Guest guest Posted July 7, 2003 Report Share Posted July 7, 2003 I have just recently started the Natural Hygeine way of eating. I have been a vegetarian for over 23 years, but have eaten dairy. Now, I'm off dairy with the exception of a little butter (for now). I have eaten only fruit before noon and then try to eat a salad twice a day along with steamed vegetables. I have also included nuts a few times a week. I believe that I've been discovering detox symptoms because I have had a bad headache a few days. Today I feel much better, but the day isn't over yet. Now I hear about cooked food addictions and going 100% raw. Wouldn't you say it would be perfectly o.k. to make this further transition for me a little more gradually since my body is already causing me so much discomfort? I have heard that eating the salad with lemon or with no dressing is best. However, I find it harder each day to eat my salad. I am buying organic mixed greens or other organic salad mix, and I find myself forcing myself to eat a small one. I look forward to the grounding feeling of my cooked vegetables, but I don't feel over compelled to eat as I did in the past. Although I hear what you are saying about food addiction, I feel myself enjoying the foods but I don't feel like I'm living to eat anymore like I did in the past. I actually feel like I have kicked my addiction. So I guess I'm asking a question to get validation for me moving slowly toward more (if not 100%) raw diet, and also some suggestions on how to do this. Although I am a vegetarian, I must admit there are quite a few vegetables that I do not like. From what I hear about fasting, that is supposed to clear the palate and help one learn to like more vegetables. But also from what I hear from the Natural Hygeine lectures from past conferences, that unless you do the fast under supervised conditions, you may cause more harm than good. Since I have gradually moved to where I am now, I feel like having all juice days and all fruit days and all raw days would be enough for me at least for the immediate future. I also heard that eating some rice or grains can help to eleviate some of the toxins thrown out into the bloodstream. Can anyone suggest any reading on or off line regarding the getting started stage? Hopefully, you will get the gist of what I am asking. Maybe some of you remember back when you first got started and what things helped you. Thanks. Viveca I am on digest version and don't mind anyone writing to me personally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2003 Report Share Posted July 8, 2003 Viveca, I am replying to your question about fasting without supervision. People can go into a fast from all kinds of starting points and there are caveats. Thus and medical practitioner of experience who has seen the mistakes possible made would in honesty advise his supervision. I have been on half a dozen fasts without any medical supervision and have had nothing but positive results from all of them. As a matter of reality I have never met a medic who thought that a fast was likely to have any benefit to health at all. They usually mumble about missing nutrients and then hunt for a change of subject in the conversation with me. I have read about fasting and there are a three of trump cards I keep around which I would use if I had ever felt any troubles coming on. The are: 1. Add a little juice to my water and see whether the problem goes away 2. Slowly break the fast and try again 3 months time. 3. Admit defeat and visit a medic. When you read about fasting you will read about a horrifying bunch of symptoms that can come your way. The only two that came my way were mouth sores and a sore throat. I boosted the water intake for the latter. As I have said before and lots of hygienist/raw food proponents have also said a fast is an excellent way of allowing the body to heal itself and get off again on the right foot. I came into a full raw diet after a 28 day water fast and never suffered any of the problems of cooked food addiction. Another early experience of going raw was the odd mouth bite. Hope this helps Peter Viveca Park [vivecapark] 07 July 2003 18:21 rawfood [Raw Food] raw vs 80/90% raw I have just recently started the Natural Hygeine way of eating. I have been a vegetarian for over 23 years, but have eaten dairy. Now, I'm off dairy with the exception of a little butter (for now). I have eaten only fruit before noon and then try to eat a salad twice a day along with steamed vegetables. I have also included nuts a few times a week. I believe that I've been discovering detox symptoms because I have had a bad headache a few days. Today I feel much better, but the day isn't over yet. Now I hear about cooked food addictions and going 100% raw. Wouldn't you say it would be perfectly o.k. to make this further transition for me a little more gradually since my body is already causing me so much discomfort? I have heard that eating the salad with lemon or with no dressing is best. However, I find it harder each day to eat my salad. I am buying organic mixed greens or other organic salad mix, and I find myself forcing myself to eat a small