Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Privatize Water

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

The New Blue Gold

 

By Silja J.A. Talvi, AlterNet. Posted June 23, 2004.

 

The rush to privatize water is underway across the world. In the new

documentary 'Thirst,' filmmakers Deborah Kaufman and Alan Snitow set out

to explore the consequences.

 

Bay Area-based filmmaking duo Deborah Kaufman and Alan Snitow.

There are untold profits to be made from controlling the simplest and most

vital ingredient of our survival: water.

 

The only question, from a profit standpoint, is why it has taken this long.

 

" You can't do anything without water, " says Alan Snitow, co-producer and

co-director of Thirst, a groundbreaking and provocative new film about the

rush to privatize what the filmmakers rightly define as the very " essence

of life. "

 

In their third collaborative documentary film after the successes of

Blacks and Jews (1997) and Secrets of Silicon Valley (2001), Bay

Area-based filmmaking duo Deborah Kaufman and Snitow take an unflinching

and multifaceted look at water privatization in Bolivia, India, Japan and

the U.S.

 

What Kaufman and Snitow find is that the " water rush " is likely to turn

into one of the most volatile and potentially galvanizing issues of the

21st century.

 

" This is an incredible struggle, and yet it's still so far below the radar

that we're trying to give it a voice, " Kaufman says. " People are already

willing to die for [water], but it's something that many of us still take

for granted. "

 

The grab for corporate control of water is indeed already here in our own

backyards. But the conflict over water supplies perhaps most familiar to

news-savvy audiences is the place where Thirst goes first: to Cochabamba,

Bolivia. After the country auctions off the water system of its

third-largest city to U.S.-based Bechtel Corporation in 1999, residents

experience water price hikes of 30-300%, and the situation eventually

erupts in a cross-class protest that makes headline news worldwide.

 

By April 2000, the government responds to civil unrest by declaring

martial law. Shortly thereafter, Victor Hugo Daza, a 17-year-old peaceful

protester, is shot dead in the streets by a government sniper.

 

Daza's death doesn't quell dissent the way it was intended to. In fact,

protests heat up to the point that water consortium execs beat a hasty

retreat, and Cochabamba's water system gets handed over to a community-run

utility. In an unlikely turn of events, the citizens actually get what

they want; water gets treated like a human right, not as the last frontier

of the commercialization and privatization of earth's natural resources.

 

" They're on the defensive in the global South, " Kaufman explains. " In many

ways, they're ahead of us responding to what's in the near future for all

of us. "

 

In point of fact, American cities and towns are the new staging ground for

rapid and strategic power plays over who controls water supply. In 2004,

85% of U.S. municipal water systems are publicly owned, with a shocking

15% already in the hands of corporations. Unbeknownst to most residents,

municipal governments are being heavily courted in the here and now to

turn over control of their water supply to multinational companies like

Suez Water, whose U.S. subsidiary took control of Atlanta's water in 1999.

 

The incentive for local governments is hard to miss; with an estimated

cost of a trillion dollars, the prospect of replacing aging pipes and

improving the condition of public water plants is increasingly seen by

city leaders as a budgetary drain best dealt with through privatization.

 

To exemplify the point, Kaufman and Snitow turn their camera to Stockton,

California, where a well-run locally controlled water purification and

distribution system is about to be offered to the highest bidder. (Notably,

the public utility itself isn't allowed to be one of the bidders.)

 

The transfer of power over the water supply is intended to take the form

of a " public-private partnership, " and Stockton Mayor Gary Podesto is a

firm supporter.

 

" This can be done for less dollars, " as Mayor Podesto says.

 

A subsequent, well-orchestrated grassroots mobilization by city residents

-- baristas, orthodontists, environmentalists, utility employees and union

members among other unlikely allies -- fails to capture any attention from

the national media. But Kaufman and Snitow have the instinct to jump into

the heart of the conflict, meeting and talking with all sides of the

privatization debate.

 

But there is no storybook ending in Thirst where Stockton's citizenry are

concerned. By February 2003, in fact, the Mayor and a severely divided

City Council hand over the $600 million, 20-year contract to a two-company

consortium of corporate water giants: OMI and Thames.

 

All along, Stockton residents who did their research were emphatic that

corporate claims of cost effectiveness, quality and safety had not been

realized elsewhere.

 

In Atlanta's case, for instance, the city's $428 million, 20-year contract

with Suez-subsidiary United Water Services was cancelled after a series of

citywide EPA alerts advising residents to boil their tap water because of

toxic contaminants. Finally, after five such " boil-alerts, " staff cutbacks,

leaking water mains, and rising sewer bill costs, city administrators

yanked back control of the utility.

