Guest guest Posted December 10, 2003 Report Share Posted December 10, 2003 Dear Susan, Yes, I am a follower of Jesus! I believe God deals with us as individuals and leads us a step at a time. Food can be all consuming and distracting from something else God wants to deal with us about. In our relationships with others I have decided food is one of those areas where we need to agree to disagree. The Bible is not a rule book. It shows us THE WAY, Jesus, God Himself, and how to be in relationship with Him who said He came to this earth to give us ABUNDANT LIFE. (John 10:10) Yes, there is a lot about food in the Bible. What I would sum up the message about food to be is that yes, all foods are lawful, however not all foods are profitable. The Lord Jesus Christ answered me when I cried out to him for health, healing and weight loss and His ANSWER is raw living food and the principals of Natural Hygiene. I've been all raw for 5 months as of today and I have lost 50 pounds so far! Praise the Lord! Love, Jenny Silliman www.rawblog.blogspot.com ______________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2003 Report Share Posted December 10, 2003 Hi Tev, Thanks for the response. I realize that we all come from different places and histories with consequent diverse presuppositions that preclude agreement. That said, I do believe the Bible to be the inspired and inerrant Word of God and have spent many years now studying it in depth to discover that there are no inconsistencies, inaccuracies, or contradictions. I do acknowledge that some appear to be there on the surface though. It wasn't until I discovered systemic theology that it all began to fall into place and make sense. Because of all this, I have learned that God's words must be put into context. Yes, we should pay particular attention to God's first words in the garden, but they must be framed properly. Who was he talking to? Why? What was the occasion? What was the world like then (it was perfect, there was no sin, there was no rain, the earth was watered differently and the atmosphere was different then, there was no death so eating animals was not an option, etc...)? All of God's Word is equally important, though all of it has it's own context. Anyway, I don't want this to become about theology per se, or hermeneutics so I'll stop here. Any Christians who want or can take a stab at this? Susan rawfood , tev treowlufu <goraw808> wrote: > Dear Susan: > > As a pre-text to my reply, I must state that I do not > believe that the bible is " the word of God " inerrant; Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2003 Report Share Posted December 10, 2003 Tev Great academy from the Bible but the entire structure of the human anatomy screams for a raw diet. Easy to go further and say frugivores. The problem with the Bible is that it is no more than a record of the of the time. The irrefutable axia sit there especially in the second testament and require no illumination from me. They will stand at the last day of mankind. A lot is dated much more will get corroded but the essence of the Bible will endure to eternity. The chaff therein exists. I believe that the raw diet is a far greater illumination than the Bible; blessed as both beacons are. Peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2003 Report Share Posted December 11, 2003 Hi Susan, Just wanna add something. Not for debate though. Story of Jesus (Yashua) being vegetarian can be read in the gospel of Nazirene(http://messianic.nazirene.us/gospel_index.htm). It was claimed that this is the true gospel that was copied into bible gospels and later on modified by correctors in Constantine period (council of Nicea) to change all teaching to conform to the life style (meat eating etcs) of rulers and priests in that era. While we read Jesus fed 5000 with fishs and breads in the Bible, in Nazirene gospel, it was breads and grapes. In that gospel, Jesus shew the humane side by treating the animal as also part of thy neighbor and forbade tormenting/killing/sacrificing animals. And also the more controversial part is that in this gospel told about Jesus teaching transmigration of soul or reincarnation. Ofcourse all these teaching is radically different from the current bible and the doctrine believed today in the mainstream Christianity. This is just another stories that I've read, just another reference about life of Jesus that is different from the bible. Whether it is true or false, you can check it out dan decide for yourself. Peace, Irawan - Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:21:53 +0100 " Peter Gardiner " <petergardiner RE: Raw Eating and The Christian Susan, Somewhere I have read something about Christ being an Essene and eating raw. He certainly ate bread but may have been vegetarian. 