Guest guest Posted February 12, 2004 Report Share Posted February 12, 2004 In addition to all the points brought about the McVeggie burger, it is important to note that transfats (from partially hydrogenated/hydrogenated oils) have actually been added to the patties supplied by Yves, which previously did not use trans fats in their patties. Yves sold out... This is after McDonald's said that it would reduce the amount of transfats in its foods. "The bun is a nutritionist's nightmare. Although the sandwich is labeled as containing a whole-wheat bun, the first ingredient is bleached white flour. Nutritionists would shudder after reading a label that lists high fructose corn syrup and partially hydrogenated oil along with a myriad of preservatives and stabilizers. Though not highly nutritious, the bun is vegan. The nutritionist would instantly notice the sandwich contains 8 grams of fat with 1.5 grams saturated. Doing the math would reveal that 6.5 grams were a combination of polyunsaturated, monounsaturated, and trans fat. Trans fat is now considered as much of an artery clogger as saturated fat. With the new labeling soon to be introduced, companies like McDonald's will have to indicate how much of that 6.5 grams is trans fat. A nutrition savvy person would also raise an eyebrow reading that the sandwich has 1490 mg of sodium, more than half of what a person should eat in an entire day. " -Vegparadise News Bureau - J. Lisa Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2004 Report Share Posted February 12, 2004 > In addition to all the points brought about the McVeggie burger, it is important to note that transfats (from partially hydrogenated/hydrogenated oils) have actually been added to the patties supplied by Yves, which previously did not use trans fats in their patties. Yves sold out... This is after McDonald's said that it would reduce the amount of transfats in its foods. > " The bun is a nutritionist's nightmare. Although the sandwich is labeled as containing a whole-wheat bun, the first ingredient is bleached white flour. Nutritionists would shudder after reading a label that lists high fructose corn syrup and partially hydrogenated oil along with a myriad of preservatives and stabilizers. Though not highly nutritious, the bun is vegan. > The nutritionist would instantly notice the sandwich contains 8 grams of fat with 1.5 grams saturated. Doing the math would reveal that 6.5 grams were a combination of polyunsaturated, monounsaturated, and trans fat. Trans fat is now considered as much of an artery clogger as saturated fat. With the new labeling soon to be introduced, companies like McDonald's will have to indicate how much of that 6.5 grams is trans fat. A nutrition savvy person would also raise an eyebrow reading that the sandwich has 1490 mg of sodium, more than half of what a person should eat in an entire day. " -Vegparadise News Bureau - J. Lisa I wonder what this person defines as a " nutritionist. " While people should limit their intake of tans fats, having some in your diet is unlikely to be harmful. At least, there is no data that they will cause noticeable damage or decrease your life span. And why would someone worry about high fructose corn syrup, of all things? The sodium *is* very high. (Maybe that's why it tastes so good. : ) As for the conversation about calcium, acid, and bones we were having, someone just sent me an abstract of a review they did on lacto-ovo vegetarians and bone health. I thought some of the people on the list might be interested in it, so I've posted it below. I can send people the actual PDF which includes some charts and references in addition to the Abstract, if anyone wants one. Jack Norris, RD Vegan Outreach Sacramento Bone mineral density in vegetarians and omnivores: a comparative review 1,2 Björn R Pettersson ABSTRACT Introduction: Osteoporosis is an important public health problem, as exemplified by the 70 000 fractures in Sweden each year. About 18 000 cases are hip fractures, which is a particularly devastating injury. The mortality rate during the year following a hip fracture is 10-15% higher in subjects suffering such fracture compared with age and sex matched subjects not suffering such fracture. In Sweden the lifetime risk of suffering one or more fractures, for the middle age person, is 50% in women and 25% in men. Recent figures show that the annual social-economic cost for osteporosis in Sweden is 3.5 billions (SEK). Hip fractures stand for more than half of this cost. The most important explanation for the increased fracture rates in Sweden and other developed countries is that the average range of life has increased during the last decades. But studies also indicate that osteoporosis now is more prevalent in some younger age groups. Also, countries with the same average range of life as Sweden have much lower fracture rates (e.g. France). Bone mass is one important factor that influences bone strength and hence fracture risk. Bone mass is influenced by