 

Little victories aside, corporate water grab is still fully underway,

working in collusion with governments and international financial agencies,

wreaking environmental havoc and inflating water prices all the while. In

the final analysis, the battle over water, says Kaufman, has more to do

with democracy than what's coming out of your tap. And it's toward this

end, say the filmmakers, that they fully intend their documentary to spur

further activism and to educate audiences about the extent to which water

has already been commodified.

 

As captured in Thirst, John Briscoe, the Senior Water Advisor to The World

Bank, puts it this way to an assembly at the Third World Water Forum in

Kyoto, Japan.

 

" What does it mean to say that water is a human right? " he asks. " Those

who proclaim it so would say that it is the obligation of [governments] to

provide free water to everybody. Well, that's a fantasy. "

 

In touring the U.S. with their film, Kaufman and Snitow have already

become cautiously optimistic that the tide of privatization can be turned.

A model ordinance to safeguard water as a public trust has already been

drafted in concert with Madison, Wisconsin Mayor David Cieslewicz, and

will be presented at the upcoming 72nd U.S. Conference of Mayors in Boston,

which runs from June 25-29th. (Perhaps not so coincidentally, the

conference's website is being sponsored by Veolia Water, which has become

North America's leading private " service provider " for local government

water and wastewater supplies.)

 

" It's a festival of privatization, " as Snitow says. " But what they don't

yet fully realize is that for many people, water is the final boundary

that can't be crossed. "

 

Check local listings for screenings of 'Thirst.' To coincide with the U.S.

Conference of Mayors, 'Thirst' will show at the Boston Museum of Fine

Arts on June 26th. It will have its national P.O.V. broadcast premiere on

PBS stations on Tuesday, July 13th at 10 p.m.

 

To learn more about related issues -- and a growing campaign to boycott

bottled water -- visit http://www.sierraclub.org/cac/water/bottled_water/.

 

Silja J.A. Talvi writes for In These Times, the Christian Science Monitor,

The Nation and other publications. Her work appears in the anthology,

" Prison Nation " (Routledge, 2003).

 

 

" I will defend my rights and those of others too weak to fight "

--common phrase stitched on many scottish lass' samplers from the 1700's

and earlier

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

sounds like it would be a good horror movie. you know, water is owned by private

companies who charge sky high prices, and everyone who isn't rich dies. ick. the

whole desert population (although fairly small) would have to move in where

there's high rainfall and collect it in buckets. the population of florida would

soar.

elisa

 

The Stewarts <stews9 wrote:

The New Blue Gold

 

By Silja J.A. Talvi, AlterNet. Posted June 23, 2004.

 

The rush to privatize water is underway across the world. In the new

documentary 'Thirst,' filmmakers Deborah Kaufman and Alan Snitow set out

to explore the consequences.

 

Bay Area-based filmmaking duo Deborah Kaufman and Alan Snitow.

There are untold profits to be made from controlling the simplest and most

vital ingredient of our survival: water.

 

The only question, from a profit standpoint, is why it has taken this long.

 

" You can't do anything without water, " says Alan Snitow, co-producer and

co-director of Thirst, a groundbreaking and provocative new film about the

rush to privatize what the filmmakers rightly define as the very " essence

of life. "

 

In their third collaborative documentary film after the successes of

Blacks and Jews (1997) and Secrets of Silicon Valley (2001), Bay

Area-based filmmaking duo Deborah Kaufman and Snitow take an unflinching

and multifaceted look at water privatization in Bolivia, India, Japan and

the U.S.

 

What Kaufman and Snitow find is that the " water rush " is likely to turn

into one of the most volatile and potentially galvanizing issues of the

21st century.

 

" This is an incredible struggle, and yet it's still so far below the radar

that we're trying to give it a voice, " Kaufman says. " People are already

willing to die for [water], but it's something that many of us still take

for granted. "

 

The grab for corporate control of water is indeed already here in our own

backyards. But the conflict over water supplies perhaps most familiar to

news-savvy audiences is the place where Thirst goes first: to Cochabamba,

Bolivia. After the country auctions off the water system of its

third-largest city to U.S.-based Bechtel Corporation in 1999, residents

experience water price hikes of 30-300%, and the situation eventually

erupts in a cross-class protest that makes headline news worldwide.

 

By April 2000, the government responds to civil unrest by declaring

martial law. Shortly thereafter, Victor Hugo Daza, a 17-year-old peaceful

protester, is shot dead in the streets by a government sniper.

