Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Dairy Products Increase Osteoporosis Risk

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Friends,

 

It would cost about $800,000 to place the

following full-page ad in every newspaper in

America next Sunday. If only all Americans

would read this information, what a different

world it would be..

 

Share a copy with your daughters, nieces,

sisters, cousins, mothers, aunts, grandmothers,

friends, teachers, school administrators, school

nurses, physicians...

 

Bruce Friedrich of PETA gets credit for having

written this column. The original appears on

their award-winning website:

 

http://milksucks.com/osteo.html

______________

 

" The myth that osteoporosis is caused by calcium

deficiency was created to sell dairy products and

calcium supplements. There's no truth to it. American

women are among the biggest consumers of calcium

in the world, and they still have one of the highest

levels of osteoporosis in the world. And eating even

more dairy products and calcium supplements is not

going to change that fact. "

—Dr. John McDougall

The McDougall Program for Women (2000)

 

Osteoporosis is a debilitating disease characterized

by low bone mass and deteriorating bone tissue that

affects tens of millions of Americans and causes 1.5

million fractures annually. The annual cost of treatment

totals more than $10 billion. While some people suffering

from osteoporosis experience recurring back pain, loss

of height, and spinal deformities, many don't even know

they have the disease until a bone fracture occurs.

 

According to the National Osteoporosis Foundation,

one in two women over the age of 50, and one in eight

men, will experience an osteoporosis-related fracture.

 

The dairy industry has a powerful hold on the nutrition

industry in this country; it pays huge numbers of

dietitians, doctors, and researchers to push dairy,

spending more than $300 million annually, just at the

national level, to retain a market for its products. The

dairy industry has infiltrated schools, bought off sports

stars, celebrities, and politicians, pushing all the while

an agenda based on profit, rather than public health.

 

Dr. Walter Willett, a veteran nutrition researcher at

the Harvard School of Public Health, says that

calcium consumption " has become like a religious

crusade, " overshadowing true preventive measures

such as physical exercise. To hear the dairy industry

tell it, if you consume three glasses of milk daily,

your bones will be stronger, and you can rest safely

knowing that osteoporosis is not in your future.

 

Despite the dairy industry funding study after study

to try to prove its claims, Dr. John McDougall, upon

examining all the available nutritional studies and

evidence, concludes:

 

" The primary cause of osteoporosis is the high-protein

diet most Americans consume today. As one leading

researcher in this area said, '[E]ating a high-protein

diet is like pouring acid rain on your bones.' " Remarkably

enough, if dairy has any effect, both clinical and

population evidence strongly implicate dairy in causing,

rather than preventing, osteoporosis. That the dairy

industry would lull unsuspecting women and children

into complacency by telling them, essentially, drink more

milk and your bones will be fine, may make good

business sense, but it does the public a grave disservice.

 

Most of the world's peoples do not consume cow's

milk, and yet most of the world does not experience the

high rates of osteoporosis found in the West. In Asian

countries, for example, where consumption of dairy

foods is low (and where women tend to be thin and

small-boned, universally accepted risk factors for

osteoporosis), fracture rates are much lower than

they are in the United States and in Scandinavian

countries, where consumption of dairy products i

s considerably higher.

 

But don't take our word for it; examine the science

for yourself:

 

One study, funded by the National Dairy Council, involved

giving a group of postmenopausal women three 8-ounce glasses

of skim milk per day for two years and comparing their bones

to those of a control group of women not given the milk. The

dairy group consumed 1,400 mg of calcium per day and

lost bone at twice the rate of the control group. According to

the researchers, " This may have been due to the average 30

percent increase in protein intake during milk supplementation ...

The adverse effect of increases in protein intake on calcium

balance has been reported from several laboratories, including

our own " (they then cite 10 other studies). Says McDougall,

 

" Needless to say, this finding did not reach the six o'clock

news. "

 

After looking at 34 published studies in 16 countries,

researchers at Yale University found that countries with the

highest rates of osteoporosis—including the United States,

Sweden, and Finland—are those in which people consume

the most meat, milk, and other animal foods. This study

also showed that African Americans, who consume, on

average, more than 1,000 mg of calcium per day, are nine

times more likely to experience hip fractures than are South

African blacks, whose daily calcium intake is only 196 mg.

Says McDougall, " [O]n a nation-by-nation basis, people who

consume the most calcium have the weakest bones and the

highest rates of osteoporosis. ... Only in those places where

calcium and protein are eaten in relatively high quantities

does a deficiency of bone calcium exist, due to an excess

of animal protein. "

 

Harvard University's landmark Nurses Health Study, which

followed 78,000 women over a 12-year period, found that

the women who consumed the most calcium from dairy

foods broke more bones than those who rarely drank milk.

