Guest guest Posted March 13, 2007 Report Share Posted March 13, 2007 " I do not know whether, nowadays, you have those debates, but I used at that time to attend debates that were held between vegetarians and vegetarians and between vegetarians and non-vegetarians. I remember one such debate, between Dr. Densmore and the late Dr. T. R. Allinson. Then vegetarians had a habit of talking of nothing but food and nothing but disease. I feel that that is the worst way of going about the business. I notice also that it is those persons who become vegetarians because they are suffering from some disease or other – that is, from purely the health point of view – it is those persons who largely fall back. I discovered that for remaining staunch to vegetarianism a man requires a moral basis. " " For me that was a great discovery in my search after truth. At an early age, in the course of my experiments, I found that a selfish basis would not serve the purpose of taking a man higher and higher along the paths of evolution. What was required. was an altruistic purpose. I found also that health was by no means the monopoly of vegetarians. I found many people having no bias one way or the other and that non-vegetarians were able to show, generally speaking, good health. I found also that several vegetarians found it impossible to remain vegetarians because they had made food a fetish and because they thought that by becoming vegetarians they could eat as much lentil, haricot, beans and cheese as they liked. Of course those people could not possibly keep their health. " " A vegetarian is made of sterner stuff. Why? Because it is for the building of the spirit and not of the body. Man is more than meat. It is the spirit in man for which we are concerned. Therefore vegetarians should have that moral basis – that a man was not born a carnivorous animal, but born to live on the fruits and herbs that the earth grows. " --Speech delivered by Gandhi at a Social Meeting organised by the London Vegetarian Society, 20 November 1931 http://www.ivu.org/news/evu/other/gandhi2.html Lovefood Lane <lovefoodlaughter wrote: Joe Postma, We are your fans and agree wholeheartedly. Many belief systems and moral codes, such as strict veganism, seem bent towards negation: the " Thou shalt nots... " A human being, guided by such systems, relinquishes rational thought and replaces it with rationalizing emotional strife. Learning and tolerating new ideas then becomes very difficult. This negating attitude is unhealthy and can result in devastating psycho-physiological rigidity and tension. I hope we can find ways for helping people to find real ways to feel healthy, not simply to enjoy new means for exercising the autocratic guilt mongering of their chosen demagoguery and dogma. Lets not shame the past but look forward to the unknown and exciting future. Thank you, Joe, for sharing and using your mind. Sincerely, Jonathan and Storm ____________________ The experience of dynamic religious living transforms the mediocre individual into a personality of idealistic power. Religion ministers to the progress of all through fostering the progress of each individual, and the progress of each is augmented through the achievement of all. [The Urantia Book: 1094:1][http://www.urantia.org/] _____________________ TRUELOVE @ http://www.vegconnect.com/ _____________________ Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2007 Report Share Posted March 13, 2007 Arguing doesn't effect change. tev treowlufu <goraw808 rawfood Tuesday, March 13, 2007 9:30:05 AM Re: [Raw Food] Dogma vs. morality (was Vitamin D requirements) " I do not know whether, nowadays, you have those debates, but I used at that time to attend debates that were held between vegetarians and vegetarians and between vegetarians and non-vegetarians. I remember one such debate, between Dr. Densmore and the late Dr. T. R. Allinson. Then vegetarians had a habit of talking of nothing but food and nothing but disease. I feel that that is the worst way of going about the business. I notice also that it is those persons who become vegetarians because they are suffering from some disease or other – that is, from purely the health point of view – it is those persons who largely fall back. I discovered that for remaining staunch to vegetarianism a man requires a moral basis. " " For me that was a great discovery in my search after truth. At an early age, in the course of my experiments, I found that a selfish basis would not serve the purpose of taking a man higher and higher along the paths of evolution. What was required. was an altruistic purpose. I found also that health was by no means the monopoly of vegetarians. I found many people having no bias one way or the other and that non-vegetarians were able to show, generally speaking, good health. I found also that several vegetarians found it impossible to remain vegetarians because they had made food a fetish and because they thought that by becoming vegetarians they could eat as much lentil, haricot, beans and cheese as they liked. Of course those people could not possibly keep their health. " " A vegetarian is made of sterner stuff. Why? Because it is for the building of the spirit and not of the body. Man is more than meat. It is the spirit in man for which we are concerned. Therefore vegetarians should have that moral basis – that a man was not born a carnivorous animal, but born to live on the fruits and herbs that the earth grows. " --Speech delivered by Gandhi at a Social Meeting organised by the London Vegetarian Society, 20 November 1931 http://www.ivu. org/news/ evu/other/ gandhi2.html Lovefood Lane <lovefoodlaughter@ > wrote: Joe Postma, We are your fans and agree wholeheartedly. Many belief systems and moral codes, such as strict veganism, seem bent towards negation: the " Thou shalt nots... " A human being, guided by such systems, relinquishes rational thought and replaces it with rationalizing emotional strife. Learning and tolerating new ideas then becomes very difficult. This negating attitude is unhealthy and can result in devastating psycho-physiologica l rigidity and tension. I hope we can find ways for helping people to find real ways to feel healthy, not simply to enjoy new means for exercising the autocratic guilt mongering of their chosen demagoguery and dogma. Lets not shame the past but look forward to the unknown and exciting future. Thank you, Joe, for sharing and using your mind. Sincerely, Jonathan and Storm ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _ The experience of dynamic religious living transforms the mediocre individual into a personality of idealistic power. Religion ministers to the progress of all through fostering the progress of each individual, and the progress of each is augmented through the achievement of all. [The Urantia Book: 1094:1][http://www.urantia. org/] ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _ TRUELOVE @ http://www.vegconne ct.com/ ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _ ------------ --------- --------- --- Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2007 Report Share Posted March 29, 2007 I am not trying to effect change. BTW, our voting process utilizes debate to create " choice. " tev Bob <comarow wrote: Arguing doesn't effect change. tev treowlufu rawfood Tuesday, March 13, 2007 9:30:05 AM Re: [Raw Food] Dogma vs. morality (was Vitamin D requirements) " I do not know whether, nowadays, you have those debates, but I used at that time to attend debates that were held between vegetarians and vegetarians and between vegetarians and non-vegetarians. I remember one such debate, between Dr. Densmore and the late Dr. T. R. Allinson. Then vegetarians had a habit of talking of required. was an ____________________ The experience of dynamic religious living transforms the mediocre individual into a personality of idealistic power. Religion ministers to the progress of all through fostering the progress of each individual, and the progress of each is augmented through the achievement of all. [The Urantia Book: 1094:1][http://www.urantia.org/] _____________________ TRUELOVE @ http://www.vegconnect.com/ _____________________ 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Search movie showtime shortcut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.