Guest guest Posted November 17, 2000 Report Share Posted November 17, 2000 What a lovely question. I believe there is no such person. King spoke for his own people as Gandhi and Chavez did for their own. Few people have been successful spokespersons for groups they are not members of. Union leaders are always union members. Perhaps the closest might be Mother Jones speaking for child laborers, but women have the traditional and understood role of speaking for children. Generally, there are people who seem to be spokespersons for certain species or orders and who seem to have a certain Kingesque quality. Karen Davis is the obvious spokesperson for chickens and other farmed birds. Maybe Pat Derby speaks for elephants. Maybe Paul Watson for cetaceans (whales, dolphins, etc.) Obviously, Jane Goodall is seen as the strong moderate voice for chimpanzees. I have tried to be a spokesperson for primates in laboratories. See my site: http://www.enviroweb.org/cepe/ One thing to consider is the way King was perceived. He was seen as a moderate due to others being seen as a radicals - Huey Newton, H. Rap Brown. The establishment had to negotiate with King because they did not want to be seen negotiating with the Black Panthers. So, the more moderate groups are probably closest to filling that role. The HSUS perhaps. This means that the role of radical is critical if the moderates are to remain being seen as such. The ALF and the " black panthers " of the movement make it more likely that a King will emerge who can speak in a moderate voice for the masses. Unfortunately, there has not been anyone emerge who currently seems likely to fill this role. Total rambling . . . R Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2000 Report Share Posted November 17, 2000 Hi, I don't know a great deal of Karen Davis but I do know of Patty Mark, Diana Simpson and others in Australia who have publicised the horror of battery hen farming for years. You can read some of their story at http://www.thylazine.org/photogallery I don't think you can actually narrow it down to " a spokesperson " for any species. Perhaps one can fairly say there are some individuals who take more of a public platform on some AR issues than others. The fact is there are many spokespersons for animal rights and we are scattered all around the globe. Kind regards, Marguerite >>Generally, there are people who seem to be spokespersons for certain species or orders and who seem to have a certain Kingesque quality. Karen Davis is the obvious spokesperson for chickens and other farmed birds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2000 Report Share Posted November 18, 2000 Why Martin Luther King? Indeed, the oldest established religion for the past 8 000 years is the Hindu religion - so, I suggest that in terms of their present membership, about 850 million, that they lead the rest of the world in respect and love for all nature. I would suggest Mahatma Gandhi. Roger ============================================================================ IMPORTANT NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic letter is confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose this letter or any part of its contents or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this letter in error, please e-mail the sender by replying to this message. All reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in the letter and the sender cannot accept responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments. If you have any doubt as to the origin of this letter, please quote the above authentication code number An email or letter from this address in not valid unless accompanied by an authentication code number. ============================================================================ NOTA IMPORTANTE: La información contenida en esta carta electrónica es confidencial y puede ser el privilegio legal con sujeción a. Si usted no es el recipiente destinado, usted no debe usar, deber copiar, deber distribuir ni debe revelar esta carta ni ninguna parte de su contenido ni tomar ninguna acción en la dependencia en lo. Si usted ha recibido esta carta en el error, por favor e envía el emisor contestando a este mensaje. Todas precauciones razonables se han tomado para asegurar que ningunos viruses sean presente en la carta y el emisor no puede aceptar responsabilidad para surgir de pérdida ni daño del uso de este correo e ni fijaciones. Si usted tiene ninguna duda en cuanto al origen de esta carta, citan por favor el encima de código de authentication numera Un email o la carta de esta dirección en no válido a menos que acompañado de un número de código de authentication. ============================================================================= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.