Summarizing this study, the Lunar Osteoporosis Update

(November 1997) explained: " This increased risk of hip

fracture was associated with dairy calcium … If this were

any agent other than milk, which has been so aggressively

marketed by dairy interests, it undoubtedly would be

considered a major risk factor. "

 

A National Institutes of Health study out of the University

of California, published in the American Journal of Clinical

Nutrition (2001), found that;

 

" Women who ate most of their protein from animal sources

had three times the rate of bone loss and 3.7 times the rate

of hip fractures of women who ate most of their protein from

vegetable sources. " Even though the researchers adjusted

" for everything we could think of that might otherwise explain

the relationship … it didn't change the results. " The study's

conclusion: " [A]n increase in vegetable protein intake and a

decrease in animal protein intake may decrease bone loss

and the risk of hip fracture. "

 

Another study published in the American Journal of Clinical

Nutrition (2000) looked at all aspects of diet and bone health

and found that high consumption of fruits and vegetables

positively affect bone health and that dairy consumption did

not. Such findings do not surprise nutritional researchers:

According to Dr. Neal Barnard, author of Turn Off the Fat

Genes (2001) and several other books on diet and health,

the calcium absorption from vegetables is as good as or

better than that from milk. Calcium absorption from milk is

approximately 30 percent, while figures for broccoli,

Brussels sprouts, mustard greens, turnip greens, kale, and

some other leafy green vegetables range between 40

percent and 64 percent.

 

After reviewing studies on the link between protein intake

and urinary calcium loss, nutritional researcher Robert P.

Heaney found that as consumption of protein increases, so

does the amount of calcium lost in the urine (Journal of

the American Dietetic Association, 1993): " This effect has

been documented in several different study designs for more

than 70 years, " he writes, adding, " [T]he net effect is such

that if protein intake is doubled without changing intake of

other nutrients, urinary calcium content increases by about

50 percent. "

 

Researchers from the University of Sydney and Westmead

Hospital discovered that consumption of dairy foods, especially

early in life, increases the risk of hip fractures in old age

(American Journal of Epidemiology, 1994).

 

Finally, an analysis of all research conducted since 1985,

published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2000),

concluded:

 

" If dairy food intakes confer bone health, one might

expect this to have been apparent from the 57 outcomes,

which included randomized, controlled trials and longitudinal

cohort studies involving 645,000 person-years. "

 

The researchers go on to lament that " there have been few

carefully designed studies of the effects of dairy foods on bone

health, " and then to conclude with typical scientific reserve

that:

 

" The body of scientific evidence appears inadequate

to support a recommendation for daily intake of dairy foods

to promote bone health in the general U.S. population. "

 

What we do know is that osteoporosis rates decline markedly

as body weight, exercise, and caloric intake rise. Corroborating

the researchers' lament about bad studies, only three studies

have factored caloric intake into the analysis; two of them

found no correlation between dairy intake and osteoporosis.

The other found a positive link; that is, the more milk consumed,

the higher the fracture risk (Harvard Nurses Study, see above).

 

The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2000) study cited

above argued that since we know for certain that total caloric

intake and body weight are positively associated with bone

mass, such factors are " particularly important " in any study

of osteoporosis and bone mass.

 

Is the dairy industry ignoring these factors by design

in its clinical studies, perhaps because dairy consumers

tend to be heavier and to consume more calories than

those consuming fewer (or no) dairy products? It is

remarkable that the dairy industry can't get the results

it's looking for, since dairy consumption does tend to

make people heavier. Even though dairy researchers

ignore this factor, most studies still show no relationship,

and some indicate that milk causes osteoporosis. If the

tendencies of those who consume more dairy to be

heavier and to consume more calories were accounted for,

would the studies indicating no link show, in fact, that

dairy intake causes osteoporosis, like the Harvard School

of Public Health study? That would bring clinical analysis

into line with the population analysis, which clearly states

that increased dairy consumption is linked to increased

risk for osteoporosis.

 

So what can I do for strong bones?

 

Osteoporosis is a horrible disease, and although the

evidence is strong that dairy consumption doesn't

prevent it, simply eliminating dairy products does not

ensure that it won't afflict you. And if, like most people

who consume no meat or dairy, you are slender, you

should be sure to put some thought (and effort) into

keeping your bones healthy.

 

What the evidence does dictate as useful for strong bones is:

 

• Getting enough vitamin D (if you don't spend any time in the

sun, be sure to take a supplement or eat fortified foods).

 

• Eliminating animal protein (for a variety of reasons, animal

protein causes severe bone deterioration).

 

• Limiting alcohol consumption (alcohol is toxic to the cells

that form bones and inhibits the absorption of calcium).

