Guest guest Posted March 8, 2004 Report Share Posted March 8, 2004 There is some truth to the assertion that things that do not taste good should not be eaten. Raw fruit that has started to spoil will not taste good. Any wholesome food eaten in too great of quantity will in time lose its taste appeal. That principal cannot be applied 100% of the time though. Hemlock tastes good (so I've been told!), but will kill you if you eat it. Likewise, there are some herbs that, while bitter, will strengthen the body. Golden seal root (just for one example) is bitter, but is very effective in stopping a runny nose and fighting infection, and helps provide insulin for diabetics. Ron Koenig Bellevue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2004 Report Share Posted March 8, 2004 > Golden seal root (just >for one example) is bitter, but is very effective in stopping a runny >nose and fighting infection, That is also an example of a substance (herb or medicine) that may actually be hindering the body. If the body is creating the symptom of a runny nose, then the body abviously wants a runny nose to accomplish something (removing something foreign, like a toxin). So, the herb (or medicine) has the appearence of " helping " when it is actually working against the body. Nora would probably mention how, while more natural, this is a carry-over from western medicine - we are led to believe that stopping the symptom is a good thing. The blood sugar issue I am not as familiar with, but may be similar to the runny nose issue. Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2004 Report Share Posted March 9, 2004 Hi Ron, I was curious about what you said about hemlock tasting " good " , so I looked up some info. I found this on www.botanical.com: " The entire plant has a bitter taste and possesses a disagreeable mousy odour, which is especially noticeable when bruised. When dry, the odour is still disagreeable, but not so pronounced as in the fresh plant. The seeds or fruits have very marked odour or taste, but when rubbed with a solution of potassium bi-oxide, the same disagreeable mouse-like odour is produced. When pure, Coniine (the primary alkaloid constituent in the leaves) is a volatile, colourless, oily liquid, strongly alkaline, with poisonous properties and having a bitter taste and a disagreeable, penetrating, mouse-like odour. There are also present the alkaloids, Methyl-coniine, Conhydrine, Pseudoconhydrine, Ethyl piperidine, mucilage, a fixed oil and 12 per cent of ash. " Doesn't sound like something we'd mistake for food, no matter how screwed up our instincts are. Additionally, herbs don't " strengthen the body " . They only burden the body. Jeff is right, you wouldn't want to stop a runny nose, and " infection " is another of those medical fables like " allergy " and " virus " . " Infection " is really inflammation, and it is always best to remove the cause of it rather than covering up its effects with herbal preparations. So few diabetics take responsibility for their health that we have no way of knowing what percentage is truly " insulin dependent " , but it's surely a very small number. The overwhelming majority would be able to overcome their disease with fasting and lifestyle changes. Victoria's Boutenko's son, for one, was diagnosed with diabetes but fortunately discovered raw food before he made the mistake of taking insulin. Insulin isn't a cure or panacea for diabetes, it's only a very expensive crutch, one that actually has the effect of making the diseased organs even less functional. Nora P.S. This might be a good opportunity to mention that I have a copy of the TC Fry " Life Science " course that I made a few months ago for someone who changed her mind about buying it. It's available for $150, which represents just a bit over copying costs. If anyone's interested, feel free to email me privately. Nora Ron Koenig wrote: > There is some truth to the assertion that things that do not taste > good should not be eaten. Raw fruit that has started to spoil will > not taste good. Any wholesome food eaten in too great of quantity > will in time lose its taste appeal. That principal cannot be applied > 100% of the time though. Hemlock tastes good (so I've been told!), > but will kill you if you eat it. Likewise, there are some herbs > that, while bitter, will strengthen the body. Golden seal root (just > for one example) is bitter, but is very effective in stopping a runny > nose and fighting infection, and helps provide insulin for > diabetics. > > Ron Koenig > Bellevue > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2004 Report Share Posted March 9, 2004 Hemlock being bitter actually makes more sense to me. I have read though of people eating it and saying it tasted pleasant (before they died). I guess they were used to eating bitter things. I agree that with any health problems the cause needs to be found and addressed rather than the symptom. I do however, believe that herbs have their place in maintaining health. This has been discussed before and I don't expect to change your mind, or you mine. Ron Koenig Bellevue RawSeattle , Nora Lenz <nmlenz@s...> wrote: > Hi Ron, > I was curious about what you said about hemlock tasting " good " , so I looked up some info. I found this on www.botanical.com: > > " The entire plant has a bitter taste and possesses a disagreeable mousy > odour, which is especially noticeable when bruised. When dry, the odour is > still disagreeable, but not so pronounced as in the fresh plant. The seeds or > fruits have very marked odour or taste, but when rubbed with a solution of > potassium bi-oxide, the same disagreeable mouse-like odour is produced. When > pure, Coniine (the primary alkaloid constituent in the leaves) is a volatile, > colourless, oily liquid, strongly alkaline, with poisonous properties and > having a bitter taste and a disagreeable, penetrating, mouse-like odour. > There are also present the alkaloids, Methyl-coniine, Conhydrine, > Pseudoconhydrine, Ethyl piperidine, mucilage, a fixed oil and 12 per cent of