangy. > Absinth?? I hope you're careful!!(nag nag) I don't think you ever > explained why you go to Aber?? Jim ¯¯¯ Well, yes. But I don't drink it in massive amounts and I always know what EXACTLY it is that I'm drinking (that's pretty important since it can be anything between 50% and 85% proof). A lot of prople went mad off it in victorian times, but that was more to do with the high copper content that used to give it it's green flavour. These days there is no copper in there. At £3 a shot I don't think I can afford to get drunk off it anyway! Besides, there are other far stronger drinks out there, although I'm not sure how far that can go to establishing my safety. > > > Jim > > ¯¯¯ > > Hmmm... I just posted a philosophy message (re Singer) that's not > > appeared. Strange, but I refuse to type all that out again because > > of a computer error. Or at least not now. > > I feel like i'm on the list sometimes, we've started discussing, like, > brainy stuff, man!! Jim ¯¯¯ Singer isn't all that brainy. All he said is that animals' interests should be considered as well as humans'. Pretty easy going stuff compared to a lot of philo since it's not had to be translated from an archaic language. > > Laters, > sas. Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.