one. I look forward to the grounding feeling of my cooked vegetables, but I don't feel over compelled to eat as I did in the past. Although I hear what you are saying about food addiction, I feel myself enjoying the foods but I don't feel like I'm living to eat anymore like I did in the past. I actually feel like I have kicked my addiction. So I guess I'm asking a question to get validation for me moving slowly toward more (if not 100%) raw diet, and also some suggestions on how to do this. Although I am a vegetarian, I must admit there are quite a few vegetables that I do not like. From what I hear about fasting, that is supposed to clear the palate and help one learn to like more vegetables. But also from what I hear from the Natural Hygeine lectures from past conferences, that unless you do the fast under supervised conditions, you may cause more harm than good. Since I have gradually moved to where I am now, I feel like having all juice days and all fruit days and all raw days would be enough for me at least for the immediate future. I also heard that eating some rice or grains can help to eleviate some of the toxins thrown out into the bloodstream. Can anyone suggest any reading on or off line regarding the getting started stage? Hopefully, you will get the gist of what I am asking. Maybe some of you remember back when you first got started and what things helped you. Thanks. Viveca I am on digest version and don't mind anyone writing to me personally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2003 Report Share Posted July 8, 2003 Viveca; First of all about fasting; I know exactly what you are feeling. I just did my first fast just recently. I work in construction and I could not possibly take any time off. I work between 10 and 12 sometimes 14 hours a day. I work hard all day long. I was honestly scared of what would happen if I had problems at work. I spend a lot of time high up on ladders and scaffolding. Not a good place to get dizzy. But you must understand, that your senses will not be less at that time, but sharper and clearer. Fasting does not harm your ability to make decisions. Every morning I stopped on the way to work and picked up a bottle of fresh squeezed orange juice, and put it in my cooler. If I became dizzy or felt weird (which happened) I just drank the juice. I actually had more energy and focus then I have now. As far as transitioning to raw, I have read a lot about the subject, and I think what you are doing is perfect. As far as being addicted to cooked food; we don't get over addictions. We learn to cope with them. I know I have a monster sleeping inside me. As long as I eat only raw foods. And get support from you guys. He will sleep comfortably and leave me alone. But if my tongue touches something cooked, he might wake up and take control of my body and soul. As far as having vegetables that you don't like. That will change. Going raw is the biggest change you will ever go through in your life. You will fall in love with the oddest fruits and vegetables. I remember I fell in love with a weed and ran around like a nut trying to get my friends to just taste it. It tastes like crap to me now but I guess it was something I needed at the time. Doug rawfood , " Viveca Park " <vivecapark@a...> wrote: > I have just recently started the Natural Hygeine way of eating. > I have been a vegetarian for over 23 years, but have eaten dairy. > Now, I'm off dairy with the exception of a little butter (for > now). I have eaten only fruit before noon and then try to eat a > salad twice a day along with steamed vegetables. I have also > included nuts a few times a week. > > I believe that I've been discovering detox symptoms because I > have had a bad headache a few days. Today I feel much better, > but the day isn't over yet. Now I hear about cooked food > addictions and going 100% raw. Wouldn't you say it would be > perfectly o.k. to make this further transition for me a little > more gradually since my body is already causing me so much > discomfort? > > I have heard that eating the salad with lemon or with no dressing > is best. However, I find it harder each day to eat my salad. I > am buying organic mixed greens or other organic salad mix, and I > find myself forcing myself to eat a small one. I look forward to > the grounding feeling of my cooked vegetables, but I don't feel > over compelled to eat as I did in the past. Although I hear what > you are saying about food addiction, I feel myself enjoying the > foods but I don't feel like I'm living to eat anymore like I did > in the past. I actually feel like I have kicked my addiction. > > So I guess I'm asking a question to get validation for me moving > slowly toward more (if not 100%) raw diet, and also some > suggestions on how to do this. Although I am a vegetarian, I > must admit there are quite a few vegetables that I do not like. > From what I hear about fasting, that is supposed to clear the > palate and help one learn to like more vegetables. But also > from what I hear from the Natural Hygeine lectures from past > conferences, that unless you do the fast under supervised > conditions, you may cause more