Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Ethic or Lifestyle?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hey Lynda

 

Ethics OR lifestyle? How about both? In my thoughts I've came across

four main reasons for choosing veganism. They are:

 

1) Health (vegans live on average six to ten years longer)

2) Environmental (meat production is not sustainable for our

population, not to mention the polution)

3) Compassion (I believe that human are inately compassionate towards

other species and eating them denys us this value)

4) Biological Manipulation (i.e. steroids, antibiotics, genetic

engineering, AN ADULT FACTORY FARM CHICKEN IT TOO FAT TO WALK AT SIX

WEEK OF AGE!!! THAT'S WARPED.

 

Do you have any more reasons?

 

k-bye

 

jeff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Jeff / Lynda

 

> 1) Health (vegans live on average six to ten years longer)

> 2) Environmental (meat production is not sustainable for our

> population, not to mention the polution)

> 3) Compassion (I believe that human are inately compassionate towards

> other species and eating them denys us this value)

> 4) Biological Manipulation (i.e. steroids, antibiotics, genetic

> engineering,

 

This is an interesting discussion. While I agree with you on all the above,

I have personally yet to meet anyone who has chosen to be vegan for purely

health reasons (most, including myself, seem to find the health reasons

after becomming vegan).

 

There is also one other reason that some people are vegan - religious. Hare

Krishna followers are often vegan for this reason, and I know that we have

in the past had Christians on the list who chose to become vegan because of

their religious views - I suspect there are other religions as well!

 

BB

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

i've known a few vegans wh o did it purely for health...

as for religions..i'm known hindu, buddhist, x-tian, wiccan, and islamic vegans...and i have a book at home on the history of jewish vegetarianism....

:) Peter May 2, 2005 10:13 AM Re: Re: Ethic or Lifestyle? Hi Jeff / Lynda> 1) Health (vegans live on average six to ten years longer)> 2) Environmental (meat production is not sustainable for our> population, not to mention the polution)> 3) Compassion (I believe that human are inately compassionate towards> other species and eating them denys us this value)> 4) Biological Manipulation (i.e. steroids, antibiotics, genetic> engineering,This is an interesting discussion. While I agree with you on all the above,I have personally yet to meet anyone who has chosen to be vegan for purelyhealth reasons (most, including myself, seem to find the health reasonsafter becomming vegan).There is also one other reason that some people are vegan - religious. HareKrishna followers are often vegan for this reason, and I know that we havein the past had Christians on the list who chose to become vegan because oftheir religious views - I suspect there are other religions as well!BBPeterTo send an email to -

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I have to admit that I feel that I do not feel that I fit into any

of these catagories mentioned here.

1.HEALTH I like the health benifits that being vegan bring and even

if I did have a choice now I would not reverse my path in life even

though I went down this path many years ago before the benifits were

recognised. In fact it was considered a health risk at the time.

2. ENVIRONMENTAL I could almost repeat the above paragraph in this

regard

3.COMPASSION. I would not deliberatly hurt any living creature if I

could avoide it but if a fly is anywhere near my food and I have no

choice I have to admit that the purity of what goes in to my mouth

is paramount. (You can guess the rest).

4 BIOLOGICAL MANIPULATION.Yes. This bothers me greatly but this did

not exist either when I gave up eating meat.

 

I am in another catagory. I did not make a choice. I have a deep

physcological problem that does not allow me to eat meat because I

think that it is in some way dirty. Am I the only one in this group.

Please tell me that I am not

 

 

, " jeffdevine8 " <jeffdevine8>

wrote:

> Hey Lynda

>

> Ethics OR lifestyle? How about both? In my thoughts I've came

across

> four main reasons for choosing veganism. They are:

>

> 1) Health (vegans live on average six to ten years longer)

> 2) Environmental (meat production is not sustainable for our

> population, not to mention the polution)

> 3) Compassion (I believe that human are inately compassionate

towards

> other species and eating them denys us this value)

> 4) Biological Manipulation (i.e. steroids, antibiotics, genetic

> engineering, AN ADULT FACTORY FARM CHICKEN IT TOO FAT TO WALK AT

SIX

> WEEK OF AGE!!! THAT'S WARPED.

>

> Do you have any more reasons?

>

> k-bye

>

> jeff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I think meat is dirty too, but I didn't consider it dirty till after I

gave it up. The thought of having a piece of meat in my mouth now is

kind of repulsive to me, it's a texture thing.

 

You seem worried that your alone in this catagory. So what if you

are? It's your individuality. Meat is dirty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Mary

 

I doubt that you are alone. I used to eat meat, but was never that

happy about it - just brought up that way. Having given it up it is

obvious to me that it is dirty, especially in comparison with all

those lovely fresh, clean veggies.

 

Jo

 

, " Mary Minihane " <minih@g...> wrote:

> I have to admit that I feel that I do not feel that I fit into any

> of these catagories mentioned here.

> 1.HEALTH I like the health benifits that being vegan bring and

even

> if I did have a choice now I would not reverse my path in life even

> though I went down this path many years ago before the benifits

were

> recognised. In fact it was considered a health risk at the time.

