Guest guest Posted April 12, 2001 Report Share Posted April 12, 2001 Blake,<br><br>The evidence I've seen suggesting that enzymes in food aid in digestion, stems from studies done of animals' pancreases. In a book entitled Enzyme Nutrition (I believe by a Doctor Edwin or Edward Howell) he cited studies that compared the pancreas size of animals that ate either raw or cooked. The cooked-food animals' pancreases were bigger, suggesting the body had to secrete more enzymes (i.e. work the pancreas harder) to digest cooked food than to digest raw food.<br><br>I also have seen a study quoted where calves' were given either pasteurized or unpasteurized milk. That study found that many calves died from pasteurized milk, even when it came from the calf's mother. This suggests something happens due to pasteurization (heating). A number of people believe one of the reasons dairy products seems to contribute to disease so much now, where they didn't in the past, has to do with pasteurization.. Presumably the problem is killing the enzymes, but there could be other negative effects from pasterization.<br><br>If you use kirlian photography to photograph a piece of fresh fruit, you will see the aura or " energy field " emanating from the fruit. You will not get this same effect from an inert or cooked object, and certainly not from irradiated food. A likely source of the energy field could be the enzymes, but it's possibly due to something else. So I tend to disagree with the author of the article you linked who scoffed at calling enzymes " live " .<br><br>I'm not sure how to address his point that even if you ingest live or active enzymes, they get destroyed in the stomach. Whether he's correct in his assertion or not, I go back to the first point about pancreas size and suggest enzymes do aid in digestion. I also point out that one reason fasting is considered healthy, is that the body does not have to secrete enzymes for digestion, but instead can direct those enzymes for internal repair.<br><br>Chinese taoist tradition and medicine considers the body's sperm, enzymes, hormones, etc. to be " vital essence " and it is generally believed if you recklessly waste your vital essence you will get run down and become more likely to develop disease. To the extent raw foods provide enzymes and help you conserve your own, I think that is good.<br><br>In summary, while I agree the significance of enzymes has not been studied nearly as extensively as other nutritional aspects of food, there are just too many know negatives arising from enzyme-dead food to discount the importance enzymes potentially play. I certainly feel there is a world of difference between a can of fruit and a fresh fruit. Wouldn't you choose fresh over canned? And if so, what is the biggest difference in your mind. From what I've read the vitamin and mineral loss is not as great as generally believed. I feel it has something to do with the enzymes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2001 Report Share Posted April 12, 2001 I make my life decisions based on my intuition... <br>I have no scientific evidence to back my feelings but it seems simple to me that we would want to eat what supports our life. Raw food is alive. Heated food isn't. If I take a raw seen and plant it, a tree will grow. In that seed is an incredible amount of power. This power to bring forward life is enzymes. Everyone has to make their own choices. I think for many it makes more sense to eat the seed that produces life, rather than one that would just rot if placed in the ground. Cook seeds rot. Raw seeds spring forth life. Which one would you choose? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2001 Report Share Posted April 13, 2001 Mallon,<br><br> " The evidence I've seen suggesting that enzymes in food aid in digestion, stems from studies done of animals' pancreases. In a book entitled Enzyme Nutrition (I believe by a Doctor Edwin or Edward Howell) he cited studies that compared the pancreas size of animals that ate either raw or cooked. The cooked-food animals' pancreases were bigger, suggesting the body had to secrete more enzymes (i.e. work the pancreas harder) to digest cooked food than to digest raw food. " <br><br>Yes I am aware of Howell and hos work and have read some of his work but I still disagree.<br>Evem if the pancreas thing is correct that does not neccessarily mean that dietary enzymes help to digest the food themselves.<br><br> " I also have seen a study quoted where calves' were given either pasteurized or unpasteurized milk. That study found that many calves died from pasteurized milk, even when it came from the calf's mother. This suggests something happens due to pasteurization (heating). A number of people believe one of the reasons dairy products seems to contribute to disease so much now, where they didn't in the past, has to do with pasteurization.. Presumably the problem is killing the enzymes, but there could be other negative effects from pasterization. " <br><br>I have heard of this study if anyone knows where I can read it fully or give me a reference please tell me. Pasteurization is a heating process, many chemical changes occur it doesn't have to be the enzymes that are at fault.<br><br> " I'm not sure how to address his point that even if you ingest live or active enzymes, they get destroyed in the stomach. Whether he's correct in his assertion or not, I go back to the first point about pancreas size and suggest enzymes do aid in digestion. " <br><br>Not destroyed but broken down into amino acids therefore losing it's abilities as an enzyme protein. This is correct as it's basic human biology which I learned last year.