Guest guest Posted April 12, 2007 Report Share Posted April 12, 2007 An interesting article... * * * By Andrew Bridges The Associated Press WASHINGTON — The days of peeling pesky stickers off apples and tomatoes may soon be over. A Georgia company is seeking federal approval for a laser that etches indelible but edible labels onto the skins of fruits and vegetables. The laser device could tag onions, cucumbers, kiwis, pears — all manner of produce — according to Durand-Wayland. The company wants federal regulations amended to allow it, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said Wednesday. The etched logos would be an alternative to the stickers that mark most fruits and vegetables sold in the United States, though it's not clear they'd be to consumers' liking. The stickers most commonly bear a standard code, called a produce look-up or PLU code, used to ring up fruits and vegetables at the register. They also can include brand names, logos and country-of-origin information. " I don't like it. I don't want my fruit lasered. I'll take a sticker over a laser. The less tampering with fruit, the better, " said consumer Ellen Hamilton, 41, of Alexandria, Va., when told about the technology. Durand-Wayland, a LaGrange, Ga., manufacturer of spraying, packing and labeling machinery, wanted to start selling the $38,000 lasers two years ago, but the FDA told it to hold off until it could show they were safe. Any source of radiation, including the light of a laser, used to treat or process food is considered a food additive. Durand-Wayland President Fred Durand III said the company delivered the agency a petition with the results of tests that show the technology is safe. The FDA has 180 days to review the findings, filed March 5. Etching The laser works by vaporizing the top layer of skin from produce, exposing the typically lighter layers underneath. That contrast allows the etching to stand out. It works well with fruit such as peaches, plums and nectarines, but not with cantaloupes (too lumpy) or brown potatoes (insufficient contrast). The Associated Press The FDA designated it for expedited review because the technology could improve the agency's ability to track and trace produce during an outbreak of food-borne disease, said Andy Zajac, who oversees petition review in the FDA's office of food-additive safety. The regulatory agency worries the etching could allow germs to penetrate treated produce, a concern noted by Sinclair Systems International, the largest manufacturer of stickers used to mark fruit. The FDA also wants to know whether the laser affects the fruit or vegetable. Test results submitted by the company are under FDA review. The lasers can etch 14 items a second, said Durand, who touts the technology as cheaper and more convenient than stickers. " Stickers are just more expensive all around. With laser, it's just light. It doesn't leave any mess. There's no labor. No inventory. No cleanup, " he said. A spokeswoman for the Produce Marketing Association called the technology intriguing. " The industry is always looking for the best, whatever will make things better and easier, " said Kathy Means, a spokeswoman for the industry group. The association estimates 60 percent of the most commonly sold fruits and vegetables are labeled for origin, either by country or region, typically with stickers or tags. Such labeling is voluntary. The 2002 Farm Act made country-of-origin labeling mandatory for seafood, meat and produce, but the requirement is on hold until September 2008 for the latter two foods. Southern Oregon Sales, a Medford, Ore., grower cooperative, used the Durand-Wayland laser etcher on a trial basis last year, tagging 2,000 to 3,000 cases of fruit. Sales manager Dave Bryan said he figures the machine could pay for itself in five years, while eliminating sticker frustration and improving produce safety. " From a food-safety standpoint, it's huge, " Bryan said. Sinclair Systems has watched the technology but is sticking to stickers. Fran Garcia, the Fresno, Calif., company's vice president of global sales and marketing, said advanced bar- code technology will keep demand for stickers high. Durand said test results should put all fears to rest. That may not sway consumer Autumn Majack, 33, of Milton, Pierce County. She said she prefers her fruit free of all labels, whether laser-etched or stuck on: " You know what you're buying. " 2007 The Seattle Times Company Full article: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003663222_produce12.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2007 Report Share Posted April 12, 2007 I'm trying to decide if this is a good thing or not. My husband is always complaining about the peel-and-stick labels. Somehow, anything that's this technologically sophisticated and leaves something that's " indelible but edible " and is approved by the FDA (red flags?) has me holding my breath, waiting for the other proverbial shoe to drop. A laser that can etch a label onto the fruit/vegetable skin - would that be heating the fruit/vegetable enough to destroy plant tissue/enzymes? Time for a discussion here... Thanks - Sue > > WASHINGTON — The days of peeling pesky stickers off apples and > tomatoes may soon be > over. A Georgia company is seeking federal approval for a laser that > etches indelible but > edible labels onto the skins of fruits and vegetables. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.