 

Daza's death doesn't quell dissent the way it was intended to. In fact,

protests heat up to the point that water consortium execs beat a hasty

retreat, and Cochabamba's water system gets handed over to a community-run

utility. In an unlikely turn of events, the citizens actually get what

they want; water gets treated like a human right, not as the last frontier

of the commercialization and privatization of earth's natural resources.

 

" They're on the defensive in the global South, " Kaufman explains. " In many

ways, they're ahead of us responding to what's in the near future for all

of us. "

 

In point of fact, American cities and towns are the new staging ground for

rapid and strategic power plays over who controls water supply. In 2004,

85% of U.S. municipal water systems are publicly owned, with a shocking

15% already in the hands of corporations. Unbeknownst to most residents,

municipal governments are being heavily courted in the here and now to

turn over control of their water supply to multinational companies like

Suez Water, whose U.S. subsidiary took control of Atlanta's water in 1999.

 

The incentive for local governments is hard to miss; with an estimated

cost of a trillion dollars, the prospect of replacing aging pipes and

improving the condition of public water plants is increasingly seen by

city leaders as a budgetary drain best dealt with through privatization.

 

To exemplify the point, Kaufman and Snitow turn their camera to Stockton,

California, where a well-run locally controlled water purification and

distribution system is about to be offered to the highest bidder. (Notably,

the public utility itself isn't allowed to be one of the bidders.)

 

The transfer of power over the water supply is intended to take the form

of a " public-private partnership, " and Stockton Mayor Gary Podesto is a

firm supporter.

 

" This can be done for less dollars, " as Mayor Podesto says.

 

A subsequent, well-orchestrated grassroots mobilization by city residents

-- baristas, orthodontists, environmentalists, utility employees and union

members among other unlikely allies -- fails to capture any attention from

the national media. But Kaufman and Snitow have the instinct to jump into

the heart of the conflict, meeting and talking with all sides of the

privatization debate.

 

But there is no storybook ending in Thirst where Stockton's citizenry are

concerned. By February 2003, in fact, the Mayor and a severely divided

City Council hand over the $600 million, 20-year contract to a two-company

consortium of corporate water giants: OMI and Thames.

 

All along, Stockton residents who did their research were emphatic that

corporate claims of cost effectiveness, quality and safety had not been

realized elsewhere.

 

In Atlanta's case, for instance, the city's $428 million, 20-year contract

with Suez-subsidiary United Water Services was cancelled after a series of

citywide EPA alerts advising residents to boil their tap water because of

toxic contaminants. Finally, after five such " boil-alerts, " staff cutbacks,

leaking water mains, and rising sewer bill costs, city administrators

yanked back control of the utility.

 

Little victories aside, corporate water grab is still fully underway,

working in collusion with governments and international financial agencies,

wreaking environmental havoc and inflating water prices all the while. In

the final analysis, the battle over water, says Kaufman, has more to do

with democracy than what's coming out of your tap. And it's toward this

end, say the filmmakers, that they fully intend their documentary to spur

further activism and to educate audiences about the extent to which water

has already been commodified.

 

As captured in Thirst, John Briscoe, the Senior Water Advisor to The World

Bank, puts it this way to an assembly at the Third World Water Forum in

Kyoto, Japan.

 

" What does it mean to say that water is a human right? " he asks. " Those

who proclaim it so would say that it is the obligation of [governments] to

provide free water to everybody. Well, that's a fantasy. "

 

In touring the U.S. with their film, Kaufman and Snitow have already

become cautiously optimistic that the tide of privatization can be turned.

A model ordinance to safeguard water as a public trust has already been

drafted in concert with Madison, Wisconsin Mayor David Cieslewicz, and

will be presented at the upcoming 72nd U.S. Conference of Mayors in Boston,

which runs from June 25-29th. (Perhaps not so coincidentally, the

conference's website is being sponsored by Veolia Water, which has become

North America's leading private " service provider " for local government

water and wastewater supplies.)

 

" It's a festival of privatization, " as Snitow says. " But what they don't

yet fully realize is that for many people, water is the final boundary

that can't be crossed. "

 

Check local listings for screenings of 'Thirst.' To coincide with the U.S.

Conference of Mayors, 'Thirst' will show at the Boston Museum of Fine

Arts on June 26th. It will have its national P.O.V. broadcast premiere on

PBS stations on Tuesday, July 13th at 10 p.m.

 

To learn more about related issues -- and a growing campaign to boycott

bottled water -- visit http://www.sierraclub.org/cac/water/bottled_water/.

