Guest guest Posted June 9, 2007 Report Share Posted June 9, 2007 Hi Caron, I suggest dropping the word " allergy " (and all its forms) from your vocabulary. Use of this term reflects medical-model thinking at its almost-worst. Your body is responding with all the energy and other resources at its disposal, trying to clean house. If you keep putting in the same foreign matter, your body merely keeps repeating its attempts to wall off and remove the stuff. That is not an allergy, it is chronic self-abuse. Sorry to put it so strongly, but that's how it appears to me ... living in a new set of paradigms about health, Nature, etc. Best, Elchanan _____ rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of Caron Friday, June 08, 2007 4:07 PM rawfood Re: [Raw Food] Re: Grains and arthritis ... why Pritikin failed (WAS: How long could you live on ...? (WAS: Deodorant) I know at least 3 people allergic to rice ;o) My brother, a friend of mine, and her baby girl. People are allergic to anything and everything these days, even fruit. (I suspect a lot of it is to do with other foods they eat, and/or chemicals in their environment, which tax their system and cause it to take it out on the good stuff) I stopped eating rice a while back when I had a tummy bug, and haven't really missed it. Just trying to wean my boy off it too - he gets constipated on white rice, and goes about with a basketball belly for a few days afterwards. Caron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2007 Report Share Posted June 11, 2007 - Elchanan >I suggest dropping the word " allergy " (and all its forms) from your vocabulary. Use of this term reflects medical-model thinking at its almost-worst. Your body is responding with all the energy and other resources at its disposal, trying to clean house. If you keep putting in the same foreign matter, your body merely keeps repeating its attempts to wall off and remove the stuff. That is not an allergy, it is chronic self-abuse. Hi Elchanan, That's a fair enough point, and I agree with you to an extent. The type of allergies I'm talking about though (my brother with rice and bananas, my boy with wheat, etc) are violent reactions to individual exposures to things that aren't usually in their diet. For example, if my brother eats something with rice in it, he gets sick; if I eat something with wheat in it, my breastfed baby gets sick (if he eats it straight, he vomits instantly). It's true that my brother has other things in his diet that are making him sick (not that he sees it, but I'll tackle my own health before pointing fingers!), but these violent reactions come after he eats or is exposed to things he's tested allergic to. There is something I've noticed about my son though, that I've been asking doctors about since he was very young, with no satisfactory answer, that you've explained to me - why he has or had mucousy poops at times. It tends to happen after I eat something (no clue exactly what, or it could just be my whole intake in general, healthy though I thought it was) that he reacts to. A few things are starting to make a whole lot of sense. Caron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2007 Report Share Posted June 11, 2007 Hi Caron, All humans respond adversely to rice and to wheat ... it's only a matter of degree. The only true banana " allergy " of which I am aware occurs when a parent tries to introduce solid foods ... in this case, bananas ... way too early. This means before the child's body is ready to process them. We wean way to early in our society, a cause of many sensitivities and " allergies " . Still, I'm willing to bet, albeit from a distance, there is more going on than you are seeing. But email is a rather crippled resource for communicating about such things. E _____ rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of Caron Monday, June 11, 2007 1:22 AM rawfood Re: [Raw Food] Language: " Allergies " as Self-Abuse (WAS: Grains and arthritis ... why Pritikin failed) Elchanan >I suggest dropping the word " allergy " (and all its forms) from your vocabulary. Use of this term reflects medical-model thinking at its almost-worst. Your body is responding with all the energy and other resources at its disposal, trying to clean house. If you keep putting in the same foreign matter, your body merely keeps repeating its attempts to wall off and remove the stuff. That is not an allergy, it is chronic self-abuse. Hi Elchanan, That's a fair enough point, and I agree with you to an extent. The type of allergies I'm talking about though (my brother with rice and bananas, my boy with wheat, etc) are violent reactions to individual exposures to things that aren't usually in their diet. For example, if my brother eats something with rice in it, he gets sick; if I eat something with wheat in it, my breastfed baby gets sick (if he eats it straight, he vomits instantly). It's true that my brother has other things in his diet that are making him sick (not that he sees it, but I'll tackle my own health before pointing fingers!), but these violent reactions come after he eats or is exposed to things he's tested allergic to. There is something I've noticed about my son though, that I've been asking doctors about since he was very young, with no satisfactory answer, that you've explained to me - why he has or had mucousy poops at times. It tends to happen after I eat something (no clue exactly what, or it could just be my whole intake in general, healthy though I thought it was) that he reacts to. A few things are starting to make a whole lot of sense. Caron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2007 Report Share Posted June 11, 2007 - Elchanan >All humans respond adversely to rice and to wheat ... it's only a matter of degree. The only true banana " allergy " of which I am aware occurs when a parent tries to introduce solid foods ... in this case, bananas ... way too early. This means before the child's body is ready to process them. We wean way to early in our society, a cause of many sensitivities and " allergies " . Still, I'm willing to bet, albeit from a distance, there is more going on than you are seeing. But email is a rather crippled resource for communicating about such things. Not sure when my brother was started on solids, I'm guessing around 6 months - most people assume that's essential, even though the WHO's recommendation is " AT LEAST 6 months of age " , not " BY 6 months of age " for starting on solids. The information pamphlets we're given at the hospital in antenatal and paediatric appointments are sponsored or published by baby food companies, and all recommend 4-6 months of age for starting solids, citing texture issues, and rejection of solids as reasons for starting at that age. The " gag " reflex is something to be trained out of an infant, rather than taken as a sign that solids are being started too early. Mum said she couldn't eat bananas when she was pregnant with him, same with peanut butter, which he's also allergic to (using the 'mainstream' definition of allergy). I couldn't stand the smell of bananas when I was pregnant, but they're my boy's favourite food, so that has me confused again. I have a feeling the aversion to bananas, and my brother's allergy, could have something to do with the poisons used on the plants, rather than the bananas themselves. Also the fact that a lot of bananas here are artificially " ripened " , where the skin is yellow, but the flesh is pale, almost white, and very firm. They smell very sharp when they're like that, and I have a very strong aversion to it. Caron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.