Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

raw vs 80/90% raw

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I have just recently started the Natural Hygeine way of eating.

I have been a vegetarian for over 23 years, but have eaten dairy.

Now, I'm off dairy with the exception of a little butter (for

now). I have eaten only fruit before noon and then try to eat a

salad twice a day along with steamed vegetables. I have also

included nuts a few times a week.

 

I believe that I've been discovering detox symptoms because I

have had a bad headache a few days. Today I feel much better,

but the day isn't over yet. Now I hear about cooked food

addictions and going 100% raw. Wouldn't you say it would be

perfectly o.k. to make this further transition for me a little

more gradually since my body is already causing me so much

discomfort?

 

I have heard that eating the salad with lemon or with no dressing

is best. However, I find it harder each day to eat my salad. I

am buying organic mixed greens or other organic salad mix, and I

find myself forcing myself to eat a small one. I look forward to

the grounding feeling of my cooked vegetables, but I don't feel

over compelled to eat as I did in the past. Although I hear what

you are saying about food addiction, I feel myself enjoying the

foods but I don't feel like I'm living to eat anymore like I did

in the past. I actually feel like I have kicked my addiction.

 

So I guess I'm asking a question to get validation for me moving

slowly toward more (if not 100%) raw diet, and also some

suggestions on how to do this. Although I am a vegetarian, I

must admit there are quite a few vegetables that I do not like.

From what I hear about fasting, that is supposed to clear the

palate and help one learn to like more vegetables. But also

from what I hear from the Natural Hygeine lectures from past

conferences, that unless you do the fast under supervised

conditions, you may cause more harm than good.

 

Since I have gradually moved to where I am now, I feel like

having all juice days and all fruit days and all raw days would

be enough for me at least for the immediate future. I also heard

that eating some rice or grains can help to eleviate some of the

toxins thrown out into the bloodstream. Can anyone suggest any

reading on or off line regarding the getting started stage?

 

Hopefully, you will get the gist of what I am asking. Maybe some

of you remember back when you first got started and what things

helped you.

 

Thanks.

 

Viveca

I am on digest version and don't mind anyone writing to me

personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Viveca,

 

I am replying to your question about fasting without supervision.

 

People can go into a fast from all kinds of starting points and there

are caveats.

 

Thus and medical practitioner of experience who has seen the mistakes

possible made would in honesty advise his supervision.

 

I have been on half a dozen fasts without any medical supervision and

have had nothing but positive results from all of them. As a matter of

reality I have never met a medic who thought that a fast was likely to

have any benefit to health at all. They usually mumble about missing

nutrients and then hunt for a change of subject in the conversation with

me.

 

I have read about fasting and there are a three of trump cards I keep

around which I would use if I had ever felt any troubles coming on.

 

The are:

 

1. Add a little juice to my water and see whether the problem goes

away

2. Slowly break the fast and try again 3 months time.

3. Admit defeat and visit a medic.

 

When you read about fasting you will read about a horrifying bunch of

symptoms that can come your way. The

only two that came my way were mouth sores and a sore throat. I boosted

the water intake for the latter.

 

As I have said before and lots of hygienist/raw food proponents have

also said a fast is an excellent way

of allowing the body to heal itself and get off again on the right foot.

I came into a full raw diet

after a 28 day water fast and never suffered any of the problems of

cooked food addiction.

 

Another early experience of going raw was the odd mouth bite.

 

Hope this helps

 

Peter

 

 

Viveca Park [vivecapark]

07 July 2003 18:21

rawfood

[Raw Food] raw vs 80/90% raw

 

 

 

I have just recently started the Natural Hygeine way of eating. I have

been a vegetarian for over 23 years, but have eaten dairy. Now, I'm off

dairy with the exception of a little butter (for now). I have eaten

only fruit before noon and then try to eat a

salad twice a day along with steamed vegetables. I have also

included nuts a few times a week.

 

I believe that I've been discovering detox symptoms because I have had a

bad headache a few days. Today I feel much better, but the day isn't

over yet. Now I hear about cooked food addictions and going 100% raw.

Wouldn't you say it would be perfectly o.k. to make this further

transition for me a little more gradually since my body is already

causing me so much discomfort?

 

I have heard that eating the salad with lemon or with no dressing is

best. However, I find it harder each day to eat my salad. I am buying

organic mixed greens or other organic salad mix, and I find myself

forcing myself to eat a small one. I look forward to the grounding

feeling of my cooked vegetables, but I don't feel over compelled to eat

as I did in the past. Although I hear what you are saying about food

addiction, I feel myself enjoying the foods but I don't feel like I'm

living to eat anymore like I did in the past. I actually feel like I

have kicked my addiction.

