Guest guest Posted March 24, 2004 Report Share Posted March 24, 2004 First off, have you ever contacted anyone in PETA with your story, or let them know about what you do? I almost feel dumb asking that b/c I don't know how they can't know about you or appreciate what you have to offer. I do hope you can find funding for your activism soon, and can keep going strong. Hang in there...hopefully those offers and speaking engagments will be able to support the website. BTW, I have never had garbage soup... sounds alot like the Saturday " Hash " Supper my dh's father used to fix them when he was growing up. I don't recall ever hearing good comments about the taste, but the stories of some of the concoctions are quite humorous... in retrospect, and in a Frank McCourt sort of way. ~ pt ~ Where her head was lifted, a spring was found... Healing for every disease is within it... Making body and soul whole. ~ Life of St. Gwenfrewi, anon. Welsh chronicle ~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~~~~~~> , " Virgil " <cybergypsy1964> wrote: Unfortunately, that site > and my email may go down here in about 3 days, since I can't pay my > phone bill. > On a happier note, I have been asked to speak at a couple of forums > this summer, spreading the word about what goes on in those plants of > death. That's great, and we are quite excited. They have also > talked with me about going on a speaking tour around the country. > Also, I was recently interviewed and written up in a French > magazine. There's a lot going on behind the scenes that will make a > BIG difference if I can just hang on a little bit longer. They are > even talking about making a movie out of my life! Big things > happening, for sure. But, I have been working so hard lately to earn > money that I just haven't had much time for online activism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2004 Report Share Posted March 25, 2004 , " Feral " <terebinthus> wrote: > First off, have you ever contacted anyone in PETA > with your story, or let them know about what you do? Yes. They were the ones I sent the first email to when I first went public. They were also the ones that brought the equipment so that I could get the undercover eyewitness videotapes made to back up my allegations. They have my story, along with a video interview of me on their site. In fact, they did another story on me that was in their most recent issue of Animal Times. The print version is out, but they haven't put it online quite yet. So, yes, they are very aware of who I am and what I am doing. If it wasn't for them, I wouldn't have gotten the coverage I have. They just haven't been very helpful lately as far as funding goes. > I almost feel dumb asking that b/c I don't know how > they can't know about you or appreciate what you > have to offer. I do hope you can find funding for > your activism soon, and can keep going strong. > Hang in there...hopefully those offers and speaking > engagements will be able to support the website. Well, actually, I don't get paid for those speaking engagements. They only pay for the travel expenses. I speak for free, so it is not really much help, except to gain more attention to the problems of what happens in that industry. You know, I really find it odd that so many vegetarians believe that organic, cage-free eggs are okay. Those chickens are not treated much better than the others. Cage-free really doesn't mean much, any more than " Animal Care Certified " does. Cage-free birds are sitting shoulder-to-shoulder in a windowless warehouse living in their own manure. They have one little door for access to the outside, which is often just a small pen. Most of the chickens never see that. My friend Paul Shapiro at Compassion Over Killing recently did an investigation that resulted in his undercover video being broadcast on the news. You can read the story and see pics and video here: http://www.thewpbfchannel.com/news/2850160/default.html That's why I don't eat any eggs from stores - only from my own chickens or from those of my neighbor's. > > BTW, I have never had garbage soup... sounds alot > like the Saturday " Hash " Supper my dh's father used > to fix them when he was growing up. I don't recall > ever hearing good comments about the taste, but > the stories of some of the concoctions are quite > humorous... in retrospect, and in a Frank McCourt sort of > way. Garbage soup is great - and it is different every time! My mother-in- law is actually the one that named it that years ago. I just thought the name was humorous, so I decided to use it, too. It's a great way to finish off those leftovers, especially when you have lots of little bits of things that aren't really enough to make a meal out of. You can then just throw it all into a pot, sometimes add a can of tomato sauce or something if necessary, and enjoy. The last we put together had leftover Not! chicken soup and spaghetti in it. sounds weird perhaps, but it was actually quite good. The other day we boiled some noodles, threw in some leftover cheese sauce from enchiladas, and the leftover burrito makings, stirred it all up, and enjoyed. It's amazing the different things you can come up with when you do this. It keeps you from wasting food, is easy on the budget, and makes for interesting and tasty meals. Try it some time. We haven't made anything yet that wasn't good, but then my wife is an excellent cook! Yumm!!! Oh, and on a brighter note than the one I wrote that post in, I did manage to gather together enough money to pay the phone bill, so I am in business for another week! Yay! A reader sent me a small check, and when I put it with what Laura and I had earned working through the week, it was enough. Now, we just have to do it all again this week. It will be a week-to-week thing until it is caught up. But, you know, the harder it gets to keep this fight going, the more determined we are to keep on going! It would be nice if we had a little more support from the AR community, especially from those who have used the material I have written for their own programs, groups, articles, etc., but I never got into this for the money. I got into it