Guest guest Posted February 10, 2001 Report Share Posted February 10, 2001 A recent survey showed that the practice of eating dogmeat is on the decline in China. Young people particularly seem more interested in dogs as companions than as food. So it's bizarre that the Chinese government has lately been investing considerable sums of money in dog farms throughout China and claiming that food dog production is set to become more profitable than raising pigs or poultry. It may be argued that farming food dogs is no different from farming any other kind of livestock. My own opinion is that it is different, entirely, and for a number of reasons; but that aside, the issue of slaughter is crucial here. Can we hope for a firm assurance from the Chinese authorities that the 'traditional' practice of, effectively, torturing dogs to death to raise adrenaline levels in the meat has emphatically no place in a modern industry, and that humane slaughter regulations are being rigorously enforced? St Bernards are being used as the foundation stock for the new farms, most of them having been procured in Europe, so our interest is not a simply prurient or officious one. Ley. __________ Get your free @.co.uk address at http://mail..co.uk or your free @.ie address at http://mail..ie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2001 Report Share Posted February 11, 2001 Ley Good wrote: > Can we hope for a firm assurance from the Chinese > authorities that the 'traditional' practice of, > effectively, torturing dogs to death to raise > adrenaline levels in the meat has emphatically no > place in a modern industry I have heard no evidence that this " traditional practice " exists in China, except perhaps in Korean communities in the North East. > and that humane slaughter > regulations are being rigorously enforced? I believe that one of the motivations for establishing " modern " dog farms is to enable control of standards - and also to move the dog slaughtering operations behind high walls away from the prying eyes of people like us. > St Bernards are being used as the foundation stock for > the new farms, most of them having been procured in > Europe, so our interest is not a simply prurient or > officious one. I believe it is the duty of all world citizens to do everything in their power to fight cruelty and injustice whenever and wherever they occur without regard to geographical, religious or political boundaries. I don't think this is remotely prurient or officious - only compassionate. John. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2001 Report Share Posted February 14, 2001 --- Dr John Wedderburn <john wrote: > Ley Good wrote: > > > Can we hope for a firm assurance from the Chinese > > authorities that the 'traditional' practice of, > > effectively, torturing dogs to death to raise > > adrenaline levels in the meat has emphatically no > > place in a modern industry > I have heard no evidence that this " traditional > practice " exists in China, except perhaps in Korean > communities in the North East. > > > and that humane slaughter > > regulations are being rigorously enforced? > I believe that one of the motivations for > establishing " modern " dog farms is to enable control > of standards - and also to move the dog slaughtering > operations behind high walls away from the prying > eyes of people like us. > > > St Bernards are being used as the foundation stock > for > > the new farms, most of them having been procured > in > > Europe, so our interest is not a simply prurient > or > > officious one. > I believe it is the duty of all world citizens to do > everything in their power to fight cruelty and > injustice whenever and wherever they occur without > regard to geographical, religious or political > boundaries. I don't think this is remotely prurient > or officious - only compassionate. > John. > > > ===== For the latest in actions for the environment and animal welfare check out http://www.geocities.com/mucha0514 Get personalized email addresses from Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.