 

So I guess I'm asking a question to get validation for me moving slowly

toward more (if not 100%) raw diet, and also some suggestions on how to

do this. Although I am a vegetarian, I must admit there are quite a few

vegetables that I do not like. From what I hear about fasting, that is

supposed to clear the palate and help one learn to like more

vegetables. But also from what I hear from the Natural Hygeine lectures

from past conferences, that unless you do the fast under supervised

conditions, you may cause more harm than good.

 

Since I have gradually moved to where I am now, I feel like having all

juice days and all fruit days and all raw days would be enough for me at

least for the immediate future. I also heard that eating some rice or

grains can help to eleviate some of the toxins thrown out into the

bloodstream. Can anyone suggest any reading on or off line regarding

the getting started stage?

 

Hopefully, you will get the gist of what I am asking. Maybe some of you

remember back when you first got started and what things helped you.

 

Thanks.

 

Viveca

I am on digest version and don't mind anyone writing to me personally.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Viveca;

 

First of all about fasting; I know exactly what you are feeling. I

just did my first fast just recently. I work in construction and I

could not possibly take any time off. I work between 10 and 12

sometimes 14 hours a day. I work hard all day long. I was honestly

scared of what would happen if I had problems at work. I spend a lot

of time high up on ladders and scaffolding. Not a good place to get

dizzy. But you must understand, that your senses will not be less at

that time, but sharper and clearer. Fasting does not harm your

ability to make decisions. Every morning I stopped on the way to work

and picked up a bottle of fresh squeezed orange juice, and put it in

my cooler. If I became dizzy or felt weird (which happened) I just

drank the juice. I actually had more energy and focus then I have

now.

 

As far as transitioning to raw, I have read a lot about the subject,

and I think what you are doing is perfect. As far as being addicted

to cooked food; we don't get over addictions. We learn to cope with

them. I know I have a monster sleeping inside me. As long as I eat

only raw foods. And get support from you guys. He will sleep

comfortably and leave me alone. But if my tongue touches something

cooked, he might wake up and take control of my body and soul.

 

As far as having vegetables that you don't like. That will change.

Going raw is the biggest change you will ever go through in your

life. You will fall in love with the oddest fruits and vegetables. I

remember I fell in love with a weed and ran around like a nut trying

to get my friends to just taste it. It tastes like crap to me now but

I guess it was something I needed at the time.

 

Doug

 

 

 

 

rawfood , " Viveca Park " <vivecapark@a...> wrote:

> I have just recently started the Natural Hygeine way of eating.

> I have been a vegetarian for over 23 years, but have eaten dairy.

> Now, I'm off dairy with the exception of a little butter (for

> now). I have eaten only fruit before noon and then try to eat a

> salad twice a day along with steamed vegetables. I have also

> included nuts a few times a week.

>

> I believe that I've been discovering detox symptoms because I

> have had a bad headache a few days. Today I feel much better,

> but the day isn't over yet. Now I hear about cooked food

> addictions and going 100% raw. Wouldn't you say it would be

> perfectly o.k. to make this further transition for me a little

> more gradually since my body is already causing me so much

> discomfort?

>

> I have heard that eating the salad with lemon or with no dressing

> is best. However, I find it harder each day to eat my salad. I

> am buying organic mixed greens or other organic salad mix, and I

> find myself forcing myself to eat a small one. I look forward to

> the grounding feeling of my cooked vegetables, but I don't feel

> over compelled to eat as I did in the past. Although I hear what

> you are saying about food addiction, I feel myself enjoying the

> foods but I don't feel like I'm living to eat anymore like I did

> in the past. I actually feel like I have kicked my addiction.

>

> So I guess I'm asking a question to get validation for me moving

> slowly toward more (if not 100%) raw diet, and also some

> suggestions on how to do this. Although I am a vegetarian, I

> must admit there are quite a few vegetables that I do not like.

> From what I hear about fasting, that is supposed to clear the

> palate and help one learn to like more vegetables. But also

> from what I hear from the Natural Hygeine lectures from past

> conferences, that unless you do the fast under supervised

> conditions, you may cause more harm than good.

>

> Since I have gradually moved to where I am now, I feel like

> having all juice days and all fruit days and all raw days would

> be enough for me at least for the immediate future. I also heard

> that eating some rice or grains can help to eleviate some of the

> toxins thrown out into the bloodstream. Can anyone suggest any

> reading on or off line regarding the getting started stage?

