Guest guest Posted December 8, 2004 Report Share Posted December 8, 2004 Amy I am so stuck. I don't believe that you would be hearing about it regularly. The same goes for horses that are used to make the drug premarin. We DON'T hear about it. but on the same note, I am sure there are decent farmers or organizations out there. I wish I knew which were which for this witch. Until I do, I am eating no dairy, just soy milk and margarine, and hoping that I can run into a milk that is milk. I would think that such a milk that is just milk, and not negatively made milk would only be available certain times of year, that would make sense to me. Oh geez, I am so cornfuzzled, but in any case, no milk for me till I know what is what. Blessings, Chanda - Amy P. Thursday, December 09, 2004 3:44 PM Re: white rice vs. milk etc.. I actually have a degree in biology and have lived in " we raise cows for a living areas " and have never seen the cruelty that is purported. Historically a few cows have lactated without giving birth and there is legitimate university research to back it up - trust me when you are working in a university you are SUPER humane because you are watched from several angles. Also cows like humans can continue to lactate without giving birth over and over again for years - even if the calf is allowed to wean naturally. I am sure it does happen, but I do not think it is as rampant as purported by some. Animal abuse laws have been on the book in the US longer that child abuse laws. I think some people are out looking for " problems. " I also believe that some people who are out looking for problems fail to report on good things. (Like guns in school - if a kid brings a gun to school every news outlet in town will be there with out with out proof, if the kids are doing a community service project - do you hear about it? Do you think there are not good things going on in schools?) I know people who video chicken plants for hours hoping to get 1 shot of a chicken being treated cruely (beyond the living in pens issue) so that anti-chicken people will pay for the footage. Specifically they are at Purdue (a large chicken farm) is located on Maryland's Eastern shore. Furthermore, whenever something bad happens - the newsmen are there. The newsmen also are out there regularly checking - just in case they can get a story (stories = promotions). I am in no way for poor treatment, but like other things one bad apple has runied a whole barrel. Where 1 or a few farms have mistreated animals - the whole farming industry is held liable. This can not be true. You would be hearing about it in the local news regularly - they love this kind of story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2004 Report Share Posted December 8, 2004 I was being abused at a company. I was forced to work hours that were not agreed on upon my hire, most of our herd was laid off, and the rest of the herd forced to do the work of the rest that were gone. I was threatened and emotionally abused. I called the labor board, and I was told they could do anything they wanted, they were a private company. I am human, just think if I were a horse or a cow. Blessings, Chanda - Diamond Dog Thursday, December 09, 2004 4:38 PM Re: Re: white rice vs. milk etc.. >You would be hearing about it in the local news >regularly - they love this kind of story. Actually, this kind of cruel treatment is the norm, not the exception. Most animal cruelty laws exclude farm animals or have provisions to make them unable to prosecute anything that is done in that they refer to as " normal farming practices " . You underestimate the power of monsanto and other farming magnates to keep things quiet and keep people out, and overestimate the caring nature of most viewers. People also used to pretend child molestation and spousal abuse didn't exist or that slaves were happy and better off being slaves. Veronica Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2004 Report Share Posted December 8, 2004 That's debatable. Milk being bad for you is one of THE GREATEST LIES OUT THERE. It's the antibiotics and the hormones that will kill you. Once I reintroduced organic milk in my diet, I felt alive! Cow milk is the best I could have done for my body. Emphasis on MY. God made cow with way more milk they could use because It had in mind that humans would partake of the surplus. Unless you're lactose intolerant there's nothing wrong w/milk quite the contrary. Except for the belief that it's bad for you. Then it's the belief that will harm you, not the milk itself. Butter is also excellent. Wouldn't touch the " I can't believe... " if they paid me to! Corn syrup is not a food IMH but you're right there. Though white rice, white bread is probably a step above eating cardboard, probably more palatable but way more toxic I'm sure... , Diamond Dog <diamonddog@g...