harm than good. > > Since I have gradually moved to where I am now, I feel like > having all juice days and all fruit days and all raw days would > be enough for me at least for the immediate future. I also heard > that eating some rice or grains can help to eleviate some of the > toxins thrown out into the bloodstream. Can anyone suggest any > reading on or off line regarding the getting started stage? > > Hopefully, you will get the gist of what I am asking. Maybe some > of you remember back when you first got started and what things > helped you. > > Thanks. > > Viveca > I am on digest version and don't mind anyone writing to me > personally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2003 Report Share Posted July 8, 2003 Hi, This is Fred, Rose's other half. I have just joined this group a few days ago. I do not articulate as well as Rose does so my words will be fewer. I am not happy with the word addiction. The term give the reader a hopless state of being a prisoner. Rose was smoking 4-5 packs of cigarettes a day in 1978 when we met a block away from Barnes and Noble in Manhattan. That night or the following day, she threw away her pack of cigarettes and stopped smoking. There was no withdrawal affects. So much for the term addiction. If we find one person whose symptoms invalidates the definition, then the definition is invalid not the person. Fred SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2003 Report Share Posted July 8, 2003 I'm reading Rational Fasting by Arnold Ehret right now...you might want to check it out. Bridgitte Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2003 Report Share Posted July 8, 2003 bridgitte, that is a very good book. i loved his mucusless healing diet system too. At 02:22 PM 7/8/2003 +0000, you wrote: > > I'm reading Rational Fasting by Arnold Ehret right now...you might > want to check it out. > > Bridgitte > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2003 Report Share Posted July 8, 2003 > > > I am not happy with the word addiction. The term give the reader a hopless state of being a prisoner. I read Victoria Boutenko's " 12 Steps to Raw Food " , and she found that if she approached cooked food as an addiction (thus the 12 steps) people were more successful at staying raw. I look at it as more of a possibility than the truth, and following the steps certainly helped get me to go raw in the first place. I think that it *can* give the impression of being a prisoner, but that's why the word addiction keeps coming up in posts. Bridgitte Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2003 Report Share Posted July 9, 2003 Hi Fred; welcome to the club. In your post you said " If we find one person whose symptoms invalidates the definition, then the definition is invalid not the person. " I was taught in high school that in nature there is an exception to every rule. It does not invalidate the rule, it only shows that there are exceptions. The reason I am doing this is that we have a failure rate among would be raw foodists, not only out there in the world, but right here in this club of about 98%. This is virtually the same rate as people trying to get off alcohol and drugs on their own, without help. When people go through a 12 step program. For alcohol, drugs, or cooked food, the success rate dramatically increases to near 100%. When a person admits to addiction it is a liberating experience. Suddenly you have a list of things to do, to find your way out of it. 12 things. Quite the opposite of the " hopless state of being a prisoner. " That you mention. I love being raw, soon I will have been raw for 4 years. When I went raw I had skin cancer, prostrate problems, I had arthritis so bad I had to sleep sitting up in a chair. Now I am healthier than I was when I was a child. I want everyone to feel the way I do. I don't want people to die young of needless diseases. This is a proven method to increase the success rate of raw foodist. If we can increase the success rate we can save more lives. If you say you are not addicted, that's fine with me. I'm not saying that anyone is addicted. What I'm saying is that cooked food contains nearly 2000 chemicals that have been proven in laboratory experiments to be addictive. It is possible that we might be addicted. This is something you have to discover in yourself. I only know that I am. Doug rawfood , fred lieberman <fred_lieberman> wrote: > Hi, > > This is Fred, Rose's other half. I have just joined this group a few days ago. I do not articulate as well as Rose does so my words will be fewer. > > > I am not happy with the word addiction. The term give the reader a hopless state of being a prisoner. Rose was smoking 4-5 packs of cigarettes a day in 1978 when we met a block away from Barnes and Noble in Manhattan. That night or the following day, she threw away her pack of cigarettes and stopped smoking. There was no withdrawal affects. So much for the term addiction. > > If we find one person whose symptoms invalidates the definition, then the definition is invalid not the person. > > Fred > > > > > SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2003 Report Share Posted