Guest guest Posted May 10, 2007 Report Share Posted May 10, 2007 Comments? Misty L. Trepke http://health. http://rense.com/general76/raw.htm Rense: Raw Food Vs. The Cooked, American Diet Raw Food Vs The Cooked, American Diet God's Way to Ultimate Health By Dr. George H. Malkumu with Michael Dye 5-9-7 The Great American Rat Experiment The following is an account of an interesting three-part experiment comparing the effects of raw foods versus cooked foods with rats. This account is taken from a book titled " Goldot " , by Lewis E. Cook, Jr. and Junko Yasui: " It has been found that a group of rats were fed diet of raw vegetables, fruits, nuts and whole grains from birth grew into completely healthy specimens and never suffered from any disease. They were never ill. They grew rapidly, but never became fat, mated with enthusiasm and had healthy offspring. They were always gently affectionate and playful and lived in perfect harmony with each other. Upon reach an old age, equivalent to 80 years in humans, these rats were put to death and autopsied. At that advanced age their organs, glands, tissues all body processes appeared to be in perfect condition without any sign of aging or deterioration. " A companion group of rats we fed a diet comparable to that of the average American and included white bread, cooked foods, meats, milk, salt, soft drinks, candies, cakes, vitamins and other supplements, medicines for their ails, etc. During their lifetime these rats became fat and, from the earliest age, contracted most of the diseases of modern American society including colds, fever, pneumonia, poor vision, cataracts, heart disease, arthritis, cancer and many more. " Most of this group died prematurely at early ages but during their lifetime most of them were vicious, snarling beasts, fighting with one another stealing one another's food and attempting to kill each other. They had to be kept apart to prevent total destruction of the entire group. Their offspring were all sick and exhibited the same general characteristics as there parents. " As this group of rats died one by one or in epidemics or various diseases, autopsies were performed revealing extensive degenerative conditions in every part of their bodies. All organs, glands and tissues were affected, as were the skin, hair, blood and nervous system. They were all truly total physical and nervous wrecks. The same condition existed in the few, which survived full duration of the experiment. " A third companion group of rats was fed the same diet as the second group to an age equivalent to about 40 years in humans. They displayed the same general symptoms of the second group being sick and vicious so that they had to be separated to prevent them from killing each other and stealing one another food. " At the end of this initial period all rats in this group were placed on a strict fast, with o water to drink for a period of several days. Then they received the natural (raw) diet o first group of rats. This diet was alternated with periods of fast and within one mouth behavioral pattern had changed completely so that the now docile, affectionate, playful creatures were once again able to live together in a harmonious society and from this point on never suffered any illness. " Several rates put to death and autopsied at the end of the initial period revealing the same general deterioration as that exhibited in the second group of rats. However, the remaining rats lived out the full duration of the experiment, to the equivalent of 80 years in humans, and when they were topside there were no signs of aging or deterioration or disease - just as those in the first group. The obvious disease, degeneration and deterioration of body parts evident in their first half of life had been completely reversed and excellent health restored. " The same principles apply to human life as there is only one TRUTH! Thus it may be concluded that sick people may be restored to health simply by choosing the proper diet, fasting observing the other rules of health. There is no mystery. There is no external force that will help all healing being accomplished within the body in accordance with the laws of organic life and health. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2007 Report Share Posted May 10, 2007 Hello My name is Kim and I'm new to this group. The question I have about eating raw foods is; Can you steam them (veggies) a little or not? Thank you. rawfood , " Misty L. Trepke " <mistytrepke wrote: > > Comments? > Misty L. Trepke > http://health. > > http://rense.com/general76/raw.htm > Rense: Raw Food Vs. The Cooked, American Diet > > Raw Food Vs The > Cooked, American Diet > God's Way to Ultimate Health > By Dr. George H. Malkumu with Michael Dye > 5-9-7 > > > The Great American Rat Experiment > > The following is an account of an interesting three-part experiment > comparing the effects of raw foods versus cooked foods with rats. > This account is taken from a book titled " Goldot " , by Lewis E. > Cook, Jr. and Junko Yasui: > > " It has been found that a group of rats were fed diet of raw > vegetables, fruits, nuts and whole grains from birth grew into > completely healthy specimens and never suffered from any disease. > They were never ill. They grew rapidly, but never became fat, mated > with enthusiasm and had healthy offspring. They were always gently > affectionate and playful and lived in perfect harmony with each > other. Upon reach an old age, equivalent to 80 years in humans, > these rats were put to death and autopsied. At that advanced age > their organs, glands, tissues all body processes appeared to be in > perfect condition without any sign of aging or deterioration. > > " A companion group of rats we fed a diet comparable to that of the > average American and included white bread, cooked foods, meats, > milk, salt, soft drinks, candies, cakes, vitamins and other > supplements, medicines