Guest guest Posted August 13, 2003 Report Share Posted August 13, 2003 I saw a link on vegan.com to the Washington Post. They have an article on WHO's recommendation to ban antibiotic use in animals (as detrimental to human health, of course). If heeded, this ban won't immediately alleviate animal suffereing and exploitation. However, maybe the repercussions of this could be that meat prices will go up, encouraging people to choose alternate foods? Here's the first paragraph: The World Health Organization will recommend today that nations phase out the widespread and controversial use of antibiotic growth promoters in animal feed, saying the move will help preserve the effectiveness of antibiotics for medicine and can be done without significant expense or health consequences to farm animals. I'm sure this will be received with listening ears here in the U.S. (insert sarcastic laugh!). No doubt the suggestions will hit the meat industry's Kevlar-reinforced armor and bounce right off. I don't know how much pull WHO has with the big industries or the government. Can they make a mandate or only suggest? Might be interesting to see what transpires. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2003 Report Share Posted August 13, 2003 Hi Doug > I saw a link on vegan.com to the Washington Post. They have an > article on WHO's recommendation to ban antibiotic use in animals (as > detrimental to human health, of course). If heeded, this ban won't > immediately alleviate animal suffereing and exploitation. However, > maybe the repercussions of this could be that meat prices will go up, > encouraging people to choose alternate foods? That would certainly be good. It really annoys me that the meat industry is so heavily subsidised (in the UK at least) - it bugs me that I am effectively paying meat farmers (through taxes) to produce something which I am completely morally opposed to. Anyway, my point being that it would be good for meat prices to rise so people start to consider other options. BB Peter ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.506 / Virus Database: 303 - Release 01/08/03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2003 Report Share Posted August 13, 2003 Hi Doug It would be good if it put meat prices up. Jo I saw a link on vegan.com to the Washington Post. They have an article on WHO's recommendation to ban antibiotic use in animals (as detrimental to human health, of course). If heeded, this ban won't immediately alleviate animal suffereing and exploitation. However, maybe the repercussions of this could be that meat prices will go up, ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.506 / Virus Database: 303 - Release 01/08/03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2003 Report Share Posted August 14, 2003 I don't belive WHO can mandate squat. And I am not so idealistic that I think people will be so horrified at the stiff dose of antibiotics they get every time they eat meat that they will stop. One of my coworkers is such a meater that she wouldn't even consider ordering from a vegetarian restaurant, even though the boss paid for it (monthly staff meeting). She got Kentucky Fried Corpse instead. Her loss. Danielle Sure there's a light at the end of the tunnel...I just hope it isn't an oncoming train! ----Original Message Follows---- " Doug " <DougDuea1 Anti-antibiotics Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:51:26 -0000 I saw a link on vegan.com to the Washington Post. They have an article on WHO's recommendation to ban antibiotic use in animals (as detrimental to human health, of course). If heeded, this ban won't immediately alleviate animal suffereing and exploitation. However, maybe the repercussions of this could be that meat prices will go up, encouraging people to choose alternate foods? Here's the first paragraph: The World Health Organization will recommend today that nations phase out the widespread and controversial use of antibiotic growth promoters in animal feed, saying the move will help preserve the effectiveness of antibiotics for medicine and can be done without significant expense or health consequences to farm animals. I'm sure this will be received with listening ears here in the U.S. (insert sarcastic laugh!). No doubt the suggestions will hit the meat industry's Kevlar-reinforced armor and bounce right off. I don't know how much pull WHO has with the big industries or the government. Can they make a mandate or only suggest? Might be interesting to see what transpires. _______________ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.