July 9, 2003 Doug & Fred, I ask myself at what point does a habit become an addiction? There are stacks of addictions easy to kick and there are a few that are the devil. The drop out rate of raw foodism is astonishing to me. Occasionally I see a raw foodist on TV and the vitality from them is highly reinforcing. I sometimes speculate upon the effect of altering the communication level in this forum. By somehow adding in the messenger facility to some degree with or without webcams and so forth. Of course such notions are risky. Why tamper with something that is working? It may have been tried before and abandoned. It could last a bit or be a roaring success. Are we experimental and moving with the times? Personally I enjoyed the format of the old CompuServe forums where there was a library and typed messages could flip back and forth and so too the voice. I also use the messenger all the time for my friends and relatives. Should this question have been addressed to Orionsdad? Peter kauguy [no_reply ] 09 July 2003 06:03 rawfood [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw Hi Fred; welcome to the club. In your post you said " If we find one person whose symptoms invalidates the definition, then the definition is invalid not the person. " I was taught in high school that in nature there is an exception to every rule. It does not invalidate the rule, it only shows that there are exceptions. The reason I am doing this is that we have a failure rate among would be raw foodists, not only out there in the world, but right here in this club of about 98%. This is virtually the same rate as people trying to get off alcohol and drugs on their own, without help. When people go through a 12 step program. For alcohol, drugs, or cooked food, the success rate dramatically increases to near 100%. When a person admits to addiction it is a liberating experience. Suddenly you have a list of things to do, to find your way out of it. 12 things. Quite the opposite of the " hopless state of being a prisoner. " That you mention. I love being raw, soon I will have been raw for 4 years. When I went raw I had skin cancer, prostrate problems, I had arthritis so bad I had to sleep sitting up in a chair. Now I am healthier than I was when I was a child. I want everyone to feel the way I do. I don't want people to die young of needless diseases. This is a proven method to increase the success rate of raw foodist. If we can increase the success rate we can save more lives. If you say you are not addicted, that's fine with me. I'm not saying that anyone is addicted. What I'm saying is that cooked food contains nearly 2000 chemicals that have been proven in laboratory experiments to be addictive. It is possible that we might be addicted. This is something you have to discover in yourself. I only know that I am. Doug rawfood , fred lieberman <fred_lieberman> wrote: > Hi, > > This is Fred, Rose's other half. I have just joined this group a few days ago. I do not articulate as well as Rose does so my words will be fewer. > > > I am not happy with the word addiction. The term give the reader a hopless state of being a prisoner. Rose was smoking 4-5 packs of cigarettes a day in 1978 when we met a block away from Barnes and Noble in Manhattan. That night or the following day, she threw away her pack of cigarettes and stopped smoking. There was no withdrawal affects. So much for the term addiction. > > If we find one person whose symptoms invalidates the definition, then the definition is invalid not the person. > > Fred > > > > > SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2003 Report Share Posted July 10, 2003 Peter; We did try the group chat room a few years ago, and it didn't work out. The group at that time was to small. I think we should try again. When that happy face beside our name on each message is lit up, I think we can chat with that person. But I don't know how it works. Doug rawfood , " Peter Gardiner " <petergardiner@e...> wrote: > Doug & Fred, > > I ask myself at what point does a habit become an addiction? > > There are stacks of addictions easy to kick and there are a few > that are the devil. > > The drop out rate of raw foodism is astonishing to me. Occasionally > I see a raw foodist on TV and the vitality from them is highly > reinforcing. > > I sometimes speculate upon the effect of altering the communication > level in this forum. By somehow adding in the messenger facility > to some degree with or without webcams and so forth. Of course such > notions are risky. Why tamper with something that is working? It may > have been tried before and abandoned. It could last a bit or be a > roaring success. Are we experimental and moving with the times? > > Personally I enjoyed the format of the old CompuServe forums where there > was a library and typed messages could flip back and forth and so too > the > voice. I also use the messenger all the time for my friends and > relatives. > > Should this question have been addressed to Orionsdad? > > Peter > > > > kauguy [no_reply ] > 09 July 2003 06:03 > rawfood > [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw > > > > Hi Fred; welcome to the