Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Understanding 'primative diets'...vs all raw

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Anne,

 

IMHO, the reason it is so difficult to remain 100% raw

after attaining this goal in an institute is for the

very reasons you mention. People who feel good

generally try to go it on their own rather than pay

the fortune at an institue. From my understanding

(conversations with friends who have done what you

have done), the food and support at such places is

wonderful The sad part is, we rarely have such

support at home and don't know how to duplicate what

we ate by those wonderful raw food chefs.

 

Since you don't plan on being 100% raw, you might be

interested in reading two books

 

NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL DEGENERATION by Weston Price

TRADITIONAL FOODS ARE YOUR BEST MEDICINE by Schmidt

 

These authors are not promoting raw diets. They are

promoting a return to a completely natural diet (as

was witness among more 'primative' societies). By

'primative', I mean societies that do not have access

to supermarkets, while flour, etc.

 

mary

>

>

> Well, I did not maintain raw. AS a matter of fact, I

> fell flat on my

> face with cooked. However, I am slowly and surely

> incorporating raw

> back into my diet. Part of the problem is energy. It

> takes a lot of

> time and effort to keep a raw diet going and I am

> recovering from

> chronic fatigue syndrome. Also, I'm not planning on

> being 100% raw

> ever. I'm not disciplined enough, among other

> things. FOrtunately or

> unfortunately I have a strong constitution and was

> able to abuse

> myself terribly until now when I am sick. I've come

> to a raw diet as

> a process of elimination looking for health and

> healing for cfs.

> Ultimately, I believe the body can heal itself given

> the proper

> milieu, and somehow I found raw in the process.

> Thank goodness. Maybe

> since I'm having to backtrack I will have a better

> chance of going

> mostly raw and staying there. -a

> >

>

>

>

 

 

=====

 

Mary, Luvie, Ranger, & the flying brigade

 

A smile is a silent 'hello'.

 

owner of

 

'The Fully Trained Working Dog'

 

'Avian Health: Holistic Approach'

 

'Yoga for Therapy'.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at HotJobs

http://hotjobs.sweepstakes./careermakeover

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Raw food support, like this forum, is very important for staying

raw. I have to occupy myself in a raw frame of mind if I want to be

able to stay raw.

 

rawfood , mary <marymassung> wrote:

> Anne,

>

> IMHO, the reason it is so difficult to remain 100% raw

> after attaining this goal in an institute is for the

> very reasons you mention. People who feel good

> generally try to go it on their own rather than pay

> the fortune at an institue. From my understanding

> (conversations with friends who have done what you

> have done), the food and support at such places is

> wonderful The sad part is, we rarely have such

> support at home and don't know how to duplicate what

> we ate by those wonderful raw food chefs.

 

I believe in just eating whole, raw plant food with little or no

processing.

 

>

> Since you don't plan on being 100% raw, you might be

> interested in reading two books

>

> NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL DEGENERATION by Weston Price

> TRADITIONAL FOODS ARE YOUR BEST MEDICINE by Schmidt

>

> These authors are not promoting raw diets. They are

> promoting a return to a completely natural diet (as

> was witness among more 'primative' societies). By

> 'primative', I mean societies that do not have access

> to supermarkets, while flour, etc.

>

> mary

 

Rich

 

New Forum: www.rawfoodeaters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Rich,

 

It is not my intent to undermind the purpose of this

group by any of the comments that I have made. I also

believe that it is much easier to attain the goal of

being a 100% raw fooder in a support situation than

without one.

 

Over the years, I have had vegans and raw fooders come

to me for help with their children...who are so

nutrient starved that they have major deficiencies.

This did not have to happen. It was caused by ignorant

ambition. It is possible for people to be very healthy

and 100% raw fooders if they are willing to do so

intelligently. Some people instinctively know their

body's needs. Others do not. Some go 'cold turkey'

with no problems while other develop deficiencies that

set them back for years. Statistically, very few who

achieve the status of 100% raw fooders are able to

maintain the diet for more than 5 years ...not because

it is not an acceptable and healthy diet but because

they did so too quickly.

 

I do not want to step on the toes of those who have

succeeded. I want to counsel 'slow but steady' rather

than 'fast but fail' to those who would not have

adequate knowledge, want help, or need information.

 

mary

--- Rich Sachs <seconaphim wrote:

> Raw food support, like this forum, is very important

> for staying

> raw. I have to occupy myself in a raw frame of mind

> if I want to be

> able to stay raw.

