Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fred's site

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Tommie,

 

I just perused Fred's site. I hate to say that it is not my cup of tea.

I read his comments on the cacao bean.I can not honor an approach that

criticizes without supplying evidence for the claims they are making

against it. He states that theobromine(SP) is a stimulant which is

true. But, it is a very mild one and there are many foods that

stimulate, such as cheyenne pepper which we all use. I don't have my

copy of Naked Chocolate by David Wolfe so I can't rebut what he says

with citations, but Wolfe would say that he is wrong, wrong, wrong

about cacao not being good for us!! I have to agree with the person

who said he Fred does not seem to have much science behind what he

says. I am not sure how healthy following his approach for a lifetime

would be. To me, a green drink is not 60% moderate to high glycemic

fruits, all that glucose is pretty stimulating and metabolizes fast and

I would think push ones sugar levels pretty high, a green drink is

cucumber and celery for a base with lots of dark greens and some

seasonings such as cheyenne, salt or ginger.

 

Having said this, my guess is that following his advice probably

results in a better diet than SAD and certainly no worse. He is just

not someone I can listen to, I need to be sure that the person giving

me advice really understands why the lights come on when I throw the

switch.

 

Tommie, I know this has worked for you in a wonderful way and I applaud

that. I just wanted to share my reactions so that those others out

there who have the same concerns I do know that they aren't alone.

Different strokes for different folks.

 

Respectfully,

 

Tammy

 

 

On Mar 18, 2006, at 7:55 AM, paddlerwoman wrote:

 

> Tommie,

> You have convinced me to check him out. I was not impressed by his

> comments on dental health. I felt that most of the comments would

> apply

> to anyone who ate a high sugar diet and/or had poor dental hygiene.

> Guess part of my reaction is because I do Rainbow Green which is not

> high is sugary items. Will give this a whirl. --I do tend to be a

> person who wants to know why the lights come on when I throw the

> switch

> and particularly when it is going to affect my body.

>

> Tammy

> On Mar 18, 2006, at 7:33 AM, jerushy1944 wrote:

>

> > I hadn't heard of him a year ago, either. That being said, I'd never

> >  heard of Paul Nison, Gabriel Cousens, or David Wolfe. Frederic is

> >  classed with them (and Doug Graham) as a raw food guru. What he

> >  teaches _is_ based on Dr. Graham's methods and, as such, it is the

> >  most nutritious out there. It's also the easiest to do.

> >

> >  I don't know how electricity works but I know the light will come

> on

> >  when I flip the switch. :)

> >  Later,

> >  Tommie

> > http://www.rawburchard.blogspot.com

> >

> >  rawfood , " Diana P. " <laurelai3 wrote:

> >  >

> >  > Hey, I can accept that.  I am new to raw and had never heard of

> this

> >  > guy.  When I was reading the way he described the fat coating the

> >  > glucose molecules and insulin receptors, I was raising my eyebrow

> >  > saying, " What?! "    However, it's not always important knowing

> how it

> >  > works just that it does work  ;)

> >  >

> >  > Peace,

> >  > Diana

> >  >

> >  > rawfood , jerushy1944 <no_reply@> wrote:

> >  > >

> >  > > Good morning, Diana,

> >  > > I can assure you that Frederic doesn't " make up " anything. He

> >  might

> >  > > not have hard science to back him up but neither do a lot of

> other

> >  > raw

> >  > > food gurus.

> >  > (clipped)

> >  >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yes, to each his/her own is true. I'm just glad that I found the site

first instead of having to wade through what, no doubt, wouldn't have

worked for me. I know the other method didn't work for my daughter

(emphasis on lots of nuts, avocados, the use of raw cacao (and there

is some debate about its " really raw-ness " ) and less fruit) and she

and I are a lot alike. As for the " high sugar " , it comes with all the

nutrients it needs to be assimilated. I'm not diabetic so that isn't

something I need to be concerned about. I'm sure, if you did some

research, you could find evidence to support what Frederic says. You

could also find research that supports the opposite opinion. I have

stopped listening to research and I listen to my own body.

Good luck!

Tommie

http://www.rawburchard.blogspot.com

 

rawfood , paddlerwoman wrote:

>

> Tommie,

>

> I just perused Fred's site. I hate to say that it is not my cup of

tea.

