Guest guest Posted July 10, 2006 Report Share Posted July 10, 2006 In a perfect world that would be a true statement but this is anything but perfect. Environment has a lot to do with the diseases both humans and animals contract. That said, I do believe that we do better if we give our bodies the food it needs and is created to use. According to the nutritional analysis, I get 'way more of most vitamins and minerals than are necessary for good health. Plus I save lots of money that I can spend on more good food! Tommie http://www.rawburchard.blogspot.com rawfood , ppicadilly <no_reply wrote: > > Animals in the wild live according to their instinct and the laws of > nature. They live their lives without getting cancer, heart disease, > stroke and the other diseases of so-called " civilization. " No animal > in the wild takes supplements. They just eat the foods they are > biologically adapted to. > > This is a really stupid statement. Most animals in the wild are killed > and eaten if they get only mildly sick and disabled. They are ridden > with deseases and parasites and live relatively short life spans. They > do get all of those civilized ailements if they get to live long enough. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.