genetics, by nutrition, by hormonal status, and by lifestyle factors, such as physical activity, smoking and drinking. If nutrition and lifestyle factors that promote bone health can be identified to a larger degree such knowledge will have the potential to decrease human suffering as well as improving the economy in developed countries. Background: Some early research suggested that a vegetarian lifestyle could have a positive impact on bone health. The proposed positive association with vegetarianism and bone health was largely based on the thesis that vegetarians had a lower net endogenous acid production which resulted in a lower urinary calcium loss, thought to conserve bone. Meat-based diets generate high net endogenous acid production while vegetables and fruits are net base producing, thereby reducing urinary calcium excretion. Objective: The objective of this review was to determine whether the scientific evidence supports the hypothesis that vegetarians have a better bone health compared with age and sex matched omnivores. A vegetarian was defined as someone who does not consume meat, fish or fowl but, on the other hand, eggs and/or dairy products in addition to plants. Method: A MEDLINE search was conducted using the key words vegetarians or vegetarian plus osteoporosis, bone, BMD or fracture. Additional publications were identified from review articles and references provided in original papers. Studies were categorized as having a statistically nonsignificant effect, a favorable effect, or an unfavorable effect of being a vegetarian compared with being an omnivore. Only outcomes, for which P£0.05, were included in the favorable and unfavorable categories. Outcomes were also categorized according to the age of the subjects. Result: Fifteen studies that fulfilled the criteria were identified. All studies examined the bone mineral content (BMC) and/or bone mineral density (BMD) and no study examined fracture rates. Since studies that examined both BMD and BMC did not differ in result between these two measures the BMD figures were included only. Since some studies reported BMD at different sites and in different age groups the total number of outcomes was twenty-six. In twenty-three (88.5%) outcomes there was no significant difference between the groups, while one (3.8%) outcome reported a favorable effect and two (7.7%) outcomes an unfavorable effect. The two unfavorable outcomes were reported from one single Chinese study in which the vegetarian diet differed considerably from typical western vegetarian diets. If the review was limited to include outcomes from groups of western vegetarians only, the result was as follows: ~95% a nonsignificant effect and ~5% a favorable effect. Conclusion: The bone health of western vegetarians, measured as bone mineral density, does not differ significantly compared with age and sex matched omnivores. Whether there is a difference in actual fracture rates between the groups remains to be clarified. It should be noted though that the conclusion of this review does not rule out the possibility that dietary-induced changes in acid-base metabolism can affect bone health. None of the studies included in this review was designed to find such relationship. Recent epidemiological studies of such design support the theory that fruits and vegetables, foods with an alka line load, promote bone health. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2004 Report Share Posted February 12, 2004 "Trans fat, like saturated fat and dietary cholesterol, raises the LDL cholesterol that increases your risk for CHD. Americans consume on average 4 to 5 times as much saturated fat as trans fat in their diets. Although saturated fat is the main dietary culprit that raises LDL, trans fat and dietary cholesterol also contribute significantly." -FDA http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2003/503_fats.html "Harvard nutritionist Walter Willett blames trans fats for at least 30,000 premature deaths a year, calling their introduction in the 1940s the "biggest food-processing disaster in U.S. history." And pioneering trans-fats researcher Mary G. Enig, Ph.D., formerly at the University of Maryland, says: "Several decades of research show consumption of trans fatty acids promotes heart disease, cancer, diabetes, immune dysfunction, obesity and reproductive problems." If Americans could detect the danger on food labels, they would cut back on trans fats, reasons the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The FDA wants new food labels to reveal trans fats, contending such labels would save lives by forcing food manufacturers to eliminate trans fats. Just removing trans fatty acids from all margarines (70% now are high in trans fats) would prevent 6,300 heart attacks a year. Also eliminating trans fats in just 3% of breads and cakes and 15% of cookies and crackers would save up to $59 billion in health care costs in the next 20 years, the FDA predicts. " http://www.usaweekend.com/01_issues/010304/010304eatsmart.html "This review explores whether fructose consumption might be a contributing factor to the development of obesity and the accompanying metabolic abnormalities observed in the insulin resistance syndrome. The per capita disappearance data for fructose from the combined consumption of sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup have increased by 26%, from 64 g/d in 1970 to 81 g/d in 1997. Both plasma insulin and leptin act in the central nervous system in the long-term regulation of energy homeostasis. Because fructose does not stimulate insulin secretion from pancreatic ß cells, the consumption of foods and beverages containing fructose produces smaller postprandial insulin excursions than does consumption of glucose-containing carbohydrate. Because leptin production is regulated by insulin responses to meals, fructose consumption also reduces circulating leptin concentrations. The combined effects of lowered circulating leptin and insulin in individuals who consume diets that are high in dietary fructose could therefore increase the likelihood of weight gain and its associated metabolic sequelae. In addition, fructose, compared with glucose, is preferentially metabolized to lipid in the liver. Fructose consumption induces insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, hyperinsulinemia, hypertriacylglycerolemia, and hypertension in animal models. The data in humans are less clear. Although there are existing data on the metabolic and endocrine effects of dietary fructose that suggest that increased consumption of fructose may be detrimental in terms of body weight and adiposity and the metabolic indexes associated with the insulin resistance syndrome, much more research is needed to fully understand the metabolic effect of dietary fructose in humans." -Fructose, weight gain, and the insulin resistance syndrome. Elliott SS, Keim NL, Stern JS, Teff K, Havel PJ.http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/76/5/911?maxtoshow= & HITS=10 & hits=10 & RESULTFORMAT= & fulltext=fructose+weight & searchid=1076615356914_9497 & stored_search= & FIRSTINDEX=0 & sortspec=relevance & journalcode=ajcn-J. Lisa >While people should>limit their intake of tans fats, having some in your diet >is unlikely to be>harmful. At least, there is no data that they will cause >noticeable damage>or decrease your life span. And why would someone worry >about high fructose>corn syrup, of all things? Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2004 Report Share Posted February 13, 2004 I promise the list moderators this will be my last post on the subject for now... In the snippet from my email below, " While people should limit their intake of tans fats, having some in your diet is unlikely to be harmful. At least, there is no data that they will cause noticeable damage or decrease your life span, " I meant that there was no data that " some " is harmful. However, how much is " some " and how much is " more than some " ? A few months ago, I tried to figure that out and could not find much at all. If you go to PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=Search & DB=PubMed and put in: " trans fat* " (with the quotation makrs) you only get 49 studies and most of them are irrelevent to the question. I try to limit hydrogenated oils and would encourage everyone to. But just because something has some hydrogenated oil in it, doesn't mean it's poison. Mary Enig (mentioned J. Lisa's post below) is also an anti-soy person, and I notice she didn't mention that animal products contain much more trans fats than do plant foods with the exception of hydrogenated plant oils. I found the following interview with her in which she discusses trans fats: http://www.healthy.net/asp/templates/interview.asp?PageType=Interview & ID=163 There were only 2 papers mentioned that show trans fats to be unhealthy in humans long term and they were both by Walter Willett. One was a presentation at a conference and the other was this one: http://tinyurl.com/2te5q which does show that large amounts of trans fatty acids over time were correlated with heart disease. I will get a copy of that article and perhaps we can determine from it how much trans fat was damaging and how much a typical McDonald's burger has. However, as people who have followed research coming out of Harvard School of Public Health probably know, the results are often contradictory over time and over different populations and they often contradict research done in other places. This is just the way things work -- you need numerous studies to verify a theory before it should be considered a hard truth. As for high fructose corn syrup, the abstract below specifically states that data on fructose in humans in unclear. My understanding is that high fructose corn syrup contains about the same amount of fructose as table sugar. (Almost) any time someone makes a lifetime habit of eating more food than their body burns, things like insulin resistance or other