>

> rawfood , mary

> <marymassung> wrote:

> > Anne,

> >

> > IMHO, the reason it is so difficult to remain 100%

> raw

> > after attaining this goal in an institute is for

> the

> > very reasons you mention. People who feel good

> > generally try to go it on their own rather than

> pay

> > the fortune at an institue. From my understanding

> > (conversations with friends who have done what you

> > have done), the food and support at such places is

> > wonderful The sad part is, we rarely have such

> > support at home and don't know how to duplicate

> what

> > we ate by those wonderful raw food chefs.

>

> I believe in just eating whole, raw plant food with

> little or no

> processing.

>

> >

> > Since you don't plan on being 100% raw, you might

> be

> > interested in reading two books

> >

> > NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL DEGENERATION by Weston

> Price

> > TRADITIONAL FOODS ARE YOUR BEST MEDICINE by

> Schmidt

> >

> > These authors are not promoting raw diets. They

> are

> > promoting a return to a completely natural diet

> (as

> > was witness among more 'primative' societies). By

> > 'primative', I mean societies that do not have

> access

> > to supermarkets, while flour, etc.

> >

> > mary

>

> Rich

>

> New Forum: www.rawfoodeaters

>

>

>

 

 

=====

 

Mary, Luvie, Ranger, & the flying brigade

 

A smile is a silent 'hello'.

 

owner of

 

'The Fully Trained Working Dog'

 

'Avian Health: Holistic Approach'

 

'Yoga for Therapy'.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at HotJobs

http://hotjobs.sweepstakes./careermakeover

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Discovering Weston A Price changed my life. I read his book about 3

1/2 years ago after years of trying to follow mainstream

recommendations on dieting and supplements. I made a complete change

after reading this book. Unfortunately, because of stressors I did

not stay with it as strict as I'd like. And when fatigued and

stressed I grabbed whatever food was most handy. However, I am a

strong believer and follower of Price, his research and current

organization. I want to incorporate his research and raw, which I

find very compatible. I did not care for the other book for some

reason; mostly I thought he capsulized things I already had info on

in a more in-depth form. PErhaps it is because of the research PRice

has his book it hit me hard enough to effect significant and long-

lasting change in my life. Thank you for the suggestions, though.--a

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

What consitutes a " fortune " is subject. Being sick is very expensive.

I needed the insitute to envelop me in the lifestyle. Fortunately, I

did have the means to stay longer than the 2 week course, but then, I

do without other things instead. After 3-4 weeks it all began to

feel very natural, and still does. So, it makes it 100% easier for me

to aim and keep shooting for the raw goal. Getting back to the

expense, we all makes choices as you noted in another post. I make a

choice to spend my money on health, instead of a new car, vacation,

or additional wardrobe. That's my choice. I have lived in a small

shack so I could pay for health remedies. IT did not matter to me.

Life is not so interesting without a relatively good heath.--a

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

You couldn't undermine the purpose of anyone. Speak freely. I don't

know what those " vegans and raw fooders come to me for help with

their children...who are so nutrient starved that they have major

deficiencies " are feeding there children. I certainly believe

there's no healthier diet for anyone at any age than a raw vegetarian

one, but it does depend on how someone interprets that.

 

I hope to be a five year man myself, of course.

 

You can't step on any toes. Speak freely.

 

rawfood , mary <marymassung> wrote:

> Rich,

>

> It is not my intent to undermind the purpose of this

> group by any of the comments that I have made. I also

> believe that it is much easier to attain the goal of

> being a 100% raw fooder in a support situation than

> without one.

>

> Over the years, I have had vegans and raw fooders come

> to me for help with their children...who are so

> nutrient starved that they have major deficiencies.

> This did not have to happen. It was caused by ignorant

> ambition. It is possible for people to be very healthy

> and 100% raw fooders if they are willing to do so

> intelligently. Some people instinctively know their

> body's needs. Others do not. Some go 'cold turkey'

> with no problems while other develop deficiencies that

> set them back for years. Statistically, very few who

> achieve the status of 100% raw fooders are able to

> maintain the diet for more than 5 years ...not because

> it is not an acceptable and healthy diet but because

> they did so too quickly.

>

> I do not want to step on the toes of those who have

> succeeded. I want to counsel 'slow but steady' rather

> than 'fast but fail' to those who would not have

> adequate knowledge, want help, or need information.

>

> mary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...