Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

raw almonds

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Thank you Shari

 

Ramona

 

-------------- Original message --------------

" SV " <shavig

Here's a website for the Almond Board:

http://www.almondboard.com/utilities/FORMContactUs.cfm

 

And here's one to sign a petition: http://www.gopetition.com/online/11754.html

 

Phew! It's up to 3377 people signing the petition!

 

Shari Viger

Food of Paradise

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi,

 

I dont like signing things " on line " Does anyone know if there is an option?

I just dont give out that kind of info on line.

I would sign on paper or phone call.

 

CAtherine

 

 

-

sturtevants

Sunday, April 08, 2007 5:28 PM

Re: raw almonds

 

 

Thank you Shari

 

Ramona

 

-------------- Original message --------------

" SV " <shavig

Here's a website for the Almond Board:

http://www.almondboard.com/utilities/FORMContactUs.cfm

 

And here's one to sign a petition: http://www.gopetition.com/online/11754.html

 

Phew! It's up to 3377 people signing the petition!

 

Shari Viger

Food of Paradise

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

[this did not go through yesterday, so I am re-sending it]

 

My thoughts..

 

I don't know how much good the online " petitions " actually do. I have

not participated in those, especially if any of the services require

signing up for the service.

 

I am sure that a physical petition received via certified mail

(return signature required) will have much more impact, especially

from a consumer group or Non-Profit Organization (oooooh, saaaay...

The Raw Network of Washington?). Is that something the board of

directors would authorize? Is there some one (or many) from this

email list that would be willing to collect signatures? Copies of the

petitions could also be sent to other agencies, as well as our

congresspersons and the California Governor (if he recognizes 100%

pasteurization means consumers choosing other states' almonds over

CA's, they may make an exception/new category).

 

Keep in mind this is just for California almonds. For now, we can

still find, hopefully, truly raw almonds from other states, though

they may follow suit if they see an economic benefit.

 

Only " two " incidents of salmonella have occurred, yet they are

implementing this process on all raw almonds (with exceptions of " DV "

category). Raw foodists (probably consuming a far higher amount of

raw almonds than the rest of the population) seem to experience far

less health problems, including colds, flues, and " food poisoning " ,

so 100% pasteurization is unacceptable. Eliminating truly raw sources

of almonds may actually increase the amount of disease symptoms (at

least among raw foodists.)

 

There are actual loopholes for California growers to ship

" unpasteurized " almonds, but nothing that appear to benefit raw

almond consumers. Perhaps, with enough pressure, they will allow a

category of consumers to receive raw almonds, provided they are

clearly marked as " unpasteurized " .

 

One angle that many raw foodists can take is religious freedom. The

Essene teachings tell us we should not cook our food. Pasteurization

is a form of cooking and may denature the food. That, to me,

interferes with our religious freedoms and right to healthful food

sources.

 

The almond board says:

" This action will help ensure that quality almonds are

available for human consumption. "

 

That is an opinion. Many of us recognize the quality diminishes with

pasteurization and various forms of " cooking " .

 

" with no significant degradation of the sensory and quality

characteristics of almonds, such as the flavor, color, texture, or

skin integrity. "

 

But will the almonds actually grow once they are soaked or planted?

For raw foodists, these are requirements for " quality " . If an almond

will not sprout/grow, then it has definitely experienced " significant

degradation " .

 

" How is the quality of pasteurized almonds being evaluated? "

 

" A professional sensory panel is evaluating almonds before and

after treatment to ensure taste and texture is within the range of

normal crop variation. In addition, analysis is being performed to

confirm no change in shelf life or nutritional benefits. "

 

What about " nutrients " not tested for, such as enzymes or nutrients

not yet discovered?

 

Jeff

 

 

 

> I dont like signing things " on line " Does anyone know if there is

> an option? I just dont give out that kind of info on line.

> I would sign on paper or phone call.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Not typically.

 

_____

 

rawfood [rawfood ] On Behalf Of

loulin3

Thursday, November 29, 2007 6:58 AM

rawfood

[Raw Food] Re: raw almonds

 

 

 

Aren't almonds in the shell raw?

 

Louise

 

rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com, " Erin "

<truepatriot wrote:

>

> Found some raw almonds online:

>

> http://www.dogmafre <http://www.dogmafreeraw.com/recommends/alissa>

eraw.com/recommends/alissa

>

> And there was much rejoicing! :)

>

>

> Enjoy,

> -Erin

> http://www.vegandon <http://www.vegandonelight.com> elight.com

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...