Guest guest Posted August 4, 2004 Report Share Posted August 4, 2004 I'm thinking it's either a healing thing, or a b12 thing. Lately I have been doing a lot of B12 research. It's a complicated topic, but I feel that I have gained a basic understanding. This is what I have learned. The B12 thing is not a raw Vs. cooked argument. We only need about a half a dime's worth of B12 for the duration of our life. We re digest B12 in our bile, and recycle it. When eating and living in a healthy way, we need VERY little B12 in our diet. The modern diet destroys vast amounts of B12..sugar, coffee, beer etc.... All the usual suspects. So when we have a poor diet, we need a lot of B12. Coincidentally some things like meet and eggs contain B12. Our stomach needs to be very acidic to digest these foods, and therefor not much of this B12 can be absorbed. These are not good sources of B12. Raw food on the other hand should have plenty of B12 if the soil it is grown in has some cobalt in it, or is fertilized with night soil (composted human poop). Cobalt is essential to the production of b12. The problem is that most of our farm land is mineral deplete. If we all foraged our food we would get plenty of B12, but not many have the time to forage. We create some good B12, but it's too far down our digestive tract to be absorbed. Our poop is a good source of B12. The Chinese have been fertilizing with night soil for thousands of years. I did not look for information on B12 deficiencies in China, but have to assume it's low. There is a sect of raw vegans in Iran who grow their food in night soil, their produce is b12 rich and they are not deficient. One of the best ways to become B12 deficient is by drinking large amounts of beer. I guess the hops are full of analog B12 that tricks the body into expelling the good B12. A beer drinker might not not appear to be deficient when taking a b12 test, when in fact they are. This is important to me because I drank massive quantities of beer on a daily basis for years and years. I have not had a sip in over a year, but I'm 37 and have to believe that the damage is done. So, all of this ties back to my thinking that I might be B12 deficient (and have subsequent nerve damage), and that might be why a sunburn itched for weeks and weeks. One of the things that B12 does is help produce a protective sheath that surrounds our nerve endings. I started taking B12 in it's most common form cyanocobalamin I did not seem to make any difference. I read some more and found out that the only form of B12 that does help reverse nerve damage is methylcobalamin. I started to take it two weeks ago, and for the past two days my sunburn feeling on my neck and arms seems to have subsided, and I was out in the sun for 4 hours today, and feel fine. I want to add that if I could have my way, I would immediately start composting night soil, but my higher power (girlfriend said no way. I eat my dinner right out of the garden, and she just could not deal with it. I have decided to continue to take a high quality supplement. I am interested in your thoughts on all of this. Do you all agree with my research ? Do you believe that my sunburn might be due to nerve damage caused by B12 deficiency ? For now I think I will continue to take the B12 methylcobalamin. Rufus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 2004 Report Share Posted August 5, 2004 Dear Rufus, I don't think that a B12 deficiency has much to do with increased photosensitivity. I also think that your decision to supplement with methylcobalamin is a good one. Large doses at first, maybe for a few weeks, to get your stores back up to " normal " levels, tapering back down to lower maintenance doses for long-term. B12 deficiency is not a joke. TC Fry had a severe B12 deficiency when he died. There is a disturbing trend among some of the raw vegan folks to look for reasons to dismiss the research. In my view this is a very dangerous approach. The solution is so simple. Why people look for excuses not to take their little pills or lozenges or whatever is beyond my comprehension. It would not be an issue in the wild, in the wild, food is contaminated with bacteria and there is also some inadvertent ingestion of small insects. But, our modern food supply is so hygenic that without an external source, we may become depleted. It can take 20 years or more. Other supplements to consider: D: 400 IU per day. This is safer than exposure to UV radiation. UV is a potent carcinogen and we are in the midst of a melanoma epidemic which will only become worse. Conditionally essential amino acids: Taurine, arginine: these are in short supply in the vegan diet. Others: L-carnitine, creatine: levels are very depressed in vegans. EPA, DHA. Some people might be convert needed amounts of these from ALA intake, for others, maybe not. The research has not effectively removed all doubt. Until then, supplementation may be the wisest course. These recommendations assume that you have the best of all possible raw vegan diets and that all other vitamin and mineral needs are being satisfied. Considering the continual depletion of the soils and the typical food choices of most raw fooders, these are very big assumptions. Do not be led astray by the propagandists that would tell you that there is no need to meet RDA/DRI requirements. These are typically minmal values derived to alleviate conditions of disease. They are far from optimal. Our close relatives, the wild howler monkeys, have diets that are orders of magnitude richer in vitamins and minerals than ours, even with the best choices from our modern food supply. But, their food is wild, and ours is not. Carol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 6, 2004 Report Share Posted August 6, 2004 Hi Rufus, Thanks for the education!! One thing was not really clear to me, that is the part about the false tests. What is being tested? You claim they do not appear to be deficient when they are. Why are these tests false? And how then do you know when people are dificient when tests are untrustworthy? cheers, Leoni A beer drinker might not not appear to > be deficient when taking a b12 test, when in fact they > are. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 6, 2004 Report Share Posted August 6, 2004 Hi Leoni, Beer and blue green algae(as Roger just mentioned) are both a source of analog B12. Not only is analog B12 not what we need, but it tricks the body into purging the good B12 instead of reabsorbing it. When tested, beer drinkers and blue green algae eaters often appear to have a healthy level of B12 in the system, when in fact their good B12 levels are dropping. The analog B12 causes a false positive reading on a blood test, because the test picks up the analog B12. Often times it is not until these people start to show serious symptoms that they are diagnosed as deficient. As said by Dr. Elson Haas: " Toxicity can occur from excess inorganic cobalt found as a food contaminant. Beer drinker's cardiomyopathy (enlarged heart) and congestive heart failure have been traced to cobalt introduced into beer during manufacturing. Increased intake may affect the thyroid or cause overproduction of red blood cells, thickened blood, and increased activity in the bone marrow. " Rufus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.