>

> Hopefully, you will get the gist of what I am asking. Maybe some

> of you remember back when you first got started and what things

> helped you.

>

> Thanks.

>

> Viveca

> I am on digest version and don't mind anyone writing to me

> personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi,

 

This is Fred, Rose's other half. I have just joined this group a few days ago.

I do not articulate as well as Rose does so my words will be fewer.

 

 

I am not happy with the word addiction. The term give the reader a hopless

state of being a prisoner. Rose was smoking 4-5 packs of cigarettes a day in

1978 when we met a block away from Barnes and Noble in Manhattan. That night or

the following day, she threw away her pack of cigarettes and stopped smoking.

There was no withdrawal affects. So much for the term addiction.

 

If we find one person whose symptoms invalidates the definition, then the

definition is invalid not the person.

 

Fred

 

 

 

 

SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

bridgitte,

 

that is a very good book. i loved his mucusless healing diet system too.

 

At 02:22 PM 7/8/2003 +0000, you wrote:

>

> I'm reading Rational Fasting by Arnold Ehret right now...you might

> want to check it out.

>

> Bridgitte

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>

>

> I am not happy with the word addiction. The term give the reader a

hopless state of being a prisoner.

 

I read Victoria Boutenko's " 12 Steps to Raw Food " , and she found that

if she approached cooked food as an addiction (thus the 12 steps)

people were more successful at staying raw. I look at it as more of

a possibility than the truth, and following the steps certainly

helped get me to go raw in the first place. I think that it *can*

give the impression of being a prisoner, but that's why the word

addiction keeps coming up in posts.

 

Bridgitte

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Fred; welcome to the club.

 

In your post you said " If we find one person whose symptoms

invalidates the definition, then the definition is invalid not the

person. " I was taught in high school that in nature there is an

exception to every rule. It does not invalidate the rule, it only

shows that there are exceptions.

 

The reason I am doing this is that we have a failure rate among would

be raw foodists, not only out there in the world, but right here in

this club of about 98%. This is virtually the same rate as people

trying to get off alcohol and drugs on their own, without help. When

people go through a 12 step program. For alcohol, drugs, or cooked

food, the success rate dramatically increases to near 100%.

 

When a person admits to addiction it is a liberating experience.

Suddenly you have a list of things to do, to find your way out of it.

12 things. Quite the opposite of the " hopless state of being a

prisoner. " That you mention. I love being raw, soon I will have been

raw for 4 years. When I went raw I had skin cancer, prostrate

problems, I had arthritis so bad I had to sleep sitting up in a

chair. Now I am healthier than I was when I was a child. I want

everyone to feel the way I do. I don't want people to die young of

needless diseases. This is a proven method to increase the success

rate of raw foodist. If we can increase the success rate we can save

more lives.

 

If you say you are not addicted, that's fine with me. I'm not saying

that anyone is addicted. What I'm saying is that cooked food contains

nearly 2000 chemicals that have been proven in laboratory experiments

to be addictive. It is possible that we might be addicted. This is

something you have to discover in yourself. I only know that I am.

 

Doug

 

 

 

 

rawfood , fred lieberman <fred_lieberman>

wrote:

> Hi,

>

> This is Fred, Rose's other half. I have just joined this group a

few days ago. I do not articulate as well as Rose does so my words

will be fewer.

>

>

> I am not happy with the word addiction. The term give the reader a

hopless state of being a prisoner. Rose was smoking 4-5 packs of

cigarettes a day in 1978 when we met a block away from Barnes and

Noble in Manhattan. That night or the following day, she threw away

her pack of cigarettes and stopped smoking. There was no withdrawal

affects. So much for the term addiction.

>

> If we find one person whose symptoms invalidates the definition,

then the definition is invalid not the person.

>

> Fred

>

>

>

>

> SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Doug & Fred,

 

I ask myself at what point does a habit become an addiction?

 

There are stacks of addictions easy to kick and there are a few

that are the devil.

 

The drop out rate of raw foodism is astonishing to me. Occasionally

I see a raw foodist on TV and the vitality from them is highly

reinforcing.

 

I sometimes speculate upon the effect of altering the communication

level in this forum. By somehow adding in the messenger facility

to some degree with or without webcams and so forth. Of course such

notions are risky. Why tamper with something that is working? It may

have been tried before and abandoned. It could last a bit or be a

roaring success. Are we experimental and moving with the times?