 

Silja J.A. Talvi writes for In These Times, the Christian Science Monitor,

The Nation and other publications. Her work appears in the anthology,

" Prison Nation " (Routledge, 2003).

 

 

" I will defend my rights and those of others too weak to fight "

--common phrase stitched on many scottish lass' samplers from the 1700's

and earlier

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

, elisa <lavendercowz>

wrote:

> sounds like it would be a good horror movie. you know, water is

owned by private companies who charge sky high prices, and everyone

who isn't rich dies. ick. the whole desert population (although

fairly small) would have to move in where there's high rainfall and

collect it in buckets. the population of florida would soar.

> elisa

>

actually, there was a scifi movie that may as well been a horror

movie back in the mid80s. I forgot the name though. I do remember

Peter Delouise was in it and it was made before his 21 jumpstreet

days. anyway this mean evil protectorate controlled all the water to

the point where it couldn't even rain. people did what they had to do

to get water. it was a weird movie. Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

This sounds like a very interesting (and frightening!) documentary -

I'm looking forward to seeing it.

 

Water supplies have always been a concern of mine, and since today is

election day here in Canada, this is an issue that I considered when

I cast my ballot. Unfortunately, water security (and its close

companion, food security) hasn't garnered the attention it should

during the campaigning process. Our main issue here with water

supplies is ensuring that water is NON-negotiable and clearly

exempted under NAFTA, the WTO and all other trade agreements. As far

as I know, water in its " natural state " is not a good or product, and

is therefore not subject to these trade agreements. However, I

believe only our boundary waters with the US are protected under

international treaty, and that the provinces have individual

authority over non-boundary waters. It makes me very nervous to know

that the laws are so haphazard at different levels of government,

which could impact our ability to protect water supplies for now and

in the future.

 

Kathy (enjoying a glass of Vancouver tap)

 

> The Stewarts <stews9@c...> wrote:

> The New Blue Gold

>

> By Silja J.A. Talvi, AlterNet. Posted June 23, 2004.

>

> The rush to privatize water is underway across the world. In the

new

> documentary 'Thirst,' filmmakers Deborah Kaufman and Alan Snitow

set out

> to explore the consequences.

>

> Bay Area-based filmmaking duo Deborah Kaufman and Alan Snitow.

> There are untold profits to be made from controlling the simplest

and most

> vital ingredient of our survival: water.

>

> The only question, from a profit standpoint, is why it has taken

this long.

>

> " You can't do anything without water, " says Alan Snitow, co-

producer and

> co-director of Thirst, a groundbreaking and provocative new film

about the

> rush to privatize what the filmmakers rightly define as the

very " essence

> of life. "

>

> In their third collaborative documentary film after the successes

of

> Blacks and Jews (1997) and Secrets of Silicon Valley (2001), Bay

> Area-based filmmaking duo Deborah Kaufman and Snitow take an

unflinching

> and multifaceted look at water privatization in Bolivia, India,

Japan and

> the U.S.

>

> What Kaufman and Snitow find is that the " water rush " is likely to

turn

> into one of the most volatile and potentially galvanizing issues of

the

> 21st century.

>

> " This is an incredible struggle, and yet it's still so far below

the radar

> that we're trying to give it a voice, " Kaufman says. " People are

already

> willing to die for [water], but it's something that many of us

still take

> for granted. "

>

> The grab for corporate control of water is indeed already here in

our own

> backyards. But the conflict over water supplies perhaps most

familiar to

> news-savvy audiences is the place where Thirst goes first: to

Cochabamba,

> Bolivia. After the country auctions off the water system of its

> third-largest city to U.S.-based Bechtel Corporation in 1999,

residents

> experience water price hikes of 30-300%, and the situation

eventually

> erupts in a cross-class protest that makes headline news worldwide.

>

> By April 2000, the government responds to civil unrest by declaring

> martial law. Shortly thereafter, Victor Hugo Daza, a 17-year-old

peaceful

> protester, is shot dead in the streets by a government sniper.

>

> Daza's death doesn't quell dissent the way it was intended to. In

fact,

> protests heat up to the point that water consortium execs beat a

hasty

> retreat, and Cochabamba's water system gets handed over to a

community-run

> utility. In an unlikely turn of events, the citizens actually get

what

> they want; water gets treated like a human right, not as the last

frontier

> of the commercialization and privatization of earth's natural

resources.