for the animals. That's what is important. I would do it even if no on ever sent my a penny. It's just that important to me that people know about these things so that they can make informed choices. And, Tyson (or any other company) should not get away with deceiving people the way they do, much less allowing the terrible cruelty to the chickens and the exploitation of the workers. Someone has to stand up and tell the truth. I guess that's me. I never thought I would be doing something like this, but then that just goes to show how much our lives CAN change so quickly if we want them to. I figure that if someone like me, that was raised on a farm and grew up catching chickens before moving on to kill them by the thousands every night, can change their life so very drastically so easily, then so can the many others who continue to serve up cruelty on their plates every day. That's what gives me hope. That, and the many supportive emails I have received from people from all walks of life all over the world. Before I started this, I didn't have much faith in the human race, but now I do. There are a lot of good, caring people out there! Virgil " The Cyberactivist " http://cyberactivist.blogspot.com/ activistsagainstfactoryfarming/ " A lesser evil, is like a little bit pregnant... " DdC Cree Prophecy After the last Tree has been cut down, After the last River has been poisoned, After the last fish has been caught, Only then will you find That money cannot be eaten. Cree Prophecy > Where her head was lifted, a spring was found... > Healing for every disease is within it... > Making body and soul whole. > ~ Life of St. Gwenfrewi, anon. Welsh chronicle > ~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~~~~~~> > , " Virgil " > <cybergypsy1964> > wrote: > Unfortunately, that site > > and my email may go down here in about 3 days, since I can't pay my > > phone bill. > > On a happier note, I have been asked to speak at a couple of forums > > this summer, spreading the word about what goes on in those plants > of > > death. That's great, and we are quite excited. They have also > > talked with me about going on a speaking tour around the country. > > Also, I was recently interviewed and written up in a French > > magazine. There's a lot going on behind the scenes that will make > a > > BIG difference if I can just hang on a little bit longer. They are > > even talking about making a movie out of my life! Big things > > happening, for sure. But, I have been working so hard lately to > earn > > money that I just haven't had much time for online activism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2004 Report Share Posted March 25, 2004 I don't understand why people would keep chickens this way It's so unnecessary. Poor chickens. Virgil <cybergypsy1964 wrote: Cage-free birds are sitting shoulder-to-shoulder in a windowless warehouse living in their own manure. They have one little door for access to the outside, which is often just a small pen. Most of the chickens never see that. My friend Paul Shapiro at Compassion Over Killing recently did an investigation that resulted in his undercover video being broadcast on the news. You can read the story and see pics and video here: http://www.thewpbfchannel.com/news/2850160/default.html That's why I don't eat any eggs from stores - only from my own chickens or from those of my neighbor's. Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2004 Report Share Posted March 26, 2004 There is only one reason - MONEY! Sadly, profit$ are the mo$t important thing. That's why I wanted to point this out to those that post things like, " I only eat organic cage-free eggs. " So? That just means that you have let the corporations suck you in to paying more for what? Better conditions? Hardly, well maybe marginally, VERY marginally. I hate that these companies are taking advantage of the people who are trying to make a more humane choice. They use these terms, which sound like much more humane alternatives, but they are deceiving you if you really believe that anything is any better for the hens. Cage-free means that they are walking around in the manure, breathing and getting burnt by, the ammonia in that manure. " Free-range " simply means the same thing, except for the fat that there will be a very small door at one end of the shed that leads outside into a tiny pen. Even in the BEST of cases, only a FEW hens EVER find their way out there. Of those, only a portion can actually go out there because the size of this outdoor yard is so much smaller than the size of the overall warehouse-sized barn they grow them in. This should be obvious to people, but they don't often think about it or know about it. They are deceived into paying several times more for eggs from chickens that are being raised just as inhumanely as the rest. They even have their beaks trimmed, just like the others. The roosters have also been culled as babies, either suffocated or ground up alive. Does that sound very humane to you? That is why Paul Shapiro and Compassion Over Killing did the undercover investigation they did. There is a case before the Better Business Bureau (or whoever it is that decides these things) on whether or not the advertisement is illegal when they call these eggs " Animal Care Certified. " Anyone who has seen the way these chickens are being raised knows that it is anything but humane, but sadly enough, many well-intentioned people pay more for them with the ill-conceived thought that their purchases are " not as bad. " That is plainly NOT the case. It really makes me MAD to see this, but I rarely point that out to the lacto-ovo people because they will get upset. And I can hardly point fingers when I am somewhat of an lacto- ovo myself. However, the ONLY true way to make sure that the eggs you buy are from humanely-raised chickens is to see where they are raised or to raise them yourself, like I do. I KNOW that my chickens are raised with love and respect, fed a proper diet, including " treats " of fresh veggies every day, and NEVER face a slaughterhouse. They live and die like any other animal on this place and are buried with the same love and