> I read his comments on the cacao bean.I can not honor an approach

that

> criticizes without supplying evidence for the claims they are making

> against it. He states that theobromine(SP) is a stimulant which is

> true. But, it is a very mild one and there are many foods that

> stimulate, such as cheyenne pepper which we all use. I don't have my

> copy of Naked Chocolate by David Wolfe so I can't rebut what he says

> with citations, but Wolfe would say that he is wrong, wrong, wrong

> about cacao not being good for us!! I have to agree with the

person

> who said he Fred does not seem to have much science behind what he

> says. I am not sure how healthy following his approach for a

lifetime

> would be. To me, a green drink is not 60% moderate to high glycemic

> fruits, all that glucose is pretty stimulating and metabolizes fast

and

> I would think push ones sugar levels pretty high, a green drink is

> cucumber and celery for a base with lots of dark greens and some

> seasonings such as cheyenne, salt or ginger.

>

> Having said this, my guess is that following his advice probably

> results in a better diet than SAD and certainly no worse. He is just

> not someone I can listen to, I need to be sure that the person

giving

> me advice really understands why the lights come on when I throw the

> switch.

>

> Tommie, I know this has worked for you in a wonderful way and I

applaud

> that. I just wanted to share my reactions so that those others out

> there who have the same concerns I do know that they aren't alone.

> Different strokes for different folks.

>

> Respectfully,

>

> Tammy

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Tammy - you say Fredric has not scientific backup and you were looking for your

David Wolfe book, well, David has no more scientific backup than Fred! The raw

food community is all in the same boat, they need to do their own research. No

one, to my knowledge, has that type of money and there certainly is no " free "

money out there for such a study. Most studies are backed by the company trying

to sell you something and food is free (so to speak).

 

I've done over 50 hours of tele classes with Frederic and find him to be most

knowledgeable. I've also sat in many talks by David Wolfe and have found him to

be very full of interesting ideas as well. For every person out there talking

about a raw food diet, you will find a different way of presenting the way of

eating.

 

Dr. Graham says 80-10-10; Victoria Boutenko is big into green smoothies (base of

greens with fruit added); Natural Hygiene says to eat nothing you cannot sit

down and make an entire meal of (i.e. oils, spices, garlic, onion, etc...); Dr.

Malkmus says 80% raw, 20% cooked; and they ALL claim healing with their way of

eating.

 

Bottom line is we have to find what works for ourselves and run with it!

 

Shari

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Shari,

 

I agree with the finding out what works and running with it.

Personalizing your diet to what works best for your body is the only

way to go. I am happy to hear that your experience with Fredric was a

positive one. I will look at this website some more. My post was my

initial reaction to what I pulled up. Thanks for sharing your

experience.

 

There is someone doing research- Gabriel Cousens and his staff at the

Tree of Life. He has started a masters program in raw Vegan living or

diet, not sure of the exact title. It is a small beginning but it is a

beginning. They are also working on some vegan farming experiments at

the Tree.

 

 

On Mar 19, 2006, at 10:09 AM, SV wrote:

 

> Tammy - you say Fredric has not scientific backup and you were looking

> for your David Wolfe book, well, David has no more scientific backup

> than Fred!  The raw food community is all in the same boat, they need

> to do their own research.  No one, to my knowledge, has that type of

> money and there certainly is no " free " money out there for such a

> study.  Most studies are backed by the company trying to sell you

> something and food is free (so to speak).

>

> I've done over 50 hours of tele classes with Frederic and find him to

> be most knowledgeable.  I've also sat in many talks by David Wolfe and

> have found him to be very full of interesting ideas as well.  For

> every person out there talking about a raw food diet, you will find a

> different way of presenting the way of eating.

>

> Dr. Graham says 80-10-10; Victoria Boutenko is big into green

> smoothies (base of greens with fruit added); Natural Hygiene says to

> eat nothing you cannot sit down and make an entire meal of (i.e. oils,

> spices, garlic, onion, etc...); Dr. Malkmus says 80% raw, 20% cooked;

> and they ALL claim healing with their way of eating.

>

> Bottom line is we have to find what works for ourselves and run with

> it!

>

> Shari

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Victoria Boutenko has done research on her own with a group of people

using her green smoothies. Problem is, the research anyone does

privately isn't on a broad enough scale to be accepted as valid. I'm

doing research on me but unless I had a " doubleblind " study going with

several hundred participants, it would never fly scientifically. Plus,

I would probably have to apply for government funding and you know the

government would never go for that. :) Anything that threatens the use

of agribusiness is verboten.

