letter from proctor & gamble regarding animal rights testing

[Guest guest]

This letter sounds awfully familiar!

 

I recieved a response from Proctor and Gamble about a year ago and if

it wasn't the same as this one it WAS VERY VERY SIMILAR....

 

Cheers,

Glenda

[Guest guest]

i'm sure it was the same. note the " If we come across a

situation when even the most advanced alternatives available

can't prove the safety of a new ingredient, we may have to rely on a

minimal amount of animal research to make sure the ingredient is safe

for human use. " .. cause i just can't live without anti-dandruff

technology.

 

, " Glenda

<philandglenda@o...> " <philandglenda@o...> wrote:

> This letter sounds awfully familiar!

>

> I recieved a response from Proctor and Gamble about a year ago and

if

> it wasn't the same as this one it WAS VERY VERY SIMILAR....

>

> Cheers,

> Glenda

[Guest guest]

, " dave <dave4sale> "

<dave4sale> wrote:

> i'm sure it was the same. note the " If we come across a

> situation when even the most advanced alternatives available

> can't prove the safety of a new ingredient, we may have to rely on

a

> minimal amount of animal research to make sure the ingredient is

safe

> for human use. " .. cause i just can't live without anti-

dandruff

> technology.

 

LOL, EXACTLY. It is rediculous.....and their 'minimal amount' of

animal research is supposed to reassure us, right ? Rediculous. The

thing that is so annoying is that all these ingredients and chemicals

and substances that have been tested on animals over the past how

ever many years and they STILL have to do more and more animal

tests. Surely they have enough ingredients by now to not have to

bother, but it all comes down to $$$ and no one suffers more than the

animals. It is revolting.

- Glenda

[Guest guest]

I know aren't they done testing?

Besides their products don't work anyway. Proctor and

Gamble should just get over it and put themselves out

of their misery . It will be more beneficial to all

humans and animals involved.

-E

 

--- " Glenda <philandglenda "

> > i'm sure it was the same. note the " If we come

> across a

> > situation when even the most advanced alternatives

> available

> > can't prove the safety of a new ingredient, we may

> have to rely on

> a

> > minimal amount of animal research to make sure the

> ingredient is

> safe

> > for human use. " .. cause i just can't live

> without anti-

> dandruff

> > technology.

>

> LOL, EXACTLY. It is rediculous.....and their

> 'minimal amount' of

> animal research is supposed to reassure us, right ?

> Rediculous. The

> thing that is so annoying is that all these

> ingredients and chemicals

> and substances that have been tested on animals over

> the past how

> ever many years and they STILL have to do more and

> more animal

> tests. Surely they have enough ingredients by now

> to not have to

> bother, but it all comes down to $$$ and no one

> suffers more than the

> animals. It is revolting.

> - Glenda

>

>

>

 

 

=====

Lady Elisa

 

" If I had a world of my own everything would be nonsense. "

Alice from Disney's Alice in Wonderland

 

 

 

Send Flowers for Valentine's Day