Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Doug Graham and 80/10/10 diet book

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Does anyone have a used copy of Doug Graham's 80/10/10 Diet book

that they would be willing to donate so I can write a line-by-line

critique of it?

I refuse to put one cent in that charlatan's pocket.

http://ecologos.org/dg.htm

 

Laurie

 

--

Scientifically-credible info on human diet:

http://ecologos.org/ttdd.html

news:alt.food.vegan.science

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laurie,

 

I ask you to please consider a shift from name-calling. You are

breaking the rules of the site noted here:

 

" We welcome debate, but do it without name calling and anger in the

posts. "

 

See the homepage for more details.

 

Please, be kind.

 

Janet

 

rawfood , Laurie < wrote:

 

Does anyone have a used copy of Doug Graham's 80/10/10 Diet book that

they would be willing to donate so I can write a line-by-line critique

of it?

I refuse to put one cent in that charlatan's pocket.

http://ecologos.org/dg.htm Laurie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Janet FitzGerald wrote:

 

> I ask you to please consider a shift from name-calling.

There is no name-calling, but an accurate description of the individual in

question's behavior.

Let's see: charlatan:

1 *:* quack </dictionary/quack> 2

2 *:* one making usually showy pretenses to knowledge or ability *:* fraud

</dictionary/fraud>, faker </dictionary/faker>

 

I think that my personal experience with Graham or his doppelganger does INDEED

prove quackery, fraud, and fakery.

This guy LIES about 5th grade arithmetic.

http://ecologos.org/dg.htm

Did you READ this exposition?

 

> You are breaking the rules of the site noted here:

Accurate, documented reports break NO rules, do you have a rule about lying,

intellectual integrity, or supporting one's claims when challenged. There

should be.

 

> " We welcome debate, but do it without name calling and anger in the

posts. "

There is NO anger, except in the perverted projections of those who falsely

claim mental telepathy.

HINT: emotions can not be transmitted through the Internet; of course if you

have some scientifically-credible evidence that this is possible, PLEASE present

it as I would live to see it. Really!

In the mean time please refrain form false accusations; are there any rules

against false accusations == there should be.

 

Laurie

 

 

--

Scientifically-credible info on human diet:

http://ecologos.org/ttdd.html

news:alt.food.vegan.science

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...