Guest guest Posted July 18, 2005 Report Share Posted July 18, 2005 A law with teeth or a bite for dog owners? 07/17/2005 South Roxana’s anti-tethering proposal stirs wide debate By CYNTHIA M. ELLIS Advertisement The Telegraph Puppy love is the beginning of a lifetime affair for most dog owners. But as those puppies mature, many owners find they are simply easier to keep outside on a chain rather than letting them have the run of the house. Some owners take great care to make sure the animals they leave outside are well-tended, with plenty of shade, food and water. But even those compassionate measures aren’t enough, some animal advocates say. " It's no life for a dog to be chained outside all the time, " said Ledy VanKavage of Collinsville, an attorney and senior director at the ASPCA Midwest State Government Affairs and Public Policy Office. One of the biggest animal debates to hit the area in a long time centers around a proposal in the village of South Roxana that would ban dog owners from tethering their dogs outside for more than an hour at a time. People are lining up on two distinct sides. One side says government has no right to enforce such a rule on what people do with their own animals. The other side says dogs left outside are those that pose the greatest risks to themselves and others. During the past month, South Roxana officials have met with the community a number of times to discuss the proposed regulation. Trustees are expected to talk about the proposed ban again at 7 p.m. Tuesday. " I don’t know how it will go, " Mayor Kenny Beasley said. " I really would like to see this happen, because I think the community and dogs deserve better. " Beasley said numerous complaints about tethered dogs prompted him to propose an ordinance. South Roxana could become only the second community in Illinois to have restrictions on tethering, if the measure passes. VanKavage said she hopes it does. She said it’s inhumane to leave a dog tied outside with little or no attention. " Dogs are pack animals by nature, " she said. " They need closeness, touching and petting to be content and happy. " She said that when they lose their ability to run with the pack (read that as hang with humans), they become more aggressive and protective of their space, especially if they are tethered. VanKavage said the America Society of Prevention and Cruelty to Animals applauds the village’s anti-tethering initiative. Beasley is pushing the ordinance as a preventive measure aimed at public safety and the humane treatment of dogs. Traditionally, he said, communities look at controlling dogs after problems occur -- rather than trying to combat problems before they start. " I want an ordinance with some ‘teeth?in it, " Beasley said. " I don’t want any child to be hurt because it got too close to a chained dog. " Many dog owners have good intentions when they tether their dog, often to keep them from running free, but what they don’t realize is the animal often suffers emotional and physical abuse while left outside -- and not necessarily from the owner. It is estimated there are more than 50 million dogs in the United States, and about one family in three owns a dog. Tammy Grimes, founder of Dogs Deserve Better, a nonprofit organization dedicated to freeing the chained dog, believes it’s a shame that communities should have to dictate common sense. " If you’re going to bring a dog into your life, you’ve got to be willing to take responsibility for its care and well-being, " Grimes said. She said chaining a dog " to the nearest tree " is irresponsible behavior. " A responsible caretaker’s dog lives inside and has a fence high and sound enough to protect both the dog and anyone passing by, " Grimes said. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Veterinary Medical Association, someone in the United States seeks medical attention for a dog bite-related injury every 40 seconds. Karen Delise, author of " Fatal Dog Attacks, " studied more than 448 cases of fatal dog attacks in the United States from 1965 to 2001. She said three critical factors contribute to attacks or maulings: function of the dog, owner responsibility and reproductive status of the dog. Delise said there is not a single documented case where a neutered, household dog was the cause of a human fatality. She makes a clear distinction between a " household " dog that lives within the home and has extensive social contact with family members, as opposed to a " resident dog " that is kept chained or restrained outside the home Delise said chaining a dog is arguably the single most dangerous condition in which to maintain a dog. Statistically, she said, chained dogs are more dangerous than free-running packs of dogs. " Many people may not view a chained dog as a potential threat by the sheer fact that the dog’s access is limited, " she said. " This is a fallacy. Chained dogs have killed at least 98 people, and of those, 92 were children that either wandered into reach or attempted to play, tease, feed or untangle a chained, tied or similarly restrained dog. " The city of Aurora is the only town in Illinois that restricts tethering in regard to the type of chain that’s used and the length of time. The closest community to South Roxana that restricts tethering is Creve Coeur. Creve Coeur City Administrator Mark Perkins said the City Council voted earlier this year to limit the time dog owners could tether their animals outside. He said one resident was very proactive in getting the ordinance changed, because she felt the animals chained up outside needed to be treated more humanely. Perkins said it’s too early to tell whether the ordinance has made difference. " So far, (the city) has not received any calls regarding violations, " he said. When the ordinance was created, it was more restrictive than it is now -- the City Council changed some of its provisions to accommodate people who work. In Creve Coeur, it is illegal to tether a dog in a fenced or unfenced yard for more than eight continuous hours or more than 12 hours in a 24-hour period. Beasley said limiting the time dogs are tethered inevitably will anger some dog owners. " I understand there will be some residents upset by this, " he said. " But I think that safety is more important. " South Roxana Police Chief Dennis Carpenter said community safety could be served and cruelty could be prevented if officials regulate irresponsible and dangerous practices. Carpenter said dog owners would be allowed to tether their animals for only one hour at a time up to three times a day. Non-tethered dogs left outside for longer periods would have to be in a fenced-in yard or a kennel. " Police are not going to be riding around all day waiting to see how long someone keeps their dog outside, " he said. " But if (the village) receives a complaint, then something could be done about it. " Those who disagree with the proposed ordinance argue that tethering a dog doesn’t make it aggressive and that the ban on tethering would not stop people from abusing their dogs. Allen Grant, of the 400 block of Illinois Avenue, said he has owned dogs his whole life and has never seen one go crazy because it was on a chain. He said being chained doesn’t cause a dog to become mean, and he also contends they can get out of a fenced area or pen just as easily as they can break the chain. Beasley said he believes many owners tether their dogs simply because they don’t want to go through the trouble and expense of putting up a fence or kennel. " I've even offered to help someone put up a fence, but they declined, " he said. " They would rather tether their dog. " cynthia_ellis ©The Telegraph 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.