Guest guest Posted August 7, 2003 Report Share Posted August 7, 2003 GMO etc. I wonder why ''the Pope " and " the President " would, seemingly, be ''in cahoots " to 'not' provide starving populations with " real food " . I am sure, again, I would think, since they have a pro life stance, their goal is to sustain life-even if the food- " products " may not be as " ideal " , " pristine " or of the best " quality " . Does this make us " stuck " with a " bad " President? I think that extreme thinking is a bit naive and unfair, as he has done not " all " " bad things " perse at all..And even alot of good things.. I can honestly say, without debate nor doubt, being a vegetarian is a pursuit not un costly for those in our area.. Nor in the United States! (Unless one is in an income bracket, or their family is, where buying the " exciting new/fun veggie foods " is pretty affordable or wholly easy to buy). Healthy vegetable " meat " replacement products are VERY costly when purchased to be incorporated, (into), a basic fruit and vegetable diet. " Fun " vegetarian products, things from Whole Foods, and the like, are NOT so easy to come by for most of the poor in America..It is largely the RICH (materially-well-to-do) who can afford much of the elite snobbery that (can) come with a comfortable and costly, yet healthful variety of non Gmo /healthy non meat food products in stores today.. We've been in positions to visit food pantries in the Greater N.Y.C area. They are NOT a " haven " for anyone seeking " health food-type " products by ANY means.The rare fresh things there will be some non-organic eggs, higher fat cheeses, butters and high fat, salt and sugar products. IF the rich in America and other (so called) " sophisticated " nations want to see " the poor " well feed, they ought stop complaining about political parties (there's good and bad in everyone..) and face the FACT that " THEY " may be the ''enemy " " they whine on about. This is not to suggest " all " or even " most " Vegetarians are " guilty " of " all " (or any) I've mentioned (*being rather stridently slanted in the negative towards a conservative Christian President, Pope and or their motives,etc.). The OTHER great irony is those, again most, who can afford to buy all of these fine products ..are surely in a financial position-(though relatively, they may not think they ARE, by the worlds standards and comparatively, we ARE with Europe and the Canada some of the richest populations in the WORLD)-to help feed, change this etc. I always wonder how folks who are worried about animals would feel if they were starving , and had NO access to buy ANY food BUT a food pantry. I must agree with the point in this article..would a once 'wealthy' soul turn down burgers and fries and some 'Gmo " foods at a pantry if " that's all there was? " NOW, if President G.W Bush and The Pope are holding out on the POSSIBILITY of providing " very good health food quality foods " to " the masses " -(including Americas " poor " and the increasingly large working poor who may live in " upscale " towns but STILL need the food pantries..OR the local church basement for food)-this is another story. though I still stand by all I've said in the rest of this post. Have we NOT enough money in America/Europe/Canada proper to have those who frequent costly health food stores or whole food stores with similar products, place a can by the registers of each and every store..to place monies of their OWN in, so to HELP the starving in OTHER nations buy the food they love to..talk about and eat themselves? I don't know of such groups, causes or cans..If they were doing well, I'd think we'd hear of them.We haven't. For us, being a semi vegetarian diet family is costly, sacrificial and we can't buy " all " 'organic foods. Fact is BAD foods are PROMOTED by wealthy folks to POOR folks. While the wealthy, or materially well off..go home to eat Non GMO products, soy products and the like. They CAN afford " the best " of every product and they DO allow, (as well as promote/push/ad) their very fatty meat, cheese and sugar laden white flour products in EVERY local bodega and store and food shop in urban areas. Again, this is a FACT. Which I must say brings NEW meaning to the phrase " Fat " " cats.. Sadly, I am also aware on a vague level of some of the snobbery that (can) come along with Vegetarian or any groups..Recently, once, when I was in a chat room and mentioned I was Christian the folks there " could not believe " I was eating in a vegetarian way....and insisted I must be a " Seventh Day " Adventist!. Their shock and quite muted replies when I shared these sentiments..was understandable..When one is in one position and has not seen or lived the others, it may be hard to see that side the fence..Perhaps it's human nature to just enjoy the comfort zone..I understand..Their suggestion I " must not be a Christian " because I am educated and enjoy healthy foods..was almost, but not quite as bad as a congressman on TV a few months back suggesting those who agreed with " war " were " war wanting born again Christians " . I found it quite sad and bizarre those words even came OUT on a TV screen. But, then again, we are living in " today.. " Perhaps, I was on a soy ''low'' At any rate, my sharing (perhaps by now an article, thank you for indulging..), is by NO means meant to criticize, mock, hurt or judge ANY vegetarians, Liberals, those of any faith or background nor those in this forum, truly. And I am most appreciative to/of the members here, their contributions, sharings and the invitation to this group. I want you to know I do not presume to " know " any of you, surely, again this all, not directed at the group, its members..or their loved ones/family/friends. Frankly, this topic is one I feel quite strongly about (you might glean *s..), seeing the wide disparity in