Guest guest Posted October 4, 2001 Report Share Posted October 4, 2001 4 October 2001 Ms. Kathryn Fuller, Executive Director World Wildlife Fund Mr. John Burke Burnett, Executive Director Indo Pacific Conservation Alliance cc: Editor, Wall Street Journal Irian Jaya's Macaca fascicularis (crab-eating macaque monkeys) Dear Ms. Fuller and Mr. Burnett, I read the 2 October 2001 Wall Street Journal article " Monkeys Threaten New Guinea's Wildlife, Greedy Macaques Have Bad Reputation Among Locals " with interest and considerable dismay. My dismay results in part from the overt bias in the tone of the article which seems geared to elicit public sentiment against the little macaques. Reading the article, one could easily be led to believe that the monkeys have a malice intent; though the truth is that all the " crimes " the crab-eating macaques are guilty of results from their survival instinct... their need for sustenance... And, of course (as with the case of any " non-native, introduced " species), it is because of misguided human intervention that the monkeys are living in Irian Jaya in the first place. As the Irian Jaya situation illustrates, it is no wonder that there would have been confusion over the " WWF " name: Certainly the " other " WWF (the wrestling folks) could have come up with " Shoot and kill all the monkeys " as a resolution to the Irian Jaya macaque problem. However, one would expect more from an international conservation organization such as the World Wildlife Fund. Namely, a wildlife protection and conservation organization should resort to considering lethal means only after the exploration and trial of every available non-lethal resolution. Regardless of your best intentions, with all due respect for the severity of the problem and regardless of how much sentiment against the monkeys you attempt to rally, killing the Irian Jaya macaques will likely be much more of an emotionally-charged controversy than the snaring of introduced pigs in Hawaii was when Nature Conservancy embarked upon its eradication program. Monkeys (despite attempts to portray them as " greedy " , " grubby " , " aggressive " ) typically do elicit more sympathy than many other species. You should not be surprised that any attempt to kill the monkeys will be met with protest and public out-cries. Why is it not possible to humanely trap the Macaca fascicularis, set up a large enclosure, vacestomize the males, and let them live out their lives? If the excuse is that it is not possible to capture the monkeys (as is referenced in the Wall Street Journal article), then I beg to differ. Nonhuman primates can successfully be trapped with a well-planned and organized effort. There are many examples of successful trapping and relocation programs (e.g., the relocation of baboons by Shirley Strum.) If strategically-placed large cages are set-up as " feeding stations " in Irain Jaya, the monkeys will (after a time) go in to the cages. Eventually, the monkeys will become habituated to the cages and quickly enter the cages for the food. After being habituated, it is simply a matter of springing the cage door to have the monkeys captured. If the excuse for not exploring non-lethal options is that it would be cost prohibitive, again, I disagree. Successful capture and relocation programs of nonhuman primates have been accomplished with minimal financial resources, specifically on " shoe-string " budgets. In essence, " where they is a will, there is a way. " Guidestar notes WWF's 1998 assets as $134,340,223; income as $111,994,391 and net gain as $32,014,816. The overall costs of capturing, relocating, erecting a large enclosure and even providing subsequent care for all the macaques on Irian Jaya would indeed be a very small fraction of WWF's budget. The Texas Snow Monkey Sanctuary (http://www.snowmonkeys.org) in Dilley, Texas is a model example for the type of enclosure which could be built for the Irian Jaya macaques as well as showing that it is possible to capture large groups of macaques without harming them. At TSMS, there are almost 400 macaques enclosed in 65 acres which is surrounded by a state-of-the-art electrified fence. Years ago, the macaques were living freely in the south Texas scrub land. A well-organized capture plan ensured that all the monkeys were safely caught. I implore you to investigate and thoroughly explore all the non-lethal options available before you further pursue a plan which will result in the tragic loss of life for the Irian Jaya macaques. If you have any questions, or if you would like additional information about viable safe-capture of monkeys, or if you would like feasibility estimates for the non-lethal methods I have suggested, I welcome you to contact me. Sincerely, Linda J. Howard AESOP-Project [Allied Effort to Save Other Primates] http://www.aesop-project.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.