Guest guest Posted March 11, 2002 Report Share Posted March 11, 2002 South China Morning Post http://china.scmp.com/chitoday/ZZZKGZ8XCYC.html Monday, March 11, 2002 Second Mercedes smashed up by supporter of first protester by MARK O'NEILL in Beijing The owner of a Mercedes-Benz car had it smashed up in public in support of another owner who did the same thing in December, an act condemned by the company and a delegate to the NPC. Six men used hammers to destroy the exterior of a white Mercedes-Benz S320 on Friday in front of a large crowd at the entrance to a wild animal park in Wuhan, Hubei province. It was the same location where a similar model was smashed up in December, the Beijing Youth Daily reported yesterday. The owner is a Beijing businessman who declined to be identified. He is a friend of Wang Sheng, the owner of the first Mercedes-Benz and chairman of the wild animal park. He said he drove his car to Wuhan to be smashed up in public in a show of support for Mr Wang, who is embroiled in a dispute with manufacturer DaimlerChrysler, which has not been settled despite several meetings. The six men damaged only the outside, leaving the engine and the interior largely untouched. A spokeswoman for Mr Wang said the process of making a complaint against a company through the law courts was too slow and without result. " The experience of other consumers gives us this lesson. So we have decided to use this method. " In a statement issued on Friday, DaimlerChrysler said the company wanted to settle the problem with Mr Wang in a positive and reasonable manner and was working hard in this regard. But it said the repeat of the December incident had made a solution even more difficult. " We praise the attitude of NPC Hubei delegate Xiong Tongfa who said during the current NPC session that destroying a car was irrational behaviour, " it said, adding that it wanted to help all of its Chinese customers enjoy Mercedes-Benz cars for a long time. Mr Wang said in December that he destroyed the car because it had serious defects which had been repaired several times, to no avail, and that the company refused to exchange the car or give him a new one. In response, the company said the problems had been caused by the customer using a fuel that was not specified by the manufacturer. It said Mr Wang had refused its offer to clean the car's fuel system free of charge. [For more on Wuhan Wild Life Park, see: http://www.aapn.org/zoopage2.html ] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.