> wrote: > >A Jasmine rice (though it's white and nothing worse for the body, I'd > rather have meat >personally as long as it's organic) and one for the veggies, > > I'm betting that it's not the worst food for one's body, eaten in > moderation. Milk, butter, corn syrup, and a lot of other things are far > worse to my knowledge. > > Veronica > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 Your post seems reactionary with loose statement and no facts. Obviously when u make absolute statements like God made cows for humans to have milk and soforth, there is no room for debate. Drinking milk is not like slurping syrup or coke but i don't see it as the best stuff to consume. There are alternative ways of getting what your body gets from milk drinking. Shouting " LIES " doesnt make your case though your personal experience does. You were obviously lacking something that led you back to milk but your arguement about all that surplus milk isnt based on logic. Just making statements like " butter is also excellent " and harmones will " kill you " is unhelpful since u didn't offer any evidence. I'd say the reason we have surplus milk is that an industry was created by humans though it fofills a need. When i added dairy into my diet it made me feel worse and my cholestrol count went up besides weight gain. You can get calcium from many sources and i cannot think of a reason to drink milk though i recognize that people have different needs and desires. Because i don't make my personal choices based on " God " or the concept of sin, etc. i cant get behind your reasoning. Groups like this are only to challenge us to become more aware and think about the choices we make. You have to discover what works for u but many are so out of touch with their bodies that dietary suggestions and education is needed. There is plenty of evidence to support the fact that breeding cattle is causing environmental problems all over the world and it's time to find alternatives. Cows use lots of resources besides taking up valuable farm land. I am glad that some people are considerate enough to support friendlier farming practices as i witnessed in Switzerland, but i believe that many people can do without milk. Not everyone is willing to have a cow in their yard or get up to milk them. d* " spirit1hawk " <irvine@p...> wrote: > > That's debatable. Milk being bad for you is one of THE GREATEST LIES OUT THERE. It's the antibiotics and the hormones that will kill you. > Once I reintroduced organic milk in my diet, I felt alive! Cow milk is the best I could have done for my body. Emphasis on MY. > God made cow with way more milk they could use because It had in mind that humans would partake of the surplus. Unless you're lactose intolerant there's nothing wrong w/milk quite the contrary. Except for the belief that it's bad for you. Then it's the belief that will harm you, not the milk itself. Butter is also excellent. Wouldn't touch the " I can't believe... " if they paid me to! > > > Veronica , " spirit1hawk " <irvine@p...> wrote: > > That's debatable. Milk being bad for you is one of THE GREATEST LIES > OUT THERE. It's the antibiotics and the hormones that will kill you. > Once I reintroduced organic milk in my diet, I felt alive! Cow milk > is the best I could have done for my body. Emphasis on MY. > > God made cow with way more milk they could use because It had in > mind that humans would partake of the surplus. Unless you're lactose > intolerant there's nothing wrong w/milk quite the contrary. Except > for the belief that it's bad for you. Then it's the belief that will > harm you, not the milk itself. Butter is also excellent. Wouldn't > touch the " I can't believe... " if they paid me to! > > Corn syrup is not a food IMH but you're right there. Though white > rice, white bread is probably a step above eating cardboard, > probably more palatable but way more toxic I'm sure... > > , Diamond Dog > <diamonddog@g...> wrote: > > >A Jasmine rice (though it's white and nothing worse for the > body, I'd > > rather have meat >personally as long as it's organic) and one for > the veggies, > > > > I'm betting that it's not the worst food for one's body, eaten in > > moderation. Milk, butter, corn syrup, and a lot of other things > are far > > worse to my knowledge. > > > > Veronica > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 - spirit1hawk >That's debatable. Milk being bad for you is one of THE GREATEST LIES >OUT THERE. It's the antibiotics and the hormones that will kill you. >Once I reintroduced organic milk in my diet, I felt alive! Cow milk >is the best I could have done for my body. Emphasis on MY. >God made cow with way more milk they could use because It had in >mind that humans would partake of the surplus. Unless you're lactose >intolerant there's nothing wrong w/milk quite the contrary. Except >for the belief that it's bad for you. Then it's the belief that will >harm you, not the milk itself. Butter is also excellent. Wouldn't >touch the " I can't believe... " if they paid me to! >Corn syrup is not a food IMH but you're right there. Though white >rice, white bread is probably a step above eating cardboard, >probably more palatable but way more toxic I'm sure... But are we not the only animal that drinks milk once weened off our Mother, there has to be a thought in there somewhere. Just out of curiousity, when you weren't drinking milk were you also making sure you were getting the protien and other possible nutrients found in milk from other sources? Perhaps these links may provide some insight into the life of a dairy cow - not exactly living life as nature had intended it to be from where i am sitting. If i was female, or my wife, had just given birth only to have the baby taken away and someone come along and start expressing the breast milk