 

Personally I enjoyed the format of the old CompuServe forums where there

was a library and typed messages could flip back and forth and so too

the

voice. I also use the messenger all the time for my friends and

relatives.

 

Should this question have been addressed to Orionsdad?

 

Peter

 

 

 

kauguy [no_reply ]

09 July 2003 06:03

rawfood

[Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw

 

 

 

Hi Fred; welcome to the club.

 

In your post you said " If we find one person whose symptoms

invalidates the definition, then the definition is invalid not the

person. " I was taught in high school that in nature there is an

exception to every rule. It does not invalidate the rule, it only

shows that there are exceptions.

 

The reason I am doing this is that we have a failure rate among would

be raw foodists, not only out there in the world, but right here in

this club of about 98%. This is virtually the same rate as people

trying to get off alcohol and drugs on their own, without help. When

people go through a 12 step program. For alcohol, drugs, or cooked

food, the success rate dramatically increases to near 100%.

 

When a person admits to addiction it is a liberating experience.

Suddenly you have a list of things to do, to find your way out of it.

12 things. Quite the opposite of the " hopless state of being a

prisoner. " That you mention. I love being raw, soon I will have been

raw for 4 years. When I went raw I had skin cancer, prostrate

problems, I had arthritis so bad I had to sleep sitting up in a

chair. Now I am healthier than I was when I was a child. I want

everyone to feel the way I do. I don't want people to die young of

needless diseases. This is a proven method to increase the success

rate of raw foodist. If we can increase the success rate we can save

more lives.

 

If you say you are not addicted, that's fine with me. I'm not saying

that anyone is addicted. What I'm saying is that cooked food contains

nearly 2000 chemicals that have been proven in laboratory experiments

to be addictive. It is possible that we might be addicted. This is

something you have to discover in yourself. I only know that I am.

 

Doug

 

 

 

 

rawfood , fred lieberman <fred_lieberman>

wrote:

> Hi,

>

> This is Fred, Rose's other half. I have just joined this group a

few days ago. I do not articulate as well as Rose does so my words

will be fewer.

>

>

> I am not happy with the word addiction. The term give the reader a

hopless state of being a prisoner. Rose was smoking 4-5 packs of

cigarettes a day in 1978 when we met a block away from Barnes and

Noble in Manhattan. That night or the following day, she threw away

her pack of cigarettes and stopped smoking. There was no withdrawal

affects. So much for the term addiction.

>

> If we find one person whose symptoms invalidates the definition,

then the definition is invalid not the person.

>

> Fred

>

>

>

>

> SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Peter;

 

We did try the group chat room a few years ago, and it didn't work

out. The group at that time was to small. I think we should try

again. When that happy face beside our name on each message is lit

up, I think we can chat with that person. But I don't know how it

works.

 

Doug

 

 

rawfood , " Peter Gardiner " <petergardiner@e...>

wrote:

> Doug & Fred,

>

> I ask myself at what point does a habit become an addiction?

>

> There are stacks of addictions easy to kick and there are a few

> that are the devil.

>

> The drop out rate of raw foodism is astonishing to me. Occasionally

> I see a raw foodist on TV and the vitality from them is highly

> reinforcing.

>

> I sometimes speculate upon the effect of altering the communication

> level in this forum. By somehow adding in the messenger

facility

> to some degree with or without webcams and so forth. Of course such

> notions are risky. Why tamper with something that is working? It

may

> have been tried before and abandoned. It could last a bit or be a

> roaring success. Are we experimental and moving with the times?

>

> Personally I enjoyed the format of the old CompuServe forums where

there

> was a library and typed messages could flip back and forth and so

too

> the

> voice. I also use the messenger all the time for my friends

and

> relatives.

>

> Should this question have been addressed to Orionsdad?

>

> Peter

>

>

>

> kauguy [no_reply ]

> 09 July 2003 06:03

> rawfood

> [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw

>

>

>

> Hi Fred; welcome to the club.

>

> In your post you said " If we find one person whose symptoms

> invalidates the definition, then the definition is invalid not the

> person. " I was taught in high school that in nature there is an

> exception to every rule. It does not invalidate the rule, it only

> shows that there are exceptions.

>

> The reason I am doing this is that we have a failure rate among

would

> be raw foodists, not only out there in the world, but right here in

> this club of about 98%. This is virtually the same rate as people

> trying to get off alcohol and drugs on their own, without help.