respect I give my dogs and cats. I also take care of the roosters for life, even though they do not produce any eggs for me. I just like to hear them crow. That is another thing to consider when you buy eggs from someone. If they raise their chickens from birth or buy them as baby " peepers, " there will be a certain number of roosters that they get. What do they do with them??? Sell them to slaughter? Slaughter them for their own food? Or do they care for them for life, as they do the hens? And bringing that question up, what do they do with the hens when they no longer produce eggs? These are all matters to take into consideration if you are going to eat eggs. Unfortunately, few people that live in urban areas can raise chickens like I can, so the best thing I could recommend for them to do if they truly want to make sure that the eggs they buy are from humanely raised chickens is for them to STAY OUT OF THE STORES! Go to the nearest small rural town and look for someone that has a few in their backyard. Now, usually the farmer will probably kill and eat all of the roosters they get, and do the same with the older hens, but they can usually be relied upon to take good care of the hens during their " productive " life span. That's about the best you can hope for. I have a distinct feeling that there are VERY few people who raise their chickens the way that we do. Sad, but true. Of course, barring quitting eggs altogether, the very best choice that you can make is to raise your own. That is really the ONLY true way to know FOR SURE that the chickens are treated properly - especially with regard to the often unwanted roosters. Hope this helps all you lacto-ovos out there make more informed choices. Virgil " A lesser evil, is like a little bit pregnant. " ..DdC , reptile grrl <reptilegoddess> wrote: > I don't understand why people would keep chickens this way It's so unnecessary. Poor chickens. > > Virgil <cybergypsy1964> wrote: Cage-free birds are sitting shoulder-to-shoulder in a windowless warehouse living in their own manure. They have one little door for access to the outside, which is often just a small pen. Most of the chickens never see that. My friend Paul Shapiro at Compassion Over Killing recently did an investigation that resulted in his undercover video being broadcast on the news. You can read the story and see pics and video here: > http://www.thewpbfchannel.com/news/2850160/default.html > > That's why I don't eat any eggs from stores - only from my own chickens or from those of my neighbor's. > > > > > Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2004 Report Share Posted March 26, 2004 Virgil, I have to disagree with you here. Most small farmers keep roosters around, because without roosters, there will be no more chickens. Not only are roosters necessary for reproduction, but they also defend the flock against predators. On our farm (In rural Louisiana,) and the surrounding farms, chickens were kept for eggs. Roosters were always kept around, just like the hens. Roosters were eaten by some people, but they weren't ever culled. - priscilla Virgil <cybergypsy1964 wrote: That is another thing to consider when you buy eggs from someone. If they raise their chickens from birth or buy them as baby " peepers, " there will be a certain number of roosters that they get. (deletia) Go to the nearest small rural town and look for someone that has a few in their backyard. Now, usually the farmer will probably kill and eat all of the roosters they get, and do the same with the older hens, but they can usually be relied upon to take good care of the hens during their " productive " life span. Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2004 Report Share Posted March 28, 2004 When I spoke of culling, I was referring to the large hatcheries. As far as the small rural farms, SOME people keep SOME roosters around, but not ALL. There are quite a few farmers around here that keep NONE at ALL, in fact. They simply buy new " peepers " when they need to restock. They eat any roosters that are raised, even keeping them in a separate pen in a lot of cases. The only reason I can think of that they would do this is to keep the roosters from fertiliaing the eggs so that a half-formed baby chick doesn't fall out of an egg into someone's frying pan. Gross! I guess I should have clarified that better. But, that is why I was recommending that if someone went to a rural area to buy eggs, that they should ask the person raising them what their practices are - because they DO vary so widely. I thought I had made that point clear, but obviously not. Sorry about that - I didn't mean to make it sound like NO farmers kept ANY roosters. That was not what I was trying to say, and I am sorry if it seemed that way. Thanks for pointing this out because I would hate to be the one accused of misleading anyone or skewing facts. I am quite aware that different farmers have different practices, and some are more humane than others. I hope this clears that up. Virgil , reptile grrl <reptilegoddess> wrote: > Virgil, > > I have to disagree with you here. Most small farmers keep roosters around, because without roosters, there will be no more chickens. Not only are roosters necessary for reproduction, but they also defend the flock against predators. > > On our farm (In rural Louisiana,) and the surrounding farms, chickens were kept for eggs. Roosters were always kept around, just like the hens. Roosters were eaten by some people, but they weren't ever culled. > > - priscilla > > Virgil <cybergypsy1964> wrote: > > That is another thing to consider when you buy eggs from > someone. If they raise their chickens from birth or buy them as baby " peepers, " there will be a certain number of roosters that they get. > > (deletia) > > Go to the nearest small rural town and look for someone that has a few in their backyard. Now, usually the farmer will probably kill and eat all of the roosters they get, and do the same with the older hens, but they > can usually be relied upon to take good care of the hens during their " productive " life span. > > > > > Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.