Guest guest Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 http://www.examiner.com/x-4348-Phoenix-Vegan-Examiner~y2009m8d11-A-vegans-take-o\ n-PETAs-Unhappy-Meal-campaign-against-McDonalds At most of PETA's antics, I often shake my head and mutter, " those silly PETA people. " With their latest McDonald's subversive ad tactic, I don't see them as being so silly. In an effort to expose McDonald's cruelty to animals, they're using pictures of a menacing, knife-wielding Ronald the Clown. They hand these boxes and labels to families about to enter the restaurant. The sheer irony is from the complaints of the parents, who claim that this PETA picture is simply too gruesome for children. Suppressing reality and calling its unveiling as inappropriate seems to ignore the overall problem of the reality itself. In this case, parents complaining that children get a tiny glimpse into the truth behind their Happy Meals completely ignore the overarching problem of how animals are torturously slaughtered. Now, I get that it's totally obnoxious to bombard a family by handing out disturbing images to unassuming children. If I was a parent and someone handed my child a postcard of an emaciated child with a missing limb who works in a sweatshop, I would be angered. My child did nothing to warrant their peace of mind being compromised. It would, however, cause me to think about my own actions: should I take my child to the Gap? In this case, should I be eating at McDonald's? The age-old philosophical question all over again—do the means justify the ends? My verdict is this: the pictures are not so offensive to cause parents to be so uppity. The picture, as one can see, is not quite a disembodied child. At best, the child will inquire why Ronald looks so unusually sinister. Likewise, at best, the parent can begin to explain the much more gruesome reality to their kids… on their own terms, not PETA's (who would likely present a wholly terrorizing image of the truth). The image of McDonald's might forever have a negative connotation in the child's mind. Such a connotation is not unfair. Most children who are vegans/vegetarians stopped eating meat when their parents explained the origins of hot dogs. Children (being less desensitized than we hardened, callused adults), are likely more inclined to cease eating meat if they know their favorite cartoon characters are being killed for food every day. When it comes to ugly truths, the better alternative to silencing it is to make the truth a whole lot prettier… or in this case, a whole lot more humane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.