Guest guest Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 > > *Editor's Note:** Some praise biofuels as the way of > the future, others > acknowledge the challenges and even > counter-productive costs in pursuing > plant-based energies. Oil and agrifood giants are > developing biofuels > and governments are setting targets for renewable > energy to make up an > increasing proportion of the overall percentage of > energy utilized. But > if biofuels offer energy solutions that contribute > less CO2 into the > atmosphere, they are controversial for the > counter-efficiency and > potential risk involved in their production: Forests > are burned to clear > land to grow biomass, emitting great amounts of > carbon dioxide; the > biotechnology industry is now applying itself to the > production of > " franken-fuels, " producing corn not intended for > human consumption but > without guarantees that it won't enter the human and > animal food supply > chains; and, finally, there is the long-standing > debate about using land > to grow crops for cars versus people. We invite > reader responses: > foodnews. * > > GM WATCH daily > http://www.gmwatch.org > > Frankenstein fuels > Mark Lynas > New Statesman, 7th August 2006 > http://www.newstatesman.com/200608070031 > > Pioneered by bearded hippies running clapped-out > vans on recycled chip > fat, biofuels now mean big business, sold to us as a > solution to global > warming. We must not be fooled, argues Mark Lynas > > Late every summer, large areas of central Borneo > become invisible. > There's no magic involved - most of the densely > forested island simply > gets covered with a pall of thick smoke. Huge areas > of forest burn, > while beneath the ground peat many metres thick > smoulders on for months. > These trees are burning in a good cause, however. > They are burning to > help save the world from global warming. > > Here is how the logic goes. As the natural forest is > cleared, land opens > up for lucrative palm-oil plantations. Palm oil is a > feedstock for > biodiesel, the " carbon-neutral " fuel that the > European Union is trying > to encourage by converting its vehicle fleet. By > reducing use of fossil > fuels for its cars and trucks, the EU believes it > can reduce its carbon > emissions and thereby help mitigate global warming. > Everyone is happy. > (Except the orang-utan. It gets to go extinct.) > > It's a con, of course. In 1997, the single worst > year of Indonesian > forest- and peat-burning, 2.67 billion tonnes of > carbon dioxide were > released by the fires, equivalent to 40 per cent of > the year's entire > emissions from burning fossil fuels. That was a > particularly bad year: > most summers, the emissions are only a billion or so > tonnes, or about 15 > per cent of total human emissions. The biggest > Indonesian fires, in 1997 > and 1998, took place on plantation company land, > while in neighbouring > Malaysia 87 per cent of recent deforestation has > occurred to make way > for palm-oil plantations. It is stretching credulity > to argue that > biofuels produced through this destructive process > are helping combat > climate change. > > The EU is undaunted (though it has undertaken a > public consultation), > and persists with a target that 5.75 per cent of its > vehicle fuels > should be " renewable " by the year 2010. Not all of > this will come from > tropical sources such as palm oil - but nor can > their importation be > restricted on environmental grounds. The campaigning > journalist George > Monbiot has discovered that world trade rules would > prevent the EU > taking any measures to restrict imports of palm oil > produced on > deforested lands. Free trade comes first. > > Some of this " deforestation diesel " will be > processed and refined in the > UK. A company called Biofuels Corporation has just > finished building a > biodiesel plant at Seal Sands, near Middlesbrough, > and supplies fuel > throughout the UK. With an annual production > capacity of 284 million > litres of biodiesel, it is strategically located > next to a deep-water > port to ease its access to imports of palm and other > vegetable oils. A > spokesman confirmed that imported palm oil from > Malaysia is being used > as feedstock, and that the source cannot at present > be guaranteed as > " rainforest-free " . A second company, Greenergy > Biofuels, is putting up a > GBP13.5m plant at Immingham on Humberside, and plans > another. Palm oil > is again expected to be one of the main feedstocks > imported. > > As the promise of profits increases, the big players > are beginning to > get involved. The two largest external stakes in > Greenergy Biofuels are > held by Tesco and Cargill. Tesco will shift the > product on its petrol > forecourts, while Cargill - one of two giants that > dominate the world > food market - will supply the feedstock. Gone are > the days when biofuels > meant bearded hippies running their clapped-out vans > on recycled chip fat. > > Even the oil majors are sniffing around this new > market. BP has teamed > up with DuPont to develop a liquid fuel called > biobutanol, derived from > sugar cane or corn starch, which they aim to launch > in the UK next year > as an additive to petrol. In the meantime, the oil > giant is ploughing > half a billion dollars into biofuels research at a > new academic > laboratory called the Energy Biosciences Institute. > Indeed, > " biosciences " are what it's all about. Speak to > anyone in the corporate > energy or agricultural sectors and they will > probably go dewy-eyed about > the technological " convergence " of energy, food, > genetics - in fact, > just about everything. In the biotechnology industry > the atmosphere is > reminiscent of the heady days of genetic > modification, before the > companies realised that consumers didn't want to eat > " Frankenstein > foods " . Frankenstein fuels, however, might prove an > easier sell. > > The GM industry now plans to reinvent itself, > following the example of > the nuclear industry, on the back of climate change. > " Producing > genetically modified crops for non-food purposes, as > a renewable source > of alternative fuels, may provide the basis for a > more rational and > balanced consideration of the technology and its > potential benefits, > away from the disproportionate hysteria which has so > often accompanied > the debate over GM foods, " suggests the Agricultural > Biotechnology > Council, an umbrella organisation for the biggest > biotech companies. > > The Swiss corporation Syngenta is already marketing > a variety of GM corn > - one not approved for human consumption or animal > feed - specifically > intended for ethanol biofuels. It has just applied, > with support from > the UK, for an EU import licence - even though it > admits it " cannot > exclude " the possibility that some of this corn will > find its way into > the normal supply chain. The European biotech > association EuropaBio is > delighted with the EU's biofuels initiative. > " Biotechnology will help to > meet Europe's carbon-dioxide emission reduction > targets, reduce our > dependence on oil imports and provide another useful > income stream for > our farmers, " enthuses its secretary general, Johan > Vanhemelrijck. > > In the United States, biofuels are welcomed as a way > to help wean the > country off its dependence on oil produced by shady, > Allah-obsessed > Arabs. " Every gallon of renewable, domestically > produced fuel we use is > a gallon we don't have to get from other countries, " > beams Congressman > Kenny Hulshof, a Republican sponsor of the Renewable > Fuels and Energy > Independence Promotion Act being considered by > Congress. Not > surprisingly, the American Soybean Association is > also a supporter. " ASA > is urging all soybean growers to contact their > members of Congress and > ask them to co-sponsor this legislation, " says its > president, Bob Metz, > in a press release. " The toll-free number for the > Congress operator is > 1-888-355-3588. " > > In America, biofuels combine patriotism with > economic self-interest in a > seamless match. Farmers love it because biodiesel > and ethanol are brewed > from agricultural commodities, helping drive up > farm-gate prices. > Red-state senators love it because federal tax > subsidies keep > Republican-voting farmers happy. Even George W Bush > loves it: " I like > the idea of a policy that combines agriculture and > modern science with > the energy needs of the American people, " the > president told the > Renewable Fuels Association in April. > > Democrats and Republicans are united in touting > ethanol. " All incumbents > and challengers in Midwestern farm country are by > definition > ethanolics, " the agricultural policy adviser Ken > Cook told the New York > Times. There are 40 ethanol plants under > construction, and the US is > poised to overtake Brazil (which uses sugar cane on > a large scale to > make the fuel) as the world's largest producer > within a year. Cargill's > CEO compares the transformation to " a gold rush " . > > But not everybody loves biofuels. David Pimentel, > professor of insect > ecology and agriculture at Cornell University, hates > them. " There is > just no energy benefit to using plant biomass for > liquid fuel, " he > complains. Pimentel's own studies have concluded > that making ethanol > from corn uses 30 per cent more energy than the > finished fuel produces, > because fossil fuels are used at every stage in the > production process, > from cultivation (in fertilisers) to transportation. > " Abusing our > precious croplands to grow corn for an > energy-inefficient process that > yields low-grade automobile fuel amounts to > unsustainable, subsidised > food burning, " he fumes. > > Pimentel is not alone in thinking that burning food > in cars while global > harvests decline is not necessarily a good idea. > China, with its > enormous population, is already having second > thoughts about going down > the biofuels path. " Basically this country has such > a large population > that the top priority for land use is food crops, " > says Dr Sergio > Trindade, an expert on biofuels. The same problem > will doubtless hamper > the biofuels revolution in Europe. According to one > study, meeting the > EU's 5.75 per cent target for its vehicles will > require about a quarter > of Europe's agricultural land. For the even more > car-dependent US, it > would take 1.8 billion acres of farmland - four > times the country's > total arable area - to produce enough soya biodiesel > to cover annual > petrol consumption. > > So which gets priority: cars or people? A very > simple answer to this > land/fuel conundrum would be for people to use their > cars less, and to > cycle and walk more. But discouraging car use is not > at the top of any > politician's agenda, either in Europe or the US. > Meanwhile, our leaders > must be seen to be doing something about the rising > greenhouse-gas > emissions from road tran sport, so biofuels are the > perfect technofix. > > The dilemma might bring to mind Douglas Adams's > Hitchhiker's Guide to > the Galaxy, where the alien Ford Prefect took the > name of a car because > - looking down from above at all the busy roads and > motorways - he had > mistaken them for the dominant life form. If cars > chug happily around > between massed ranks of starving people in our > biofuelled future, then > perhaps Ford Prefect won't have got it so wrong > after all. > > For more about biofuels, log on to > [http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk] > <http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk%5D> > > The basics of biofuels > > The term biofuels covers a wide range of products, > some of which are > already commercially available, some of which are > still in the research > and development stage. > > A biofuel is made from biomass - organic material > with stored chemical > energy. Agricultural products specifically grown for > use as biofuels > include corn and soybeans, flaxseed and rapeseed, > and hemp. > > Biofuels are renewable, and can be stored > indefinitely and safely, > though their " feedstocks " can require vast areas of > land and their > generation produces pollution. > > The two main types of biofuel currently in use are > biodiesel, made from > new or used vegetable oils and animal fats, and > ethanol, produced by > fermenting grain, sugar cane, grass, straw and wood. > > This article first appeared in the New Statesman. > For the latest in current and cultural affairs take > out a print or > online subscription. > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > WHO WE ARE: This e-mail service shares information > to help more people > discuss crucial policy issues affecting global food > security. > The service is managed by Amber McNair of the > University of Toronto > in partnership with the Centre for Urban Health > Initiatives (CUHI) and > Wayne Roberts of the Toronto Food Policy Council, in > partnership with > the Community Food Security Coalition, World Hunger > Year, and > International Partners for Sustainable Agriculture. > > Please help by sending information or names and > e-mail addresses of > co-workers who'd like to receive this service, to > foodnews. To or , please > visit http://list.web.net/lists/listinfo/food-news. > _____________ food-news mailing list food-news http://list.web.net/lists/listinfo/food-news Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.