Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 Does anyone have a used copy of Doug Graham's 80/10/10 Diet book that they would be willing to donate so I can write a line-by-line critique of it? I refuse to put one cent in that charlatan's pocket. http://ecologos.org/dg.htm Laurie -- Scientifically-credible info on human diet: http://ecologos.org/ttdd.html news:alt.food.vegan.science Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 Laurie, I ask you to please consider a shift from name-calling. You are breaking the rules of the site noted here: " We welcome debate, but do it without name calling and anger in the posts. " See the homepage for more details. Please, be kind. Janet rawfood , Laurie < wrote: Does anyone have a used copy of Doug Graham's 80/10/10 Diet book that they would be willing to donate so I can write a line-by-line critique of it? I refuse to put one cent in that charlatan's pocket. http://ecologos.org/dg.htm Laurie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2007 Report Share Posted December 17, 2007 Janet FitzGerald wrote: > I ask you to please consider a shift from name-calling. There is no name-calling, but an accurate description of the individual in question's behavior. Let's see: charlatan: 1 *:* quack </dictionary/quack> 2 2 *:* one making usually showy pretenses to knowledge or ability *:* fraud </dictionary/fraud>, faker </dictionary/faker> I think that my personal experience with Graham or his doppelganger does INDEED prove quackery, fraud, and fakery. This guy LIES about 5th grade arithmetic. http://ecologos.org/dg.htm Did you READ this exposition? > You are breaking the rules of the site noted here: Accurate, documented reports break NO rules, do you have a rule about lying, intellectual integrity, or supporting one's claims when challenged. There should be. > " We welcome debate, but do it without name calling and anger in the posts. " There is NO anger, except in the perverted projections of those who falsely claim mental telepathy. HINT: emotions can not be transmitted through the Internet; of course if you have some scientifically-credible evidence that this is possible, PLEASE present it as I would live to see it. Really! In the mean time please refrain form false accusations; are there any rules against false accusations == there should be. Laurie -- Scientifically-credible info on human diet: http://ecologos.org/ttdd.html news:alt.food.vegan.science Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.