against ones will, well I could not imagine it being an experience as nature had intended... http://www.vegansociety.com/html/animals/exploitation/cows/dairy_cow.php http://www.vegansociety.com/html/animals/exploitation/cows/poor_mother.php And here is an article on the possible link between lactose and ovarian cancer - http://webcenter.health.webmd.netscape.com/content/Article/97/104354.htm Pete... http://www.primalvision.net " There is a vitality, a life force, an energy, a quickening, that is translated through you into action, and because there is only one of you in all time, this expression is unique. And if you block it, it will never exist through any other medium and will be lost " - Martha Graham Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 Cows don't naturally produce excess milk. They can only make milk if they give birth to a calf. If left with their calf they only produce enough for the calf. They produce all that excess for several reasons: 1. They are bred and sometimes genetically engineered to produce more milk than normal. 2. Their calves are taken away, either at birth or a few days later so that the calf doesn't " steal " the milk. 3. They are fed a richer diet than they need. 4. They are milked often, sometimes several times a day, and lactating animals tend to make milk based on the amount taken, so their bodies produce the amount that the milking machine takes. 5. They are kept on a constant cycle of pregnancy and birth so that milk production does not cease. The amount of milk cows are forced to produce takes a toll on their bodies, so that they are usually used up at 3-5 years of age rather than the 20 years of their ancestors. Whether or not the milk is organic, the cows are still treated like milk machines, and their babies dragged away kicking and screaming. And organic cows are usually denied veterinary care even more often since the medicines would make them unable to be labeled organic. All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 At 07:23 AM 12/9/2004 +0000, you wrote: >That's debatable. Milk being bad for you is one of THE GREATEST LIES >OUT THERE. It's the antibiotics and the hormones that will kill you. >Once I reintroduced organic milk in my diet, I felt alive! Cow milk >is the best I could have done for my body. Emphasis on MY. I have to disagree. No other species drinks milk beyond infancy for a reason...cow's milk is made to make baby cows gain hundreds of pounds in a year. Animal fat is horrible for the arteries and milk saps the body of iron. Cows were not " made " having excessive milk production. We bred them to be that way (cows, as we know them, are a human conjecture, ill-bred for their own health and well-being) not to mention that we force them to be constantly pregnant (or recovering from pregnancy) at the " rape rack " so they will continue to make milk, then kill them when they no longer produce. Not to mention stealing their babies for veal. There's nothing natural about drinking milk, organic or no. Lactose intolerance is not an allergy, but the natural progression of maturing...weaning oneself, per se. If it works for you, good (well, bad for the cows) but in general, it's not a health food. Veronica Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 Butter is also excellent. Wouldn't > touch the " I can't believe... " if they paid me to! I have to agree with you hear.... What exactly is in margarine anyway.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 I actually prefer " Smart Balance - Light " to butter or margarine - it's a blend of olive, soy, and flax oils, and it is not only dairy-free, it's free of transfats. Debra Lee Thompson Analyst - Mortgage I First Horizon Home Loans Corporation debrathompson <debrathompson 214.492.7402 Amy P. [aviva_ha] Thursday, December 09, 2004 1:18 PM Re: white rice vs. milk etc.. Butter is also excellent. Wouldn't > touch the " I can't believe... " if they paid me to! I have to agree with you hear.... What exactly is in margarine anyway.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 Me too-YUM! All the taste, and none of the problems. " Thompson, Debra lee " <Debrathompson wrote:I actually prefer " Smart Balance - Light " to butter or margarine - it's a blend of olive, soy, and flax oils, and it is not only dairy-free, it's free of transfats. Debra Lee Thompson Analyst - Mortgage I First Horizon Home Loans Corporation debrathompson <debrathompson 214.492.7402 Amy P. [aviva_ha] Thursday, December 09, 2004 1:18 PM Re: white rice vs. milk etc.. Butter is also excellent. Wouldn't > touch the " I can't believe... " if they paid me to! I have to agree with you hear.... What exactly is in margarine anyway.