Guest guest Posted April 15, 2003 Report Share Posted April 15, 2003 Just thought I'd share this with you... :-) __ ARBOR CLINICAL NUTRITION UPDATES © __ This week we review some recent research concerning the health aspects of chocolate. For those with children (or nephews and nieces), this might be an appropriate topic to prepare you for the upcoming Easter holiday ! We would be very pleased if you were to share this publication with health professional friends and colleagues. Subscribing instructions for them are at the end, as are the instructions for changing your own subscription details. Kind regards, Editorial team, Arbor Clinical Nutrition Updates http://arborcom.com __ NUTRITION RESEARCH REVIEW Study 1: Cocoa, oxidation and inflammation -------------------------- Chocolate and cocoa drink decrease LDL oxidation susceptibility but do not affect markers of inflammation, according to a new study from Texas. Subjects: 25 healthy subjects. Method: Cross-over non-blinded study in which subjects were given cocoa in the form of chocolate and cocoa drink daily for 6 weeks. Measures of oxidative stress, (e.g. LDL oxidation kinetics and urinary isoprostanes) and markers of inflammation (e.g. whole-blood cytokines, interleukins TNF and C-reactive protein) were assessed before, at after a 6 week washout period after conclusion of cocoa supplementation. Results: There was a significant decrease in LDL oxidisability during the cocoa supplementation phase. - see Table. There was however no change in measures of inflammation. Table: Conjugated diene formation lag time with cocoa supplementation -- Pre-supplementation 91.3 min (18.0) Supplementation 101.0 min (20.7) Washout 96.4 min (7.5) p<0.05 Reference: J Nutr 2002 Dec;132(12):3663-7 Study 2: Cocoa is like a mild aspirin ---------------------- Cocoa has a similar but lesser effect on platelet activation and function than does aspirin, according to a recent American research. Subjects: 16 healthy adults. Method: Cross-over design. Subjects consumed aspirin (81 mg), cocoa (as a drink), or a combination of aspirin and cocoa. Platelet function was assessed by a variety of tests (e.g. epinephrine-induction) at 2 and 6 hours after consumption. Results: Cocoa (given alone or with aspirin) increased the plasma level of the cocoa-derived flavonoid epicatechin. Both aspirin and cocoa inhibited platelet function. Aspirin tended to do so at both 2 and 6 hours, whereas cocoa on its own more at 6 hours. There was some evidence of an additive effect of combining the two. Reference: Thromb Res 2002 May 15;106(4-5):191-7 Study 3: Cocoa and chocolate reduce oxidation ---- Cocoa powder and dark chocolate reduce lipid oxidation susceptibility and increase total antioxidant capacity without adversely affecting prostaglandin levels. These are conclusions from another American study. Subjects: 23 healthy subjects. Method: Randomised, 2 limb cross-over study. Subjects were placed on either an average American diet (controlled for content of fibre, caffeine, and theobromine) or the same diet supplemented with cocoa powder (22 gm/day) and dark chocolate (16 gm/day), then switched to the other diet. Results: There was a 4% increase in total serum oxidation capacity (p=0.04) and an 8% increase in LDL oxidation lag time (p=0.01) on the cocoa-chocolate diet, compared with the normal diet. These two parameters were positively correlated (r = 0.32, p =0.03). Although HDL was significantly higher on the cocoa-chocolate diet (4% greater p = 0.02), there was no significant difference in HDL:LDL ratios. There were no differences between diets in relation to 24 hour urinary prostaglandin excretion (thromboxane B2 and 6-keto-prostaglandin F-1-alpha.) Reference: Am J Clin Nutr 2001 Nov;74(5):596-602 COMMENTS For many years chocolate has been looked on as an indulgence, for which some people (more often women than men) have cravings, which has been described as at times bordering on addiction (refs.1,2,3). Chocolate has been something of a `guilty pleasure', and has been held responsible for ill effects as varied as elevation of lipids, disturbance of diabetic control, dental caries, migraine, heartburn and renal stones (refs.4-7). However, in recent years there has been quite a reassessment of the health impact of chocolate. For one thing, it has become apparent that its effect on lipid profile is less than one might assume from looking at its saturated fat content. This may be because much of the saturated fat is in the form of stearic acid. The more common view is now that chocolate can happily be eaten in moderation, including by those specifically wanting to follow a `heart friendly' diet (refs.8,9,10). Evidence has also suggested that small amounts of chocolate can be eaten by diabetics without any significant adverse impact on their glucose control (ref.11). But the biggest change in thinking has been the realisation that chocolate may have positive health benefits related to the content of antioxidant and platelet inhibiting compounds in cocoa (particularly polyphenol flavonoids such as epicatechin) (ref.12). The polyphenol content of cocoa foods varies, being more in dark than light chocolate for example (ref. 10). Since these cocoa flavonoids are platelet inhibitors, it is possible that they may also not only have anti-coagulation but also anti-inflammatory effects. Indeed, some have even postulated that, although there is little concrete evidence so far to prove it, chocolate and other cocoa consumption may help prevent cancer (ref.13). Polyphenols are also found in tea and red wine (refs.13,14), and in some respects the change in attitude towards chocolate reflects that towards these latter foods over the decade or two. These three new studies are consistent with the more recent thinking about chocolate. As research data accumulates, we get some sense of the degree of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects and how they compare, for example, to those of red wine. At this stage, chocolate appears to be a mild antioxidant, and any anti-inflammatory effect may be milder still. Since chocolate does have other components that have potential adverse effects when eaten to excess (e.g. saturated fat and sugar) it seems prudent that we do not talk about it as some kind of `health food'. At the same time, the evidence so far accumulated can certainly help to take away any guilt from the undoubted enjoyment of eating chocolate in moderation ! References: 1. J Am Diet Assoc 1999 Oct;99(10):1249-56 2. Appetite 1993 Dec;21(3):233-46 3. Appetite 1991 Dec;17(3):199-212 4. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1983 Dec;11(6):337-41 4. Am J Dig Dis 1975 Aug;20(8):703-7 5. Cephalalgia 1991 May;11(2):93-5 6. Am J Gastroenterol 1988 Jun;83(6):633-6 7. Horm Metab Res 1994 Aug;26(8):383-6 8. Am J Clin Nutr 1994 Dec;60(6 Suppl):1014S-1016S 9. Am J Clin Nutr 1994 Dec;60(6 Suppl):1037S-1042S 10. J Am Diet Assoc 2003 Feb;103(2):215-23 11. Eur J Pediatr 1993 Aug;152(8):635-9 12. J Am Coll Nutr 2001 Oct;20(5 Suppl):436S-439S; discussion 440S-442S 13. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2001 Nov;226(10):891-7 14. J Nutr 2000 Aug;130(8S Suppl):2120S-6S BECOMING A SUBSCRIBER If you would like to receive the Clinical Nutrition Updates in your own name, please send us a request email to <updatD. This is a FREE service to health professionals and students. Include details of: your name, email address, the country where you live, the institution you are associated with (if relevant) and your professional background. The Updates are available in English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Russian, Korean and Japanese. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.