club. > > In your post you said " If we find one person whose symptoms > invalidates the definition, then the definition is invalid not the > person. " I was taught in high school that in nature there is an > exception to every rule. It does not invalidate the rule, it only > shows that there are exceptions. > > The reason I am doing this is that we have a failure rate among would > be raw foodists, not only out there in the world, but right here in > this club of about 98%. This is virtually the same rate as people > trying to get off alcohol and drugs on their own, without help. When > people go through a 12 step program. For alcohol, drugs, or cooked > food, the success rate dramatically increases to near 100%. > > When a person admits to addiction it is a liberating experience. > Suddenly you have a list of things to do, to find your way out of it. > 12 things. Quite the opposite of the " hopless state of being a > prisoner. " That you mention. I love being raw, soon I will have been > raw for 4 years. When I went raw I had skin cancer, prostrate > problems, I had arthritis so bad I had to sleep sitting up in a > chair. Now I am healthier than I was when I was a child. I want > everyone to feel the way I do. I don't want people to die young of > needless diseases. This is a proven method to increase the success > rate of raw foodist. If we can increase the success rate we can save > more lives. > > If you say you are not addicted, that's fine with me. I'm not saying > that anyone is addicted. What I'm saying is that cooked food contains > nearly 2000 chemicals that have been proven in laboratory experiments > to be addictive. It is possible that we might be addicted. This is > something you have to discover in yourself. I only know that I am. > > Doug > > > > > rawfood , fred lieberman <fred_lieberman> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is Fred, Rose's other half. I have just joined this group a > few days ago. I do not articulate as well as Rose does so my words > will be fewer. > > > > > > I am not happy with the word addiction. The term give the reader a > hopless state of being a prisoner. Rose was smoking 4-5 packs of > cigarettes a day in 1978 when we met a block away from Barnes and > Noble in Manhattan. That night or the following day, she threw away > her pack of cigarettes and stopped smoking. There was no withdrawal > affects. So much for the term addiction. > > > > If we find one person whose symptoms invalidates the definition, > then the definition is invalid not the person. > > > > Fred > > > > > > > > > > SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2003 Report Share Posted July 10, 2003 Doug, The signs are that some sort of revival may be on the way. Frankly I have clicked on the chat room that seems to be there already but it did not work. Personally, I like to be on the cutting edge. Raw Food is cutting edge as eventually everybody will be doing it. To put that in a cutting edge forum makes sense to me. Sometimes things have to lie around a little until they are used. We will see. Peter kauguy [no_reply ] 10 July 2003 03:57 rawfood [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw Peter; We did try the group chat room a few years ago, and it didn't work out. The group at that time was to small. I think we should try again. When that happy face beside our name on each message is lit up, I think we can chat with that person. But I don't know how it works. Doug rawfood , " Peter Gardiner " <petergardiner@e...> wrote: > Doug & Fred, > > I ask myself at what point does a habit become an addiction? > > There are stacks of addictions easy to kick and there are a few that > are the devil. > > The drop out rate of raw foodism is astonishing to me. Occasionally I > see a raw foodist on TV and the vitality from them is highly > reinforcing. > > I sometimes speculate upon the effect of altering the communication > level in this forum. By somehow adding in the messenger facility > to some degree with or without webcams and so forth. Of course such > notions are risky. Why tamper with something that is working? It may > have been tried before and abandoned. It could last a bit or be a > roaring success. Are we experimental and moving with the times? > > Personally I enjoyed the format of the old CompuServe forums where there > was a library and typed messages could flip back and forth and so too > the > voice. I also use the messenger all the time for my friends and > relatives. > > Should this question have been addressed to Orionsdad? > > Peter > > > > kauguy [no_reply ] > 09 July 2003 06:03 > rawfood > [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw > > > > Hi Fred; welcome to the club. > > In your post you said " If we find one person whose symptoms > invalidates the definition, then the definition is invalid not the > person. " I was taught in high school that in nature there is an > exception to every rule. It does not invalidate the rule, it only > shows that there are exceptions. > > The reason I am doing this is that we have a failure rate among would > be raw foodists, not only out there in the world, but right here in > this club