Guest guest Posted February 4, 2003 Report Share Posted February 4, 2003 that's interresting but now that we have computers, we definitely don't need the space program for them anymore. i am not a computer science buff but it seems to me we could best advance computers by funding, well, computers. computers are one of the few technologies out these days i don't dislike and feel is unnecessary. a great deal of " technology " has also been discovered through the development of military weaponry. but does that make war / weapons good? i think not. personally i don't even approve of cars (even if they were hydrogen powered they're still dangerous and expensive) i use public transportation and my feet to take me everywhere i need to go. if i had it my way there would be no cars, only buses, trains, and planes. obviously this might not work in rural areas. I don't expect everyone else to give up their car, and hey they might even need it for their job. i just think it is a shame that so many people see their car is a source of identity, but then, i never understood that. i realized i was different from other boys, when at age 12 they were staring at a car magazine like it was full of naked women and i was busy thinking of naked women. i also am sad to hear that china has become more like the US in recent years with a lot more vehicles and less bikes. super d p.s. lol, now the newbies will really be confused Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2003 Report Share Posted February 5, 2003 p.s. lol, now the newbies will really be confused I have to say I'm definitely confused as the reason for space exploration topics in a veggie group, but here's a tidbit I thought maybe might interest you guys discussing this. " When NASA began the launch of astronauts into space, they found out that the pens wouldn't work at zero gravity as the ink wouldn't flow down to the writing surface. In order to solve this problem, they hired Andersen Consulting (Accenture today). It took them one decade and 12 million dollars. They developed a pen that worked at zero gravity, upside down, under water, on practically any surface including crystal and in a temperature range from below freezing to over 300 degrees C. The Russians used a pencil... and saved 12 million dollars " I don't necessarily oppose the space program, but I DO think that our government has very poor spending habits. I'm sure that there are wonderful benefits to space exploration.If we were to address the issue at all I would say we should address the issues of mindless spending and not whole programs. But that's just my opinion. Namaste, Jennifer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2003 Report Share Posted February 5, 2003 p.s. lol, now the newbies will really be confused I have to say I'm definitely confused as the reason for space exploration topics in a veggie group, but here's a tidbit I thought maybe might interest you guys discussing this. " When NASA began the launch of astronauts into space, they found out that the pens wouldn't work at zero gravity as the ink wouldn't flow down to the writing surface. In order to solve this problem, they hired Andersen Consulting (Accenture today). It took them one decade and 12 million dollars. They developed a pen that worked at zero gravity, upside down, under water, on practically any surface including crystal and in a temperature range from below freezing to over 300 degrees C. The Russians used a pencil... and saved 12 million dollars " I don't necessarily oppose the space program, but I DO think that our government has very poor spending habits. I'm sure that there are wonderful benefits to space exploration.If we were to address the issue at all I would say we should address the issues of mindless spending and not whole programs. But that's just my opinion. Namaste, Jennifer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2003 Report Share Posted February 5, 2003 On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 14:35:41 -0000, you wrote: > " When NASA began the launch of astronauts into space, they found >out that the pens wouldn't work at zero gravity as the ink wouldn't >flow down to the writing surface. In order to solve this problem, >they hired Andersen Consulting (Accenture today). It took them one >decade and 12 million dollars. They developed a pen that worked at >zero gravity, upside down, under water, on practically any surface >including crystal and in a temperature range from below freezing to >over 300 degrees C. The Russians used a pencil... and saved 12 >million dollars " It's a cute story, but of course it's not true. See: http://www.snopes.com - just put NASA in the search box (this site uses frames, so I can't give the exact URL). Snopes.com is an urban legend debunking site. The thing about exploration and research: you cannot specify ahead of time what you'll find. You either support it for the benefits which may (or may not) accrue, or you don't. The space program, in particular, has been rich in knowledge that has led to benefits on earth. Not computers, that's not true. Computers were developed LONG before space travel ever took place - anyone who thinks that the space program developed computers doesn't know the history of computing. But various other things have been derived from it, mainly I believe in the realm of material science - better materials, some used for medical purposes, for example. For me, the clincher is the very valid possibility that a large asteroid could be on an impact course with earth, and could be deflected by a spacecraft. The salvation of all life on earth seems a worth goal to me. Pat -- Pat Meadows CLICK DAILY TO FEED THE HUNGRY United States: http://www.stopthehunger.com/ International: http://www.thehungersite.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2003 Report Share Posted February 5, 2003 On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 12:30:39 -0500, I wrote: PS.... <snip> >It's a cute story, but of course it's not true. > >See: http://www.snopes.com - just put NASA in the search >box (this site uses frames, so I can't give the exact URL). >Snopes.com is an urban legend debunking site. I found the exact URL - it's: http://www.snopes.com/business/genius/spacepen.htm Pat -- Pat Meadows CLICK DAILY TO FEED THE HUNGRY United States: http://www.stopthehunger.com/ International: http://www.thehungersite.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2003 Report Share Posted February 5, 2003 that may very well be a valid reason for pursuing the space program, IF the space program was pushing all of their efforts towards discovering another inhabitable planet. and they're not. Much of the money is being pumped into things like military surveillance, satellite tv, the " star wars " project, and other pardon my french, crap, that we don't need. , Pat Meadows <pat@m...> wrote: > On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 14:35:41 -0000, you wrote: > > > > " When NASA began the launch of astronauts into space, they found > >out that the pens wouldn't work at zero gravity as the ink wouldn't > >flow down to the writing surface. In order to solve this problem, > >they hired Andersen Consulting (Accenture today). It took them one > >decade and 12 million dollars. They developed a pen that worked at > >zero gravity, upside down, under water, on practically any surface > >including crystal and in a temperature range from below freezing to > >over 300 degrees C. The Russians used a pencil... and saved 12 > >million dollars " > > It's a cute story, but of course it's not true. > > See: http://www.snopes.com - just put NASA in the search > box (this site uses frames, so I can't give the exact URL). > Snopes.com is an urban legend debunking site. > > The thing about exploration and research: you cannot > specify ahead of time what you'll find. You either support > it for the benefits which may (or may not) accrue, or you > don't. > > The space program, in particular, has been rich in knowledge > that has led to benefits on earth. Not computers, that's > not true. Computers were developed LONG before space travel > ever took place - anyone who thinks that the space program > developed computers doesn't know the history of computing. > > But various other things have been derived from it, mainly I > believe in the realm of material science - better materials, > some used for medical purposes, for example. > > For me, the clincher is the very valid possibility that a > large asteroid could be on an impact course with earth, and > could be deflected by a spacecraft. The salvation of all > life on earth seems a worth goal to me. > > Pat > -- Pat Meadows > CLICK DAILY TO FEED THE HUNGRY > United States: http://www.stopthehunger.com/ > International: http://www.thehungersite.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.