ash. " > > Doesn't sound like something we'd mistake for food, no matter how screwed > up our instincts are. Additionally, herbs don't " strengthen the body " . They > only burden the body. Jeff is right, you wouldn't want to stop a runny nose, > and " infection " is another of those medical fables like " allergy " and > " virus " . " Infection " is really inflammation, and it is always best to remove > the cause of it rather than covering up its effects with herbal > preparations. > So few diabetics take responsibility for their health that we have no way > of knowing what percentage is truly " insulin dependent " , but it's surely a > very small number. The overwhelming majority would be able to overcome their > disease with fasting and lifestyle changes. Victoria's Boutenko's son, for > one, was diagnosed with diabetes but fortunately discovered raw food before > he made the mistake of taking insulin. Insulin isn't a cure or panacea for > diabetes, it's only a very expensive crutch, one that actually has the effect > of making the diseased organs even less functional. > Nora Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2004 Report Share Posted March 9, 2004 >I do however, believe that herbs >have their place in maintaining health. That hit's upon what I was saying. I believe plants have a purpose. Not that they are therefor all edible, but many may have a healthful purpose. If there is a purpose for a specific herb in maintaining health, I believe we will be attracted to it (in an ideal world) and it will taste good. As Nora mentioned, we are far from our natural world and natural healthy bodies, so it may be that our " intuition " is off a bit. I know my diet is far from perfect (but much closer than it used to be.) I will end saying I understand Nora and Robert's perspective, yet am not confident enough in that theory to say an herb will never have a purpose for health. This discussion of taste reminds me of the zinc insufficiency test. A person swishes around a zinc solution in their mouth. If it tastes good, they need zinc. If it tastes nasty, they don't need zinc. Granted, that is an isolated nutrient, but it does use that same idea that something our body needs will taste good. I can hear it now... " my body must need chocolate " , etc! Sorry, that's different. Though, I suspect if I tried some of the processed chocolate like I use to eat, it may have some good flavors, but would probably have an artificial or bad taste as well. When I've prepared some not-so-raw foods for others and did the ole taste and spit test. It left a bad taste in my mouth, even though it included raw food. Chocolate would probably be the same way. Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2004 Report Share Posted March 9, 2004 Right on, Jeff! As with zinc, it is also true with licorice root. If it tastes sweet, you need it. Some people don't like the taste of it, and those people usually don't need it. (There has to be a biochemical explanation for it, but that is beyond my realm of knowledge.) There is a big difference between liking the taste of a whole food and a refined food. If you like the taste of a refined food, you most likely are in the early stages of starting an addiction. You can never get addicted to whole foods in the sense that you will experience withdrawals if you don't have some. As a teenager I remember having my first taste of a Dr. Pepper (which contains caffeine). It had a very bitter and stimulating taste to it and I didn't like it, and never drank one ever again. However, I saw the potential that if I had continued to drink it, I would of gotten addicted to it to the point of having withdrawals if I didn't have some every day. Ron Koenig RawSeattle , Jeff Rogers <jeff@t...> wrote: > >I do however, believe that herbs > >have their place in maintaining health. > > That hit's upon what I was saying. I believe plants have a purpose. > Not that they are therefor all edible, but many may have a healthful > purpose. If there is a purpose for a specific herb in maintaining > health, I believe we will be attracted to it (in an ideal world) and > it will taste good. As Nora mentioned, we are far from our natural > world and natural healthy bodies, so it may be that our " intuition " > is off a bit. I know my diet is far from perfect (but much closer > than it used to be.) I will end saying I understand Nora and > Robert's perspective, yet am not confident enough in that theory to > say an herb will never have a purpose for health. > > This discussion of taste reminds me of the zinc insufficiency test. A > person swishes around a zinc solution in their mouth. If it tastes > good, they need zinc. If it tastes nasty, they don't need zinc. > > Granted, that is an isolated nutrient, but it does use that same idea > that something our body needs will taste good. > > I can hear it now... > " my body must need chocolate " , etc! Sorry, that's different. Though, > I suspect if I tried some of the processed chocolate like I use to > eat, it may have some good flavors, but would probably have an > artificial or bad taste as well. When I've prepared some not-so-raw > foods for others and did the ole taste and spit test. It left a bad > taste in my mouth, even though it included raw food. Chocolate would > probably be the same way. > > Jeff > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2004 Report Share Posted March 9, 2004 Regarding caffeinated sodas, I had been addicted to them a long time ago. I got off of them, then back on , then off, etc. I think three cycles before getting off them altogether. Regarding chocolate addiction. Since starting experimentatin with the raw cacao beans last week, i've noticed I don't feel any of the addictive qualities that the chocolate brownies, ice creams, cookies, etc. had on me. No REALLY... I can quit ANY TIME I WANT! I haven't had any for a couple days and have not cravings. That supports the theory that it's the cooking and processing of ingreduebts that creates the addiction. Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.