problems are going to crop up. That is true of fat, protein, fructose, sucrose, starch, alcohol, etc. Yet all these things are fine in moderation and sometimes even healthy. I don't think people would say that McDonalds' bun was a nutritional nightmare because there was a bit of table sugar (sucrose) in it (or, at least, they shouldn't), and I don't see how having corn syrup could be different enough to cause harm to people should they regularly eat McDonald's buns. Jack - so_oy delicious Thursday, February 12, 2004 12:00 PM Re: Nutrition and McVeggie " Trans fat, like saturated fat and dietary cholesterol, raises the LDL cholesterol that increases your risk for CHD. Americans consume on average 4 to 5 times as much saturated fat as trans fat in their diets. Although saturated fat is the main dietary culprit that raises LDL, trans fat and dietary cholesterol also contribute significantly. " -FDA http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2003/503_fats.html " Harvard nutritionist Walter Willett blames trans fats for at least 30,000 premature deaths a year, calling their introduction in the 1940s the " biggest food-processing disaster in U.S. history. " And pioneering trans-fats researcher Mary G. Enig, Ph.D., formerly at the University of Maryland, says: " Several decades of research show consumption of trans fatty acids promotes heart disease, cancer, diabetes, immune dysfunction, obesity and reproductive problems. " If Americans could detect the danger on food labels, they would cut back on trans fats, reasons the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The FDA wants new food labels to reveal trans fats, contending such labels would save lives by forcing food manufacturers to eliminate trans fats. Just removing trans fatty acids from all margarines (70% now are high in trans fats) would prevent 6,300 heart attacks a year. Also eliminating trans fats in just 3% of breads and cakes and 15% of cookies and crackers would save up to $59 billion in health care costs in the next 20 years, the FDA predicts. " http://www.usaweekend.com/01_issues/010304/010304eatsmart.html " This review explores whether fructose consumption might be a contributing factor to the development of obesity and the accompanying metabolic abnormalities observed in the insulin resistance syndrome. The per capita disappearance data for fructose from the combined consumption of sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup have increased by 26%, from 64 g/d in 1970 to 81 g/d in 1997. Both plasma insulin and leptin act in the central nervous system in the long-term regulation of energy homeostasis. Because fructose does not stimulate insulin secretion from pancreatic ß cells, the consumption of foods and beverages containing fructose produces smaller postprandial insulin excursions than does consumption of glucose-containing carbohydrate. Because leptin production is regulated by insulin responses to meals, fructose consumption also reduces circulating leptin concentrations. The combined effects of lowered circulating leptin and insulin in individuals who consume diets that are high in dietary fructose could therefore increase the likelihood of weight gain and its associated metabolic sequelae. In addition, fructose, compared with glucose, is preferentially metabolized to lipid in the liver. Fructose consumption induces insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, hyperinsulinemia, hypertriacylglycerolemia, and hypertension in animal models. The data in humans are less clear. Although there are existing data on the metabolic and endocrine effects of dietary fructose that suggest that increased consumption of fructose may be detrimental in terms of body weight and adiposity and the metabolic indexes associated with the insulin resistance syndrome, much more research is needed to fully understand the metabolic effect of dietary fructose in humans. " -Fructose, weight gain, and the insulin resistance syndrome. Elliott SS, Keim NL, Stern JS, Teff K, Havel PJ. http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/76/5/911?maxtoshow= & HITS=10 & hits=10 & RES\ ULTFORMAT= & fulltext=fructose+weight & searchid=1076615356914_9497 & stored_search= & F\ IRSTINDEX=0 & sortspec=relevance & journalcode=ajcn -J. Lisa >While people should >limit their intake of tans fats, having some in your diet >is unlikely to be >harmful. At least, there is no data that they will cause >noticeable damage >or decrease your life span. And why would someone worry >about high fructose >corn syrup, of all things? Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online BAY AREA VEGETARIANS (BAV) is a community group for veggies to network & find support. Free membership and lots of free events :-) Event Calendar, Charter, FAQ (/) and More! http://www.bayareaveg.org/ Bookmark this page! Don't miss local events! http://www.bayareaveg.org/events.php Message board http://www.bayareaveg.org/forum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.