Raw Vegan Parents

[Guest guest]

Being a teacher, I am off today.

There is a channel here called “Court TV”. They show court

cases in progress sometimes. Right now they are giving closing arguments on a

case involving 2 Raw Vegan Parents. They are on trial for “starving”

their 6 month old daughter by just giving her these things to eat: Wheat grass,

coconut water and almond milk. Their other children are doing fine on the Raw

Vegan Diet. The 6 month old baby is dead.

The name of this couple is Andressohn, in case

anyone is interested in looking it up. It is 23NOV, 4:10PM on the East

Coast and the trial is in progress as I type this. Personally, I do not

know what to think. The defense argues that the diet did not kill the

baby – it was a rare birth defect. They do not name what that birth

defect might be. They are trying to get these two parents on “culpable

negligence” , which I think means that they did not set out to kill their

baby; they were doing what they thought was in the baby’s best interest,

HOWEVER, they should have known what they were doing was wrong. (This is

not my belief, I am just relaying what the prosecutor was arguing.)

Good Luck. I’m stumped.

Cynthia

[Guest guest]

What a sad story Have they said if she was being breastfed as well?

If she was, then it would definitely not have been diet as

breastfeeding would be more than enough at that age and anything else

would have been additional rather than vital.

 

BB

AlexOn 23/11/05, Cynthia Gadarian <cgadarian wrote:

 

 

Being a teacher, I am off today.

There is a channel here called "Court TV". They show court

cases in progress sometimes. Right now they are giving closing arguments on a

case involving 2 Raw Vegan Parents. They are on trial for "starving"

their 6 month old daughter by just giving her these things to eat: Wheat grass,

coconut water and almond milk. Their other children are doing fine on the Raw

Vegan Diet. The 6 month old baby is dead.

The name of this couple is Andressohn, in case

anyone is interested in looking it up. It is 23NOV, 4:10PM on the East

Coast and the trial is in progress as I type this. Personally, I do not

know what to think. The defense argues that the diet did not kill the

baby – it was a rare birth defect. They do not name what that birth

defect might be. They are trying to get these two parents on "culpable

negligence" , which I think means that they did not set out to kill their

baby; they were doing what they thought was in the baby's best interest,

HOWEVER, they should have known what they were doing was wrong. (This is

not my belief, I am just relaying what the prosecutor was arguing.)

Good Luck. I'm stumped.

Cynthia

 

 

 

To send an email to -

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

No one mentioned the breastfeeding. The

whole focus seems to be on the Raw Vegan thing. Finally, I heard the Defense

name what he thought the birth defect was – I am sorry I did not get the whole

thing – Partial something St. George something Syndrome. Perhaps a medical

list member can figure it out. It seemed to have physical characteristics

common only to this disorder.

 

Cynthia

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of Alex Iantaffi

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

6:22 PM

 

Re: Raw

Vegan Parents

 

 

What a sad story Have

they said if she was being breastfed as well? If she was, then it would

definitely not have been diet as breastfeeding would be more than enough at

that age and anything else would have been additional rather than vital.

 

BB

Alex

 

On 23/11/05, Cynthia

Gadarian <cgadarian

wrote:

 

 

Being a teacher, I am off today. There

is a channel here called " Court TV " . They show court cases in

progress sometimes. Right now they are giving closing arguments on a case

involving 2 Raw Vegan Parents. They are on trial for " starving "

their 6 month old daughter by just giving her these things to eat: Wheat grass,

coconut water and almond milk. Their other children are doing fine on the Raw

Vegan Diet. The 6 month old baby is dead.

The name of this couple is Andressohn, in case

anyone is interested in looking it up. It is 23NOV, 4:10PM on the East

Coast and the trial is in progress as I type this. Personally, I do not

know what to think. The defense argues that the diet did not kill the

baby – it was a rare birth defect. They do not name what that birth

defect might be. They are trying to get these two parents on

" culpable negligence " , which I think means that they did not set out

to kill their baby; they were doing what they thought was in the baby's best

interest, HOWEVER, they should have known what they were doing was wrong.

(This is not my belief, I am just relaying what the prosecutor was arguing.)

Good Luck. I'm stumped.

Cynthia

 

 

 

To

send an email to -

 

 

 

 

 

SPONSORED

LINKS

 

 

 

 

Vegan footwear

 

 

Vegan

 

 

Vegan food

 

 

 

 

Vegan product

 

 

Vegan shoes

 

 

Vegan shoes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

!

GROUPS LINKS

 

 

 

Visit your group

" "

on the web.

 

To

from this group, send an email to:

-

 

Your use of

is subject to the

 

 

[Guest guest]

Shame that the focus was on something that is completely irrelevant if

mom was breastfeeding. Yet typical of both court cases and the media:

if there is a difference that people don't understand, they will focus

on that rather than look at the situation and what is relevant

information.

 

AlexOn 24/11/05, Cynthia Gadarian <cgadarian wrote:

 

No one mentioned the breastfeeding. The

whole focus seems to be on the Raw Vegan thing. Finally, I heard the Defense

name what he thought the birth defect was – I am sorry I did not get the whole

thing – Partial something St. George something Syndrome. Perhaps a medical

list member can figure it out. It seemed to have physical characteristics

common only to this disorder.

 

Cynthia

 

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of Alex Iantaffi

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

6:22 PM

 

Re: Raw

Vegan Parents

 

 

What a sad story Have

they said if she was being breastfed as well? If she was, then it would

definitely not have been diet as breastfeeding would be more than enough at

that age and anything else would have been additional rather than vital.