social, regional, financial,economic areas, etc.. I'm an Artist, my Husband a Sociologist, perhaps we just " see " these things..a bit more clearly, I do not know..Individuals can't be blamed though, only God knows each of our hearts. I would not pretend to know anyone's nor their motives, feelings.etc. But I can share what I do know and what we have, or have not experienced. For this, and others, I am glad to be an American:) My Husband and I have seen (and lived) enough of ..fairly-well both " sides " of these (very real life) stories to know whence we speak. Below a wonderful quote on the benefits of healthful vegetarian living (we couldn't agree more *s) " Disease prevention benefits of vegetarianism are also noted, with vegetarians reported to have lower body mass indices than nonvegetarians; lower rates of death from ischemic heart disease; lower cholesterol and blood pressure levels; and lower rates of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and prostate and colon cancer. According to the associations, 2.5% of adults in the U.S. and 4% of adults in Canada follow vegetarian diets. Interest is vegetarianism appears to be increasing, with many restaurants and college food services routinely offering vegetarian meals " *-SO true, but these spoken of are,mainly, the wealthy, and Upper Middle classes. Not the American poor and other poor who die too young of bad illnesses ..not having such food sold to them, advertised to them nor afforded by them.. I found this quote ..I really must go. It is not the quote I wanted to share on this topic, but I guess it'll do for now..It's the same idea, basically: " To talk about the hungry on a full stomach is not the same when we talk about it on an empty one. " ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Now " I " am going to have a bowl of possibly BHT added cereal with some NON organic skimmed milk and a non organic banana. And I am going to thank GOD for it and the ability to work and loved ones to work to buy it. And thank HIM for our good health as well. Peace. P.S. And no, we have never seen a Trader Joe's nor a Whole Foods in the projects (ghetto). We hold fast to the hope & dream.. As they say in the nearby boroughs , " Ya nevah know.. " God Bless You All, P & W Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2003 Report Share Posted August 7, 2003 Well, just because the pope and president side with a position called " pro-life " does not in fact mean that they have a strong value for all life or even all human life. (i.e. death penalty, Iraqui civilians, etc.) " Pro-life " is a political term- liberals often refer to it as " anti-choice " just like " pro-choice " is referred to as " anti-life " by conservatives. The reasons corporations and the likes of Pres Bush may not be interrested in feeding the hungry of other nations (or his own for that matter) is racism. There still exists a strong sentiment in many americans that american lives matter more. Also, pro-life positions may be advocated by wealthy individuals who wish to ensure a large pool of cheap labor, not necessarily out of any concern for the unborn fetus. (this is not to say that most pro-lifers do not have a genuine concern for the fetus). I will agree with you that vegetarian food can be more expensive in the inner cities. I think this a very deliberate act by the stores to keep the poor living off of unhealthy foods. Whether its motivated by racism, classism, or the store stereotyping it's customers (i.e. " Poor people don't like health food " ). I will also agree with you that gm food is better than none at all. I don't think anyone here is arguing that no one should buy this, but that we should at least have a choice (i.e food should be labeled as gmo). And I feel that yes, if someone is starving and animal products are all they can get then eating them is perfectly justified. Just like it is justified for a lion to eat a zebra; for biological reasons, they have no choice. The thing is the President is holding out on the possibility of providing healthy food to all americans. first, the only reason meat and dairy are so cheap is because of corporate welfare- tax dollars. And farmers are actually paid NOT to grow more soybeans. Another problem being that the grains and wheat grown for livestock could be fed to humans if we stopped raising animals for food. Also, the president, ceos, etc. have enough money that they could buy food for every poor person and still live a very high quality of life. You also mentioned that can't there be cans to put money in at health food stores. I believe there are. there are also places to put food for the poor in at whole foods market. the problem is that, all people typically put in these is there pocket change. Of course most middle class people do lead a very luxurious life with lots of computers, tvs, stereos, etc. that we don't really need, but have been convinced by ads that we do. But another problem with charity is that, even if it actually ends up in the hands of the poor (which i understand it frequently does not), it is a temporary / quick fix solution to a problem that requires structural change. In order to eliminate poverty, we need redistribution of wealth (i.e. tax the rich more and the poor less) and laws passed (i.e. much higher minimum wage, price regulations, medicare, etc.) Sorry if I totally missed the point of your post. I don't think anyone here would claim that animals have more of a right to life than the poor. Personally, I like to view humans and animals as equals. However, because of the great destruction my fellow humans inflict on the environment, I feel we need to take some serious steps toward decreasing the human population. Humanely of course, through increased birth control, education, and " anti-natal " government policies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.