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 If i was female, or my wife, had just given birth only to have the baby taken away and someone come along and start expressing the breast milk against ones will, well I could not imagine it being an experience as nature had intended... I don't know how all farms are ran, but a dairly cow is not equivalent to a human females in milk production. Humans only start to lactate becasue of hormonal changes that occurn during pregnancy. Theoretically if she contined to breastfeed daily, she would not stop lactating - Look into wet-nurses & /or women who still nuse 2 & 3 year olds. Cows do not need the hormone to start lactating, so they do not even have to have a calf to give milk. Furthermore, it is far more painful for a cow to " hold " the milk than to have it expressed. BTW the expressing of milk has been described as massage (pleasurable) like. (I have never given birth, so I can not vouce for the sensation; however, I have seen cats nursing and it appears to be pleasurable. I know for me that when my cat " kneads " me it is quite pleasurable.) Just remember that there are two sides to every story and Veggie groups are going to emphasize what they want just as the meat and dairy groups are going to emphasize that they want. There are bad parts on both sides. (Tomaotes forced to grow in hot houses, Crop pickers living in POVERTY, Organic farmers charging a premium, etc.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 , " Thompson, Debra lee " <Debrathompson@f...> wrote: > I actually prefer " Smart Balance - Light " I like this one too - I prefer butter, and in baking it is all I use - however, I use Smart Balance when I cook & it is nice for spreading when the butter isn't softened. I have family members with high cholesterol, etc. and a hubby who could do with shedding a few pounds, the Smart Balance cooks up nicely and suites the needs of the previously mentioned - and I don't feel awful giving it to the kids! m Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 What a great taste too. In use it on baked potatoes with Mrs. Dash. and chopped chives. " Thompson, Debra lee " <Debrathompson wrote:I actually prefer " Smart Balance - Light " to butter or margarine - it's a blend of olive, soy, and flax oils, and it is not only dairy-free, it's free of transfats. Debra Lee Thompson Analyst - Mortgage I First Horizon Home Loans Corporation debrathompson <debrathompson 214.492.7402 Amy P. [aviva_ha] Thursday, December 09, 2004 1:18 PM Re: white rice vs. milk etc.. Butter is also excellent. Wouldn't > touch the " I can't believe... " if they paid me to! I have to agree with you hear.... What exactly is in margarine anyway.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 Yes, I love it:) I've also had good luck with it in making grilled sandwiches - and at only 45 calories per serving, I don't have any guilt on that end!! Debra Lee Thompson Analyst - Mortgage I First Horizon Home Loans Corporation debrathompson <debrathompson 214.492.7402 GeminiDragon [thelilacflower] Thursday, December 09, 2004 1:47 PM RE: Re: white rice vs. milk etc.. What a great taste too. In use it on baked potatoes with Mrs. Dash. and chopped chives. " Thompson, Debra lee " <Debrathompson wrote:I actually prefer " Smart Balance - Light " to butter or margarine - it's a blend of olive, soy, and flax oils, and it is not only dairy-free, it's free of transfats. Debra Lee Thompson Analyst - Mortgage I First Horizon Home Loans Corporation debrathompson <debrathompson 214.492.7402 Amy P. [aviva_ha] Thursday, December 09, 2004 1:18 PM Re: white rice vs. milk etc.. Butter is also excellent. Wouldn't > touch the " I can't believe... " if they paid me to! I have to agree with you hear.... What exactly is in margarine anyway.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 > Yes, I love it:) I've also had good luck with it in making grilled > sandwiches - and at only 45 calories per serving, I don't have any guilt > on that end!! Aww - but Grilled cheese is supposed to be a guilty pleasure. I like it with a slice of apple stuck in the middle or tomato..... I have had a steamed grilled cheese before - now that was NICE! I wanted a veggie meal at a fast food place that had a steamer - this is what I got - I had lettuce, tomaotes, onions and pickles on the steamed cheese bun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 If cows did not have to have calves to continue or start milk production, the farms would not be constantly keeping the cows pregnant like they do. In nature the milk production would decline as the calf consumed less milk. Cows do not spontaneously begin making milk. They are just like any other animal. They can continue to produce milk for sometime after giving birth, but farmers want to keep the production at an artificially high level, as much as 100 pounds a day (10 times more than they would naturally produce), so the cows must continue to calve, usually once a year. They live either chained in buildings or in filthy feedlots. Milking is painful because the cows are bred to have the biggest udders possible (to make extra milk), sometimes so large they drag on the ground, the cows annot walk normally, and mastitis (infection of the udder) runs rampart. They are still milked even with swollen, infected udders. Even organic cows might graze maybe only 3-4 months of the year, if they are lucky. Milk is taken using mechanical " milking wheels " which are used to milk many cows simultaneously. These wheels serve to make the lives of dairy cows even more difficult because, at any given operation, they enable operations to milk each cow a higher number of times per day. The cows are hooked by their udders to electronic milking machines, which can cause the cows to suffer electrical shocks, painful lesions, and worsen and spread mastitis. The highest proportion of " downer cows " are former dairy cows, because just a few years of being forced to produce tens of thousands of pounds of milk leaches vital nutrients from their bodies, causing them to become lame and diseased, and suffer from brittle bones. Up to 25% of a herd may be culled every year because their bodies are worn out from the endless cycle of birth and lactation. At that point, they are slaughtered and usually ground up to make hamburgers because their meat is of such poor quality. Their babies may be sold for veal or used for rennet, or females may eventually replace their mothers. Drinking milk is a personal choice, like eating meat, but it still causes cruelty to animals. Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 Do you have Sonic drive-Ins where you live? They steam toast their grilled cheese sandwiches (only 99 cents too). Unfortunately for me, tho - I've recently discovered that I have an allergy to dairy - so no more real cheese for me...*sigh* I was never a big milk drinker, tho - always gives me a sore throat - but now I've found nut milks and am in heaven!! Debra Lee Thompson Analyst - Mortgage I First Horizon Home Loans Corporation debrathompson <debrathompson 214.492.7402 Amy P. [aviva_ha] Thursday, December 09, 2004 2:05 PM Re: white rice vs. milk etc.. > Yes, I love it:) I've also had good luck with it in making grilled > sandwiches - and at only 45 calories per serving, I don't have any guilt > on that end!! Aww - but Grilled cheese is supposed to be a guilty pleasure. I like it with a slice of apple stuck in the middle or tomato..... I have had a steamed grilled cheese before - now that was NICE! I wanted a veggie meal at a fast food place that had a steamer - this is what I got - I had lettuce, tomaotes, onions and pickles on the steamed cheese bun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 I actually have a degree in biology and have lived in " we raise cows for a living areas " and have never seen the cruelty that is purported. Historically a few cows have lactated without giving birth and there is legitimate university research to back it up - trust me when you are working in a university you are SUPER humane because you are watched from several angles. Also cows like humans can continue to lactate without giving birth over and over again for years - even if the calf is allowed to wean naturally. I am sure it does happen, but I do not think it is as rampant as purported by some. Animal abuse laws have been on the book in the US longer that child abuse laws. I think some people are out looking for " problems. " I also believe that some people who are out looking for problems fail to report on good things. (Like guns in school - if a kid brings a gun to school every news outlet in town will be there with out with out proof, if the kids are doing a community service project - do you hear about it? Do you think there are not good things going on in schools?) I know people who video chicken plants for hours hoping to get 1 shot of a chicken being treated cruely (beyond the living in pens issue) so that anti-chicken people will pay for the footage. Specifically they are at Purdue (a large chicken farm) is located on Maryland's Eastern shore. Furthermore, whenever something bad happens - the newsmen are there. The newsmen also are out there regularly checking - just in case they can get a story (stories = promotions). I am in no way for poor treatment, but like other things one bad apple has runied a whole barrel. Where 1 or a few farms have mistreated animals - the whole farming industry is held liable. This can not be true. You would be hearing about it in the local news regularly - they love this kind of story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 > Do you have Sonic drive-Ins where you live? No, but that is where I had my sandwich - I was on vacation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 At 01:25 PM 12/9/2004 -0600, you wrote: >I actually prefer " Smart Balance - Light " to butter or margarine - it's >a blend of olive, soy, and flax oils, and it is not only dairy-free, >it's free of transfats. I use Earth Balance...they may be from the same company. Again, no transfats, bakes great, good healthy oils. Veronica Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 Where do you find Earth Balance? I don't believe I've seen that one... Debra Lee Thompson Analyst - Mortgage I First Horizon Home Loans Corporation debrathompson <debrathompson 214.492.7402 Diamond Dog [diamonddog] Thursday, December 09, 2004 3:17 PM RE: Re: white rice vs. milk etc.. At 01:25 PM 12/9/2004 -0600, you wrote: >I actually prefer " Smart Balance - Light " to butter or margarine - it's >a blend of olive, soy, and flax oils, and it is not only dairy-free, >it's free of transfats. I use Earth Balance...they may be from the same company. Again, no transfats, bakes great, good healthy oils. Veronica Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 >I don't know how all farms are ran, but a dairly cow is not >equivalent to a human females in milk production. Humans only start >to lactate becasue of hormonal changes that occurn during pregnancy. >Theoretically if she contined to breastfeed daily, she would not stop >lactating - Look into wet-nurses & /or women who still nuse 2 & 3 year >olds. Cows do not need the hormone to start lactating, so they do not >even have to have a calf to give milk. I doubt that. I've never heard