 

BB

Alex

 

On 23/11/05, Cynthia

Gadarian <cgadarian

wrote:

 

 

Being a teacher, I am off today. There

is a channel here called " Court TV " . They show court cases in

progress sometimes. Right now they are giving closing arguments on a case

involving 2 Raw Vegan Parents. They are on trial for " starving "

their 6 month old daughter by just giving her these things to eat: Wheat grass,

coconut water and almond milk. Their other children are doing fine on the Raw

Vegan Diet. The 6 month old baby is dead.

The name of this couple is Andressohn, in case

anyone is interested in looking it up. It is 23NOV, 4:10PM on the East

Coast and the trial is in progress as I type this. Personally, I do not

know what to think. The defense argues that the diet did not kill the

baby – it was a rare birth defect. They do not name what that birth

defect might be. They are trying to get these two parents on

" culpable negligence " , which I think means that they did not set out

to kill their baby; they were doing what they thought was in the baby's best

interest, HOWEVER, they should have known what they were doing was wrong.

(This is not my belief, I am just relaying what the prosecutor was arguing.)

Good Luck. I'm stumped.

Cynthia

 

 

 

To

send an email to -

 

 

 

 

 

SPONSORED

LINKS

 

 

 

 

 

Vegan footwear

 

 

 

Vegan

 

 

 

Vegan food

 

 

 

 

 

Vegan product

 

 

 

Vegan shoes

 

 

 

Vegan shoes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

!

GROUPS LINKS

 

 

 

Visit your group

" "

on the web.

 

To

from this group, send an email to:

-

 

Your use of

is subject to the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To send an email to -

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

DiGeorge syndrome..a malfunction of the thymus Cynthia Gadarian Nov 23, 2005 5:06 PM RE: Raw Vegan Parents

 

 

 

 

No one mentioned the breastfeeding. The whole focus seems to be on the Raw Vegan thing. Finally, I heard the Defense name what he thought the birth defect was – I am sorry I did not get the whole thing – Partial something St. George something Syndrome. Perhaps a medical list member can figure it out. It seemed to have physical characteristics common only to this disorder.

 

Cynthia

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of Alex IantaffiWednesday, November 23, 2005 6:22 PM Subject: Re: Raw Vegan Parents

 

What a sad story Have they said if she was being breastfed as well? If she was, then it would definitely not have been diet as breastfeeding would be more than enough at that age and anything else would have been additional rather than vital.BBAlex

 

On 23/11/05, Cynthia Gadarian <cgadarian wrote:

 

 

Being a teacher, I am off today. There is a channel here called "Court TV". They show court cases in progress sometimes. Right now they are giving closing arguments on a case involving 2 Raw Vegan Parents. They are on trial for "starving" their 6 month old daughter by just giving her these things to eat: Wheat grass, coconut water and almond milk. Their other children are doing fine on the Raw Vegan Diet. The 6 month old baby is dead.

The name of this couple is Andressohn, in case anyone is interested in looking it up. It is 23NOV, 4:10PM on the East Coast and the trial is in progress as I type this. Personally, I do not know what to think. The defense argues that the diet did not kill the baby – it was a rare birth defect. They do not name what that birth defect might be. They are trying to get these two parents on "culpable negligence" , which I think means that they did not set out to kill their baby; they were doing what they thought was in the baby's best interest, HOWEVER, they should have known what they were doing was wrong. (This is not my belief, I am just relaying what the prosecutor was arguing.)

Good Luck. I'm stumped.

Cynthia

To send an email to -

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dai George, I new him at school!

 

The Valley Vegan..............fraggle <EBbrewpunx wrote:

 

DiGeorge syndrome..a malfunction of the thymus Cynthia Gadarian Nov 23, 2005 5:06 PM RE: Raw Vegan Parents

 

 

 

 

No one mentioned the breastfeeding. The whole focus seems to be on the Raw Vegan thing. Finally, I heard the Defense name what he thought the birth defect was – I am sorry I did not get the whole thing – Partial something St. George something Syndrome. Perhaps a medical list member can figure it out. It seemed to have physical characteristics common only to this disorder.

 

Cynthia

 

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of Alex IantaffiWednesday, November 23, 2005 6:22 PM Subject: Re: Raw Vegan Parents

 

What a sad story Have they said if she was being breastfed as well? If she was, then it would definitely not have been diet as breastfeeding would be more than enough at that age and anything else would have been additional rather than vital.BBAlex

 

On 23/11/05, Cynthia Gadarian <cgadarian wrote:

 

 

Being a teacher, I am off today. There is a channel here called "Court TV". They show court cases in progress sometimes. Right now they are giving closing arguments on a case involving 2 Raw Vegan Parents. They are on trial for "starving" their 6 month old daughter by just giving her these things to eat: Wheat grass, coconut water and almond milk. Their other children are doing fine on the Raw Vegan Diet. The 6 month old baby is dead.

The name of this couple is Andressohn, in case anyone is interested in looking it up. It is 23NOV, 4:10PM on the East Coast and the trial is in progress as I type this. Personally, I do not know what to think. The defense argues that the diet did not kill the baby – it was a rare birth defect. They do not name what that birth defect might be. They are trying to get these two parents on "culpable negligence" , which I think means that they did not set out to kill their baby; they were doing what they thought was in the baby's best interest, HOWEVER, they should have known what they were doing was wrong. (This is not my belief, I am just relaying what the prosecutor was arguing.)

Good Luck. I'm stumped.

Cynthia

To send an email to -