Guest guest Posted March 4, 2001 Report Share Posted March 4, 2001 getting back to that spot on my face. I found out I still have it. But it is very small. I know how dumb this sounds (like I don't know whats going on on my own face) but it is on my temple right at the hair line, I need two mirrors to see it. Anyway now I know what is going on, the skin seems to dry up on top of it, (which is how I discovered it was still there) then the skin falls off. each time it does this, the spot gets smaller. I also have a wart on the back of my hand and the same thing is happening with that, and it is nearly gone. <br><br>Now lets talk about something really disgusting; Age Spots (sometimes called liver spots). Those telltale brown spots. " It doesn't matter whether you're a man, a mouse, a fruit fly, or even a cup of coffee or a slice of toast, you will still accumulate certain fluorescent pigments as you age. (Even foods are subject to aging via the same free radical reactions which cause human skin and nerve cells to accumulate Lipofuscin pigment.) " Life Extension A Practical Scientific Approach. Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw.<br><br>Lipofuscin can be made to flouresce yellowish to yellow-green, orange, or yellow-brown under ultraviolet light, and has a fluorescence spectra identical to compounds made from malonaldehyde (an aldehyde breakdown product of peroxidized fats). Lipofuscin accumulates in nerve cells (neurons) in the brain, skin cells, heart and skeletal muscle, voluntary muscle, liver, adrenals, and other organs and tissues. It seems that the apperance of these spots on the skin, just lets us know that it is happening everywhere. Lipofuscin pigment has been found in children as young as 10 years old.<br><br>Now for the good news mine are fading away. Some have done the same as other spots (the skin dried up, and fell off) others seem to be wearing away. I only have about 10 of them so I keep track of them (I can't count them because every time I look at myself naked in a mirror, I can't stop laughing ). I saw a picture of Dr. Johnie Lovewisdom (one of the old timers of raw foods) at 78 and he didn't appear to have any. his skin was as clear and youthful as a babies.<br><br>Every time I am tempted to eat something cooked, I just think of age spots.<br><br>Doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2001 Report Share Posted March 6, 2001 Wow, that's strange about your " spot " . I thought it went away but I guess not entirely. Mine is still there but it's looking some better. I just wish it would get the hell outta here and never come back!<br><br>Age spots. Aint they fun? I have a couple on the back of my hands and I swear they're lighter now. I didn't even notice it until you posted about them. That's something we can do without, eh?<br><br>Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw are still around? I thought those two were a couple of loons when I saw them on a talk show about 10 years ago. Jack Lalane was on that same show and you could tell he disagreed with everything they said. They said your body doesn't know the difference between a baked potato and a candy bar. I guess as far as carbs go, that may be true but what about all the other junk in a candy bar? It made no sense. I see they aren't very popular in the health/diet movement these days! Gee, I wonder why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2001 Report Share Posted March 6, 2001 YOU ARE RIGHT!!! Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw are a couple of LOONS, but they are two M.I.T. Phd Graduate sientists who are great at research. They get 'Loonie' with what they do, with their research, but the research is great. <br><br>They are trying to maintain health by taking extraodinary amounts of chemicals (vitamins and stranger stuff) so they can go on eating CRAP.<br><br>If you read between the lines, their books are pretty good<br><br>Doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2001 Report Share Posted March 7, 2001 Yup, I thought those two were looney tunes after seeing them on that talk show. Plus they don't exactly look like the picture of health, or anything even close to it. Ahem.<br><br> & lt; & lt; & lt;They are trying to maintain health by taking extraodinary amounts of chemicals (vitamins and stranger stuff) so they can go on eating CRAP. & gt; & gt; & gt;<br><br>That sums it up right there. They're way off base if they think that's the way to extend one's life! <br><br>KOO-KOO! KOO-KOO!<br><br> & lt; & lt; & lt;If you read between the lines, their books are pretty good & gt; & gt; & gt;<br><br>Actually, I like to read books that are straight forward and don't entail any reading between the lines. I saw their Life Extension book when it came out years ago and it's a friggin novel! I think War and Peace is much shorter ;~}<br><br>I couldn't fathom reading even one chapter from that book. Wait a sec! I think I DID read about a paragraph or two and it was soooooo confusing. They were throwing all sorts of ridiculous formulas at the reader or some such nonsense. It was hard to follow and had nothing at all to do with sensible advice like.... " eat organic produce for optimum health. " To be honest with you, I don't even know what they were trying to get at. Methinks they've fried out too many brain cells with all those supplements and junk food! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2001 Report Share Posted March 7, 2001 I agree with your take on Pearson/Shaw. They were WAY ahead of the curve on vitamin and nutrition research when they published their Life Extension book around 1980. Plus they were crazy and cocky enough to ingest huge amounts of chemicals. And for the people who are on this path, these 2 are more knowledgable than most. Many of the things they stated in their book did not become mainstream " knowledge " , or perhaps more correctly " belief " , until years later.<br><br>But nowadays I don't accept everything they stated as gospel. Particularly the idea that the body doesn't know the difference between a denatured carbohydrate (e.g. junk food or " power bar " ) and a fresh fruit or vegetable. I did note recently that they got involoved in the political and First Amendment issues surrounding the ability or inability of vitamin and herbal remedy producers to make health claims. I belive they scored a big success on this issue.<br><br>Having said all that, I don't believe anymore in taking large amounts of supplments, and I further believe if you're mostly raw, you don't need them. But if you " want " to abuse your body with bad food, drugs and alcohol, these 2 can tell you what supplements to take to mitigate some of the damage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.