Guest guest Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Greens are not a complete protein! One needs beans/legumes! They may be soaked and then eaten raw. It is not possible to often eat fruit ripened on the tree in the Northwest. A 10% fat level long-term is not healthy or realistic. The natural/local diet has to be considered and not just the theory of ANY human author. NO one person has all the correct info. As Romans chapter 3 verse 23 states, " All fall short of the glory of God. " _____ On Behalf Of Mark Hovila Monday, June 08, 2009 1:21 AM RE: Re: Health and Fat Emily, If you were eating 3 big bunches of greens a day, you were probably getting around 60 grams of protein from that alone. The USDA recommends 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight. A 150 pound person would, according to this guideline, need only 54 grams of protein daily. And let's not forget that the USDA is basically owned by the meat and dairy industries, so their recommendations are high. And because your protein was raw, not cooked, it was 100% useable by the body, unlike cooked protein, which I have read is only 50% useable or so. I think this fact is mentioned in The Live Food Factor. Nora's comments make a lot of sense to me. Mark Chiming in a bit, though I haven't been active lately. I agree that a low-fat diet is essential. However, I followed 80/10/10 for a few months and started to develop signs of protein deficiency, particularly brittle nails and hair. I was eating about three bunches of greens a day plus a tablespoon of vitamineral green in my smoothies. I've started to drink hemp milk (with just a little raw cacao) without straining the pulp after workouts and I've increased my vegetable intake as well. We shall see what happens. Before I went raw, I was following Dr. Joel Fuhrman's " Eat to Live " plan. He advocates at least a 50% raw diet and really emphasizes in his book that we need RAW fruits and vegetables to protect ourselves from diseases of affluence (cancer!). The book is a really easy, valuable lesson in nutrition, and also emphasizes a low, low, low fat diet; no more than once ounce of walnuts a day or a tablespoon of flax a day, and all fat should be heavy in omega-3's. I've started to re-read it due to these protein deficiency issues. It's a great reminder! -Emily Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 I'm interested to hear more info on what you've said below. thanks, kristi On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Jim Casale-Health < health wrote: > > > Greens are not a complete protein! One needs beans/legumes! They may be > soaked and then eaten raw. > > It is not possible to often eat fruit ripened on the tree in the Northwest. > A 10% fat level long-term is not healthy or realistic. The natural/local > diet has to be considered and not just the theory of ANY human author. NO > one person has all the correct info. As Romans chapter 3 verse 23 states, > " All fall short of the glory of God. " > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 On Jun 8, 2009, at 11:24 AM, Jim Casale-Health wrote: > One needs beans/legumes! I think that's the first I've heard this theory (of course, my memory does not retain everything). I'm curious what you base your theory on. Regarding greens and protein, while every whole plant-based food may contain protein, what is more important is the building blocks for protein: amino acids. Fruits and other vegetables (including greens) are loaded with amino acids, which our bodies use to build proteins. Whole proteins must first be broken down into amino acids. Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Jim, >Greens are not a complete protein! False. >One needs beans/legumes! False. >They may be soaked and then eaten raw. True. >It is not possible to often eat fruit ripened on the tree in the Northwest. False. I eat tree ripened apples off of a tree in my front yard, Lake Forest Park, WA. A 10% fat level long-term is not healthy or realistic. False. The natural/local diet has to be considered You mean the Burger King diet? and not just the theory of ANY human author. NO one person has all the correct info. True. As Romans chapter 3 verse 23 states, " All fall short of the glory of God. " Too bad God was so skimpy on the details in Genesis 1:29. I guess that means we have to figure it out ourselves. Not bad, you got at least two correct. Keep trying! :-) Mark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 In a SAD diet, the idea is that beans and rice make a complete protein, (the Mexicans have it right) ! So if you were to equal that theory/truth to the raw diet it seems to me you would have to break down the rice and beans to what amino acids are in each the rice and beans and their amounts....then do the same for the raw greens , fruit , whatever , to make up the equivelent amino acid combination and amount.. (?) anyone up for the challenge? or has it been done ? . Catherine. On Jun 8, 2009, at 11:24 AM, Jim Casale-Health wrote: > One needs beans/legumes! I think that's the first I've heard this theory (of course, my memory does not retain everything). I'm curious what you base your theory on. Regarding greens and protein, while every whole plant-based food may contain protein, what is more important is the building blocks for protein: amino acids. Fruits and other vegetables (including greens) are loaded with amino acids, which our bodies use to build proteins. Whole proteins must first be broken down into amino acids. Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 The " old school " theory was that vegetarians had to combine certain foods in a given meal, like beans and rice or whole wheat bread and peanut butter, etc. Then it was realized that foods don't need to be combined within a meal; a variety of foods can be consumed over time and the intelligent body combines nutrients as necessary to build tissues or carry on other tasks. Of course, the body can't (IMO) survive effectively on just one food. We need a variety of foods in our diets. I just hadn't heard the theory that we must consume beans/legumes (to survive)! After over 8 years raw and only consuming beans/legumes on rare occasions, I'm still alive and thriving. I was able to bike 400 miles+ last month without a single bean! (Unless there was some in a restaurant dish I ate.) Jeff On Jun 8, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Catherine wrote: > In a SAD diet, the idea is that beans and rice make a complete > protein, (the Mexicans have it right) ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.