When

> people go through a 12 step program. For alcohol, drugs, or cooked

> food, the success rate dramatically increases to near 100%.

>

> When a person admits to addiction it is a liberating experience.

> Suddenly you have a list of things to do, to find your way out of

it.

> 12 things. Quite the opposite of the " hopless state of being a

> prisoner. " That you mention. I love being raw, soon I will have

been

> raw for 4 years. When I went raw I had skin cancer, prostrate

> problems, I had arthritis so bad I had to sleep sitting up in a

> chair. Now I am healthier than I was when I was a child. I want

> everyone to feel the way I do. I don't want people to die young of

> needless diseases. This is a proven method to increase the success

> rate of raw foodist. If we can increase the success rate we can

save

> more lives.

>

> If you say you are not addicted, that's fine with me. I'm not

saying

> that anyone is addicted. What I'm saying is that cooked food

contains

> nearly 2000 chemicals that have been proven in laboratory

experiments

> to be addictive. It is possible that we might be addicted. This is

> something you have to discover in yourself. I only know that I am.

>

> Doug

>

>

>

>

> rawfood , fred lieberman

<fred_lieberman>

> wrote:

> > Hi,

> >

> > This is Fred, Rose's other half. I have just joined this group a

> few days ago. I do not articulate as well as Rose does so my words

> will be fewer.

> >

> >

> > I am not happy with the word addiction. The term give the reader

a

> hopless state of being a prisoner. Rose was smoking 4-5 packs of

> cigarettes a day in 1978 when we met a block away from Barnes and

> Noble in Manhattan. That night or the following day, she threw

away

> her pack of cigarettes and stopped smoking. There was no

withdrawal

> affects. So much for the term addiction.

> >

> > If we find one person whose symptoms invalidates the definition,

> then the definition is invalid not the person.

> >

> > Fred

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Doug,

 

The signs are that some sort of revival may be on the way. Frankly

I have clicked on the chat room that seems to be there already but it

did not

work. Personally, I like to be on the cutting edge. Raw Food is

cutting

edge as eventually everybody will be doing it. To put that in a cutting

edge forum

makes sense to me. Sometimes things have to lie around a little until

they are

used.

 

We will see.

 

Peter

 

 

kauguy [no_reply ]

10 July 2003 03:57

rawfood

[Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw

 

 

 

Peter;

 

We did try the group chat room a few years ago, and it didn't work

out. The group at that time was to small. I think we should try

again. When that happy face beside our name on each message is lit

up, I think we can chat with that person. But I don't know how it

works.

 

Doug

 

 

rawfood , " Peter Gardiner " <petergardiner@e...>

wrote:

> Doug & Fred,

>

> I ask myself at what point does a habit become an addiction?

>

> There are stacks of addictions easy to kick and there are a few that

> are the devil.

>

> The drop out rate of raw foodism is astonishing to me. Occasionally I

 

> see a raw foodist on TV and the vitality from them is highly

> reinforcing.

>

> I sometimes speculate upon the effect of altering the communication

> level in this forum. By somehow adding in the messenger

facility

> to some degree with or without webcams and so forth. Of course such

> notions are risky. Why tamper with something that is working? It

may

> have been tried before and abandoned. It could last a bit or be a

> roaring success. Are we experimental and moving with the times?

>

> Personally I enjoyed the format of the old CompuServe forums where

there

> was a library and typed messages could flip back and forth and so

too

> the

> voice. I also use the messenger all the time for my friends

and

> relatives.

>

> Should this question have been addressed to Orionsdad?

>

> Peter

>

>

>

> kauguy [no_reply ]

> 09 July 2003 06:03

> rawfood

> [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw

>

>

>

> Hi Fred; welcome to the club.

>

> In your post you said " If we find one person whose symptoms

> invalidates the definition, then the definition is invalid not the

> person. " I was taught in high school that in nature there is an

> exception to every rule. It does not invalidate the rule, it only

> shows that there are exceptions.

>

> The reason I am doing this is that we have a failure rate among

would

> be raw foodists, not only out there in the world, but right here in

> this club of about 98%. This is virtually the same rate as people

> trying to get off alcohol and drugs on their own, without help.

When

> people go through a 12 step program. For alcohol, drugs, or cooked

> food, the success rate dramatically increases to near 100%.

>

> When a person admits to addiction it is a liberating experience.

> Suddenly you have a list of things to do, to find your way out of

it.