Tommie

http://www.rawburchard.blogspot.com

 

rawfood , paddlerwoman wrote:

>

> Shari,

>

> I agree with the finding out what works and running with it.

> Personalizing your diet to what works best for your body is the only

> way to go. I am happy to hear that your experience with Fredric was

a

> positive one. I will look at this website some more. My post was my

> initial reaction to what I pulled up. Thanks for sharing your

> experience.

>

> There is someone doing research- Gabriel Cousens and his staff at

the

> Tree of Life. He has started a masters program in raw Vegan living

or

> diet, not sure of the exact title. It is a small beginning but it is

a

> beginning. They are also working on some vegan farming experiments

at

> the Tree.

>

>

> On Mar 19, 2006, at 10:09 AM, SV wrote:

>

> > Tammy - you say Fredric has not scientific backup and you were

looking

> > for your David Wolfe book, well, David has no more scientific

backup

> > than Fred!  The raw food community is all in the same boat, they

need

> > to do their own research.  No one, to my knowledge, has that type

of

> > money and there certainly is no " free " money out there for such a

> > study.  Most studies are backed by the company trying to sell you

> > something and food is free (so to speak).

> >

> > I've done over 50 hours of tele classes with Frederic and find

him to

> > be most knowledgeable.  I've also sat in many talks by David

Wolfe and

> > have found him to be very full of interesting ideas as well.  For

> > every person out there talking about a raw food diet, you will

find a

> > different way of presenting the way of eating.

> >

> > Dr. Graham says 80-10-10; Victoria Boutenko is big into green

> > smoothies (base of greens with fruit added); Natural Hygiene says

to

> > eat nothing you cannot sit down and make an entire meal of (i.e.

oils,

> > spices, garlic, onion, etc...); Dr. Malkmus says 80% raw, 20%

cooked;

> > and they ALL claim healing with their way of eating.

> >

> > Bottom line is we have to find what works for ourselves and run

with

> > it!

> >

> > Shari

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Oh, yes! How could I forget Gabriel Cousens!! I am just biding my time to have

enough time to take an apprenticeship with him. Unfortunately working for a

school only leaves me summers and I don't really care for summers in Arizona.

Been there, done that, have the skin damage to prove it!!

 

Shari

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Shari,

 

If you don't have time for a full apprenticeship, taking the one week

Conscious Eating Seminar is a wonderful alternative. I learned a

tremendous amount. I would love to do the masters program but am not

sure if I am ready for that big of a time and financial commitment at

this point in my life. Just being there with all those people who were

eating raw was an inspiration. Nice place, nice people. Hope you get

there someday. Have only spent a week in AZ in the summer and it is hot

but the Tree is at 4000 feet so it might not get so hot there and I

think that it does cool down pretty good at night.

 

Tammy

On Mar 19, 2006, at 3:41 PM, SV wrote:

 

> Oh, yes!  How could I forget Gabriel Cousens!!  I am just biding my

> time to have enough time to take an apprenticeship with him. 

> Unfortunately working for a school only leaves me summers and I don't

> really care for summers in Arizona. Been there, done that, have the

> skin damage to prove it!!

>

> Shari

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thanks, Tammy. I will remember that when and if I get the opportunity to get

there! Did you happen to meet Lorraine Barnes when you were there? She is a

friend and we've done a couple of classes together.

 

Shari

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

How much did one week cost you? I would love to go. What were the topics etc.

Is it worthwhile for somebody already 100% raw?

 

Robert W

>

> paddlerwoman

> 2006/03/19 Sun PM 05:06:29 EST

> rawfood

> Re: [Raw Food] Fred's site

>

>

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The only one that makes scientific claims (to my knowledge) is Robert Young.

 

Robert W

>

> " SV " <shavig

> 2006/03/19 Sun AM 10:09:36 EST

> <rawfood >

> Re: [Raw Food] Fred's site

>

>

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Cost was aroung $1800 for class, room, board and use of the facilities.

And, yes it was worth it, I was alreacy 95% raw for 4 months. We had

two classes a day for six days, 2-3 each. Covered topics such as

salads, dressings, breads, crackers, desserts, etc. What I loved was

that the chefs didn't really stick to recipes. I came away with an

understanding of how to adjust recipes and do things from scratch w/o a

recipe. I truly believe that they can make crackers from anything from

left over soups and dressings to tabouli. I have a lot more confidence

and a lot more ideas. Do be aware that a lot of the item they teach

are the fancier, transistion foods. Anyone who is already 100% raw who

goes there probably will overeat the first few days, wanting to try

everything. After a few days, I started taking TBS of things I wanted

to try and still ended up with too much sometimes. The staff is all

wonderful when it comes to sharing recipes from the buffet and

technique. I also feel that I could call the Cafe now and ask how to do

something I did not understand. I highly recommend the Conscious Eating

seminar for anyone, 20-100% raw. They honor where you are.