of about 98%. This is virtually the same rate as people > trying to get off alcohol and drugs on their own, without help. When > people go through a 12 step program. For alcohol, drugs, or cooked > food, the success rate dramatically increases to near 100%. > > When a person admits to addiction it is a liberating experience. > Suddenly you have a list of things to do, to find your way out of it. > 12 things. Quite the opposite of the " hopless state of being a > prisoner. " That you mention. I love being raw, soon I will have been > raw for 4 years. When I went raw I had skin cancer, prostrate > problems, I had arthritis so bad I had to sleep sitting up in a > chair. Now I am healthier than I was when I was a child. I want > everyone to feel the way I do. I don't want people to die young of > needless diseases. This is a proven method to increase the success > rate of raw foodist. If we can increase the success rate we can save > more lives. > > If you say you are not addicted, that's fine with me. I'm not saying > that anyone is addicted. What I'm saying is that cooked food contains > nearly 2000 chemicals that have been proven in laboratory experiments > to be addictive. It is possible that we might be addicted. This is > something you have to discover in yourself. I only know that I am. > > Doug > > > > > rawfood , fred lieberman <fred_lieberman> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is Fred, Rose's other half. I have just joined this group a > few days ago. I do not articulate as well as Rose does so my words > will be fewer. > > > > > > I am not happy with the word addiction. The term give the reader a > hopless state of being a prisoner. Rose was smoking 4-5 packs of > cigarettes a day in 1978 when we met a block away from Barnes and > Noble in Manhattan. That night or the following day, she threw away > her pack of cigarettes and stopped smoking. There was no withdrawal > affects. So much for the term addiction. > > > > If we find one person whose symptoms invalidates the definition, > then the definition is invalid not the person. > > > > Fred > > > > > > > > > > SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2003 Report Share Posted July 10, 2003 Doug, My Messenger ID is peterpfgardiner. Drop in time! Peter kauguy [no_reply ] 10 July 2003 03:57 rawfood [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw Peter; We did try the group chat room a few years ago, and it didn't work out. The group at that time was to small. I think we should try again. When that happy face beside our name on each message is lit up, I think we can chat with that person. But I don't know how it works. Doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2003 Report Share Posted July 11, 2003 Peter Gardiner wrote: " Raw Food is cutting edge as eventually everybody will be doing it. " Do you really think so Peter? How long do you think it's going to take before everyone realizes the benefits of a raw diet and switches over? Personally I think it will never happen! I have seen and heard so many people react to a raw vegan diet like " Oh I could NEVER leave grains " or " I really NEED meat at every meal " or " Well WHAT do you eat then if you can't eat dairy and grains " and so on. People are ready to even face death instead of change their diet. They'll grab medicines instead of a lettuce. Anything as long as they can stay on their cooked diet full of bread, dairy and meat. Sad, but I think that human kind will face its end before we are all raw. /Mimi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2003 Report Share Posted July 11, 2003 Me. Call me Don Quixote if you like. Who would have thought 20 years ago that we would all be on the internet. Bill Gates and a few others! It will take 50 years at least at my best guess. That is based upon nothing scientific. Peter raw_peas [no_reply ] 11 July 2003 07:25 rawfood [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw Peter Gardiner wrote: " Raw Food is cutting edge as eventually everybody will be doing it. " Do you really think so Peter? How long do you think it's going to take before everyone realizes the benefits of a raw diet and switches over? Personally I think it will never happen! I have seen and heard so many people react to a raw vegan diet like " Oh I could NEVER leave grains " or " I really NEED meat at every meal " or " Well WHAT do you eat then if you can't eat dairy and grains " and so on. People are ready to even face death instead of change their diet. They'll grab medicines instead of a lettuce. Anything as long as they can stay on their cooked diet full of bread, dairy and meat. Sad, but I think that human kind will face its end before we are all raw. /Mimi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2003 Report Share Posted July 11, 2003 > > > > > Me. > > Call me Don Quixote if you like. > Who would have thought 20 years ago that we would all be on the > internet. > > Bill Gates and a few others! > > It will take 50 years at least at my best guess. That is based upon > nothing > scientific. > > Peter > Peter, i'm so much with you on this! i'm expecting a vegan world before 2050, then a raw vegan world would only need a maximum of 1 decade after the first slide! See, how easy it is, if on vegan helps one omnivorous going vegan every year... that's just this!! Same process for the cook & the raw! f Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2003 Report Share Posted July 12, 2003 Peter; I am in the process of getting wired. I went out today and bought a web cam. Tomorrow I will sign up for mesenger. Can we do Videoconferencing with ? That would be great. What are we going to do about the problem of me living on the other side of the planet? Maybe I will SEE you online. Doug rawfood , " Peter Gardiner " <petergardiner@e...