> 12 things. Quite the opposite of the " hopless state of being a

> prisoner. " That you mention. I love being raw, soon I will have

been

> raw for 4 years. When I went raw I had skin cancer, prostrate

> problems, I had arthritis so bad I had to sleep sitting up in a

> chair. Now I am healthier than I was when I was a child. I want

> everyone to feel the way I do. I don't want people to die young of

> needless diseases. This is a proven method to increase the success

> rate of raw foodist. If we can increase the success rate we can

save

> more lives.

>

> If you say you are not addicted, that's fine with me. I'm not

saying

> that anyone is addicted. What I'm saying is that cooked food

contains

> nearly 2000 chemicals that have been proven in laboratory

experiments

> to be addictive. It is possible that we might be addicted. This is

> something you have to discover in yourself. I only know that I am.

>

> Doug

>

>

>

>

> rawfood , fred lieberman

<fred_lieberman>

> wrote:

> > Hi,

> >

> > This is Fred, Rose's other half. I have just joined this group a

> few days ago. I do not articulate as well as Rose does so my words

> will be fewer.

> >

> >

> > I am not happy with the word addiction. The term give the reader

a

> hopless state of being a prisoner. Rose was smoking 4-5 packs of

> cigarettes a day in 1978 when we met a block away from Barnes and

> Noble in Manhattan. That night or the following day, she threw

away

> her pack of cigarettes and stopped smoking. There was no

withdrawal

> affects. So much for the term addiction.

> >

> > If we find one person whose symptoms invalidates the definition,

> then the definition is invalid not the person.

> >

> > Fred

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Doug,

 

My Messenger ID is peterpfgardiner. Drop in time!

 

Peter

 

kauguy [no_reply ]

10 July 2003 03:57

rawfood

[Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw

 

 

 

Peter;

 

We did try the group chat room a few years ago, and it didn't work

out. The group at that time was to small. I think we should try

again. When that happy face beside our name on each message is lit

up, I think we can chat with that person. But I don't know how it

works.

 

Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Peter Gardiner wrote:

" Raw Food is cutting edge as eventually everybody will be doing it. "

 

Do you really think so Peter? How long do you think it's going to

take before everyone realizes the benefits of a raw diet and switches

over?

 

Personally I think it will never happen! I have seen and heard so

many people react to a raw vegan diet like " Oh I could NEVER leave

grains " or " I really NEED meat at every meal " or " Well WHAT do you

eat then if you can't eat dairy and grains " and so on. People are

ready to even face death instead of change their diet. They'll grab

medicines instead of a lettuce. Anything as long as they can stay on

their cooked diet full of bread, dairy and meat.

 

Sad, but I think that human kind will face its end before we are all

raw.

 

/Mimi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Me.

 

Call me Don Quixote if you like.

Who would have thought 20 years ago that we would all be on the

internet.

 

Bill Gates and a few others!

 

It will take 50 years at least at my best guess. That is based upon

nothing

scientific.

 

Peter

 

 

 

 

raw_peas [no_reply ]

11 July 2003 07:25

rawfood

[Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw

 

 

 

Peter Gardiner wrote:

" Raw Food is cutting edge as eventually everybody will be doing it. "

 

Do you really think so Peter? How long do you think it's going to

take before everyone realizes the benefits of a raw diet and switches

over?

 

Personally I think it will never happen! I have seen and heard so

many people react to a raw vegan diet like " Oh I could NEVER leave

grains " or " I really NEED meat at every meal " or " Well WHAT do you

eat then if you can't eat dairy and grains " and so on. People are

ready to even face death instead of change their diet. They'll grab

medicines instead of a lettuce. Anything as long as they can stay on

their cooked diet full of bread, dairy and meat.

 

Sad, but I think that human kind will face its end before we are all

raw.

 

/Mimi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>

>

>

>

> Me.

>

> Call me Don Quixote if you like.

> Who would have thought 20 years ago that we would all be on the

> internet.

>

> Bill Gates and a few others!

>

> It will take 50 years at least at my best guess. That is based upon

> nothing

> scientific.

>

> Peter

>

Peter,

 

i'm so much with you on this!

i'm expecting a vegan world before 2050, then a raw vegan world would only

need a maximum of 1 decade after the first slide! See, how easy it is, if

on vegan helps one omnivorous going vegan every year... that's just this!!

Same process for the cook & the raw!

 

f

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Peter;

I am in the process of getting wired. I went out today and bought a

web cam. Tomorrow I will sign up for mesenger. Can we do

Videoconferencing with ? That would be great. What are we going

to do about the problem of me living on the other side of the planet?