 

• Limiting salt intake (sodium leaches calcium out of the bones)

 

• Not smoking (studies have shown that women who smoke one

pack of cigarettes a day have 5 to 10 percent less bone density

at menopause than nonsmokers).

 

• Getting plenty of exercise. Studies have concluded that physical

exercise is the key to building strong bones (more important than

any other factor). For example, a study published in the British

Medical Journal, which followed 1,400 men and women over

a 15-year period, found that exercise may be the best protection

against hip fractures and that " reduced intake of dietary calcium

does not seem to be a risk factor. " And Penn State University

researchers found that bone density is significantly affected by

how much exercise girls get during their teen years, when 40

to 50 percent of their skeletal mass is developed. Consistent

with previous research, the Penn State study, which was

published in Pediatrics (2000), the journal of the American

Academy of Pediatrics, showed that calcium intake, which

ranged from 500 to 1,500 mg per day, has no lasting effect

on bone health.

 

" We (had) hypothesized that increased calcium intake

would result in better adolescent bone gain. Needless

to say, we were surprised to find our hypothesis refuted, "

one researcher explained.

 

Conclusion:

 

Drinking milk builds dairy producers' profits, but as the

above studies show, it's more likely to harm your bones

than to help them. And dairy foods are linked to all sorts

of other problems, including obesity, heart disease and cancer

(including breast cancer and prostate cancer) and are likely to

be contaminated with trace levels of antibiotics, hormones, and

other chemicals, including dioxin, one of the most toxic

substances known to humans (The Washington Post reported

that " the latest EPA study concludes that people who consume

even small amounts of dioxin in fatty foods and dairy products

face a cancer risk of 1 in 100. They may also develop other

problems, such as attention disorder, learning disabilities,

susceptibility to infections and liver disorders " (April 12, 2001).

 

Of course, calcium is an essential mineral, and it is possible to

have a calcium deficiency. According to Dr. Neal Barnard,

president of the Physicians Committee for Responsible

Medicine:

 

" Milk, in particular, is poor insurance against bone breaks …

the healthiest calcium sources are green leafy vegetables and

legumes … You don't need to eat huge servings of

vegetables or beans to get enough calcium, but do include

both in your regular menu planning. If you are looking for

extra calcium, fortified orange, apple, or grapefruit juices

are good choices. "

 

It makes no more sense for humans to consume the mother's

milk of cows than for us to consume the mother's milk of

rats, cats, dogs, giraffes, or any other mammal. Nature

created human mother's milk for baby humans, cow

mother's milk for baby cows, and so on.

 

The late Dr. Benjamin Spock, in Baby and Child Care

(the United States' best selling book, other than the Bible,

over the past 50 years), after recommending that no one

consume cow's milk and cataloging a host of ills associated

with milk consumption (heart disease, cancer, obesity,

antibiotic residue, iron deficiency, asthma, ear infections,

skin conditions, stomach aches, bloating, and diarrhea),

concludes:

 

" In nature, animals do not drink milk after infancy, and that

is the normal pattern for humans, too. …Children stay in

better calcium balance when their protein comes from plant

sources. "

 

Dr. Spock recommends human mother's milk for baby

humans, as nature intended.

 

" It is hard to turn on the television without hearing

commercials suggesting that milk promotes strong bones.

The commercials do not point out that only 30 percent

of milk's calcium is absorbed by the body or that

osteoporosis is common among milk drinkers. Nor

do they help you correct the real causes of bone loss. "

—Dr. Neal Barnard

 

Says Dr. T. Colin Campbell, the world's leading

epidemiological researcher in the field of diet and health,

 

" The dairy folks, ever since the 1920s, have been

enormously successful in cultivating an environment

within virtually all segments of our society—from research

and education to public relations and politics—to have us

believing that cow's milk and its products are manna

from heaven. … Make no mistake about it; the dairy

industry has been virtually in total control of any and

all public health information that ever rises to the level

of public scrutiny. "

 

" The association between the intake of animal protein

and fracture rates appears to be as strong as the

association between cigarette smoking and

lung cancer. "

—Dr. T. Colin Campbell

 

" Milk, it now seems clear, is not the solution to poor

bone density. To the contrary, it's part of the problem. "

—Dr. Charles Attwood

______________

 

Robert Cohen

http://www.notmilk.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

-------------------

THE NOTMILK NEWSLETTER:

SUBSCRIBE: send an empty Email to-

notmilk-

UNSUBSCRIBE: send an empty Email to-

notmilk-

 

Forward this message to your milk-drinking friends:

Learn about MILK from A to Z: http://www.notmilk.com/milkatoz.html

PLAY 2O QUESTIONS: http://www.notmilk.com/notmilkfaq.html

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...