Guest guest Posted August 8, 2009 Report Share Posted August 8, 2009 Hi Jerrod, that was rather cryptic ... we're all 'living' to know - what was they machine H.Acres ended up recommending? =) THANKS, lala , " Jerrod " <jerrod wrote: > > Dr. Donaldson from the Hallelujah Acres Foundation did some testing on several machines recently. I can ask him for some information but I know what machine they ended up recommending. No need to reinvent the wheel. Also, testing is a really scientific thing and tough for a group to properly weight the variables. Also the insertion of incentives always taints us humans. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 All- I am not sure that Hallelujah Acres is going to actually come out with a particular water machine recommendation at this time. I sense that they will not or they likely would have by now. I do know that they picked a particular machine which we purchased because of the quality of the water and the design of the machine such that it would be able to produce similar quality water for many years to come. The difference (interestingly enough) has to do with the way the electricity is fead to the plates. One of the most popular machines and most expensive has sort of lead the way with their design in this regard but unfortunately it will degrade the plates over time and significantly reduce the quality of the water coming out of the machine in 3-5 years. The machine that we purchased was $1300, has similar charactoristics as the others available in terms of the quality if the water if produces and because it is not a copy cat design of the others, the engineers have created a different electrical flow to the plates that will ensure multiple times the life for this machine while it can still produce good quality water. I hesitate to share the machine info but will if I am pressed. I don't want anyone to feel as if I am hammering on their machine OR that I am trying to make a buck. I could care less about either. I simply want to know what is best. So, here is the scoop. Ironically, all of the machines produce water that is subpar to distilled water with live minerals added back to it. The reason is that the ionize machines don't do the job of cleaning the water like distillation does. We all know that distillation removes the good minerals so we need to add those back using WaterMAX by Hallelujah Acres or Willards Water (the later is more expensive without high benefit/quality). What I am wondering is if there is some sort of combination like taking the distilled water and running it through an ionizer and then adding minerals... More testing. I suppose. The big push for these water machines is the testimonies that people have in the first few days and weeks. My reaction, which has been confirmed by other professionals who know more about this than I do, is that the testimonies are mainly playing off of the fact that most people live in a dehydrated state. When we pay a lot of money for a machine that makes magic water, we drink a lot of it. Naturally, this " watering " of our body is going to create some very positive results short term. For those that continue to eat a dry, processed food diet (verses a primarily raw food diet), it is really important to drink lots of water. The reality is that the spike in improvements are short lived for most if not all beyond just good hydration. So, I would say personally that we should continue to drink clean distilled water with live minerals added back and if someone wants to experiment with putting distilled water through an ionizer and then adding minerals then I think that could be a fun project. I personally however do not want to trade the ionizing benefits for the negatives of getting the toxins in the water. Thanks, Jerrod , " wolfmother1 " <wolfmother1 wrote: > > Hi Jerrod, that was rather cryptic ... we're all 'living' to know - what was they machine H.Acres ended up recommending? =) > > THANKS, > lala > > > > , " Jerrod " <jerrod@> wrote: > > > > Dr. Donaldson from the Hallelujah Acres Foundation did some testing on several machines recently. I can ask him for some information but I know what machine they ended up recommending. No need to reinvent the wheel. Also, testing is a really scientific thing and tough for a group to properly weight the variables. Also the insertion of incentives always taints us humans. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 Jerrod - I am now " pressing " - are you " pressed " - I would like to be im- " pressed " with the name of the machine - and the runner-ups, etc as many people already have machines and may want to know how theirs fared. : ) Thank you - politics of bizness - should be put aside for any true study. Incidentally, I do have a 501c3 research institute to perform this type of testing, however the trick is getting funding to do so. I do have access to a scientific lab that may be able to do intensive testing but that all takes money - so whatever type of testing HAS been done, please share the information, you have already posted your disclaimer as simply the messenger. Namaste, Yashpal Dr. Yashpal Jayne, ND www.yashpal.com Jerrod wrote: > > > All- > I am not sure that Hallelujah Acres is going to actually come out with > a particular water machine recommendation at this time. I sense that > they will not or they likely would have by now. I do know that they > picked a particular machine which we purchased because of the quality > of the water and the design of the machine such that it would be able > to produce similar quality water for many years to come. The > difference (interestingly enough) has to do with the way the > electricity is fead to the plates. One of the most popular machines > and most expensive has sort of lead the way with their design in this > regard but unfortunately it will degrade the plates over time and > significantly reduce the quality of the water coming out of the > machine in 3-5 years. > > The machine that we purchased was $1300, has similar charactoristics > as the others available in terms of the quality if the water if > produces and because it is not a copy cat design of the others, the > engineers have created a different electrical flow to the plates that > will ensure multiple times the life for this machine while it can > still produce good quality water. > > I hesitate to share the machine info but will if I am pressed. I don't > want anyone to feel as if I am hammering on their machine OR that I am > trying to make a buck. I could care less about either. I simply want > to know what is best. > > So, here is the scoop. Ironically, all of the machines produce water > that is subpar to distilled water with live minerals added back to it. > The reason is that the ionize machines don't do the job of cleaning > the water like distillation does. We all know that distillation > removes the good minerals so we need to add those back using WaterMAX > by Hallelujah Acres or Willards Water (the later is more expensive > without high benefit/quality). > > What I am wondering is if there is some sort of combination like > taking the distilled water and running it through an ionizer and then > adding minerals... More testing. I suppose. > > The big push for these water machines is the testimonies that people > have in the first few days and weeks. My reaction, which has been > confirmed by other professionals who know more about this than I do, > is that the testimonies are mainly playing off of the fact that most > people live in a dehydrated state. When we pay a lot of money for a > machine that makes magic water, we drink a lot of it. Naturally, this > " watering " of our body is going to create some very positive results > short term. For those that continue to eat a dry, processed food diet > (verses a primarily raw food diet), it is really important to drink > lots of water. The reality is that the spike in improvements are short > lived for most if not all beyond just good hydration. > > So, I would say personally that we should continue to drink clean > distilled water with live minerals added back and if someone wants to > experiment with putting distilled water through an ionizer and then > adding minerals then I think that could be a fun project. I personally > however do not want to trade the ionizing benefits for the negatives > of getting the toxins in the water. > > Thanks, > Jerrod > > > <%40>, " wolfmother1 " > <wolfmother1 wrote: > > > > Hi Jerrod, that was rather cryptic ... we're all 'living' to know - > what was they machine H.Acres ended up recommending? =) > > > > THANKS, > > lala > > > > > > > > > <%40>, " Jerrod " <jerrod@> wrote: > > > > > > Dr. Donaldson from the Hallelujah Acres Foundation did some > testing on several machines recently. I can ask him for some > information but I know what machine they ended up recommending. No > need to reinvent the wheel. Also, testing is a really scientific thing > and tough for a group to properly weight the variables. Also the > insertion of incentives always taints us humans. > > > > > > > -- *Chrysalis Yashpal Jayne, ND* *Naturopathic & Homeopathic Physician* 1044 Water St #206 Port Townsend, Wash 98368 *www.yashpal.com* Office: 360-385-3551 Fax/Msg: 877-860-5110 Skype: 360-356-1008 Cell: 360-302-0040 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.