> wrote: > > Doug, > > My Messenger ID is peterpfgardiner. Drop in time! > > Peter > > kauguy [no_reply ] > 10 July 2003 03:57 > rawfood > [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw > > > > Peter; > > We did try the group chat room a few years ago, and it didn't work > out. The group at that time was to small. I think we should try > again. When that happy face beside our name on each message is lit > up, I think we can chat with that person. But I don't know how it > works. > > Doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2003 Report Share Posted July 12, 2003 Doug, messenger works well with voice and web camera. It is a good idea to have the headphones otherwise the feedback is a problem. My time is very flexible as I do not have hours of work. Given we have 12 hours difference, your evening would be my morning! Easy. Peter kauguy [no_reply ] 12 July 2003 08:16 rawfood [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw Peter; I am in the process of getting wired. I went out today and bought a web cam. Tomorrow I will sign up for mesenger. Can we do Videoconferencing with ? That would be great. What are we going to do about the problem of me living on the other side of the planet? Maybe I will SEE you online. Doug rawfood , " Peter Gardiner " <petergardiner@e...> wrote: > > Doug, > > My Messenger ID is peterpfgardiner. Drop in time! > > Peter > > kauguy [no_reply ] > 10 July 2003 03:57 > rawfood > [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw > > > > Peter; > > We did try the group chat room a few years ago, and it didn't work > out. The group at that time was to small. I think we should try > again. When that happy face beside our name on each message is lit > up, I think we can chat with that person. But I don't know how it > works. > > Doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2003 Report Share Posted July 12, 2003 Peter; I'm all signed up. My messenger ID is kauguy. I don't think I can use my camera yet, I have slow dial up connection. But even as we speak I am being upgraded to broad band. It should be up and running later next week. But they told me that 2 months ago. This is a new company just starting up, and they have a lot of bugs in the system. Doug rawfood , " Peter Gardiner " <petergardiner@e...> wrote: > > Doug, > > My Messenger ID is peterpfgardiner. Drop in time! > > Peter > > kauguy [no_reply ] > 10 July 2003 03:57 > rawfood > [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw > > > > Peter; > > We did try the group chat room a few years ago, and it didn't work > out. The group at that time was to small. I think we should try > again. When that happy face beside our name on each message is lit > up, I think we can chat with that person. But I don't know how it > works. > > Doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2003 Report Share Posted July 14, 2003 Hi Peter Certainly enjoy this group!!! Do you think that we need to talk about raw food diet to more people more often? My hubby, Austin, is getting a little bored but I just keep on talking. He's supportive of the raw food approach until it reaches his dinner plate...then...where's the usual meal. (Arrrrggghhh) Anyway it seems to me that educate, educate, educate is the only way. After all, an infant has to be forced to eat cooked meat. That's some education process. If someone comments that I'm looking great the reply is that I'm eating a lot of raw foods now and feel so much better. They look slightly funny at the reply but it is my hope that they'll think about it. George Malkmus has written a book about his own health struggles. His book got me started on the quest for a raw foods diet. Diane Peter Gardiner <petergardiner wrote: Me. Call me Don Quixote if you like. Who would have thought 20 years ago that we would all be on the internet. Bill Gates and a few others! It will take 50 years at least at my best guess. That is based upon nothing scientific. Peter raw_peas [no_reply ] 11 July 2003 07:25 rawfood [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw Peter Gardiner wrote: " Raw Food is cutting edge as eventually everybody will be doing it. " Do you really think so Peter? How long do you think it's going to take before everyone realizes the benefits of a raw diet and switches over? Personally I think it will never happen! I have seen and heard so many people react to a raw vegan diet like " Oh I could NEVER leave grains " or " I really NEED meat at every meal " or " Well WHAT do you eat then if you can't eat dairy