Guest guest Posted March 6, 2007 Report Share Posted March 6, 2007 The article below describes a plan for genetically-modified (GM) strains of rice that would produce human proteins. Implications for meat-eating? -- Mike [from http://www.truthabouttrade.org/article.asp?id=7143] USDA Backs Production of Rice With Human Genes by: Rick Weiss 3/6/2007 The Washington Post The Agriculture Department has given a preliminary green light for the first commercial production of a food crop engineered to contain human genes, reigniting fears that biomedically potent substances in high-tech plants could escape and turn up in other foods. The plan, confirmed yesterday by the California biotechnology company leading the effort, calls for large-scale cultivation in Kansas of rice that produces human immune system proteins in its seeds. The proteins are to be extracted for use as an anti-diarrhea medicine and might be added to health foods such as yogurt and granola bars. " We can really help children with diarrhea get better faster. That is the idea, " said Scott E. Deeter, president and chief executive of Sacramento-based Ventria Bioscience, emphasizing that a host of protections should keep the engineered plants and their seeds from escaping into surrounding fields. But critics are assailing the effort, saying gene-altered plants inevitably migrate out of their home plots. In this case, they said, that could result in pharmacologically active proteins showing up in the food of unsuspecting consumers. Although the proteins are not inherently dangerous, there would be little control over the doses people might get exposed to, and some might be allergic to the proteins, said Jane Rissler of the Union of Concerned Scientists, a science policy advocacy group. " This is not a product that everyone would want to consume, " Rissler said, adding that other companies grow such plants indoors or in vats. " It is unwise to produce drugs in plants outdoors. " Consumer advocacy groups, including Consumers Union and the Washington-based Center for Food Safety, have also opposed Ventria's plans. " We definitely have big concerns, " said Joseph Mendelson, the center's legal director. Ventria has developed three varieties of rice, each endowed with a different human gene that makes the plants produce one of three human proteins. Two of them -- lactoferrin and lysozyme -- are bacteria-fighting compounds found in breast milk and saliva. A recent company-sponsored study done in Peru concluded that children with severe diarrhea recovered a day and a half faster if the salty fluids they were prescribed were spiked with the proteins. Deeter said production in plants is far cheaper than other methods, which should help make the therapy affordable in the developing world, where severe diarrhea kills 2 million children each year. " Plants are phenomenal factories, " Deeter said. " Our raw materials are the sun, soil and water. " The company is also talking to the Food and Drug Administration about putting the proteins into health foods. Its third variety of rice makes serum albumin, a blood protein used in medical therapies. Until now, plants with human genes have been restricted to small test plots. In October, Ventria sought permission to grow its rice commercially on as many as 3,200 acres in Geary County, Kan., starting with 450 acres this spring. A previous plan to grow the rice in southern Missouri was dropped when beermaker Anheuser-Busch -- the nation's largest rice buyer, which has expressed concern about the safety and consumer acceptance of gene-altered rice -- threatened to stop buying rice from the state if the deal went through. Because no other rice is grown in Kansas and because rice can grow only in flooded areas, the risk of escape or cross-fertilization with other rice plants is nil there, Deeter said. The company will mill virtually all the seeds on site -- using dedicated equipment -- to minimize the risk of seeds getting mistakenly released or sold. On Wednesday, the Agriculture Department published its draft environmental assessment, which concluded that the project posed no undue risks. The public can comment until March 30. Also on Wednesday, the agency revealed that a type of rice seed in Arkansas had become contaminated with a different variety of genetically engineered rice, LL62, that was never released for marketing. The error was discovered in the course of an ongoing investigation into the widespread contamination of U.S. rice by yet another gene-altered variety, LL601, which has seriously disrupted rice exports. Those problems, along with the previous discovery of unapproved, gene-altered StarLink corn in food and the accidental release of crops that had been engineered to make a vaccine for pig diarrhea, undermine the USDA's credibility, critics said. " USDA's record is not good, " Rissler said, pointing to several recent court judgments against the department and a December 2005 inspector general report that savaged the department for its poor oversight of biotechnology. " We don't think they can enforce even the inadequate system that is in place. " Paid for by Truth About Trade and Technology 309 Court Avenue, Suite 214, Des Moines, Iowa 50309 - Copyright 2003 - - - - - - - References: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_food http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ventria_Bioscience http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/ph_permits.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2007 Report Share Posted March 7, 2007 The implications for meat-[not]eating will depend mostly on the personal reasons for veg*nism. Enviromental and health vega*ns might have a much stronger objections to such experiments. For example, do we consider the human " meat " /protein consumption as a problem if we care about the animal world? The more serious problems are more generic, regardless of ones dietary convictions: >> (from gmwatch.org) +US laboratory testing transgenic rice with Peruvian children http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6641 + MOMMY, IS AUNT SALLY IN THE RICE PUFFS? A very readable article with the above title on the craziness of Ventria Bioscience's plan to put human DNA into rice is at http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5221 EXCERPTS: Pharmaceutical rice could be spread by cross-pollination, floods, rice-eating birds, rice grains in farm equipment, or human error in distribution. Risks