British animal rights activists spread violence on Continent

[Guest guest]

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,176-1807047,00.html

Peter H

 

To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Security Centre.

[Guest guest]

while i don't condone their acts,

I don't condemn the either.

It is the people that allow the

laws that say that testing/experimenting on animals is perfectly

natural and legal,

that are the real criminals. Making/profiting their corporations with

blood money, from the most helpless creatures.

 

These activist take the law into their own hands, there are

consequences, but in my opinion

are NOt the immoral ones.

 

-anouk

 

, peter hurd <swpgh01@t...> wrote:

>

> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,176-1807047,00.html

>

>

>

> Peter H

>

>

>

>

> To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new

Security Centre.

[Guest guest]

do you then consider intimidation, violence, abuse, and in one extreme case digging up the body of a relative and stealing it immoral?

 

The Valle Vegan.........Anouk Sickler <zurumato wrote:

while i don't condone their acts,I don't condemn the either. It is the people that allow thelaws that say that testing/experimenting on animals is perfectlynatural and legal, that are the real criminals. Making/profiting their corporations with blood money, from the most helpless creatures. These activist take the law into their own hands, there areconsequences, but in my opinionare NOt the immoral ones. -anouk , peter hurd wrote:> > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,176-1807047,00.html> > > > Peter H > > > > > To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Security Centre.

[Guest guest]

Have they proved it was animal activists who dug up the body? I

thought the ones in court at present were there for threatening

behaviour, and it was the media linking the two.

 

If it was animal activists I can't quite see their reasoning.

 

Jo

 

, peter hurd <swpgh01@t...> wrote:

> do you then consider intimidation, violence, abuse, and in one

extreme case digging up the body of a relative and stealing it

immoral?

>

> The Valle Vegan.........

>

> Anouk Sickler <zurumato@e...> wrote:

> while i don't condone their acts,

> I don't condemn the either.

> It is the people that allow the

> laws that say that testing/experimenting on animals is perfectly

> natural and legal,

> that are the real criminals. Making/profiting their corporations

with

> blood money, from the most helpless creatures.

>

> These activist take the law into their own hands, there are

> consequences, but in my opinion

> are NOt the immoral ones.

>

> -anouk

>

> , peter hurd wrote:

> >

> > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,176-1807047,00.html

> >

> >

> >

> > Peter H

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all

new

> Security Centre.

>

To send an email to -

 

>

[Guest guest]

Nothing has been proved yet, although the media are trying hard to link them with animal activists. I would still class it as immoral though, and firebombs, breaking windows, threatening to hurt relatives etc......

 

The Valley Vegan.................heartwerk <jo.heartwork wrote:

Have they proved it was animal activists who dug up the body? I thought the ones in court at present were there for threatening behaviour, and it was the media linking the two.If it was animal activists I can't quite see their reasoning.Jo , peter hurd wrote:> do you then consider intimidation, violence, abuse, and in one extreme case digging up the body of a relative and stealing it immoral?> > The Valle Vegan.........> > Anouk Sickler wrote:> while i don't condone their acts,> I don't condemn the either. > It is the people that allow the> laws that say that testing/experimenting on animals is perfectly> natural and legal, > that are the real criminals. Making/profiting their corporations with >

blood money, from the most helpless creatures. > > These activist take the law into their own hands, there are> consequences, but in my opinion> are NOt the immoral ones. > > -anouk> > , peter hurd wrote:> > > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,176-1807047,00.html> > > > > > > > Peter H > > > > > > > > > > To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new> Security Centre.> > > > > > > > To send an email to - >

[Guest guest]

I do agree with you. I think writing to companies and being a

nuisance in that way, picketing outside workplaces etc. is fine though.

 

Jo

 

, peter hurd <swpgh01@t...> wrote:

> Nothing has been proved yet, although the media are trying hard to

link them with animal activists. I would still class it as immoral

though, and firebombs, breaking windows, threatening to hurt relatives

etc......

>

> The Valley Vegan.................

>

> heartwerk <jo.heartwork@g...> wrote:

> Have they proved it was animal activists who dug up the body? I

> thought the ones in court at present were there for threatening

> behaviour, and it was the media linking the two.

>

> If it was animal activists I can't quite see their reasoning.

>

> Jo

>

> , peter hurd wrote:

> > do you then consider intimidation, violence, abuse, and in one

> extreme case digging up the body of a relative and stealing it

> immoral?

> >

> > The Valle Vegan.........

> >

> > Anouk Sickler wrote:

> > while i don't condone their acts,

> > I don't condemn the either.

> > It is the people that allow the

> > laws that say that testing/experimenting on animals is perfectly

> > natural and legal,

> > that are the real criminals. Making/profiting their corporations

> with

> > blood money, from the most helpless creatures.

> >

> > These activist take the law into their own hands, there are

> > consequences, but in my opinion

> > are NOt the immoral ones.

> >

> > -anouk

> >

> > , peter hurd wrote:

> > >

> > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,176-1807047,00.html

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Peter H

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all

> new

> > Security Centre.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > To send an email to -

>

> >

[Guest guest]

I agree, I still think a good arguement is better than a punch in the face.

 

The Valley Vegan............

 

Un pechod a lusg gant ar ei ol One sin draws a hundred after it heartwerk <jo.heartwork wrote:

I do agree with you. I think writing to companies and being anuisance in that way, picketing outside workplaces etc. is fine though.Jo , peter hurd wrote:> Nothing has been proved yet, although the media are trying hard tolink them with animal activists. I would still class it as immoralthough, and firebombs, breaking windows, threatening to hurt relativesetc......> > The Valley Vegan.................> > heartwerk wrote:> Have they proved it was animal activists who dug up the body? I > thought the ones in court at present were there for threatening > behaviour, and it was the media linking the two.> > If it was animal activists I can't quite see their reasoning.> > Jo> > --- In

, peter hurd wrote:> > do you then consider intimidation, violence, abuse, and in one > extreme case digging up the body of a relative and stealing it > immoral?> > > > The Valle Vegan.........> > > > Anouk Sickler wrote:> > while i don't condone their acts,> > I don't condemn the either. > > It is the people that allow the> > laws that say that testing/experimenting on animals is perfectly> > natural and legal, > > that are the real criminals. Making/profiting their corporations > with > > blood money, from the most helpless creatures. > > > > These activist take the law into their own hands, there are> > consequences, but in my opinion> > are NOt the immoral ones. > > > > -anouk> > > > , peter hurd

wrote:> > > > > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,176-1807047,00.html> > > > > > > > > > > > Peter H > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all > new> > Security Centre.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To send an email to -> > >