for their ails, etc. During their lifetime > these rats became fat and, from the earliest age, contracted most > of the diseases of modern American society including colds, fever, > pneumonia, poor vision, cataracts, heart disease, arthritis, cancer > and many more. > > " Most of this group died prematurely at early ages but during their > lifetime most of them were vicious, snarling beasts, fighting with > one another stealing one another's food and attempting to kill each > other. They had to be kept apart to prevent total destruction of > the entire group. Their offspring were all sick and exhibited the > same general characteristics as there parents. > > " As this group of rats died one by one or in epidemics or various > diseases, autopsies were performed revealing extensive degenerative > conditions in every part of their bodies. All organs, glands and > tissues were affected, as were the skin, hair, blood and nervous > system. They were all truly total physical and nervous wrecks. The > same condition existed in the few, which survived full duration of > the experiment. > > " A third companion group of rats was fed the same diet as the > second group to an age equivalent to about 40 years in humans. > They displayed the same general symptoms of the second group being > sick and vicious so that they had to be separated to prevent them > from killing each other and stealing one another food. > > " At the end of this initial period all rats in this group were > placed on a strict fast, with o water to drink for a period of > several days. Then they received the natural (raw) diet o first > group of rats. This diet was alternated with periods of fast and > within one mouth behavioral pattern had changed completely so that > the now docile, affectionate, playful creatures were once again > able to live together in a harmonious society and from this point > on never suffered any illness. > > " Several rates put to death and autopsied at the end of the initial > period revealing the same general deterioration as that exhibited > in the second group of rats. However, the remaining rats lived out > the full duration of the experiment, to the equivalent of 80 years > in humans, and when they were topside there were no signs of aging > or deterioration or disease - just as those in the first group. > The obvious disease, degeneration and deterioration of body parts > evident in their first half of life had been completely reversed > and excellent health restored. > > " The same principles apply to human life as there is only one > TRUTH! Thus it may be concluded that sick people may be restored to > health simply by choosing the proper diet, fasting observing the > other rules of health. There is no mystery. There is no external > force that will help all healing being accomplished within the > body in accordance with the laws of organic life and health. " > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2007 Report Share Posted May 10, 2007 Yes, some foods are advised to eat steamed. A lot of purists say no, but it's perfectly fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2007 Report Share Posted May 11, 2007 Peace Thank so much, I was not sure because I was told not to steam my veggies, just eat as is, and I wanted to make sure because I do not wantto get sick. Thank you so so much; Kim. rawfood , " Erica " <schoolofrawk wrote: > > Yes, some foods are advised to eat steamed. > A lot of purists say no, but it's perfectly fine. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2007 Report Share Posted May 11, 2007 If they are steamed at more than 118 degrees F, they are no longer raw, but cooked. Steaming is cooked. ~k On May 10, 2007, at 2:14 PM, tumoon0 wrote: > Hello My name is Kim and I'm new to this group. > > The question I have about eating raw foods is; Can you steam them > (veggies) a little or not? > > Thank you. > rawfood , " Misty L. Trepke " <mistytrepke > wrote: > > > > Comments? > > Misty L. Trepke > > http://health. > > > > http://rense.com/general76/raw.htm > > Rense: Raw Food Vs. The Cooked, American Diet > > > > Raw Food Vs The > > Cooked, American Diet > > God's Way to Ultimate Health > > By Dr. George H. Malkumu with Michael Dye > > 5-9-7 > > > > > > The Great American Rat Experiment > > > > The following is an account of an interesting three-part > experiment > > comparing the effects of raw foods versus cooked foods with rats. > > This account is taken from a book titled " Goldot " , by Lewis E. > > Cook, Jr. and Junko Yasui: > > > > " It has been found that a group of rats were fed diet of raw > > vegetables, fruits, nuts and whole grains from birth grew into > > completely healthy specimens and never suffered from any disease. > > They were never ill. They grew rapidly, but never became fat, > mated > > with enthusiasm and had healthy offspring. They were always > gently > > affectionate and playful and lived in perfect harmony with each > > other. Upon reach an old age, equivalent to 80 years in humans, > > these rats were put to death and autopsied. At that advanced age > > their organs, glands, tissues all body processes appeared to be > in > > perfect condition without any sign of aging or deterioration. > > > > " A companion group of rats we fed a diet comparable to that of > the > > average American and included white bread, cooked foods, meats, > > milk, salt, soft drinks, candies, cakes, vitamins and other > > supplements, medicines for their ails, etc. During their lifetime > > these rats became fat and, from the earliest age, contracted most > > of the diseases of modern American society including colds, > fever, > > pneumonia, poor vision, cataracts, heart disease, arthritis, > cancer > > and many more. > > > > " Most of this group died prematurely at early ages but during > their > > lifetime most of them were vicious, snarling beasts, fighting > with > > one another stealing one another's food