and grains " and so on. People are ready to even face death instead of change their diet. They'll grab medicines instead of a lettuce. Anything as long as they can stay on their cooked diet full of bread, dairy and meat. Sad, but I think that human kind will face its end before we are all raw. /Mimi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2003 Report Share Posted July 14, 2003 rawfood , Diane Law <joy2knit> wrote: > Hi Peter > > Certainly enjoy this group!!! > > Do you think that we need to talk about raw food diet to more people more often? My hubby, Austin, is getting a little bored but I just keep on talking. He's supportive of the raw food approach until it reaches his dinner plate...then...where's the usual meal. (Arrrrggghhh) > I know that you addressed this to Peter, but I have a thing or two to say on the subject... I never bring up my diet unless somebody asks. Otherwise it starts to sound preachy and people just aren't interested. Like if someone asks how I lost weight, or why I don't get sick, or if they complain about feeling crappy I'll tell them what worked for me. I think they best way to " spread the word " is to lead by example - people will be naturally curious. Bridgitte Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2003 Report Share Posted July 14, 2003 Diane, My opinion is not that important. Pythagoras was a raw foodist in - 300bc +. At that rate, given the present, you can push the multiplier button on how long it will all take to get the world straight. Have not read George Malkmus. Clearly your husband is patient which is more than sufficient to rejoice. I like your style. Peter Diane Law [joy2knit] 14 July 2003 21:31 rawfood RE: [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw Hi Peter Certainly enjoy this group!!! Do you think that we need to talk about raw food diet to more people more often? My hubby, Austin, is getting a little bored but I just keep on talking. He's supportive of the raw food approach until it reaches his dinner plate...then...where's the usual meal. (Arrrrggghhh) Anyway it seems to me that educate, educate, educate is the only way. After all, an infant has to be forced to eat cooked meat. That's some education process. If someone comments that I'm looking great the reply is that I'm eating a lot of raw foods now and feel so much better. They look slightly funny at the reply but it is my hope that they'll think about it. George Malkmus has written a book about his own health struggles. His book got me started on the quest for a raw foods diet. Diane Peter Gardiner <petergardiner wrote: Me. Call me Don Quixote if you like. Who would have thought 20 years ago that we would all be on the internet. Bill Gates and a few others! It will take 50 years at least at my best guess. That is based upon nothing scientific. Peter raw_peas [no_reply ] 11 July 2003 07:25 rawfood [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw Peter Gardiner wrote: " Raw Food is cutting edge as eventually everybody will be doing it. " Do you really think so Peter? How long do you think it's going to take before everyone realizes the benefits of a raw diet and switches over? Personally I think it will never happen! I have seen and heard so many people react to a raw vegan diet like " Oh I could NEVER leave grains " or " I really NEED meat at every meal " or " Well WHAT do you eat then if you can't eat dairy and grains " and so on. People are ready to even face death instead of change their diet. They'll grab medicines instead of a lettuce. Anything as long as they can stay on their cooked diet full of bread, dairy and meat. Sad, but I think that human kind will face its end before we are all raw. /Mimi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2003 Report Share Posted July 15, 2003 Hi Bridgitte I agree with you about *preachy*. Can't stand that sort of thing. It's quite possible to mention thatchanging my diet has helped me feel better and leave it at that. Strong-arming leaves me cold! It also ocurrs to me that non-raw foodist are always happy to talk about what they eat because this or that tastes sooo good. Then they continue with the pills tha they are taking because they feel so rotten. These comments are merely observations. Diane Bridgitte <syndactylcat wrote: rawfood , Diane Law <joy2knit> wrote: > Hi Peter > > Certainly enjoy this group!!! > > Do you think that we need to talk about raw food diet to more people more often? My hubby, Austin, is getting a little bored but I just keep on talking. He's supportive of the raw food approach until it reaches his dinner plate...then...where's the usual meal. (Arrrrggghhh) > I know that you addressed this to Peter, but I have a thing or two to say on the subject... I never bring up my diet unless somebody asks. Otherwise it starts to sound preachy and people just aren't interested. Like if someone asks how I lost weight, or why I don't get sick, or if they complain about feeling crappy I'll tell them what worked for me. I think they best way to " spread the word " is to lead by example - people will be naturally curious. Bridgitte Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.