[100% veg*n ] U.S. Has Duty to Lead on Global Warming

June 27, 2006

I don't mean to sound rude or anything, but, well, DUH. I'm more than sure by

now that even people who don't live in the United States (and yes, I do, and

yes, I know this sounds horrible, but I don't care) have figured out that our

President is not concerned with matters on home soil and has never been

concerned since his first election day. If he can't drop a bomb and " fix the

problem " (his words, not mine) then it's not important to him. Besides, if he

admitted that there could be even the slightest chance that global warming does

in fact exist, he'd have to look at all the companies he has stock invested in

that have been causing the problems over the years. That would be too bad a

trip for him to take. He doesn't realize that there soon won't be anything left

to divide and conquer at the rate our planet is shaking us off.

fraggle <EBbrewpunx wrote: U.S. Has Duty to Lead on Global

Warming

June 27, 2006 â€” By Jeremy Lovell, Reuters

LONDON â€” The United States -- the world's richest and most polluting nation --

has a moral duty to take the lead in tackling catastrophic global warming

instead of denying it is happening, a leading scientist said on Monday.

Addressing a meeting of international climate scientists and policymakers, John

Houghton, a former senior member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate

Change, said urgent action was imperative.

" If only the U.S. administration could flip from denial to acceptance it could

save the world, " he said. " If the Americans continue to do nothing then we have

a big problem -- therefore they must do something. "

U.S. president George W. Bush's administration has refused to ratify the Kyoto

Protocol on cutting climate-warming carbon gases from burning fossil fuels,

calling it economic suicide.

Harlan Watson, Bush's top climate negotiator, ruled out joining the treaty but

did not exclude the possibility that a future U.S. President might take a

different view.

However, he said whatever emerged from the current round of talks it would be

radically different.

" The future regime will not look much like the current regime, " he told the

meeting.

Luiz Alberto Figueirdo Machado, head of the environment section of Brazil's

foreign ministry, said the developed world had had a free ride for 150 years and

it was payback time.

" The polluter must pay, " he told the meeting at think-tank the Royal Institute

for International Affairs. " It is not the wish of the developing countries to

repeat the mistakes of the developed countries over the past 150 years.

ACT URGENTLY

Scientists predict average global temperatures will rise by at least two degrees

Celsius this century, bringing floods, droughts and rising sea levels from

melting polar ice caps.

" Whatever we do things will get worse from here, so we must act urgently, "

Houghton said.

Houghton said developed nations had to take a lead in combating warming because

if they did not the developing world -- particularly countries like China --

would take no action.

China is building roughly one large coal-fired power station a week to fuel its

booming economy.

But both Houghton and Halldor Thorgeirsson of the UN Framework Convention on

Climate Change expressed optimism.

" Climate change is a solvable problem. We have the technology to deal with

this, " Thorgeirsson said, saying that if it had not been for Kyoto, global

carbon emissions would have been at least 30 percent higher than current levels.

He said he was confident there would be a follow-up to Kyoto when the treaty

expired in 2012, adding it would have to be broader than the current agreement.

" We won't have all the answers by 2012, but we need to have found a way forward

by then, " he said. " We have a window of 20-30 years to find a solution. "

(Additional reporting by Gerard Wynn)

Source: Reuters

" NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may

have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this

without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse nor

protection save to call for the impeachment of the current President. "

To to the Digest Mode [ recommended ], send an email to:

vegan-network-digest

June 27, 2006

and yet, there are hordes of people in the US who still keep their heads under

the sand, er like our *president* said today " we need to get beyond the fact

that people are causing global warming "

many refuse to believe we have anything to do with it, and if we do, tough..

>Jenny Demonic <jennydemonic

>Jun 27, 2006 5:21 PM

>vegan-network

>Re: [100% veg*n ] U.S. Has Duty to Lead on Global Warming

>

>I don't mean to sound rude or anything, but, well, DUH. I'm more than sure by