Guest guest Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 Erin, Though thinly veiled, this is obviously about me. Next time, just step up and say what's on your mind, that would make the communication cleaner. I have repeatedly suggested to people specific experiments they can conduct by themselves to gain precisely the visceral learning you describe. Have you? I don't recall so ... Perhaps some would like to learn from those who have actually helped other people restore their health and/or who have a foundation of knowledge in the sciences, etc. Perhaps some are seeking genuinely optimal health, really high-performance living. Perhaps they would like to avoid setbacks, and so forth. In all of these cases, diddling around with this way and that way will not serve their purposes and may actually hinder their forward progress. So here is my suggestion to you ... trust everyone on the list to fend for themselves. They will fend for themselves anyway, whether you trust them or not. But if you trust them, then you can relieve yourself of any perceived need to protect them. As for lab and population studies, if you had a background in research methods and the underlying math, you'd take a more distant view of these as a resource for those on this path. I realize you often point to (i.e., provide links to) articles about studies. However, I do not recall an instance where you gave evidence that you actually read the study itself (the peer-reviewed, published journal article). But perhaps I missed that .... There is a world of difference, what appears in the popular press about studies often bears little resemblance to what the researchers actually publish. Finally, I encourage people to connect with other aspects of their awareness, beyond cognition. The knowing is within us all. We require no studies of any kind in order to create and sustain our health and vitality. Rather, we need to reconnect with ourselves, as I've offered about thirst, hunger, satiation, and so forth. I don't recall your offering anything of comparable value ... but again, I may have missed it. Best to all, Elchanan _____ rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of Erin Friday, June 22, 2007 4:45 AM rawfood [Raw Food] critical thinking in food choices I am a little surprised at the reactivity and instant acceptance I've noticed in some here when told, with little explanation, that a certain foodstuff is bad for you. This despite years of using these ingredients and dozens of studies in peer-reviewed journals showing the opposite. Now, I'm not saying these alternative views are wrong (not saying they are right either). What I am advocating, however, is to not take them as gospel just for having been written on this forum. Keep an open mind, run the experiments, read all opposing views, evaluate their level of support and logic/intuitiveness. Most experiments, even if not converted into lifelong practice, are harmless. Many are supremely beneficial and necessary constructs to overcome habitual mindsets. There are, of course, exceptions; think of the film Supersize Me, where a simple 30-days wreaked havoc on the documentarian's health. Weigh the results of your visceral evidence (your personal " one rat " study) with the findings of the lab and population studies. Perhaps you'll discover a " middle path " where the dose is not poisonous, where hormesis takes precedence, etc.. Recall also that high blood pressure is not called the " silent killer " for nothing. We do not always realize, without objective measure, that our feelings of wellbeing belies an unhealthy reality (as evidenced by future mortality and morbidity). -Erin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 Well put, Caron! Elchanan _____ rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of Caron Friday, June 22, 2007 5:53 AM rawfood Re: [Raw Food] critical thinking in food choices That's all well and good, but a line needs to be drawn somewhere. Do we all feel the need to go sail around the world to prove it's definitely not flat? I'm happy to trust that one to those who know how to sail, and have already proven it. I have more important things to do with my time, and I'm not going to go and eat something I'm told is poison just to prove it is - I have better things to do with my body than deliberately inflict pain or discomfort on myself. I have enough of that in day to day living. I do test as much as possible, and take note of results I come across by accident, but in cases, for example, where I have had heartburn from eating onions in the past, I don't feel the need to follow strict experimental proceedure as described, and go and get it again, just to prove that it works. Caron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 Bet that song was about you too. I figure myself to be a pretty straight shooter, don't you worry. You're not the only one who offers up weak evidence in the raw foods community for shunning certain foods. My fascination was with how willingly people are (and not just in this group) to suddenly turn a complete 180 on such statements. So, the message was more about or rather to, them, I suppose. Anyway, to each his/her own. But my offering up advice to think critically and for yourself and with the totally of the data, both experiential and scientific, is no less worthy of airing than your listen-to-your-body advice. And certainly, we both have the right to suggest it! -Erin http://www.zenpawn.com/vegblog rawfood , " Elchanan " <Elchanan wrote: > > Erin, > > Though thinly veiled, this is obviously about me. Next time, just step up > and say what's on your mind, that would make the communication cleaner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 Dr. Ann Wigmore always said to be your own doctor. Of course raw onion may give you heartburn. That is not to say it is poison to everyone. No one person has all the answers. It is never that easy. So I would urge people NOT to choose just one healer to follow at any cost just due to common sense alone. P.S. Garlic has natural pain-relieving abilities.... Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2007 Report Share Posted June 23, 2007 Hi Erica, Hippocrates encouraged us all to become our own doctor, Ann W was merely borrowing. Have you ever known a single person who ate raw onion, by itself and on an empty stomach, and did NOT experience noticeable discomfort? As with garlic, we bury the onion in a larger recipe, we pickle it, we do anything we can to get it down. What we are enjoying is NOT the onion!! Elchanan _____ rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of School Of Rawk Friday, June 22, 2007 2:48 PM rawfood [Raw Food] Re: critical thinking in food choices Dr. Ann Wigmore always said to be your own doctor. Of course raw onion may give you heartburn. That is not to say it is poison to everyone. No one person has all the answers. It is never that easy. So I would urge people NOT to choose just one healer to follow at any cost just due to common sense alone. P.S. Garlic has natural pain-relieving abilities.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 Certainly everyone has the 'right' to suggest anything they want. However, I am curious Erin why you seem to think there are so many of us who seem to blindly listen to someone? Do you know if we have done our own research? You doubt we are capable of thinking? Perhaps I misread what you said but (to me anyway) it came across as if we are a bunch of blind and dumb mindlessly listening to someone with no verification. For those who have actually taken some of the advice given to them have been very pleased with the results. That speaks volumes to me. I don't mean to come across harshly to you it is jsut your comments seemed a little insulting. Erin <truepatriot wrote: Bet that song was about you too. I figure myself to be a pretty straight shooter, don't you worry. You're not the only one who offers up weak evidence in the raw foods community for shunning certain foods. My fascination was with how willingly people are (and not just in this group) to suddenly turn a complete 180 on such statements. So, the message was more about or rather to, them, I suppose. Anyway, to each his/her own. But my offering up advice to think critically and for yourself and with the totally of the data, both experiential and scientific, is no less worthy of airing than your listen-to-your-body advice. And certainly, we both have the right to suggest it! -Erin http://www.zenpawn.com/vegblog rawfood , " Elchanan " <Elchanan wrote: > > Erin, > > Though thinly veiled, this is obviously about me. Next time, just step up > and say what's on your mind, that would make the communication cleaner. Terry Lynn Bakhtiari May God bless you Today and always. www.terrywithpcos.blogspot.com Building a website is a piece of cake. Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 Well, my criticism has not aged well. I made it when many were quickly writing off their favorite foods, like garlic, ginger, hots, etc., with nary a bit of (expressed) skepticism. The situation has since turned around, and folks are either running the experiments and/or challenging the assertions. -Erin http://www.zenpawn.com/vegblog/vegan-done-light.html rawfood , Terry Bakhtiari <pablobully wrote: > > Certainly everyone has the 'right' to suggest anything they want. However, I am curious Erin why you seem to think there are so many of us who seem to blindly listen to someone? Do you know if we have done our own research? You doubt we are capable of thinking? Perhaps I misread what you said but (to me anyway) it came across as if we are a bunch of blind and dumb mindlessly listening to someone with no verification. For those who have actually taken some of the advice given to them have been very pleased with the results. That speaks volumes to me. I don't mean to come across harshly to you it is jsut your comments seemed a little insulting. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 Erin, I understood you-yet I did point out that it was interesting new info to me that was worth the try. ...not that I have really started it up yet but I am backing away from the garlic hands up in the air... :-) Emrawfood , " Erin " <truepatriot wrote: > > Well, my criticism has not aged well. I made it when many > were quickly writing off their favorite foods, like garlic, > ginger, hots, etc., with nary a bit of (expressed) skepticism. > The situation has since turned around, and folks are either > running the experiments and/or challenging the assertions. > > -Erin > http://www.zenpawn.com/vegblog/vegan-done-light.html > > > rawfood , Terry Bakhtiari <pablobully@> > wrote: > > > > Certainly everyone has the 'right' to suggest anything they want. > However, I am curious Erin why you seem to think there are so many of > us who seem to blindly listen to someone? Do you know if we have done > our own research? You doubt we are capable of thinking? Perhaps I > misread what you said but (to me anyway) it came across as if we are > a bunch of blind and dumb mindlessly listening to someone with no > verification. For those who have actually taken some of the advice > given to them have been very pleased with the results. That speaks > volumes to me. I don't mean to come across harshly to you it is jsut > your comments seemed a little insulting. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.