>

> " They're on the defensive in the global South, " Kaufman

explains. " In many

> ways, they're ahead of us responding to what's in the near future

for all

> of us. "

>

> In point of fact, American cities and towns are the new staging

ground for

> rapid and strategic power plays over who controls water supply. In

2004,

> 85% of U.S. municipal water systems are publicly owned, with a

shocking

> 15% already in the hands of corporations. Unbeknownst to most

residents,

> municipal governments are being heavily courted in the here and now

to

> turn over control of their water supply to multinational companies

like

> Suez Water, whose U.S. subsidiary took control of Atlanta's water

in 1999.

>

> The incentive for local governments is hard to miss; with an

estimated

> cost of a trillion dollars, the prospect of replacing aging pipes

and

> improving the condition of public water plants is increasingly seen

by

> city leaders as a budgetary drain best dealt with through

privatization.

>

> To exemplify the point, Kaufman and Snitow turn their camera to

Stockton,

> California, where a well-run locally controlled water purification

and

> distribution system is about to be offered to the highest bidder.

(Notably,

> the public utility itself isn't allowed to be one of the bidders.)

>

> The transfer of power over the water supply is intended to take the

form

> of a " public-private partnership, " and Stockton Mayor Gary Podesto

is a

> firm supporter.

>

> " This can be done for less dollars, " as Mayor Podesto says.

>

> A subsequent, well-orchestrated grassroots mobilization by city

residents

> -- baristas, orthodontists, environmentalists, utility employees

and union

> members among other unlikely allies -- fails to capture any

attention from

> the national media. But Kaufman and Snitow have the instinct to

jump into

> the heart of the conflict, meeting and talking with all sides of

the

> privatization debate.

>

> But there is no storybook ending in Thirst where Stockton's

citizenry are

> concerned. By February 2003, in fact, the Mayor and a severely

divided

> City Council hand over the $600 million, 20-year contract to a two-

company

> consortium of corporate water giants: OMI and Thames.

>

> All along, Stockton residents who did their research were emphatic

that

> corporate claims of cost effectiveness, quality and safety had not

been

> realized elsewhere.

>

> In Atlanta's case, for instance, the city's $428 million, 20-year

contract

> with Suez-subsidiary United Water Services was cancelled after a

series of

> citywide EPA alerts advising residents to boil their tap water

because of

> toxic contaminants. Finally, after five such " boil-alerts, " staff

cutbacks,

> leaking water mains, and rising sewer bill costs, city

administrators

> yanked back control of the utility.

>

> Little victories aside, corporate water grab is still fully

underway,

> working in collusion with governments and international financial

agencies,

> wreaking environmental havoc and inflating water prices all the

while. In

> the final analysis, the battle over water, says Kaufman, has more

to do

> with democracy than what's coming out of your tap. And it's toward

this

> end, say the filmmakers, that they fully intend their documentary

to spur

> further activism and to educate audiences about the extent to which

water

> has already been commodified.

>

> As captured in Thirst, John Briscoe, the Senior Water Advisor to

The World

> Bank, puts it this way to an assembly at the Third World Water

Forum in

> Kyoto, Japan.

>

> " What does it mean to say that water is a human right? " he asks. "

Those

> who proclaim it so would say that it is the obligation of

[governments] to

> provide free water to everybody. Well, that's a fantasy. "

>

> In touring the U.S. with their film, Kaufman and Snitow have

already

> become cautiously optimistic that the tide of privatization can be

turned.

> A model ordinance to safeguard water as a public trust has

already been

> drafted in concert with Madison, Wisconsin Mayor David Cieslewicz,

and

> will be presented at the upcoming 72nd U.S. Conference of Mayors in

Boston,

> which runs from June 25-29th. (Perhaps not so coincidentally, the

> conference's website is being sponsored by Veolia Water, which has

become

> North America's leading private " service provider " for local

government

> water and wastewater supplies.)

>

> " It's a festival of privatization, " as Snitow says. " But what they

don't

> yet fully realize is that for many people, water is the final

boundary

> that can't be crossed. "

>

> Check local listings for screenings of 'Thirst.' To coincide with

the U.S. Conference of Mayors, 'Thirst' will show at the Boston

Museum of Fine Arts on June 26th. It will have its national P.O.V.

broadcast premiere on PBS stations on Tuesday, July 13th at 10 p.m.

>

> To learn more about related issues -- and a growing campaign to

boycott bottled water -- visit

http://www.sierraclub.org/cac/water/bottled_water/.

>

> Silja J.A. Talvi writes for In These Times, the Christian Science

Monitor, The Nation and other publications. Her work appears in the

anthology, " Prison Nation " (Routledge, 2003).

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...