and attempting to kill > each > > other. They had to be kept apart to prevent total destruction of > > the entire group. Their offspring were all sick and exhibited the > > same general characteristics as there parents. > > > > " As this group of rats died one by one or in epidemics or various > > diseases, autopsies were performed revealing extensive > degenerative > > conditions in every part of their bodies. All organs, glands and > > tissues were affected, as were the skin, hair, blood and nervous > > system. They were all truly total physical and nervous wrecks. > The > > same condition existed in the few, which survived full duration > of > > the experiment. > > > > " A third companion group of rats was fed the same diet as the > > second group to an age equivalent to about 40 years in humans. > > They displayed the same general symptoms of the second group > being > > sick and vicious so that they had to be separated to prevent them > > from killing each other and stealing one another food. > > > > " At the end of this initial period all rats in this group were > > placed on a strict fast, with o water to drink for a period of > > several days. Then they received the natural (raw) diet o first > > group of rats. This diet was alternated with periods of fast and > > within one mouth behavioral pattern had changed completely so > that > > the now docile, affectionate, playful creatures were once again > > able to live together in a harmonious society and from this point > > on never suffered any illness. > > > > " Several rates put to death and autopsied at the end of the > initial > > period revealing the same general deterioration as that exhibited > > in the second group of rats. However, the remaining rats lived > out > > the full duration of the experiment, to the equivalent of 80 > years > > in humans, and when they were topside there were no signs of > aging > > or deterioration or disease - just as those in the first group. > > The obvious disease, degeneration and deterioration of body parts > > evident in their first half of life had been completely reversed > > and excellent health restored. > > > > " The same principles apply to human life as there is only one > > TRUTH! Thus it may be concluded that sick people may be restored > to > > health simply by choosing the proper diet, fasting observing the > > other rules of health. There is no mystery. There is no external > > force that will help all healing being accomplished within the > > body in accordance with the laws of organic life and health. " > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2007 Report Share Posted May 11, 2007 The most important distinction here is overlooked, apparently. Steaming veggies will not harm you in any big way, but it will diminish their nutrient value and increase the workload required for digestion, assimilation, and elimination. And if any vegetable MUST be cooked to be eaten, that that particular vegetable is not food for our species. That is a key distinction ... the NEED to cook means it's not food for us, at least not in terms of Nature's design. Can we shovel it in and force it through? Yes, Does this make it a healthful food choice? No. Best, Elchanan _____ rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of tumoon0 Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:42 PM rawfood [Raw Food] Re: Rense: Raw Food Vs. The Cooked, American Diet Peace Thank so much, I was not sure because I was told not to steam my veggies, just eat as is, and I wanted to make sure because I do not wantto get sick. Thank you so so much; Kim. rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com, " Erica " <schoolofrawk wrote: > > Yes, some foods are advised to eat steamed. > A lot of purists say no, but it's perfectly fine. > <http://geo./serv?s=97359714/grpId=5520395/grpspId=1705015482/msgId =29055/stime=1178886095/nc1=4438979/nc2=4299903/nc3=4025377> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2007 Report Share Posted May 11, 2007 excellent point. this shows itself in our love for baked potatoes...you wouldnt eat them raw.....but as soon as we bake them, we eat tooons! they contain toxins...sure yams have vitamin A but there are other sources without all the sugar, etc. now i lllooooovvveeee yams!....again though, the butter will kill me..so better not to eat any at all unless i want to get fat. notice though that eating tubers, with no toppings, doesnt hurt natives in africa at all....something to consider... peace anna On 5/11/07, Elchanan <Elchanan wrote: > The most important distinction here is overlooked, apparently. Steaming > veggies will not harm you in any big way, but it will diminish their > nutrient value and increase the workload required for digestion, > assimilation, and elimination. And if any vegetable MUST be cooked to be > eaten, that that particular vegetable is not food for our species. That is a > key distinction ... the NEED to cook means it's not food for us, at least > not in terms of Nature's design. Can we shovel it in and force it through? > Yes, Does this make it a healthful food choice? No. > > Best, > Elchanan > > _____ > > rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of > tumoon0 > Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:42 PM > rawfood > [Raw Food] Re: Rense: Raw Food Vs. The Cooked, American Diet > > > Peace > Thank so much, I was not sure because I was told not to steam my > veggies, just eat as is, and I wanted to make sure because I do not > wantto get sick. > Thank you so so much; Kim. > rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com, " Erica " > <schoolofrawk wrote: > > > > Yes, some foods are advised to eat steamed. > > A lot of purists say no, but it's perfectly fine. > > > <http://geo./serv?s=97359714/grpId=5520395/grpspId=1705015482/msgId > =29055/stime=1178886095/nc1=4438979/nc2=4299903/nc3=4025377> > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.