of a cow just suddenly giving milk and I know some vegan large animal vets... >Furthermore, it is far more >painful for a cow to " hold " the milk than to have it expressed. BTW >the expressing of milk has been described as massage (pleasurable) >like. If it hurts, the cow cannot get away and the milk machines often exacerbate mastitis or other infections. The cows are not usually carefully inspected for lesions or other problems before the mechanisms are hooked on. >Just remember that there are two sides to every story and Veggie >groups are going to emphasize what they want What's their ulterior motive? Meat and dairy groups want to make money...veggie groups only want to stop animal suffering. > just as the meat and >dairy groups are going to emphasize that they want. There are bad >parts on both sides. (Tomaotes forced to grow in hot houses, I do not think one can compare the suffering of a cow to the growth of a tomato in a greenhouse. > Crop >pickers living in POVERTY Meat, egg, and dairy workers living in POVERTY suffering terrible illness due to being exposed to the conditions the animals have to live in all the time (lung damage from ammonia, etc.) Veronica Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 >You would be hearing about it in the local news >regularly - they love this kind of story. Actually, this kind of cruel treatment is the norm, not the exception. Most animal cruelty laws exclude farm animals or have provisions to make them unable to prosecute anything that is done in that they refer to as " normal farming practices " . You underestimate the power of monsanto and other farming magnates to keep things quiet and keep people out, and overestimate the caring nature of most viewers. People also used to pretend child molestation and spousal abuse didn't exist or that slaves were happy and better off being slaves. Veronica Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 At 03:17 PM 12/9/2004 -0600, you wrote: >Where do you find Earth Balance? I don't believe I've seen that one... I usually pick it up at Whole Foods. Makes fabulous cookies! Veronica Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 It IS difficult to find farms that raise animals in a way that I would approve of. I look for places where the animal is primarily a pet, and its eggs, milk, are a byproduct of it being a pet. I occasionally get eggs from a friend who has pet chickens. They live a free life, and are well cared for and given lots of space. She would have more eggs, but most of her chickens are too old to lay. She doesn't kill them just because they aren't producing because they are not moneymakers, they are pets. Maria/Chanda <puterwitch wrote:Amy I am so stuck. I don't believe that you would be hearing about it regularly. The same goes for horses that are used to make the drug premarin. We DON'T hear about it. but on the same note, I am sure there are decent farmers or organizations out there. I wish I knew which were which for this witch. Until I do, I am eating no dairy, just soy milk and margarine, and hoping that I can run into a milk that is milk. I would think that such a milk that is just milk, and not negatively made milk would only be available certain times of year, that would make sense to me. Oh geez, I am so cornfuzzled, but in any case, no milk for me till I know what is what. Blessings, Chanda - Amy P. Thursday, December 09, 2004 3:44 PM Re: white rice vs. milk etc.. I actually have a degree in biology and have lived in " we raise cows for a living areas " and have never seen the cruelty that is purported. Historically a few cows have lactated without giving birth and there is legitimate university research to back it up - trust me when you are working in a university you are SUPER humane because you are watched from several angles. Also cows like humans can continue to lactate without giving birth over and over again for years - even if the calf is allowed to wean naturally. I am sure it does happen, but I do not think it is as rampant as purported by some. Animal abuse laws have been on the book in the US longer that child abuse laws. I think some people are out looking for " problems. " I also believe that some people who are out looking for problems fail to report on good things. (Like guns in school - if a kid brings a gun to school every news outlet in town will be there with out with out proof, if the kids are doing a community service project - do you hear about it? Do you think there are not good things going on in schools?) I know people who video chicken plants for hours hoping to get 1 shot of a chicken being treated cruely (beyond the living in pens issue) so that anti-chicken people will pay for the footage. Specifically they are at Purdue (a large chicken farm) is located on Maryland's Eastern shore. Furthermore, whenever something bad happens - the newsmen are there. The newsmen also are out there regularly checking - just in case they can get a story (stories = promotions). I am in no way for poor treatment, but like other things one bad apple has runied a whole barrel. Where 1 or a few farms have mistreated animals - the whole farming industry is held liable. This can not be true. You would be hearing about it in the local news regularly - they love this kind of story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.