 

Tammy

On Mar 19, 2006, at 7:02 PM, rbwest01 wrote:

 

> How much did one week cost you? I would love to go.  What were the

> topics etc. Is it worthwhile for somebody already 100% raw?

>

> Robert W

> >

> > paddlerwoman

> > 2006/03/19 Sun PM 05:06:29 EST

> > rawfood

> > Re: [Raw Food] Fred's site

> >

> >

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

sounds wonderful. Have to fit this in somewhere.

 

Robert W

>

> paddlerwoman

> 2006/03/20 Mon AM 11:57:18 EST

> rawfood

> Re: [Raw Food] Fred's site

>

>

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

where are these class's?

Donna

 

paddlerwoman wrote:

Cost was aroung $1800 for class, room, board and use of the facilities.

And, yes it was worth it, I was alreacy 95% raw for 4 months. We had

two classes a day for six days, 2-3 each. Covered topics such as

salads, dressings, breads, crackers, desserts, etc. What I loved was

that the chefs didn't really stick to recipes. I came away with an

understanding of how to adjust recipes and do things from scratch w/o a

recipe. I truly believe that they can make crackers from anything from

left over soups and dressings to tabouli. I have a lot more confidence

and a lot more ideas. Do be aware that a lot of the item they teach

are the fancier, transistion foods. Anyone who is already 100% raw who

goes there probably will overeat the first few days, wanting to try

everything. After a few days, I started taking TBS of things I wanted

to try and still ended up with too much sometimes. The staff is all

wonderful when it comes to sharing recipes from the buffet and

technique. I also feel that I could call the Cafe now and ask how to do

something I did not understand. I highly recommend the Conscious Eating

seminar for anyone, 20-100% raw. They honor where you are.

 

Tammy

On Mar 19, 2006, at 7:02 PM, rbwest01 wrote:

 

> How much did one week cost you? I would love to go. What were the

> topics etc. Is it worthwhile for somebody already 100% raw?

>

> Robert W

> >

> > paddlerwoman

> > 2006/03/19 Sun PM 05:06:29 EST

> > rawfood

> > Re: [Raw Food] Fred's site

> >

> >

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

They are at the Tree of Life in Patagonia, AZ www.treeoflife.nu

On Mar 20, 2006, at 2:30 PM, donna mccrossen wrote:

 

> where are these class's?

>   Donna

>

> paddlerwoman wrote:

>   Cost was aroung $1800 for class, room, board and use of the

> facilities.

> And, yes it was worth it, I was alreacy 95% raw for 4 months.  We had

> two classes a day for six days, 2-3 each. Covered topics such as

> salads, dressings, breads, crackers, desserts, etc.  What I loved was

> that the chefs didn't really stick to recipes. I came away with an

> understanding of how to adjust recipes and do things from scratch w/o

> a

> recipe. I truly believe that they can make crackers from anything from

> left over soups and dressings to tabouli. I have a lot more confidence

> and a lot more ideas.  Do be aware that a lot of the item they teach

> are the fancier, transistion foods.  Anyone who is already 100% raw

> who

> goes there probably will overeat the first few days, wanting to try

> everything.  After a few days, I started taking TBS of things I wanted

> to try and still ended up with too much sometimes.  The staff is all

> wonderful when it comes to sharing recipes from the buffet and

> technique. I also feel that I could call the Cafe now and ask how to

> do

> something I did not understand. I highly recommend the Conscious

> Eating

> seminar for anyone, 20-100% raw.  They honor where you are.

>

> Tammy

> On Mar 19, 2006, at 7:02 PM, rbwest01 wrote:

>

> > How much did one week cost you? I would love to go.  What were the

> > topics etc. Is it worthwhile for somebody already 100% raw?

> >

> >  Robert W

> >  >

> >  > paddlerwoman

> >  > 2006/03/19 Sun PM 05:06:29 EST

> >  > rawfood

> >  > Re: [Raw Food] Fred's site

> >  >

> >  >

> >

> >

> > 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...