from pharmed rice, with artificial versions of human milk and blood proteins, include allergic reactions, aggravation of bacterial infections, and autoimmune disorders. Farmers might be less nervous if Ventria had liability insurance. But instead of purchasing enough insurance, Ventria has its public relations artists spin the yarn that dangers are too little to worry about. " It can't happen here " is the essence of its message. But it has happened. The StarLink corn incident of 2000 led to a $1 billion recall... .... When Grandpa is spliced into a pollinating plant, he just keeps blowin' in the wind forever. His DNA becomes part of the diet of all who eat the plant. Unlike exploding gas tanks, Grandpa's genes can't be recalled. << --Sergei , " Sage, Mike " <mike.sage wrote: > > The article below describes a plan for genetically-modified (GM) strains > of rice that would produce human proteins. Implications for > meat-eating? > > -- Mike > > > [from http://www.truthabouttrade.org/article.asp?id=7143] > > USDA Backs Production of Rice With Human Genes > by: Rick Weiss > 3/6/2007 > The Washington Post > > > The Agriculture Department has given a preliminary green light for the > first commercial production of a food crop engineered to contain human > genes, reigniting fears that biomedically potent substances in high-tech > plants could escape and turn up in other foods. > > The plan, confirmed yesterday by the California biotechnology company > leading the effort, calls for large-scale cultivation in Kansas of rice > that produces human immune system proteins in its seeds. > > The proteins are to be extracted for use as an anti-diarrhea medicine > and might be added to health foods such as yogurt and granola bars. > > " We can really help children with diarrhea get better faster. That is > the idea, " said Scott E. Deeter, president and chief executive of > Sacramento-based Ventria Bioscience, emphasizing that a host of > protections should keep the engineered plants and their seeds from > escaping into surrounding fields. > > But critics are assailing the effort, saying gene-altered plants > inevitably migrate out of their home plots. In this case, they said, > that could result in pharmacologically active proteins showing up in the > food of unsuspecting consumers. > > Although the proteins are not inherently dangerous, there would be > little control over the doses people might get exposed to, and some > might be allergic to the proteins, said Jane Rissler of the Union of > Concerned Scientists, a science policy advocacy group. > > " This is not a product that everyone would want to consume, " Rissler > said, adding that other companies grow such plants indoors or in vats. > " It is unwise to produce drugs in plants outdoors. " > > Consumer advocacy groups, including Consumers Union and the > Washington-based Center for Food Safety, have also opposed Ventria's > plans. " We definitely have big concerns, " said Joseph Mendelson, the > center's legal director. > > Ventria has developed three varieties of rice, each endowed with a > different human gene that makes the plants produce one of three human > proteins. Two of them -- lactoferrin and lysozyme -- are > bacteria-fighting compounds found in breast milk and saliva. > > A recent company-sponsored study done in Peru concluded that children > with severe diarrhea recovered a day and a half faster if the salty > fluids they were prescribed were spiked with the proteins. > > Deeter said production in plants is far cheaper than other methods, > which should help make the therapy affordable in the developing world, > where severe diarrhea kills 2 million children each year. > > " Plants are phenomenal factories, " Deeter said. " Our raw materials are > the sun, soil and water. " > > The company is also talking to the Food and Drug Administration about > putting the proteins into health foods. Its third variety of rice makes > serum albumin, a blood protein used in medical therapies. > > Until now, plants with human genes have been restricted to small test > plots. In October, Ventria sought permission to grow its rice > commercially on as many as 3,200 acres in Geary County, Kan., starting > with 450 acres this spring. > > A previous plan to grow the rice in southern Missouri was dropped when > beermaker Anheuser-Busch -- the nation's largest rice buyer, which has > expressed concern about the safety and consumer acceptance of > gene-altered rice -- threatened to stop buying rice from the state if > the deal went through. > > Because no other rice is grown in Kansas and because rice can grow only > in flooded areas, the risk of escape or cross-fertilization with other > rice plants is nil there, Deeter said. The company will mill virtually > all the seeds on site -- using dedicated equipment -- to minimize the > risk of seeds getting mistakenly released or sold. > > On Wednesday, the Agriculture Department published its draft > environmental assessment, which concluded that the project posed no > undue risks. The public can comment until March 30. > > Also on Wednesday, the agency revealed that a type of rice seed in > Arkansas had become contaminated with a different variety of genetically > engineered rice, LL62, that was never released for marketing. The error > was discovered in the course of an ongoing investigation into the > widespread contamination of U.S. rice by yet another gene-altered > variety, LL601, which has seriously disrupted rice exports. > > Those problems, along with the previous discovery of unapproved, > gene-altered StarLink corn in food and the accidental release of crops > that had been engineered to make a vaccine for pig diarrhea, undermine > the USDA's credibility, critics said. > > " USDA's record is not good, " Rissler said, pointing to several recent > court judgments against the department and a December 2005 inspector > general report that savaged the department for its poor oversight of > biotechnology. " We don't think they can enforce even the inadequate > system that is in place. " > > > Paid for by Truth About Trade and Technology > 309 Court Avenue, Suite 214, Des Moines, Iowa 50309 - Copyright 2003 > > - - - - - - - > > References: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_food > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ventria_Bioscience > http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/ph_permits.html > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.