Maybe I will SEE you online.

 

Doug

 

 

rawfood , " Peter Gardiner " <petergardiner@e...>

wrote:

>

> Doug,

>

> My Messenger ID is peterpfgardiner. Drop in time!

>

> Peter

>

> kauguy [no_reply ]

> 10 July 2003 03:57

> rawfood

> [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw

>

>

>

> Peter;

>

> We did try the group chat room a few years ago, and it didn't work

> out. The group at that time was to small. I think we should try

> again. When that happy face beside our name on each message is lit

> up, I think we can chat with that person. But I don't know how it

> works.

>

> Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Doug,

 

messenger works well with voice and web camera.

 

It is a good idea to have the headphones otherwise the feedback is a

problem.

 

My time is very flexible as I do not have hours of work.

 

Given we have 12 hours difference, your evening would be my morning!

Easy.

 

Peter

 

kauguy [no_reply ]

12 July 2003 08:16

rawfood

[Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw

 

 

 

Peter;

I am in the process of getting wired. I went out today and bought a

web cam. Tomorrow I will sign up for mesenger. Can we do

Videoconferencing with ? That would be great. What are we going

to do about the problem of me living on the other side of the planet?

Maybe I will SEE you online.

 

Doug

 

 

rawfood , " Peter Gardiner " <petergardiner@e...>

wrote:

>

> Doug,

>

> My Messenger ID is peterpfgardiner. Drop in time!

>

> Peter

>

> kauguy [no_reply ]

> 10 July 2003 03:57

> rawfood

> [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw

>

>

>

> Peter;

>

> We did try the group chat room a few years ago, and it didn't work

> out. The group at that time was to small. I think we should try

> again. When that happy face beside our name on each message is lit

> up, I think we can chat with that person. But I don't know how it

> works.

>

> Doug

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Peter; I'm all signed up. My messenger ID is kauguy. I don't

think I can use my camera yet, I have slow dial up connection. But

even as we speak I am being upgraded to broad band. It should be up

and running later next week. But they told me that 2 months ago. This

is a new company just starting up, and they have a lot of bugs in the

system.

 

Doug

 

 

 

rawfood , " Peter Gardiner " <petergardiner@e...>

wrote:

>

> Doug,

>

> My Messenger ID is peterpfgardiner. Drop in time!

>

> Peter

>

> kauguy [no_reply ]

> 10 July 2003 03:57

> rawfood

> [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw

>

>

>

> Peter;

>

> We did try the group chat room a few years ago, and it didn't work

> out. The group at that time was to small. I think we should try

> again. When that happy face beside our name on each message is lit

> up, I think we can chat with that person. But I don't know how it

> works.

>

> Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Peter

 

Certainly enjoy this group!!!

 

Do you think that we need to talk about raw food diet to more people more often?

My hubby, Austin, is getting a little bored but I just keep on talking. He's

supportive of the raw food approach until it reaches his dinner

plate...then...where's the usual meal. (Arrrrggghhh)

 

Anyway it seems to me that educate, educate, educate is the only way. After

all, an infant has to be forced to eat cooked meat. That's some education

process.

 

If someone comments that I'm looking great the reply is that I'm eating a lot of

raw foods now and feel so much better. They look slightly funny at the reply

but it is my hope that they'll think about it.

 

George Malkmus has written a book about his own health struggles. His book got

me started on the quest for a raw foods diet.

 

Diane

 

 

 

Peter Gardiner <petergardiner wrote:

Me.

 

Call me Don Quixote if you like.

Who would have thought 20 years ago that we would all be on the

internet.

 

Bill Gates and a few others!

 

It will take 50 years at least at my best guess. That is based upon

nothing

scientific.

 

Peter

 

 

 

 

raw_peas [no_reply ]

11 July 2003 07:25

rawfood

[Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw

 

 

 

Peter Gardiner wrote:

" Raw Food is cutting edge as eventually everybody will be doing it. "

 

Do you really think so Peter? How long do you think it's going to

take before everyone realizes the benefits of a raw diet and switches

over?

 

Personally I think it will never happen! I have seen and heard so

many people react to a raw vegan diet like " Oh I could NEVER leave

grains " or " I really NEED meat at every meal " or " Well WHAT do you

eat then if you can't eat dairy and grains " and so on. People are

ready to even face death instead of change their diet. They'll grab

medicines instead of a lettuce. Anything as long as they can stay on

their cooked diet full of bread, dairy and meat.