400 years earlier, Pythagoras was raw and there was a whole Greek school around which was Raw. Speaking for myself the more religions here the better although I care not at all for preaching The Bible was written long ago when human knowledge was less but I am compelled to agree with the notion of Love being a basis for the conduct of life. Not all the scientists in the world the highest power will convince me otherwise. Certainly peace and inner calm is getting very good press in the medical fraternity. That said trekking through biblical texts on diets an exercise of casual interest at best to me. The lawyer attacking me is getting Luke 11.46. :-) Peter Susan [susan_wilkinson] 10 December 2003 17:39 rawfood [Raw Food] Raw Eating and The Christian Okay, this might open a can of worms, but I have a question. I am a Christian (in the narrow sense, not the broader sense. IOW, I am a ~practicing~, I-hope-to-get-it-right-one-day Christian, not in name only). I have done a ton of reading on diets and natural hygiene, etc. and am quite convinced that our SAD is indeed sad. But... Because I believe the Bible above all things I am wondering how any Christians that might be here reconcile what the Bible says with an all-raw or vegetarian lifestyle. God gave meat to eat and in fact, clearly provided it at times (for the priests, for the Israelites in the desert, etc.). Romans 14 calls the vegetarian the weaker brother because his conscience will only allow vegetables. The Lord gave Peter the vision of all previous " unclean " things being let down in the sheet and commanded him to " rise and eat " . All of this makes me question the science that all raw/all veggie is really THE way to go as far as eating. There is science that suggests that some meat is a good thing (just as there is science that suggests the opposite). Who to believe? I have decided to use the Word of God to help me sift the science and decide what to eat. I am absolutely convinced (by experience, by reading, and mostly by the confirmation of the Word of God) that raw food is good, that whole food is good, that overly-processed foods are not good (IOW, chemicals, additives, " instant " foods, etc., excluding the process of cooking some foods), that fasting and juicing are great and necessary and the like. But I am not able to accept all raw or vegetarian at this point because I have not been able to reconcile it with the Bible and have not heard the other point of view if there is one (and I suspect there is). Well, I have heard the Halleluia Acres argument that in Gen. 1:29 we were originally given the plants and stuff to eat, but this takes one portion of Scripture and discounts others (there is another reason we didn't eat meat at that time). I would like to see this verse/argument reconciled with the other verses that talk about eating meat and cooked. If this is beyond the scope of this group, please forgive me and ignore this post. I just thought this the best place to find those who were already convinced of raw eating who might also be Christians. I know Jenny Silliman here is a believer, but wasn't sure about anyone else. Oh, 'cept Grace, but I know where she stands. Anyone else willing to share? (If it's appropriate.) Thanks, Susan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2003 Report Share Posted December 11, 2003 Peter Gardiner <petergardiner wrote: but the entire structure of the human anatomy screams for a raw diet. Easy to go further and say frugivores. T: I concur Peter The problem with the Bible is that it is no more than a record of the of the time. The irrefutable axia sit there especially in the second testament and require no illumination from me. They will stand at the last day of mankind. A lot is dated much more will get corroded but the essence of the Bible will endure to eternity. The chaff therein exists. Perhaps some of it is worthy of retention; but its essence? A god who requires blood sacrifice? sacrifices his own son? No thanks. Keep your god of death. I believe that the raw diet is a far greater illumination than the Bible; I agree. Everything after Gen 1:29 is a carnivore farce. wit regard, tev The experience of dynamic religious living transforms the mediocre individual into a personality of idealistic power. Religion ministers to the progress of all through fostering the progress of each individual, and the progress of each is augmented through the achievement of all. [The Urantia Book: 1094:1] New Photos - easier uploading and sharing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2003 Report Share Posted December 12, 2003 Genesis 1:29 God gives instructions to humans regards food. Check it out. tev treowlufu <goraw808 wrote: Peter Gardiner <petergardiner wrote: but the entire structure of the human anatomy screams for a raw diet. Easy to go further and say frugivores. T: I concur Peter The problem with the Bible is that it is no more than a record of the of the time. The irrefutable axia sit there especially in the second testament and require no illumination from me. They will stand at the last day of mankind. A lot is dated much more will get corroded but the essence of the Bible will endure to eternity. The chaff therein exists. Perhaps some of it is worthy of retention; but its essence? A god who requires blood sacrifice? sacrifices his own son? No thanks. Keep your god of death. I believe that the raw diet is a far greater illumination than the Bible; I agree. Everything after Gen 1:29 is a carnivore farce. wit regard, tev The experience of dynamic religious living transforms the mediocre individual into a personality of idealistic power. Religion ministers to the progress of all through fostering the progress of each individual, and the progress of each is augmented through the achievement of all. [The Urantia Book: 1094:1] New Photos - easier uploading and sharing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.