Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Elchanan, I didn't know cats saliva pH remains stable regardless of what I eat! Ok, so that's not what you meant to say. Anyway, if you could clarify what you're saying here, I'd be gracious. Janet rawfood , " Elchanan " <Elchanan wrote: Belinda, Humans produce saliva whose pH remains stable within a narrow range, regardless of what we eat. Cats (any type of which I am aware) produce saliva whose pH remains stable within a narrow range, regardless of what we eat. Dogs produce saliva whose pH varies dramatically in response to what they eat. This is but one of many examples indicating that what you say is, in fact, false. Sorry ... and of course, you are free to hold onto whatever belief you wish! Best, Elchanan _____ rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of Belinda Wednesday, June 27, 2007 2:38 PM rawfood [Raw Food] Re: Classification of dogs: the taxonomy vs. the evolutionary and dietary reality (WAS: raw for pets) Dogs can, with mans help live, on vegetation only. However, in the wild they could not, nor would they choose too. It is not natural for them to do so. Their bodies are designed for priamrily a meat diet. <<< snip >>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Oh, what THEY eat, sorry! _____ rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of Janet FitzGerald Wednesday, June 27, 2007 11:42 PM rawfood [Raw Food] Re: Classification of dogs: the taxonomy vs. the evolutionary and die Elchanan, I didn't know cats saliva pH remains stable regardless of what I eat! Ok, so that's not what you meant to say. Anyway, if you could clarify what you're saying here, I'd be gracious. Janet rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com, " Elchanan " <Elchanan wrote: Belinda, Humans produce saliva whose pH remains stable within a narrow range, regardless of what we eat. Cats (any type of which I am aware) produce saliva whose pH remains stable within a narrow range, regardless of what we eat. Dogs produce saliva whose pH varies dramatically in response to what they eat. This is but one of many examples indicating that what you say is, in fact, false. Sorry ... and of course, you are free to hold onto whatever belief you wish! Best, Elchanan _____ rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com [rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com] On Behalf Of Belinda Wednesday, June 27, 2007 2:38 PM rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com [Raw Food] Re: Classification of dogs: the taxonomy vs. the evolutionary and dietary reality (WAS: raw for pets) Dogs can, with mans help live, on vegetation only. However, in the wild they could not, nor would they choose too. It is not natural for them to do so. Their bodies are designed for priamrily a meat diet. <<< snip >>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 No, I clarified that part for you... I'm talking about the correlation between saliva pH and what was said that is incorrect. ??? Just a little confused about the point you were making. Janet rawfood , " Elchanan " <Elchanan wrote: Oh, what THEY eat, sorry! _____ rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of Janet FitzGerald Wednesday, June 27, 2007 11:42 PM rawfood [Raw Food] Re: Classification of dogs: the taxonomy vs. the evolutionary and die Elchanan, I didn't know cats saliva pH remains stable regardless of what I eat! Ok, so that's not what you meant to say. Anyway, if you could clarify what you're saying here, I'd be gracious. Janet rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com, " Elchanan " <Elchanan@> wrote: Belinda, Humans produce saliva whose pH remains stable within a narrow range, regardless of what we eat. Cats (any type of which I am aware) produce saliva whose pH remains stable within a narrow range, regardless of what we eat. Dogs produce saliva whose pH varies dramatically in response to what they eat. This is but one of many examples indicating that what you say is, in fact, false. Sorry ... and of course, you are free to hold onto whatever belief you wish! Best, Elchanan _____ rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com [rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com] On Behalf Of Belinda Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 2:38 PM rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com [Raw Food] Re: Classification of dogs: the taxonomy vs. the evolutionary and dietary reality (WAS: raw for pets) Dogs can, with mans help live, on vegetation only. However, in the wild they could not, nor would they choose too. It is not natural for them to do so. Their bodies are designed for priamrily a meat diet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 As am I, at this point. Moving on ... :) E _____ rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of Janet FitzGerald Thursday, June 28, 2007 1:08 PM rawfood [Raw Food] Re: Classification of dogs: the taxonomy vs. the evolutionary and die No, I clarified that part for you... I'm talking about the correlation between saliva pH and what was said that is incorrect. ??? Just a little confused about the point you were making. Janet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.