 

Sad, but I think that human kind will face its end before we are all

raw.

 

/Mimi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

rawfood , Diane Law <joy2knit> wrote:

> Hi Peter

>

> Certainly enjoy this group!!!

>

> Do you think that we need to talk about raw food diet to more

people more often? My hubby, Austin, is getting a little bored but I

just keep on talking. He's supportive of the raw food approach until

it reaches his dinner plate...then...where's the usual meal.

(Arrrrggghhh)

>

I know that you addressed this to Peter, but I have a thing or two to

say on the subject...

 

I never bring up my diet unless somebody asks. Otherwise it starts

to sound preachy and people just aren't interested. Like if someone

asks how I lost weight, or why I don't get sick, or if they complain

about feeling crappy I'll tell them what worked for me.

 

I think they best way to " spread the word " is to lead by example -

people will be naturally curious.

 

Bridgitte

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Diane,

 

My opinion is not that important.

 

Pythagoras was a raw foodist in - 300bc +.

 

At that rate, given the present, you can push the multiplier button on

how long it will all take to get the world straight.

 

Have not read George Malkmus. Clearly your husband is patient which is

more than sufficient to rejoice.

 

I like your style.

 

Peter

 

 

 

 

Diane Law [joy2knit]

14 July 2003 21:31

rawfood

RE: [Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw

 

 

 

Hi Peter

 

Certainly enjoy this group!!!

 

Do you think that we need to talk about raw food diet to more people

more often? My hubby, Austin, is getting a little bored but I just keep

on talking. He's supportive of the raw food approach until it reaches

his dinner plate...then...where's the usual meal. (Arrrrggghhh)

 

Anyway it seems to me that educate, educate, educate is the only way.

After all, an infant has to be forced to eat cooked meat. That's some

education process.

 

If someone comments that I'm looking great the reply is that I'm eating

a lot of raw foods now and feel so much better. They look slightly

funny at the reply but it is my hope that they'll think about it.

 

George Malkmus has written a book about his own health struggles. His

book got me started on the quest for a raw foods diet.

 

Diane

 

 

 

Peter Gardiner <petergardiner wrote:

Me.

 

Call me Don Quixote if you like.

Who would have thought 20 years ago that we would all be on the

internet.

 

Bill Gates and a few others!

 

It will take 50 years at least at my best guess. That is based upon

nothing scientific.

 

Peter

 

 

 

 

raw_peas [no_reply ]

11 July 2003 07:25

rawfood

[Raw Food] Re: raw vs 80/90% raw

 

 

 

Peter Gardiner wrote:

" Raw Food is cutting edge as eventually everybody will be doing it. "

 

Do you really think so Peter? How long do you think it's going to

take before everyone realizes the benefits of a raw diet and switches

over?

 

Personally I think it will never happen! I have seen and heard so

many people react to a raw vegan diet like " Oh I could NEVER leave

grains " or " I really NEED meat at every meal " or " Well WHAT do you

eat then if you can't eat dairy and grains " and so on. People are

ready to even face death instead of change their diet. They'll grab

medicines instead of a lettuce. Anything as long as they can stay on

their cooked diet full of bread, dairy and meat.

 

Sad, but I think that human kind will face its end before we are all

raw.

 

/Mimi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Bridgitte

 

I agree with you about *preachy*. Can't stand that sort of thing. It's quite

possible to mention thatchanging my diet has helped me feel better and leave it

at that. Strong-arming leaves me cold!

 

It also ocurrs to me that non-raw foodist are always happy to talk about what

they eat because this or that tastes sooo good. Then they continue with the

pills tha they are taking because they feel so rotten. These comments are

merely observations.

 

Diane

 

Bridgitte <syndactylcat wrote:

rawfood , Diane Law <joy2knit> wrote:

> Hi Peter

>

> Certainly enjoy this group!!!

>

> Do you think that we need to talk about raw food diet to more

people more often? My hubby, Austin, is getting a little bored but I

just keep on talking. He's supportive of the raw food approach until

it reaches his dinner plate...then...where's the usual meal.

(Arrrrggghhh)

>

I know that you addressed this to Peter, but I have a thing or two to

say on the subject...

 

I never bring up my diet unless somebody asks. Otherwise it starts

to sound preachy and people just aren't interested. Like if someone

asks how I lost weight, or why I don't get sick, or if they complain

about feeling crappy I'll tell them what worked for me.

 

I think they best way to " spread the word " is to lead by example -

people will be naturally curious.

 

Bridgitte

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...