Guest guest Posted April 11, 2002 Report Share Posted April 11, 2002 Bush administration decides against making it easier to eliminate more toxic chemicals Thursday, April 11, 2002 By John Heilprin, Associated Press WASHINGTON — President Bush plans to ask Congress to support a global treaty phasing out a dozen of the world's most highly toxic chemicals but won't back a provision making it easier to eliminate more toxins, administration officials said Wednesday. An announcement was scheduled for Thursday by EPA Administrator Christie Whitman and Acting Assistant Secretary of State Anthony F. Rock, whose agencies drafted the proposed legislation. It comes nearly a year after Bush held a Rose Garden ceremony in advance of Earth Day to announce he would sign and ask the Senate to ratify a Clinton-era treaty on persistent organic pollutants, or POPs. Bush's originally supported a treaty provision calling for expanding the list of chemicals that would be covered. But administration officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that would now be left for lawmakers to decide. " The intention is to work with the Congress on the process of adding additional chemicals, " said one official. Environmental groups have been nervously awaiting the administration's official request for the Senate to ratify and for Congress to implement the treaty, which takes aim at the chemicals widely referred to as the " dirty dozen. " That group includes PCBs, dioxins, and furans along with DDT and other pesticides shown to contribute to developmental defects, cancer, and other problems in humans and animals. But since most of the pollutants no longer are used in industrial countries such as the United States, environmentalists said dropping the provision for eliminating future chemicals and leaving it up to Congress ignores some of the most important protections under the treaty. " It's unfortunate that the Bush administration is undermining one of the very few environmental protections that they've supported, " said Jeremiah Baumann, environmental health specialist for U.S. PIRG, an advocacy group. " They are omitting one of the most important pieces of this international treaty that would protect human health from dozens of harmful chemicals on the market. " Even if the add-on provision were included, enlarging the list of chemicals to be banned would still require rigorous scientific review. A year has gone by since, flanked by Whitman and Secretary of State Colin Powell, Bush said at a ceremony that the United States " must work to eliminate or at least severely restrict the release of these toxins without delay. " " The risks are great and the need for action is clear, " Bush said. Many of the dozen pollutants in the treaty remain popular in developing countries even though they break down slowly, travel long distances in the environment, and have been linked to cancer and birth defects. Traces have been found in the Arctic, transported by air currents from hundreds of miles away. Under the treaty, production and use of 9 of the 12 chemicals would be banned as soon as the treaty takes effect, which would take at least several years. About 25 countries would be allowed to continue to use DDT to combat malaria in accordance with World Health Organization guidelines, pending development of safer solutions. Releases of dioxins and furans — toxic byproducts of waste burning and industrial production — would be reduced and eventually eliminated where feasible, according to the treaty. Other chemicals on the list are polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and the pesticides aldrin, chlordane, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor, mirex, toxaphene, and hexachlorobenzene. The treaty also establishes an international fund of perhaps up to $150 million to help countries develop and use substitutes for the " dirty dozen " chemicals. And it allows for an expansion of the number of chemicals to be covered, although adding to the list would require rigorous scientific review. The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants must be ratified by 50 countries to take effect. Whitman signed it on behalf of the United States on May 23. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.