Why is Yellowstone Destroying Its Bison Herd?

[Guest guest]

A Sickening Slaughter

 

http://www.counterpunch.org/jackson03012008.html

 

Why is Yellowstone Destroying Its Bison Herd?

 

By BOB JACKSON

March 1 / 2, 2008

 

I spent 30 years in Yellowstone protecting its resources, which I

carried out with all my heart. Yellowstone, for most of those years,

enthusiastically supported me whenever I brought a poacher to court.

But the black and white of whether a person is a poacher is not the

same as managing the greater population of animals in the Park.

 

Yellowstone has always been prone to politics. But due to its

mission, Yellowstone has always led the country, with science, in

countering the detrimental political influence imposed on Park

resources. Employees always rose to the occasion because they had the

deep conviction to protect the Park's resources. But not now with the

bison issue. I wish one could simply say Yellowstone has rolled over

and given up, but it is much worse. I see the Park actively ensuring

the status quo of ignorance. Yellowstone IS CULPABLE in the

destruction of its bison.

 

I had heard of the elk reductions in the 50's and 60's. A few of the

old time rangers, during evenings shared in backcountry cabins, would

confide in me. None liked what they had been ordered to do. I was

told the Model 70 Winchester 30-06, the very same one I slipped into

my saddle scabbard for all those years of boundary patrol, had kill

over 2000 elk in Yellowstone. But those days of unenlightened and

exploitive management were over! I was proud to carry the same gun

used to kill so many Park elk, because now it protected them.

 

No one thought Yellowstone would ever again stoop to allow such abuse

of its resources. Black and white has blurred into shades of gray.

The best Yellowstone administrators can offer is backroom whispering

to non profits telling them to save their bison. Where is the honor

and conviction of these public servants to stand up for what is

right? If they had it, there would be a desperate search for answers,

as was done for Yellowstone's elk in the 60's. Yellowstone had a lot

of years to address this bison issue and has unequivocally failed to

take the lead.

 

There is so much Yellowstone can do to fight for their bison. To

start with, they need to acknowledge bison herds are composed of

families and extended families, the same as elephants. Then they

could focus studies showing the effects to the remnants of these

families after they are broken up in the Park corrals. After

determining family order, they also would realize each bison has a

role within its family. Therein lies the solution to the brucellosis

issue. For example, elimination of scout bulls, the Jim Bridgers and

Kit Carsons of the bison world, upon entering unoccupied (ranch)

lands, would solve the problem of bison families expanding into areas

of concern.

 

Culpability comes from Yellowstone's administrators lobbying against

all but perfunctory University research to study these family groups.

Why? It was something too far out of their knowledge grasp and thus

became threatening to in-house status quo.

 

Second, Yellowstone needs to acknowledge the Mountain Bison culture

of the non-migratory MirrorñPelican herd still exists as a distinct

functioning entity. The matriarchal segments of this herd are much

warier than the introduced Plains bison and would never occupy areas

where humans habituate. Protecting these bison from human contact in

the summer means expansion of this native herd and at the same time

be assured these animals will not leave the Park. Why doesn't

Yellowstone acknowledge this unique herd? Because they would have to

reassess then rewrite their Bison Management Plan. Include in this

the fear of the inevitable demands to remove the introduced Plains Bison.

 

More culpability comes in because Yellowstone had already been given

this information about Mountain Bison. They have done nothing but

give precautionary research lip service to it. Of course if they wait

long enough, biologists " in-the-knowî can then claim it as their own

" discoveryî. All this stalling, while our last native bison herd is

fractured and destroyed.

 

Third, Yellowstone is covering up abuse of bison at their Stevens

Creek Corrals. The Humane Society asked to film these corrals because

they had heard of injuries and deaths at this facility. Even though

no animals were around when filming was to be done, one excuse led to

another until finally the Park's Public Affairs Office had to come

out and say NO. The Humane Society has a long history of cooperation

and is welcome in other National Parks as a monitor. Not Yellowstone!

Nor is the media now permitted to film corralling activities-- in the

name of animal welfare.

 

Culpability also comes from Yellowstone not questioning the off limit

policy of filming carcasses after shipment of animals from

Yellowstone. But with initial reports of massive bruising and broken

ribs wouldn't administrators, in the name of humane treatment, insist

on independent monitoring? They do not, and thus they are culpable.

 

I wish I could simply say Yellowstone doesn't have the backbone for a

fight like they did with 50's elk reductions or eliminating garbage

dumps. But what Yellowstone has allowed to happen on their soil

today, to my " alma mater,î is sickening. I ask the rank and file in

Yellowstone; rise above the fear of job retaliation and remember why

you joined the Park Service.

 

To cower in the closets of your Ranger Stations, maintenance sheds,

and Mammoth administration buildings may secure careers, but every

year of compromise means adding another year of personal slow death.

Is it worth it? Lack of initiative by park administrators to have

employees' concerns heard and documented lets employees know their

" leadersî are more like political lemmings following Washington pied

pipers. Perhaps " political servantî is more appropriate than public servant.

 

For the public, I ask you to question the Park on these

culpabilities. In fact question my statements. It is the best way to

come up with personal conviction. Your questions means substantiating

facts are disclosed. The cover up of inhumane treatment especially

needs to be addressed.

 

From the beginning, the interagency bison committee insulated

themselves by writing in " experimental handlingî language, making

them immune to Montana State's animal humane treatment laws. There is

nothing going on at Yellowstone's Steven's Creek corrals today to

justify being above the law, unless one believes in the validity of

Holocaust experiments.

 

I ask Yellowstone and any of the public who cares about Yellowstone

to take the bull by the horns. Let's rectify what's happening to our

Park and its wildlife.

---

 

Bob Jackson was a backcountry ranger in Yellowstone Park for 30 years.

 

 

Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance.

Confucius