Guest guest Posted January 31, 2002 Report Share Posted January 31, 2002 Just dropped in my inbox- thought it might be of interest in the light of recent discussions on the industrialisation of agriculture... Graham This week's SchNEWS: http://www.schnews.org.uk/ wake up! wake up! It's yer heavily subsidised SchNEWS Published in Brighton by Justice? - Brighton's Direct Action collective ISSUE 340, February 1st, 2002 FOOD FIGHT " Everywhere on these Isles, rich and beautiful habitats have been ploughed, bulldozed and sprayed out of existence, not as a result of need but in response to farm subsidies " - Graham Harvey, The Killing of the Countryside This week the Policy Commission on the Future of Farming published its long awaited report on what they see as the future of agriculture in the UK. Commissioned by the government in the wake of the foot and mouth crisis, it recommends changes in the way we produce our food, namely that more money be spent on organic farming methods and subsidies towards the protection of the environment rather than for food production. Foot and mouth was just the latest in a long line of disasters to illustrate the unhealthy state of UK farming. Since the introduction of subsidies in the last few decades, farming has largely become an industrialised process just like any other manufacturing industry. Many parts of Britain could be described as agricultural wastelands, devoid of wildlife and plants. Look out across the countryside in some parts of the UK and you'll see endless fields of chemically contaminated monocrop, separated not by hedgerows but by roads and barbed wire. Over 10,000 miles of hedgerows disappear each year. 97% of meadowland has been lost since WW2, and many water courses have been heavily polluted through extensive f chemical use. Prof. Jules Pretty of the University of Essex has calculated that even before foot and mouth, the hidden costs of industrial agriculture to our health and environment added up to £2.3billion a year. It's estimated that in the last 2 years at least 40,000 people have lost their jobs in agriculture. Many people have come to accept the failures of the modern farming system as the price we have to pay for cheap food. But with the taxpayer contributing to the £3billion in subsidies paid to farmers each year, each family is actually paying an extra £10 a week. Supermarket Sweep On the face of it we'd have to agree with Tony Blur for once, who welcomed the new report saying that " the current situation benefits no-one: farmers, taxpayers, consumers or the environment. " But er, sorry Tony but we think Tesco might disagree with you there. Supermarkets are raking it in, with Tesco's profits rising every year in the last decade, last year amassing over £1bn. The supermarkets' power on our food chain has become almost complete, and the result has been that our agricultural land now looks like the supermarkets they are servicing. A fifth of farms, mostly the wealthy ones in this country received 80 percent of the annual production subsides. This mis-distribution of subsidies has been compared to the government choosing to subside grocery shops, and giving all the money to Tescos and Sainsbury's. And farming just like the retail world has had it's casualties - small farms are closing all the time while the large monoculture farms (yer Tesco equivalent) keep growing. But even these big farms are being screwed by the supermarkets they serve. For example a litre of milk in March last year costs 22p to produce, farmers were being paid 17.6p for each litre, the supermarket was selling it for 35p, that's 17.4p profit for supermarkets and a bill of 4.4p to tax payer for subsidies, which means that we are subsidising the supermarkets! Overall today in the UK only 9p of each pound you spend ends up in the farmer's pocket. Food Chained Marion Shoard the author of " This Land is Our Land " told SchNEWS that this idea of environmental subsidies assumes that farmers know what's best, yet considering that they're the ones who've been busy destroying the landscape in the first place, putting our faith in them helping to restore it is a bit laughable. Marion believes that the best way to shake up our agricultural system is to get rid of subsidies altogether. She believes that land prices would then plummet and farming would become more profitable, this would then allow land to be bought by environmental and social groups for the public good. This sounded like a good idea so we tried to track down some farmers who've managed to survive without subsidies, but unfortunately we couldn't find any. Not surprising really when the price farmers get for their produce is often less than it costs them to produce it in the first place. But regardless of whether or not redirecting subsidies are the solution to our problems, nothing is likely to change until there is a serious shift in the balance of power in the food chain. The biggest villains of all are the supermarkets who've made us believe they're providing us with cheap food. The report does nothing to challenge the powers of supermarkets, which isn't surprising when you consider that Peter Davis from Sainsbury's was a member of the Committee. Professor Pretty points out " The quest for even cheaper food is at the root of all these problems. It has encouraged farmers to cut corners, compromising food safety, animal welfare and damaging the environment. " * Further reading " The Killing of the Countryside " by Graham Harvey. For a history of the landownership in Britain read " This Land is Our Land - The struggle for Britain's Country " By Marion Shoard. Loads of information on supermarkets at www.corporatewatch.org.uk Positive SchNEWS It isn't necessarily true that farming and environmental destruction need to go hand in hand. Ragman's Lane Farm in Gloustershire is one of many commercial farms now being run successfully using permaculture ecological principles. When Matt Dunwell and Jan Davies took over the farm in Gloucestershire, in 1990 the Valuer commented that its 50 acres of grassland could only provide half of one salary, which would be true were it only a conventional farm. But now the farm employs three full-time people. The farm sells most of it's food locally and they run regular courses to pass on their knowledge - the next one is 23-24 February is 'Growing and selling vegetables'. More info Mandy Pullen Ragman's Lane Farm, Lower Lydbrook, Glos, GL17 9PA. 01594 861173 www.permaculture.co.uk * And don't forget Seedy Saturday next Saturday 9th February at St.Georges Hall, St.Georges Rd, Brighton 11am - 4pm. Find out how to bypass the corporate seed industry and pick up some outlawed vegetable seeds. Volunteers needed to help out call 01273 882552 email baggage * Only 8% of UK farmland is given over to crops that provide for people directly. The rest goes to feed livestock. * We would need only a fifth of our current cultivated area to be self sufficient in this country if we grew food for only human consumption. * In 1970 the average household spent 25% of its income on food, the equivalent figure today is little more than 10%. * In 1950 there were 221,662 food shops in Britain, by 1997 this had gone down to just 36,931. ------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.