Notes on EM fields

[Guest guest]

Joe, I'm really sorry ... all matter emits electromagnetic fields.

Electromagnetism is one of the four identified forces that operate in the

known universe. And EM fields exist independent of whether something is

animate or inanimate, dead or alive. The only question is as to the nature

of the field.

 

A Kirlian image can be induced specifically by running an electric current

through or near an object ... any object. It's just not nearly the big deal

as a few RF and other teachers would have us believe. And as you wrote

earlier (and correctly), there is little research to point in any

interpretive direction, WRT Kirlian images surrounding living things. The

imprinting involved in Kirlian photography occurs on the photographic

medium, not on the object emitting the field ... that construction, below,

is incorrect.

 

Not even quite sure what the point of the thread is at this point ... just

trying to offer some more correct information.

 

Best,

Elchanan

_____

 

rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of

Joe Postma

Wednesday, September 26, 2007 8:14 PM

rawfood

[Raw Food] Re: Enzyme myth

 

 

Right...I don't think we're in disagreement here. The important

difference is between something being " off " or " on " , i.e., dead or alive.

Metal objects can definitely create or have imprinted on them

electromagnetic fields.

Flesh of plants or animals only create an EM field when it is alive.

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Yah I can't say I am an expert on Kirlian photography. But what I

think I am right in saying is that the DIFFERENCE in the Kirlian

photograph between a plant before and after cooking is due to the EM

activity level being either more (alive) or less (dead).

 

I agree that all normal matter has an EM field. But, doesn't an alive

piece of flesh have a stronger EM field than a dead piece?

 

In any case, I agree too that the connection to raw food here is

tenuous, at least for now. Certainly people have had fun coming up

with mysterious life-force-energy ideas.

 

 

Anyway, I'm still waiting to learn more about the enzyme myth. The

book I got on it didn't have very much scientific information, other

than saying there are enzymes in plants. That's great! But, how are

these used, if at all? And still the more basic question: why IS raw

better than cooked? Simply saying that raw is alive is not an

answer. What is the active difference? Enzymes, I think, provide

the answer for SOME people...but this apparently may not be right.

 

So, looking forward to hearing about it Thanks for the info!

 

Joe

 

 

rawfood , " Elchanan " <Elchanan wrote:

>

> Joe, I'm really sorry ... all matter emits electromagnetic fields.

> Electromagnetism is one of the four identified forces that operate

in the

> known universe. And EM fields exist independent of whether something is

> animate or inanimate, dead or alive. The only question is as to the

nature

> of the field.

>

> A Kirlian image can be induced specifically by running an electric

current

> through or near an object ... any object. It's just not nearly the

big deal

> as a few RF and other teachers would have us believe. And as you wrote

> earlier (and correctly), there is little research to point in any

> interpretive direction, WRT Kirlian images surrounding living

things. The

> imprinting involved in Kirlian photography occurs on the photographic

> medium, not on the object emitting the field ... that construction,

below,

> is incorrect.

>

> Not even quite sure what the point of the thread is at this point

.... just

> trying to offer some more correct information.

>

> Best,

> Elchanan

[Guest guest]

Thanks, Joe.

 

A transformer on a pole puts out a much larger field, imagable in many ways

(Kirlian and otherwise) than does any food of which I am aware.

 

From my perspective, my primary point is simply that there are MANY reasons

to eat RF, we need not rely heavily upon any one reason, and certainly one

where we end up using terms such as " life force " to describe a class of

proteins.

 

BTW, one friend who is following this and writes to me privately reminds me

that the version of Howell's book everyone has is an abridged version, much

of the original work and thinking have been cut out.

 

Best,

Elchanan

_____

 

rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of

Joe Postma

Wednesday, September 26, 2007 11:01 PM

rawfood

[Raw Food] Re: Notes on EM fields

 

 

Yah I can't say I am an expert on Kirlian photography. But what I think I

am right in saying is that the DIFFERENCE in the Kirlian photograph between

a plant before and after cooking is due to the EM activity level being

either more (alive) or less (dead).

 

I agree that all normal matter has an EM field. But, doesn't an alive piece

of flesh have a stronger EM field than a dead piece?

 

In any case, I agree too that the connection to raw food here is tenuous, at

least for now. Certainly people have had fun coming up with mysterious

life-force-energy ideas.

 

Anyway, I'm still waiting to learn more about the enzyme myth. The book I

got on it didn't have very much scientific information, other than saying

there are enzymes in plants. That's great! But, how are these used, if at

all? And still the more basic question: why IS raw better than cooked?

Simply saying that raw is alive is not an answer. What is the active

difference? Enzymes, I think, provide the answer for SOME people...but this

apparently may not be right.

 

So, looking forward to hearing about it Thanks for the info!

 

Joe

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

So, enzymes are still good for us.

Raw food has more in it, correct?

Raw food is alive and isn't cooked still dead?

I don't see what the big deal is, honestly.