<br><br> " In summary, while I agree the significance of enzymes has not been studied nearly as extensively as other nutritional aspects of food, there are just too many know negatives arising from enzyme-dead food to discount the importance enzymes potentially play. " <br><br>But why does it have to be the enzymes?? It may well be some change that is yet to be understood.<br><br> " I certainly feel there is a world of difference between a can of fruit and a fresh fruit. Wouldn't you choose fresh over canned? " <br><br>You seem to think I am not in favor of raw which I am and have made clear before, I just question the mis-information surrounding raw. Yes raw fresh fruit is clearly superior to it's cooked counterpart.<br><br>Blake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2001 Report Share Posted April 13, 2001 leafygreens,,,<br><br> " This power to bring forward life is enzymes. " <br><br>But why, we don't know this. People involved in raw foods tend to believe everything that is thrown at them. I as a future nutrition professional can not afford to do this and I don't accept things unless there is good reason to believe so and good, ie not just anecdotal, evidence.<br><br>I think people get turned off raw foods when all they here is about enzymes.<br><br> & gt; & gt; & gt; " Cook seeds rot. Raw seeds spring forth life. Which one would you choose? " <br><br>I made it clear I am in favor of raw.<br><br> & gt; & gt; & gt; " I make my life decisions based on my intuition... " <br><br>My intuition tells me to go and eat some vegetarian pie my mum has sitting in the oven right now. My knowledge about health tells me to stick to the fast I am an despite cravings. <br><br> & gt; & gt; & gt; " Raw food is alive. Heated food isn't. " <br><br>Is juice or oils alive?? I don't think so but it's raw. <br><br><br>Blake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2001 Report Share Posted April 15, 2001 If you look back over these messages, you will see there is a lot more than just talk about enzymes.<br><br> In one of my posts I explain how enzymes from animal products are killed in the stomach, and that enzymes from plant sources are not. As you may have noticed I rarely state my opinion but rather cite the source.<br><br>This crap about enzymes being killed in the stomach is as old as dirt and just as jadded.<br><br>Doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2001 Report Share Posted April 17, 2001 Blake, <br>In all honesty, I think you should follow your intuition. Get out of your mind and into your body. I don't think one way of life is meant to fit everyone. If your feelings tell you to eat your mom's pie, then why would you not listen? I am 45 years old, and have recently discovered there is not a seed of truth in anything anyone has ever told me. Truth is only in my heart... what I discovered listening to my self. Go eat that pie. You know best what is best for you. If I was going to be a nutritionist , I would teach just one thing: put down the books and listen to your body. Listen by getting out of your head and into your senses. Everything we need to make all the right choices are all right here. Listen, smell, taste, feel, look. Then decide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2001 Report Share Posted April 17, 2001 Blake,<br><br>I don't disagree with anything in particular you say about enzymes. I also agree that even the arguments or studies I raise don't point conclusively to enzymes being the main benefit arising from raw food, as it well could be other or a combination of factors. It is an interesting subject and I wish more studies on it were published. Having said all that, in simple terms it's obvious raw is preferable to cooked so this is useful information to know and practice even if all the mechanisms are not well understood or even misunderstood.<br><br>To heat or not to heat. That is the question.<br><br>Cheers, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2001 Report Share Posted April 18, 2001 leafygreens,,,<br><br>How long have you been on your diet???<br><br>Many people can do really well on unbalanced diets for even years, such as 100% fruit, and then go down hill. If your still thriving after 5 or more years then your diet can't be too deficient.<br><br>What about the people who have done what you are doing, follow there intuition and end up sick with all kinds of serious deficiencies. Intuition is not enough IMO. We live in a such a different world to our ancestors.<br><br>How do you know your apparent intuition is not intertwine with a desire to cling to the ideology of raw vegan?? How do you know your intuition has not been messed up by previous decades of eating poorly.<br><br>If you have researched raw a lot you will know that most people do not survive on an all raw diet in the long term and there are very few long term healthy examples. Many of the thousands of people who have doen well for a few years then went down hill followed there intuition to eat fresh raw foods.<br><br>Have you analised your diet to check how balanced it is??? or would you see this as being not accurate as it is based upon cooked fooder standards??<br><br>BTW none of my post or previous post was supposed to sound negetive or aggressive if I was discussing these things ith you in person this would be clear but tone used in discussion forums can easily be misinterpreted.<br><br>Blake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.