> 2. ENVIRONMENTAL I could almost repeat the above paragraph in this

> regard

> 3.COMPASSION. I would not deliberatly hurt any living creature if I

> could avoide it but if a fly is anywhere near my food and I have no

> choice I have to admit that the purity of what goes in to my mouth

> is paramount. (You can guess the rest).

> 4 BIOLOGICAL MANIPULATION.Yes. This bothers me greatly but this did

> not exist either when I gave up eating meat.

>

> I am in another catagory. I did not make a choice. I have a deep

> physcological problem that does not allow me to eat meat because I

> think that it is in some way dirty. Am I the only one in this

group.

> Please tell me that I am not

>

>

> , " jeffdevine8 " <jeffdevine8>

> wrote:

> > Hey Lynda

> >

> > Ethics OR lifestyle? How about both? In my thoughts I've came

> across

> > four main reasons for choosing veganism. They are:

> >

> > 1) Health (vegans live on average six to ten years longer)

> > 2) Environmental (meat production is not sustainable for our

> > population, not to mention the polution)

> > 3) Compassion (I believe that human are inately compassionate

> towards

> > other species and eating them denys us this value)

> > 4) Biological Manipulation (i.e. steroids, antibiotics, genetic

> > engineering, AN ADULT FACTORY FARM CHICKEN IT TOO FAT TO WALK AT

> SIX

> > WEEK OF AGE!!! THAT'S WARPED.

> >

> > Do you have any more reasons?

> >

> > k-bye

> >

> > jeff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Mary

 

> I am in another catagory. I did not make a choice. I have a deep

> physcological problem that does not allow me to eat meat because I

> think that it is in some way dirty. Am I the only one in this group.

> Please tell me that I am not

 

I'm not sure I'd call that a psychological *problem* - more a

psychological blessing!! :-)

 

BB

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Very true - it would be the response of a natural herbivore, which we should

be.

 

Jo

-

<metalscarab

 

Tuesday, May 03, 2005 2:33 PM

Re: Re: Ethic or Lifestyle?

 

 

> Hi Mary

>

> > I am in another catagory. I did not make a choice. I have a deep

> > physcological problem that does not allow me to eat meat because I

> > think that it is in some way dirty. Am I the only one in this group.

> > Please tell me that I am not

>

> I'm not sure I'd call that a psychological *problem* - more a

> psychological blessing!! :-)

>

> BB

> Peter

>

>

>

>

>

> To send an email to -

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I think that you are correct. I feel that I was born vegan but took

a few years to realise it. I recall a time in my early teens when I

prefered to use margarine to butter and my family were shocked

because it was generaly considered to be used by people who could

not afford butter (the good old days). When I did eat meat I could

never eat anything that maintained its original shape so I could eat

a fish cake but not a fish. Maybe there is such a thing as anatural

born vegan but if we accept that then will we have to accept the

opposite.

 

 

, " Jo Cwazy " <heartwork@c...> wrote:

> Very true - it would be the response of a natural herbivore, which

we should

> be.

>

> Jo

> -

> <metalscarab@c...>

>

> Tuesday, May 03, 2005 2:33 PM

> Re: Re: Ethic or Lifestyle?

>

>

> > Hi Mary

> >

> > > I am in another catagory. I did not make a choice. I have a

deep

> > > physcological problem that does not allow me to eat meat

because I

> > > think that it is in some way dirty. Am I the only one in this

group.

> > > Please tell me that I am not

> >

> > I'm not sure I'd call that a psychological *problem* - more a

> > psychological blessing!! :-)

> >

> > BB

> > Peter

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > To send an email to -

 

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I'm sure that's right Mary. Not a bad thing to be :-)

 

Jo

 

-

" Mary Minihane " <minih

 

Tuesday, May 03, 2005 6:48 PM

Re: Ethic or Lifestyle?

 

 

> I think that you are correct. I feel that I was born vegan but took

> a few years to realise it. I recall a time in my early teens when I

> prefered to use margarine to butter and my family were shocked

> because it was generaly considered to be used by people who could

> not afford butter (the good old days). When I did eat meat I could

> never eat anything that maintained its original shape so I could eat

> a fish cake but not a fish. Maybe there is such a thing as anatural

> born vegan but if we accept that then will we have to accept the

> opposite.

>

>

> , " Jo Cwazy " <heartwork@c...> wrote:

> > Very true - it would be the response of a natural herbivore, which

> we should

> > be.

> >

> > Jo

> > -

> > <metalscarab@c...>

> >

> > Tuesday, May 03, 2005 2:33 PM

> > Re: Re: Ethic or Lifestyle?

> >

> >

> > > Hi Mary

> > >

> > > > I am in another catagory. I did not make a choice. I have a

> deep

> > > > physcological problem that does not allow me to eat meat

> because I

> > > > think that it is in some way dirty. Am I the only one in this

> group.

> > > > Please tell me that I am not

> > >

> > > I'm not sure I'd call that a psychological *problem* - more a

> > > psychological blessing!! :-)

> > >

> > > BB

> > > Peter

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > To send an email to -

>

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...