Guest guest Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 I don't think I am preaching to the choir at ALL! To my GREAT surprise, the Raw Washington group seems to support I-1000! As I have stated, diet is vital, but MUCH more is needed for great health! That turnaround has been done MANY times! www.hacres.com Suscribe to their weekly healthtip and read Dodie Osteen's book " Healed Of Cancer. " It doesn't seem like you are reading my emails Blanc so I have keep stating the same thing again. The taking of a human life can't be justified...I wonder how many of you that are voting YES on I-1000 would support a similar measure that applied to animals?!? On Behalf Of Blanc Sunday, November 02, 2008 8:41 PM Re: Respnding to Blanc, SV, & Sam But you are preaching to the choir, here. Most everyone on the list is already convinced of the propriety of eating raw and taking assiduous care of their health. Once you have approached a few of those terminally ill who are so racked with pain that they would rather die (especially those who are so incapacitated that they couldn't even do the deed by themselves), and have convinced them that a raw diet is going to turn everything around, then you could come back to the list and relate to everyone the details of how you were successful not only in convincing them to change their unhealthy lifestyle, but also of how their health was restored in time to save them within the expected short time they still had available to them. Success is the best argument. Blanc On Nov 2, 2008, at 7:37 AM, <health <health > wrote: > BLANC: I have listened Blanc, but I have heard those ideas MANY times > before for around 25 years and because one is NOT persuaded by them > does NOT > mean one is NOT listening. I appreciate the idea about juicing > pumpkins! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 So how do you feel about people asking to have the plug pulled? Or ending their life by having no water or food...they are given large amounts of drugs to ease there suffering till they die. By this time the person is so drudged out of there minds they aren't present. What are your thoughts on this? And we do have our pets put to sleep when they are terminal.. We see it as a merciful act..We did this for our cat, she had lukemia. Cancer and other diseases are taking the life.not people.. I-1000 gives the option to die on there own terms not the cancers.. I worked with hospice for 5 yrs. Its changed my view on death from terminal illness and the suffering it brings.I think your stuck on the letter of the law and cant see the spirit of the law. Do you understand how sick these terminal patients are when they finally end there lives? Yes good nutrition has helped many.. but not all those who are ill. health Monday, November 03, 2008 1:34 AM RE: Respnding to Blanc I don't think I am preaching to the choir at ALL! To my GREAT surprise, the Raw Washington group seems to support I-1000! As I have stated, diet is vital, but MUCH more is needed for great health! That turnaround has been done MANY times! www.hacres.com Suscribe to their weekly healthtip and read Dodie Osteen's book " Healed Of Cancer. " It doesn't seem like you are reading my emails Blanc so I have keep stating the same thing again. The taking of a human life can't be justified...I wonder how many of you that are voting YES on I-1000 would support a similar measure that applied to animals?!? On Behalf Of Blanc Sunday, November 02, 2008 8:41 PM Re: Respnding to Blanc, SV, & Sam But you are preaching to the choir, here. Most everyone on the list is already convinced of the propriety of eating raw and taking assiduous care of their health. Once you have approached a few of those terminally ill who are so racked with pain that they would rather die (especially those who are so incapacitated that they couldn't even do the deed by themselves), and have convinced them that a raw diet is going to turn everything around, then you could come back to the list and relate to everyone the details of how you were successful not only in convincing them to change their unhealthy lifestyle, but also of how their health was restored in time to save them within the expected short time they still had available to them. Success is the best argument. Blanc On Nov 2, 2008, at 7:37 AM, <health <health > wrote: > BLANC: I have listened Blanc, but I have heard those ideas MANY times > before for around 25 years and because one is NOT persuaded by them > does NOT > mean one is NOT listening. I appreciate the idea about juicing > pumpkins! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 You are certainly preaching though, and shouting a lot in the process. I have reviewed postings from your email address, and out of 27 posts to , all but 4 involve your I-1000 tirade, another is a what I consider a spam on a Chinook book which you sought benefit from. Congratulations, you have now made it to my spam folder, the very first member to get that distinction from me.... David On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:34 AM, <health wrote: > I don't think I am preaching to the choir at ALL! To my GREAT surprise, > the > Raw Washington group seems to support I-1000! As I have stated, diet is > vital, but MUCH more is needed for great health! That turnaround has been > done MANY times! www.hacres.com Suscribe to their weekly healthtip and > read Dodie Osteen's book " Healed Of Cancer. " It doesn't seem like you are > reading my emails Blanc so I have keep stating the same thing again. > > The taking of a human life can't be justified...I wonder how many of you > that are voting YES on I-1000 would support a similar measure that applied > to animals?!? > > > <%40> > [ <%40>]On > Behalf Of Blanc > Sunday, November 02, 2008 8:41 PM > <%40> > Re: Respnding to Blanc, SV, & Sam > > But you are preaching to the choir, here. Most everyone on the list > is already convinced of the propriety of eating raw and taking > assiduous care of their health. > > Once you have approached a few of those terminally ill who are so > racked with pain that they would rather die (especially those who are > so incapacitated that they couldn't even do the deed by themselves), > and have convinced them that a raw diet is going to turn everything > around, then you could come back to the list and relate to everyone > the details of how you were successful not only in convincing them to > change their unhealthy lifestyle, but also of how their health was > restored in time to save them within the expected short time they > still had available to them. > > Success is the best argument. > > Blanc > > On Nov 2, 2008, at 7:37 AM, <health<health%40casaleconsulting.com> > > > <health <health%40casaleconsulting.com> > > wrote: > > > BLANC: I have listened Blanc, but I have heard those ideas MANY times > > before for around 25 years and because one is NOT persuaded by them > > does NOT > > mean one is NOT listening. I appreciate the idea about juicing > > pumpkins! > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 Jim, I assume the reason you mentioned that medical professionals oppose I-1000 was to give credence to your own position. Knowing what we all know about how flawed and fraudulent medicine is, aligning yourself with them does not do you credit. It's not hard to figure out why a medical association would oppose this initiative. Slow lingering deaths are lucrative. Personally, anytime the medical profession backs something I tend to run the other direction, but the truth is there are lots of individual doctors who support this initiative. It's really the system that opposes it, because the system is heartless and cold and always goes for the money. " The taking of a human life can't be justified...I wonder how many of you that are voting YES on I-1000 would support a similar measure that applied to animals?!? " This is the kind of accusation we usually hear from vivisectors, hunters and factory farmers. Well, your challenge doesn't work because we already perform the act of merciful death on animals too sick to recover. It's legal and it's a loving and compassionate thing to do, if circumstances warrant it. It is not those who support I-1000 who have the double standard, Jim, it is *you*. One way for animals (they are disposable), another way for humans (they are too special to die). I guess now you'll say that you want to remove the option of euthanasia for animals, too. Thanks for offering to coach our dying loved ones and make them see the error of their ways. But knowing that if you're not able to convince them to get healthy you would subject them to a cruel and prolonged death, I'll pass. You can't really have their interests at heart, anyway, if you would take away the option of escape that the rest of us take for granted. Nora Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.